Stratocasters guitars look dorky?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Does anyone else think Stratocasters look dorky?

Maybe it's ME, my face, my personality, that says, "Hey audience, I know I'm not that cool to look at, so at least you can look at my cool chromey guitar."

I'd think I'd really like a Fender Strat (natural finish), but then it seems like I'd have to try so much harder to look cool on stage.

I know it's stupid, but I just can't see myself with a Strat. Needs more chrome! Tele's look okay, but too twangy.

Guitarist, Wednesday, 8 February 2006 21:01 (nineteen years ago)

Also, what is up with Fender's bridge? Why so many screwy parts? It just makes it easier to get fucked up, doesn't it? I much prefer the Les Paul or Mosrite bridge where it's like a bar and the strings bend over it and I never have to think about it.

Guitarist, Wednesday, 8 February 2006 21:05 (nineteen years ago)

Aha, the old Google informs me that My Mosrite has a bigsby tremelo with a tune-o-matic bridge. I guess there's some screwy stuff under all that somewhere too, but I never touched them and never even saw them. I just see a bar that the strings bend over (I think).

While we're on the subject, do you ever start screwing around with your bridge? I did once on an old Fender Bullet in a feeble attempt to remove a flat spot from the G string. Never figured it out and it drove me nuts trying to get it back where I thought maybe it should be. Raising and lowering these pieces is good for what, exactly?

Guitarist, Wednesday, 8 February 2006 21:14 (nineteen years ago)

I'm trying to set up a strat for the first time today. Have to agree that I'd rather be working with a Tune-O-Matic. But I will have learned a thing or two, won't I?

rogermexico (rogermexico), Wednesday, 8 February 2006 21:15 (nineteen years ago)

It'll be fine. I wrote some painfully long thread on here a while ago that is based off of Fender's method of set-up that might be of use, if I can find it.

BTW, Guitarist, moving the saddles forward and backward adjusts the intonation, up and down adjusts the string height (in conjunction with neck curvature).

John Justen (johnjusten), Wednesday, 8 February 2006 21:30 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.harmony-central.com/Newp/2001/Ztar-Mark-III-Diamond.jpg

Pablo (Pablo A), Wednesday, 8 February 2006 22:06 (nineteen years ago)

Just remember: No guitar looks dorky in your hands if you can actually play.

martin m. (mushrush), Wednesday, 8 February 2006 22:17 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.indianapolismusic.net/pics4/john_mayer/john_mayer_7.jpg

Damn straight, Martin.

Johnny M., Wednesday, 8 February 2006 22:24 (nineteen years ago)

Not strictly true.

http://www.music-44.com/W/hires/REHBK010CD.jpg

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 8 February 2006 22:30 (nineteen years ago)

I can just see that in MY hands. I would look worse than John Mayer, probably. He chose the dorkiest colors, too.

This one looks damn cool:

ihttp://members.tripod.com/~arf_she_said/fzguitars/jimistrat.jpg
http://members.tripod.com/~arf_she_said/fzguitars/jimistrat.jpg

Guitarist, Wednesday, 8 February 2006 22:35 (nineteen years ago)

A local guitar shop owner told me he's had more trouble selling strats in the last few years and thinks they're probably out of style at the moment. I'm sure they'll come back though.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Wednesday, 8 February 2006 22:42 (nineteen years ago)

This one, I mean:
http://www.fendereurope.com/images/zappastrat.jpg
http://www.fendereurope.com/images/zappastrat.jpg

Guitarist, Wednesday, 8 February 2006 22:42 (nineteen years ago)

i have a natural color strat. it looks like shit with the stock white pickguard though, it needs either black, or tortoiseshell of some sort. i used to think strats look dorky, but then realized all guitars look dorky in the wrong hands (probaby mine included). now i think most guitars look dorky when they're new and kept to look new. i also used to think sunburst was a stupid color, now i think it's one of the best. i guess these things come and go.

AaronK (AaronK), Wednesday, 8 February 2006 23:29 (nineteen years ago)

The look of a strat never bothered me (never caught my eye either). The thing that used to bother me was how close the volume knob was to the strings. I'd accidentally hit it with my hand and turn the volume up or down at the worst moments. Now I think that is a nice design... especially since I do alot more volume swells now.

The two guitars that I use most are a Tele and a Rick 12 string. The more I think about it the more I wish I had the option of a third pickup and a five way selector (a tremolo bar would be nice also). Strats get a bad rap, but they sound great, are easy to play (unlike my rick 12) and about $500 - $1000 cheaper than a Les Paul. I'd like to get a nice strat as my next guitar.

xpost
That pic above may be the "Hendrix burned strat" that FZ had.

MadMaryWilliams (MadMaryWilliams), Wednesday, 8 February 2006 23:44 (nineteen years ago)

RE: the Zappa guitar pic... that is not the burned hendrix strat. I think that's the one on the cover of the FZ album "Guitar" (recommended).

MadMaryWilliams (MadMaryWilliams), Wednesday, 8 February 2006 23:51 (nineteen years ago)

Strats get a bad rap? Really? I've always thought of them as the tone-master motherfucker supreme. I've owned a Les Paul and I traded it for a Telecaster. I sold the Tele when I was broke and now I have this Mosrite. But, I still remember playing American Deluxe Strats and being like, "HOLY SHIT!" They were so incredibly superior to my Fender Bullet and Tele. Didn't even feel the same. I should have bought one instead of the Les Paul, but I thought the LP was supposed to be better and at that point I wanted THE BEST! I was disappointed. I also think humbuckers are overrated. I never noticed a hum that needed to be bucked on single coils and if you need it louder, turn up the amp.

However, I just went over to Guitar Center and I'll be damned if the Strats seemed to have really fat necks today. They didn't feel at all like the ones I'd played in the past! What gives?

Also, yes, that is the burnt Hendrix/FZ guitar. They should just sell them pre-burned.

Guitarist, Wednesday, 8 February 2006 23:53 (nineteen years ago)

My Strat-type guitar (okay fine it's a Squier, happy now?) used to bug me with its total boringness, so much that when I was 18 or so I tried to add a little, umm, something:

http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y257/nitsuh/Picture042.jpg

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 8 February 2006 23:55 (nineteen years ago)

BURNT GEETAR: Dweezil changed the neck and pickguard, I think. Check out the burn marks. It's the same guitar. (The Zappa family lost it for like 7 years because frank tucked it away under some stairs and forgot about it-- must be nice to be that fucking rich!)

ZAPPA GEETAR ALBUMS: Speaking of Zappa guitar albums, I just downloaded "Non Foods" and "Wanna Buy Some Acid" off Limewire. Both are pristine double-cd collections and could be packaged and sold by Rykodisc as is. Non Foods is 2 cds of GREAT solos that FZ recorded for Guitar Player Magazine Records. Wanna Buy Some Acid is just a great fucking bootleg, I guess. Check out Non Foods if you like the SUAPYG and Guitar albums. I actually prefer Non Foods in some ways.

ZAPPA'S GEETARS COMPARED: Interesting to note- Zappa tended toward Stratocasters in the 80s. I prefer the tonal variety he had at that period, despite the fact that his playing wasn't always as good as it was in the 70s when he was using mostly Gibsons. It seems there is much less subtlety in Gibsons and they don't sound as good played sloppily, either.

Guitarist, Thursday, 9 February 2006 00:01 (nineteen years ago)

Of course Strats look dorky, that's their charm. Picture David Byrne.

n/a (Nick A.), Thursday, 9 February 2006 01:57 (nineteen years ago)

I was being flippant before because my Strat is one of my favorite guitars, and I have no idea whether or not I look dorky holding it or whether or not I'm actually any good. Mine is black because it started life as one of those Roland Ready Mexican Strats, which only come in three colors.

I replaced a ton of the hardware and switched out the pickguard for a perloid "Mother of Toilet Seat" job which looks a lot nicer than the stock flat white. It has American Fender tuners and the pickups were taken from a beaten '74 Strat I rescued at a garage sale. (It was actually in a basket containing half of a broken neck with no truss rod and about 3/4 of the pickguard with all the electronics. I dated it from the neck fragment which indicated that it was a few months younger than I am.)

I don't really like black guitars in general, but I went to a big bullshit music store and played every Roland Ready they had in stock to find the one that really deserved to make it through quality control off the line, and it happened to be black.

I still don't like that it's black so much, but it was originally just gonna be something to dick around with guitar-to-MIDI and with a Roland VG-8 for fun. As it turns out, all the mods (especially the relic pickups) has turned it into my favorite "regular" guitar too.

My Strat only has two knobs for the standard guitar mode though: volume and tone. The third knob belongs to the hexaphonic pickup circuit and acts as the volume for the extra 13 pin output on the edge of the guitar.

So yeah. Yay for Strats.

martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 9 February 2006 01:59 (nineteen years ago)

nay for strats! in the name of friendly discourse!

i kinda hate strats. some of these reasons are more petty/subjective than others.

the bodies always feel like too big and flat for me. tonally, they play it safe- all three (or five) positions on the strat all still have a very 'middle pickup' sound- the Telecaster, for instance, has a wooly, deep, almost humbuckery rhythm pickup and a shrill treble pickup- much more of a distinction, much more useful, heftier, cooler looking guitar. you can look cool with a strat, maybe, but you definitely never look LAME with a tele.

because they've been so mercilessly copied, most shitty guitars i've played have been strat copies- most strat copies are shitty. even fenders own strat copies, cause i mean - thats what they are, suck. there's probably 100 shitty made in china/korea/mexico strats or strat copies for every decent american made one. not to dismiss the idea of good imported ones, the early japanese ones are amazing. they've also creeped up (and creeped out) the price of the american ones you know- they've made imports the norm across the board. and don't get me started on their new convention of naming things YEARS. you know, having a '62 strat' and a '65 twin' used to actually mean something.

b mulvey, Thursday, 9 February 2006 07:48 (nineteen years ago)

Great thread!

**While we're on the subject, do you ever start screwing around with your bridge?I did once on an old Fender Bullet**

Me too, and considered smashing the fucker to pieces more than once during the process. It was one of those 'not through the body' bridges that's impossible to set-up right. I count the day last August when I sold that guitar for £240 as one of the greatest days of my life.

Strats - I don't really covet one, but I wouldn't mind a GOOD one - a decent vintage one, or a top-of-the range American one. Maybe a fat strat? I haven't played a really good one, but I have had a go on a few that made me feel less than enthusiastic.

b.mulvey is totally on-the-money about the pickups on some strats/teles - there isn't that much variation in the pickup positions, at least the middle 3. I prefer the clearer distinction between the tele pickups - both lovely, lovely sounds and both totally different. And cool-looking? hell, yes.

I guess IMM people are getting the message that I'm a tele-fan by now, but you know my love for these beasts grows stronger every time I pick up mine. Maybe it's just that for the stuff I play - 60's beat/freakbeat, brit-punk and postpunk and a touch of classic rock, I don't think it can be beaten.

Any thoughts on Fat Strats?

Dr.C (Dr.C), Thursday, 9 February 2006 09:44 (nineteen years ago)

** b.mulvey is totally on-the-money about the pickups on some strats/teles **

I meant ...the pickups on some strats.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 9 February 2006 10:01 (nineteen years ago)

Our guitarist mocks them on the grounds that if a businessman hung a guitar on his wall in a feeble attempt to appear rock'n'roll, he'd choose a red Strat.

Ben Dot (1977), Thursday, 9 February 2006 14:45 (nineteen years ago)

I got put off them for years back in the eighties, because I had this image in my head of the strat being played by mark knopfler, with his towelette headband on, playing all those great great twangy licks for ever and ever.

It's a bit silly really, but that sort of lingers in my brain, plus, all my favourite guitarists played gibsons - steves howe/hillage/hackett, robert fripp. or I guess danny fishelshcer (telecaster) randy california (danelectro, looking at the pictures in the spirit CDs I have)

As a strat-related aside, I listened to the radio last night, and it was some folk awards ceremony thing. They gave the lifetime achievement award to richard thompson (a pretty good pro-strat argt in his own right) - they actually got mark knopfler to present the award to him! We had to larf @ that...

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 9 February 2006 14:58 (nineteen years ago)

ben,

maybe if he sold cell phones or owned a deli.

yer MBA'ers? lawyers? it's going to be a PRS. they should come with wall-hangers.

b mulvey, Thursday, 9 February 2006 17:13 (nineteen years ago)

According to Ed Roman, PRS guitars are mostly crap now. I dig all the things Ed Roman has to say about guitars and I'd really like one of the Quicksilver or Jet guitars featured on his website, but man, those COLORS are off the wall. Those guitars remind me of either Gene Loves Jezebel, 80s hair metal or new country. The curly wood is a nice detail, but tone it down some, would ya? And stick with mop boxes like a Les Paul.

http://www.dreamstrat.com/images/dtmo102a.jpg
http://www.dreamstrat.com/images/prs48272.jpg

http://www.infinityguitars.com/Jetguitars/jet_tmb200.jpg
http://www.infinityguitars.com/Jetguitars/jettwins.jpg
http://www.infinityguitars.com/Jetguitars/purplejet.jpg

beautiful in a way, but can you imagine standing in front of a crowd playing raw rock?

Guitarist, Thursday, 9 February 2006 18:20 (nineteen years ago)

Pardon me, I thought you said "accrding to Ed Roman."

rogermexico (rogermexico), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:24 (nineteen years ago)

It'll be fine. I wrote some painfully long thread on here a while ago that is based off of Fender's method of set-up that might be of use, if I can find it.

That thread was my inspiration! Reading it way back when, it dawned on me that there was nothing mystical about "guitar setup" that couldn't be conquered with a decent set of Allen keys.

Then I discovered the G&L dual-fulcrum tremolo bridge.

rogermexico (rogermexico), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:34 (nineteen years ago)

**with his towelette headband on**

Aw come-on Norm, you MUST have one of these in yr gig bag somehwhere?

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 9 February 2006 20:16 (nineteen years ago)

Pardon me, I thought you said "accrding to Ed Roman."

I did, but I wrote "according" not "accrding".

Are you complaining because I didn't link you to Ed's extremely poorly scripted heavy-loading website where you can find the same guitars I found elsewhere? Fine, then here: http://www.edromanguitars.com

Guitarist, Thursday, 9 February 2006 20:18 (nineteen years ago)

No link required. I'm complaining because Ed Roman's just not generally considered to be much of a reliable authority on what is and isn't crap.

Check out his rant on G&L, where he renounces them forever because he just assumed that he could swap G&L and Fender necks and decided it was a tragic design flaw when that turned out to be dead wrong. (d00d, Leo made sure you couldn't - you can't even swap trem bars).

rogermexico (rogermexico), Thursday, 9 February 2006 21:25 (nineteen years ago)

Ed R0man is an idiot, and I wouldn't trust his opinion on anything ever.

Sorry I sentenced you to a G&L bridge adjustment, man...they are more than a little difficult. Fantastic guitars though.

John Justen (johnjusten), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:04 (nineteen years ago)

So, the guitars he builds and recommends are crap?

Guitarist, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:10 (nineteen years ago)

RE: "builds". They aren't any better than anything else from the same source countries, and what he recommends is so deeply rooted in his bizarre world view (there are some fairly interesting comments on his latent racism out there that make me...uncomfortable.) that it's nearly impossible to dig the factual aspects out of the ranting, in my opinion.

Here's that set-up thing, if anyone needs it:
Public service announcement: how to set up your own guitar/bass and not pay for others to do it...

John Justen (johnjusten), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:15 (nineteen years ago)

Ed Roman's "Rant" is not much of a rant:
http://www.edromanguitars.com/guitar/home_gnl.htm

What little he said is not idiotic in the slightest:

"Upon taking the G&L apart I discovered that G&L was no longer routing their guitars in the original way.

In fact they were using the same horribly unacceptable swimming pool route that Fender used throughout the 80's and 90's. Upon trying to make the necks interchange I discovered, the G&L neck was totally different from the Fender that we were intending to use the neck on. Up until that time I had thought that G&L guitars were the same as Fenders.

For these reasons I hereby rescind any positive recommendations I have made regarding G&L instruments. I hereby will no longer recommend the G&L product to my customers. And I will buy back any G&L guitar that was purchased from me within a two year period for full price paid.

When I first discovered these facts I put a new recommendation on my G&L pages. I was recommending Pearlcaster guitars to any and all of my customers. If you are looking for a G&L Bass I suggest you look at the Low-Rider Basses instead. The G&L Models are heavy, clunky and hard to play. They sound decent but that headstock is ugly and the Instrument is unwieldy. Even when I was recommending G&L Guitars I never liked the basses."

He has very strict requirements and that is why I like to read what he has to say. I think he is correct in the assessment that Gibsons and Fenders are way overpriced.

Guitarist, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:19 (nineteen years ago)

Sorry I sentenced you to a G&L bridge adjustment, man...they are more than a little difficult.

Ha! Now he tells me. I can always take it to a tech if I just can't stand it no more, meanwhile it's a great learning experience. And a great opportunity to add to my vast collection of tiny, easily misplaced allen keys!

It's a Tribute, btw, so a little less status-y than the parent brand more or less fell into my lap at 200 bucks used on Craigslist. Needed a lot of TLC (grungiest, gunkiest fretboard EVER, among other things) but a few hours with a rag, some Murphy's, a philips-head, etc and some new strings (I swear the old ones had spanish moss hanging off 'em) and it's turning into a beauty.

I've always been on the strat=dorky side (prolly a function of age, these things go in cycles), much preferring Lesters, Juniors (P90 phroar yay "Din Of Ecstasy"), and Teles. But this may turn out to be the best 200 bucks I've ever spent.

rogermexico (rogermexico), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:26 (nineteen years ago)

I think most of his strict requirements are based on Ed R0man making more money.

RE: Fender being overpriced - I have no idea why anyone would think this, given that you can buy an American Fender Highway One for a little over $600. Actually, I think the whole concept of guitars being "over-priced" is sort of flawed. If enough people are willing to pay a given amount, then the price isn't too high. Economics is Economics, after all.

xpost

John Justen (johnjusten), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:30 (nineteen years ago)

He acts like he has "very strict requirements."

But let's take another look...

"Upon trying to make the necks interchange I discovered, the G&L neck was totally different from the Fender that we were intending to use the neck on. Up until that time I had thought that G&L guitars were the same as Fenders.

For these reasons I hereby rescind any positive recommendations I have made regarding G&L instruments."

Translation: I assumed wrong. I was embarassed. It must be someone else's fault.

"I hereby will no longer recommend the G&L product to my customers. And I will buy back any G&L guitar that was purchased from me within a two year period for full price paid.

When I first discovered these facts I put a new recommendation on my G&L pages. I was recommending Pearlcaster guitars to any and all of my customers."

Translation: actually, that business about the routing and the necks is just pretext anyway - buy my crappy, if-Fender-is-overpriced-then-what-do-you-call-this? house brand.

"And I will buy back any G&L guitar that was purchased from me within a two year period for full price paid."

Translation: I will buy back the pre-CNC models now that they're worth more than I sold them for.

He's entertaining from a distance. Is all I'm-a say about that.


rogermexico (rogermexico), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:41 (nineteen years ago)

I've met him -- spent about half a day with him as he tried to hard-sell me a bass. He's entertaining up close, too.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Thursday, 9 February 2006 23:02 (nineteen years ago)

Hmmm... Vegas IMM FAP, anyone?

rogermexico (rogermexico), Thursday, 9 February 2006 23:15 (nineteen years ago)

He has a whole spiel on his site about guitars being perfect and yet easy to maintain. He mentions his disdain for "swimming pool" routing elsewhere on the site in reference to Gibsons and other overpriced guitars. He was recommending the G & L guitars for a reason: he thought they were Fender-friendly perfect parts. They're not.

Translation: Looks to me like you got him all wrong.

Guitarist, Friday, 10 February 2006 00:17 (nineteen years ago)

If he's referencing swimming pool routing w/Gibsons, he's hit a new height in dumb. "Swimming Pool" routing is when they make a rectangular rout underneath the pickguard on a strat style guitar, in contrast to individual routs for each pickup. Also, G&L guitars are MORE EXPENSIVE as a rule (not the imports, which are too new for his critique) than Fenders. At the risk of starting the first IMM beef, I really suggest you start reading R0man's "information" with a grain of salt.

John Justen (johnjusten), Friday, 10 February 2006 00:44 (nineteen years ago)

What?!? How dare you! This means war!

What do you all think of those Line 6 Variax things? After watching the videos, I was convinced. But, it sure does seem wrong.

Guitarist, Friday, 10 February 2006 00:57 (nineteen years ago)

The Variax is fantastic, brilliant design in the worlds least appealing cosmetic package. It's a shame, really.

John Justen (johnjusten), Friday, 10 February 2006 01:42 (nineteen years ago)

You don't like ANY of the styles? I like the 700 alright. It's a bit weird not to see pickups. But, when the hand is strumming, you can't tell.

Guitarist, Friday, 10 February 2006 02:49 (nineteen years ago)

Ed Roman is a cartoon. I can't help but think he trashes PRS because they pulled their dealership with him- apparently he was doing stuff like installing after-market inlays to make the plain-er models be basically counterfeit... that's what I hear at least. Anyone who's that pushy, who has totally sexist, "Easy Riders"-esque cheesecake shots with nightmare guitars from Queensyche's storage locker, and has SUCH a bad reputation should not be dealt with. I mean, WHY? so many options to buy online these days to spend any time, money, or thought on such a creep.

i'm not sure about the specifics about the Highway 1 but they're slightly shady as to the 'made in usa'-ness, either they're mexican parts assembled here, or vice versa. the one i tried had an awful paint job, it looked like it was dipped in wax or something.

b mulvey, Friday, 10 February 2006 03:08 (nineteen years ago)

No shit, he's that bad. I had no idea. I never really paid attention to him that much. I thought he had a good reputation. Glad I brought it up. Now, I will never be tempted to buy one of those when I have the cash.

Guitarist, Friday, 10 February 2006 03:13 (nineteen years ago)

Aw come-on Norm, you MUST have one of these in yr gig bag somehwhere?
Grrrr GRRRRR. NO.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 10 February 2006 10:43 (nineteen years ago)

I love Strats. Always have. I think the reason being my early fascination with Hendrix, then Richard Thompson and then Alex Chilton.

I'm a huge fan of the out-of-phase positions on the pickup switch. And I like the fact that you usually have to wrestle with a Strat to get tone and volume. I tend to put thicker gauge strings on a Strat versus my Les Paul, Danelectro or Jazzmaster. I like the volume and sustain that thicker gauge strings give you on Strats more than any other guitar.

The only thing I don't like about Strats is the huge variation in tone and EQ that you get from switching pickups. I tend to use every position but the neck pickup when playing live, because the bass response is so much louder. Lots of 2nd/4th and bridge settings. Plus Fenders really taught me the value in turning up the amp and lowering the volume on the guitar, and then raising the volume for boost and tonal effect.

Anyhow, I'm a Fender man, even though I've been sleeping with the enemy for the past three months (old goldtop Les Paul with p-94s).

Now I just have to decide what I'm going to take to SXSW.

Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 19:09 (nineteen years ago)

I like the feel of the extended length on a Strat neck, but that middle pickup, the placement of the volume knob and the bridge are a real problem for a flogger like me.

I don't have a Strat anymore, but I don't like playing a Les Paul either. There is something about that rolled top and where the bridge is located that doesn't work well for me either. The flat top LP specials and Juniors feel pretty good and are pretty much like my SG.

Earl Nash (earlnash), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 23:27 (nineteen years ago)

five months pass...
I loved the look and feel of my Strat but ultimately sold it--partly because it was a pain to string and tune, because of the tremelo that I never used. Partly because I find the fell in love with a Les Paul and a Tele, from which I can get the sounds I want. And thought I am a gearslut of the worst order, even I need only so many guitars.

Soundwise, the Strat was nice in the middle positions but the bridge-only and neck-only selections were too thin for my taste.

The Mad Puffin (The Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 15 August 2006 23:09 (nineteen years ago)

I hate Tune O Matics.

I find them HARDER to get a good setup on.
What if I don't like the action on two strings? ONE string?
I'm stuck filing 1-6 saddles and polishing.

Less string/body coupling, too.
What a TOM/Tail setup DOES offer that no Fender does is variable tension across the bridge, which allows you to adjust the amount of sustain(however, most people using this setup set them for the most tension you can get as they want it to sustain just by looking at it).

I prefer more adjustability to more simplicity.
if you find intimidating, don't touch it.

Personally, I never found a strat-type any harder to string than a TOM type.
In fact, I found it far easier to mess up a TOM, as if you're not careful in keeping tension on the string as you wind and also across the bridge, you end up with a string snagged on some part at the other end of the body if you're paying attention to doing a good wind.

The GZeus (The GZeus), Wednesday, 16 August 2006 01:10 (nineteen years ago)

Born in the 50s looking so bold
Fender Stratocaster
Everythin' your parents hated about rock 'n roll
Fender Fender Fender

Wangin' and a twangin, sounding so tough
Fender Stratocaster
And the kids in my corner, they can't get enough
Fender Fender Fender
Like the wind in your hair when the top is down
Like taillights headed for another town
Fender Stratocaster, well there's something about that sound.

Like gasoline in the sand
Fender Stratocaster
Like a motorcycle at a hotdog stand
Fender Fender Fender
Like the Dunkin Donuts in Mattapan
Fender Stratocaster
Like the Thrifty Drugs in Santa An'
Fender Fender Fender
Well the sound is thin and the sound is cheap
Like a tin can falling on a dead end street
Fender Stratocaster, well there's something about that sound.

(Guitar)

Well how can it sound so tough?
Fender Stratocaster
And it's made to be treated rough.
Fender Fender Fender
It's got the ancient Egyptian script
Fender Stratocaster
It's got the wang bar from the crypt.
Fender Fender Fender
Oh you should have known it right off the bat
One look and you know it would sound like that
Fender Stratocaster, well there's something about that sound.

Like gasoline in the sand
Fender Stratocaster
Like a motorcycle at a hotdog stand
Fender Fender Fender
Like the Dunkin Donuts in Mattapan
Fender Stratocaster
Like the Thrifty Drugs in Santa An'
Fender Fender Fender
Oh and the sound so thin it's barely there
Like a bitchy girl who just don't care
Fender Stratocaster, well there's something about that sound.

Like Woo Woo Ginsberg at the juke box joint
You hear the sound and you get the point.
Fender Stratocaster, well there's something about that sound.
Oh Oh Oh Alright, etc.

Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 16 August 2006 02:48 (nineteen years ago)

Like Woo Woo Ginsberg.

Also: Strats fucking rule.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 16 August 2006 21:32 (nineteen years ago)

what we can learn from the fender stratocaster

dan (dan), Wednesday, 16 August 2006 22:39 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.