ableton 5 vs reason 3

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
OK I'm a complete novice here - just got my self a nice fast PC and wnat to get some software that's best suited to making annoying frank zappa / aphex twin / max tundra nonrepetitive prog techno. ableton has all that easy dj stuff the appeal of which is wearing off (i heard the eq is weak too is that true?) reason ships with synths & drum machines - I don't by any stretch of the imagination have an unlimited budget so this saves me having to buy a million great things. I used to use a ZX spectrum until recently cos the sounds are admittedly (appealingly) shit but you can easily make it do what you want 5/ 7 time signatures, stutters & stammers, key changes etc etc. I know there's a search function on this thing but I don't have for ever to research this damned thing!!
thanks for any help,

bob snoom (vestibule), Monday, 13 February 2006 17:36 (nineteen years ago)

The two programs have really different emphases. Reason is perfect for doing intricate sequencing -- programming drum patterns, detailed synth automations, etc. It's probably the best available interface for slicing, dicing, triggering, and doing all that other beat-by-beat sample and synth manipulation, and I say that as someone who's still using Reason 1.0; I'm afraid to even hear what all 3.0 has added. What Reason can't do is record sound for you. Ableton can multi-track like that, and it works on that larger scale. Load in the loops you want, and it's great for arranging them, filtering them with whatever VST effects (Reason only has built-in effects), making them move right. It also has great software synths and effects banks, so you can create great sounds -- but it mostly allows you to play and record them yourself, with (say) a MIDI controller keyboard. There's no great little sequencer in there -- and I don't know of any VST plug-in sequencers that can compete with Reason.

Having both would be great. It sounds like you want to slice and dice and get really involved in the sounds, which Reason is great for; if you could make loops there and then arrange them in Live, with its VST capabilities, that'd be nice. But start with Reason; it seems best suited to what you want to do. And it can do everything you want; it's capable of most all the same arrangement stuff as Live. The only thing you need extra is some little program that'll let you record multi-track audio -- so that if you want to record something like a vocal line and then shove that sample into Reason, you'll be able to.

But the breakdown is this, basically --

Live = can record audio and handles VST plug-ins (for infinite addition of little tools)

Reason = quickly and intuitively lets you work on a really detailed sequencing level

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 13 February 2006 19:31 (nineteen years ago)

Reason 3 would probably be best for what you want to do(as you don;t say if you want to record), with the exception of operrator (which you have to pay extra for) live ships with no synths. and vst plugs can get expensive. also once you get into the combinator (and you cna download new ones off the web) it's can do a lot of interesting effects, as for the lack of recording, unless you want to multitrack you can download audacity for free which can record single sounds. so i would get:
Reason 3: ($400)
Oxygen 8: ($150)
Audacity: (free)

AMD (AMD), Monday, 13 February 2006 21:09 (nineteen years ago)

soulseek: (also free :)

AaronK (AaronK), Monday, 13 February 2006 21:27 (nineteen years ago)

Well he might want some sort of bare-bones multi-tracker, actually. For instance, if I want to record vocals for a Reason track, I export the song and load it up in an old copy of Cakewalk, so I can record the vocals with proper timing and then load the whole performance back into Reason as a sample. It'd be much more difficult to get the timing down without that multi-track step.

Though yes, something like Audacity is fine for recording and processing raw sample sounds, before shipping them into Reason and manipulating them. My usual chain =

Soundforge (recording and prepping sounds)
Reason (developing and sequencing patterns into song)
Cakewalk (recording multi-track parts like vox and guitar)
Reason (mixing parts back in and finalizing arrangement)
Live (adding VST effects and mastering)

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 13 February 2006 21:40 (nineteen years ago)

So different! Prog techno is probably best served with Reason, although aspirationally, the Reaktor series are great, as is Max/MSP if you really wanna get all wickedout. Those are mucho pricey, but I was pretty disappointed with the sound output of Reason for a while, and even now, it's not the same in terms of true warping of sound as Reaktor. Argh--can you try them both out?

Jubalique (Jubalique), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 01:44 (nineteen years ago)

Can we turn this into a Ableton vs. Cubase vs. Pro Tools throwdown, or should I start a new thread?

Within the next year I'll be getting my home studio together and I haven't decided which way to go software-wise. I feel really comfortable with Cubase, but I know Pro Tools is more ubiquitous/pro and possibly has higher quality plugins. I tried the demo of Ableton once and found it really non-inuitive, contrary to its rep.

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 19:28 (nineteen years ago)

Ableton seems really intuitive to me. But I think parts of that intuitiveness are aimed at its remix function, not its multitracker potential. For instance, the way you trigger clips in a given channel using that vertical view: totally sensible for quick on-the-fly mixing, not so much for recording and DAW work.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 19:32 (nineteen years ago)

What about editing, like slicing and dicing beats, sequencing, timestretching, etc.? That's the sort of thing I was hoping it would be good at.

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 19:39 (nineteen years ago)

I agree that Ableton's sequencing is blah. But its audio warping and reversing and chopping, esp since it's non-destructive, is very, very, very cool. That said, I can't seem to get great sounding songs out of Ableton Live--I always end up mixing it in Logic or something else. Reason, on the other hand, I love the sound sometimes, you finish a song, run it thru the distortion box and it sounds lovely and hot, although we probably abuse it too much in our band. The only problem is that Reason's bass sounds are kinda weak. For any weird, timestretching granulizer sounds, I actually use Fruityloops more than Reaktor--R5 is great, but it's such a resource hog, so I use it for other things, like weird sequencing loops or synths more.

Jubalique (Jubalique), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 20:48 (nineteen years ago)

Slicing/dicing = I will always stand by Reason contraptions. Plus Ableton has no interface that I'd even want to begin doing this in. But the one caveat here is that Ableton can take VST plug-ins, and I suppose it's possible that there are superfab sequencer plug-ins I'd love working with.

(Still, I can't imagine anything getting the ease of sequencing you get with Reason, where you can use simple, uniform controllers to automate any parameters you want. The moment you notice the "curve" function, you have full control to program out so much, easily, right down to, say matching patterns of wheel modulation or effects settings for every individual note.) (I like copying curve patterns and matching them so different parts flicker the same way -- an envelope here, a reverb decay there, a delay pan here, etc.)

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 21:45 (nineteen years ago)

I never got past Redrum. :(

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 21:55 (nineteen years ago)

(and then I ditched that and just started sequencing drum samples in Cubase)

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 21:55 (nineteen years ago)

Well, I'm partly just a Reason booster because it's the main thing I've ever actually put the time into learning, so ... grain of salt. But Redrum = intuitive and very flexible, right? And I feel like everything else has that same quality. And I love how easy the patch-cord layout makes it to tinker and built and re-route, with everything very visual and right in front of you, all in one view. Especially since this means that any module on your screen can interface with any other module -- you can use the output of one thing to modulate another, or easily route different sounds into the same chain, or whatever else you happen to come up with. Just for instance: in about ten seconds, I can set things up so that my kick drum triggers a bass note. I'm not sure how I'd even begin to do that in other programs, at least not in ten seconds.

Usually I'm in love with the NN sampler -- especially with the way you can set polyphony. There isn't much more I want in terms of sample control.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 22:53 (nineteen years ago)

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0002VCUZK.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

Pablo (Pablo A), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 23:16 (nineteen years ago)

The thing with Reason though is that it can't really handle recording or wav editing... so slicing and dicing really means just whole sample, it's hard to just reverse two beats in a longer chunk or stretch half of it, pitchshift, and then resynchronise. I dunno, I kind of wish Reason had it, but at the same time, it's so efficient cpu-wise and it's so simple that I kind of don't. I wonder what's going to be in Live 6 and Reason 4.

Jubalique (Jubalique), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 23:55 (nineteen years ago)

Maybe I'd do that kind of thing more often if it was easier in Reason, but to be honest ... if I really need to do it, I don't much mind prepping the sample in an editor and throwing it back in. The NN sampler is really good for that -- just make a one-note key zone for the next sample, trigger it there, and you're good.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 16 February 2006 06:51 (nineteen years ago)

1) I do find Redrum to be intuitive, but the others, not so much. Probably because I suck ass at synthesis wherever I encounter it.

2) See, the ability to easily edit wav files/samples is more important to me than Reason's grid sequencing and effects chains. I'd rather be able to go through a phrase and quickly make some cymbal and snare hits shorter or longer than prepare a bunch of different length samples and load them into Reason.

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 16 February 2006 18:12 (nineteen years ago)

Oh, you can still do that sort of thing with the Reason samplers, though (said the Reason booster). I mean, it's nothing like Ableton, with those warp functions and clip manipulations and all that, but modules like the NN samplers make it pretty easy to control stuff like that.

(Our difference on this makes sense, though, cause I imagine you're working more with full performance recordings! Most everything I do is getting programmed from the ground up, which is the kind of construction Reason's obviously really good for.)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 16 February 2006 20:07 (nineteen years ago)

Nabisco, do you have any music online?

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 16 February 2006 20:28 (nineteen years ago)

These are from a long time ago, but here you go. Both of them were done with Reason 1.0, apart from recording the vocals and processing some of the samples.

Mr Death

Let It Go Let It Go Let It Go

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 17 February 2006 01:48 (nineteen years ago)

one month passes...
I use Med v3.21 on an Amiga 500 for all my sequencing.

Max Tundra, Tuesday, 21 March 2006 10:40 (nineteen years ago)

Yes, but you're Max Tundra.

Minimaxi, Monday, 27 March 2006 18:43 (nineteen years ago)

I thought you were using a Yamaha Q-series at one point.
Which frankly if they produced a Q-series interface for a software app like Ableton I'd be a very happy man and all my questions would be answered.

TOMBOT (TOMBOT), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 16:30 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

Did Nabisco notice this?!

jaymc, Thursday, 13 December 2007 19:39 (seventeen years ago)

Is the pope Greek?

nabisco, Friday, 21 December 2007 18:41 (seventeen years ago)

if you've got the separate tracks for a song (like that 'drugs in your body' by thieves like us) and want to make a remix of it but add a big beefy bassline and harder technoish drums and some twinkly effects, what program would be best? and what else would i need - a good softsynth?

s.rose, Sunday, 23 December 2007 17:33 (seventeen years ago)

I used to use a ZX spectrum until recently cos (...) you can easily make it do what you want

Okay that is hardcore. Especially the "easily".

anatol_merklich, Sunday, 23 December 2007 22:43 (seventeen years ago)

s.rose, you want ableton live with operator.

live 5 is the first software sequencer/sampler workstation I've ever worked on that felt like it made almost as much sense as hardware - live 6 doesn't improve on a great deal in that respect, but it does have some better built-in FX.

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 25 December 2007 19:47 (seventeen years ago)

thank you tom, i am working through the tutorials on ableton live 7 now. it seems like a great program. have you or anyone on IMM used live 7 yet? (and does live 7 come with operator built in? i can't seem to find out of this version has it or not)

s.rose, Friday, 4 January 2008 05:49 (seventeen years ago)

fuck we're on 7 now? I only just got around to giving a shit about 6

El Tomboto, Friday, 4 January 2008 08:11 (seventeen years ago)

lol they're trying to turn this shit into some kind of full-on logic pro bullshit aren't they

HOW ABOUT A VOCODER??? EH!?!?!?

El Tomboto, Friday, 4 January 2008 08:14 (seventeen years ago)

they may be trying to market it as a pro-full-DAW-work-flow-environment-experience but that's just so the legions of schmock and schmindie fools buy it. they haven't actually bothered to add any logicy features. in fact, logic and that crowd are stealing off ableton more than the other way round.

alec, Friday, 4 January 2008 10:50 (seventeen years ago)

s.rose, live 7 has managed to split itself into loads of different products that you need to buy separately, including but not limited to, operator, sampler, essential instrument collection, drum machines, tension, analog and session drums.

the best thing to do is buy the cheapest product you can find that comes with live lite (i got a m-audio audiophile pci soundcard for £45) and then put the serial number into the live website. then go to the webshop and you can buy either the ableton suite (everything) for €599 or the ableton suite without the drum samples and essential instrument collection (it's far from essential) and cardboard box for €499.

alec, Friday, 4 January 2008 11:23 (seventeen years ago)

god i think i am going to use garage band :(

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Sunday, 6 January 2008 17:46 (seventeen years ago)

eleven months pass...

Ableton == in any form == will reduce you to tears after wrestling with its interface and hardware connections with a PC. Really sophisticated Euor-made dogshit. If that's your thing, then it's great.

Gorge, Monday, 8 December 2008 08:40 (sixteen years ago)

??

I have had zero wrestling issues with it, its interface, and especially not hardware connections; what exactly are you working with?

nabisco, Monday, 8 December 2008 19:57 (sixteen years ago)

show him what you're working with.

TOMBOT, Monday, 8 December 2008 19:58 (sixteen years ago)

(I have also had exactly 0 issues with ableton besides the fact that impulse has no button of its own to quickly and easily backwardize a sample)

TOMBOT, Monday, 8 December 2008 19:59 (sixteen years ago)

I just can't imagine what interface problems are being referred to. Granted, I don't use any complicated connections with it, but everything seems to work pretty simply -- pick the driver format you're using, it recognizes any interfaces, you select and use them ... what problems would develop? I feel like any interface issues wouldn't be with Ableton, they'd be with your system dealing with the hardware in the first place.

nabisco, Monday, 8 December 2008 20:39 (sixteen years ago)

one month passes...

Personal breakthrough, 9:30pm, January 19

Redrum is murder backwards.
Now checking other Reason modules for similar evil references, will report back.

scourge of cords (Z S), Tuesday, 20 January 2009 02:35 (sixteen years ago)

"scream"

Cooking From A Stovetop (electricsound), Tuesday, 20 January 2009 02:37 (sixteen years ago)

No WONDER I haven't had any luck breaking into the bigtime with my awesome music...one of my drum machines is evil!

scourge of cords (Z S), Tuesday, 20 January 2009 02:38 (sixteen years ago)

All work and no play makes Z S a dull boy
All work and no play makes Z S a dull boy
All work and no play makes Z S a dull boy
All work and no play makes Z S a dull boy
All work and no play makes Z S a dull boy
All work and no play makes Z S a dull boy
All work and no play makes Z S a dull boy
All work and no play makes Z S a dull boy
All work and no play makes Z S a dull boy
All work and no play makes Z S a dull boy
All work and no play makes Z S a dull boy
All work and no play makes Z S a dull boy

snoball, Tuesday, 20 January 2009 10:50 (sixteen years ago)

one month passes...

I only just noticed the synth is Malstrom and not Maelstrom.

Should I go for Ableton? I am a Reason-head.

I made you a Justice bass sound, but I EATED it (Masonic Boom), Thursday, 12 March 2009 14:20 (sixteen years ago)

I'm really, really happy with using both -- I prefer the Reason environment for actually programming things, and the Live environment for recording, plug-in effects, automations, etc. I think they work really well together. Most of the things I work on, at this point, are a half-and-half split between tracks routed in from Reason and tracks recorded with Live.

nabisco, Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:51 (sixteen years ago)

me 2

cob nobblin' (latebloomer), Thursday, 12 March 2009 23:42 (sixteen years ago)

Well, I'm getting me Ableton posted to me so I can have a go on it and see what I think. I've been warned that I can just say goodbye to my life for the next few months, that it's totally like crack rock.

I made you a Justice bass sound, but I EATED it (Masonic Boom), Friday, 13 March 2009 00:10 (sixteen years ago)

one month passes...

Oh, wow: Propellerheads is just starting to beta-test a package called RECORD -- full multi-tracking software that can mount in and use any of the modules from Reason. Supposed to be released this fall.

nabisco, Monday, 11 May 2009 17:59 (sixteen years ago)

^quite interested in this myself

jump in the looool (electricsound), Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:24 (sixteen years ago)

three months pass...

ooh, record for reason users includes an upgrade to 4 for users of 1.0 thru 3.0

so effectively you get either record or the upgrade for free

sweeet

surfin on my face (electricsound), Thursday, 10 September 2009 01:35 (sixteen years ago)

for users that purchased Reason between May 11th and September 8th, 2009.

i bought reason 2 several yrs ago, so i'm not eligible? how the hell would someone own v. 1 or 2 without having bought it before may 2009?

am0n, Thursday, 10 September 2009 15:30 (sixteen years ago)

nar that only applies to the $50 rebate

surfin on my face (electricsound), Thursday, 10 September 2009 15:37 (sixteen years ago)

Users that purchased a new, full copy of Reason version 4 between May 11th and September 8th are entitled to a $50 USD/€30 EUR rebate on Record for Reason Owners, available in the Propellerhead online store. To obtain the rebate, send us a copy of your receipt through this e-mail form before placing your order.

surfin on my face (electricsound), Thursday, 10 September 2009 15:37 (sixteen years ago)

ok i figured i must have read it wrong

am0n, Friday, 11 September 2009 14:36 (sixteen years ago)

thats a great deal, i might actually pay for software again. how is record though? looks kinda cubase-y

am0n, Friday, 11 September 2009 14:44 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.