― bob snoom (vestibule), Monday, 13 February 2006 17:36 (nineteen years ago)
Having both would be great. It sounds like you want to slice and dice and get really involved in the sounds, which Reason is great for; if you could make loops there and then arrange them in Live, with its VST capabilities, that'd be nice. But start with Reason; it seems best suited to what you want to do. And it can do everything you want; it's capable of most all the same arrangement stuff as Live. The only thing you need extra is some little program that'll let you record multi-track audio -- so that if you want to record something like a vocal line and then shove that sample into Reason, you'll be able to.
But the breakdown is this, basically --
Live = can record audio and handles VST plug-ins (for infinite addition of little tools)
Reason = quickly and intuitively lets you work on a really detailed sequencing level
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 13 February 2006 19:31 (nineteen years ago)
― AMD (AMD), Monday, 13 February 2006 21:09 (nineteen years ago)
― AaronK (AaronK), Monday, 13 February 2006 21:27 (nineteen years ago)
Though yes, something like Audacity is fine for recording and processing raw sample sounds, before shipping them into Reason and manipulating them. My usual chain =
Soundforge (recording and prepping sounds)Reason (developing and sequencing patterns into song)Cakewalk (recording multi-track parts like vox and guitar)Reason (mixing parts back in and finalizing arrangement)Live (adding VST effects and mastering)
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 13 February 2006 21:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Jubalique (Jubalique), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 01:44 (nineteen years ago)
Within the next year I'll be getting my home studio together and I haven't decided which way to go software-wise. I feel really comfortable with Cubase, but I know Pro Tools is more ubiquitous/pro and possibly has higher quality plugins. I tried the demo of Ableton once and found it really non-inuitive, contrary to its rep.
― Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 19:28 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 19:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 19:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Jubalique (Jubalique), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 20:48 (nineteen years ago)
(Still, I can't imagine anything getting the ease of sequencing you get with Reason, where you can use simple, uniform controllers to automate any parameters you want. The moment you notice the "curve" function, you have full control to program out so much, easily, right down to, say matching patterns of wheel modulation or effects settings for every individual note.) (I like copying curve patterns and matching them so different parts flicker the same way -- an envelope here, a reverb decay there, a delay pan here, etc.)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 21:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 21:55 (nineteen years ago)
Usually I'm in love with the NN sampler -- especially with the way you can set polyphony. There isn't much more I want in terms of sample control.
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 22:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Pablo (Pablo A), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 23:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Jubalique (Jubalique), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 23:55 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 16 February 2006 06:51 (nineteen years ago)
2) See, the ability to easily edit wav files/samples is more important to me than Reason's grid sequencing and effects chains. I'd rather be able to go through a phrase and quickly make some cymbal and snare hits shorter or longer than prepare a bunch of different length samples and load them into Reason.
― Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 16 February 2006 18:12 (nineteen years ago)
(Our difference on this makes sense, though, cause I imagine you're working more with full performance recordings! Most everything I do is getting programmed from the ground up, which is the kind of construction Reason's obviously really good for.)
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 16 February 2006 20:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 16 February 2006 20:28 (nineteen years ago)
Mr Death
Let It Go Let It Go Let It Go
― nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 17 February 2006 01:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Max Tundra, Tuesday, 21 March 2006 10:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Minimaxi, Monday, 27 March 2006 18:43 (nineteen years ago)
― TOMBOT (TOMBOT), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 16:30 (nineteen years ago)
Did Nabisco notice this?!
― jaymc, Thursday, 13 December 2007 19:39 (seventeen years ago)
Is the pope Greek?
― nabisco, Friday, 21 December 2007 18:41 (seventeen years ago)
if you've got the separate tracks for a song (like that 'drugs in your body' by thieves like us) and want to make a remix of it but add a big beefy bassline and harder technoish drums and some twinkly effects, what program would be best? and what else would i need - a good softsynth?
― s.rose, Sunday, 23 December 2007 17:33 (seventeen years ago)
I used to use a ZX spectrum until recently cos (...) you can easily make it do what you want
Okay that is hardcore. Especially the "easily".
― anatol_merklich, Sunday, 23 December 2007 22:43 (seventeen years ago)
s.rose, you want ableton live with operator.
live 5 is the first software sequencer/sampler workstation I've ever worked on that felt like it made almost as much sense as hardware - live 6 doesn't improve on a great deal in that respect, but it does have some better built-in FX.
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 25 December 2007 19:47 (seventeen years ago)
thank you tom, i am working through the tutorials on ableton live 7 now. it seems like a great program. have you or anyone on IMM used live 7 yet? (and does live 7 come with operator built in? i can't seem to find out of this version has it or not)
― s.rose, Friday, 4 January 2008 05:49 (seventeen years ago)
fuck we're on 7 now? I only just got around to giving a shit about 6
― El Tomboto, Friday, 4 January 2008 08:11 (seventeen years ago)
lol they're trying to turn this shit into some kind of full-on logic pro bullshit aren't they
HOW ABOUT A VOCODER??? EH!?!?!?
― El Tomboto, Friday, 4 January 2008 08:14 (seventeen years ago)
they may be trying to market it as a pro-full-DAW-work-flow-environment-experience but that's just so the legions of schmock and schmindie fools buy it. they haven't actually bothered to add any logicy features. in fact, logic and that crowd are stealing off ableton more than the other way round.
― alec, Friday, 4 January 2008 10:50 (seventeen years ago)
s.rose, live 7 has managed to split itself into loads of different products that you need to buy separately, including but not limited to, operator, sampler, essential instrument collection, drum machines, tension, analog and session drums.
the best thing to do is buy the cheapest product you can find that comes with live lite (i got a m-audio audiophile pci soundcard for £45) and then put the serial number into the live website. then go to the webshop and you can buy either the ableton suite (everything) for €599 or the ableton suite without the drum samples and essential instrument collection (it's far from essential) and cardboard box for €499.
― alec, Friday, 4 January 2008 11:23 (seventeen years ago)
god i think i am going to use garage band :(
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Sunday, 6 January 2008 17:46 (seventeen years ago)
Ableton == in any form == will reduce you to tears after wrestling with its interface and hardware connections with a PC. Really sophisticated Euor-made dogshit. If that's your thing, then it's great.
― Gorge, Monday, 8 December 2008 08:40 (sixteen years ago)
??
I have had zero wrestling issues with it, its interface, and especially not hardware connections; what exactly are you working with?
― nabisco, Monday, 8 December 2008 19:57 (sixteen years ago)
show him what you're working with.
― TOMBOT, Monday, 8 December 2008 19:58 (sixteen years ago)
(I have also had exactly 0 issues with ableton besides the fact that impulse has no button of its own to quickly and easily backwardize a sample)
― TOMBOT, Monday, 8 December 2008 19:59 (sixteen years ago)
I just can't imagine what interface problems are being referred to. Granted, I don't use any complicated connections with it, but everything seems to work pretty simply -- pick the driver format you're using, it recognizes any interfaces, you select and use them ... what problems would develop? I feel like any interface issues wouldn't be with Ableton, they'd be with your system dealing with the hardware in the first place.
― nabisco, Monday, 8 December 2008 20:39 (sixteen years ago)
Personal breakthrough, 9:30pm, January 19
Redrum is murder backwards.Now checking other Reason modules for similar evil references, will report back.
― scourge of cords (Z S), Tuesday, 20 January 2009 02:35 (sixteen years ago)
"scream"
― Cooking From A Stovetop (electricsound), Tuesday, 20 January 2009 02:37 (sixteen years ago)
No WONDER I haven't had any luck breaking into the bigtime with my awesome music...one of my drum machines is evil!
― scourge of cords (Z S), Tuesday, 20 January 2009 02:38 (sixteen years ago)
All work and no play makes Z S a dull boyAll work and no play makes Z S a dull boyAll work and no play makes Z S a dull boyAll work and no play makes Z S a dull boyAll work and no play makes Z S a dull boyAll work and no play makes Z S a dull boyAll work and no play makes Z S a dull boyAll work and no play makes Z S a dull boyAll work and no play makes Z S a dull boyAll work and no play makes Z S a dull boyAll work and no play makes Z S a dull boyAll work and no play makes Z S a dull boy
― snoball, Tuesday, 20 January 2009 10:50 (sixteen years ago)
I only just noticed the synth is Malstrom and not Maelstrom.
Should I go for Ableton? I am a Reason-head.
― I made you a Justice bass sound, but I EATED it (Masonic Boom), Thursday, 12 March 2009 14:20 (sixteen years ago)
I'm really, really happy with using both -- I prefer the Reason environment for actually programming things, and the Live environment for recording, plug-in effects, automations, etc. I think they work really well together. Most of the things I work on, at this point, are a half-and-half split between tracks routed in from Reason and tracks recorded with Live.
― nabisco, Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:51 (sixteen years ago)
me 2
― cob nobblin' (latebloomer), Thursday, 12 March 2009 23:42 (sixteen years ago)
Well, I'm getting me Ableton posted to me so I can have a go on it and see what I think. I've been warned that I can just say goodbye to my life for the next few months, that it's totally like crack rock.
― I made you a Justice bass sound, but I EATED it (Masonic Boom), Friday, 13 March 2009 00:10 (sixteen years ago)
Oh, wow: Propellerheads is just starting to beta-test a package called RECORD -- full multi-tracking software that can mount in and use any of the modules from Reason. Supposed to be released this fall.
― nabisco, Monday, 11 May 2009 17:59 (sixteen years ago)
^quite interested in this myself
― jump in the looool (electricsound), Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:24 (sixteen years ago)
ooh, record for reason users includes an upgrade to 4 for users of 1.0 thru 3.0
so effectively you get either record or the upgrade for free
sweeet
― surfin on my face (electricsound), Thursday, 10 September 2009 01:35 (sixteen years ago)
for users that purchased Reason between May 11th and September 8th, 2009.
i bought reason 2 several yrs ago, so i'm not eligible? how the hell would someone own v. 1 or 2 without having bought it before may 2009?
― am0n, Thursday, 10 September 2009 15:30 (sixteen years ago)
nar that only applies to the $50 rebate
― surfin on my face (electricsound), Thursday, 10 September 2009 15:37 (sixteen years ago)
Users that purchased a new, full copy of Reason version 4 between May 11th and September 8th are entitled to a $50 USD/€30 EUR rebate on Record for Reason Owners, available in the Propellerhead online store. To obtain the rebate, send us a copy of your receipt through this e-mail form before placing your order.
ok i figured i must have read it wrong
― am0n, Friday, 11 September 2009 14:36 (sixteen years ago)
thats a great deal, i might actually pay for software again. how is record though? looks kinda cubase-y
― am0n, Friday, 11 September 2009 14:44 (sixteen years ago)