So, my band is looking to record their first EP (here in Chicago), but we're unsure of the best way to do it. Invest in a 4/8 track and some mixing software and do it at home? Or take that same money and put it into a few hours of studio time and get sexier results?
Are any of you familiar with Chicagoland recording studios? Or dudes with recording equipment that might help out? Etc.
― gbx (skowly), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 15:05 (nineteen years ago)
― gbx (skowly), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 15:08 (nineteen years ago)
― martin m. (mushrush), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 15:28 (nineteen years ago)
― gbx (skowly), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 16:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 16:22 (nineteen years ago)
Still, I think our energy would be more apparent if we recorded live, and just did as many takes as possible to get a song right.
― gbx (skowly), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 16:33 (nineteen years ago)
It would depend on your situation... If you want to be able to make cheap demos on your own then sure it might be helpful. If you only ever want to record yourself just to go back and listen for cool ideas from improvisation or for mistakes or places you can improve then it might make more sense just to record live to 2 track. If you want to learn more about recording by being the engineer for your own or friends' bands then it would certainly be helpful to own some kind of multitrack recording set up, whether it's an 8 track or a computer with appropriate software.
― martin m. (mushrush), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 16:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 17:08 (nineteen years ago)
― gbx (skowly), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 17:29 (nineteen years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 17:43 (nineteen years ago)