* REEL * TO * REEL *

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I am thinking about acquiring a reel-to-reel multitrack tape recorder, for recording of band demos/albums/etc. I know very little about reel-to-reels, so tell me about them. I want like a smallish one, like a 4-track or 8-track. Questions:
1. Can you recommend any particular brands?
2. Anywhere I should look for used recorders?
3. 4-track vs. 8-track?
4. Is it hard to get access to the tape?
5. Any important issues I should be aware of?

n/a (Nick A.), Monday, 2 October 2006 19:46 (eighteen years ago)

A friend in Mke was using one to record bands for awhile. He loved using it and loved the sound, but apparently there are very few places left that do repairs and it would break down fairly regularly. He had to keep sending it off and waiting a couple weeks to get it back.

Can't remember what he said about buying the tape.

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 2 October 2006 19:57 (eighteen years ago)

Re: 4 vs 8 tracks. The more stuff you record onto it, the lower the signal integrity gets, ie less tracks = fuller/clearer sound. You probably already know this, but I didn't when I tried to use one (DISASTROUS).

a naked Kraken annoying Times Square tourists with an acoustic guitar (nickalici, Monday, 2 October 2006 20:28 (eighteen years ago)

1. Depends on your price factor.
2. I've found all of mine on Ebay, but shipping is a BITCH. Also, music stores and pawn shops.
3. 4 track if you're doing 1/4" tape, 8 track only if it's a 1/2".
4. Getting harder all the time, unfortunately.
5. Tape speed (IPS) is crucial information. You probably want to look for something that's selectable to 15 1/2. Anything faster than that isn't really needed, and just eats up more tape. Condition of the heads (corrosion, tape hours, etc.) also very important.

John Justen, the tap-dancing spirochete in your zesty chicken fingers. (johnjust, Monday, 2 October 2006 22:05 (eighteen years ago)

Useful, thanks. What are the usual sources for tape these days?

n/a (Nick A.), Monday, 2 October 2006 23:06 (eighteen years ago)

Could this be a good deal?

http://chicago.craigslist.org/wcl/msg/214576719.html

n/a (Nick A.), Monday, 2 October 2006 23:09 (eighteen years ago)

This is what some dude on homerecording.com says:

"The model A-6010 is a 4-track stereo, 3 motor deck, direct drive reel-tables and belt-driven capstan. Can take up to 7-inch reels. Automatic shut-off, tape tension switch for normal or thin tape (1 or 1,1/2 mil). Auto-reverse function, 4 heads, solenoid operated pushbuttons for the transport controls, Tape/Monitor switch. wood cabinet. Speed: 3-3/4 and 7-1/2."

So it sounds like it doesn't have the tape speed capabilities you mentioned.

n/a (Nick A.), Monday, 2 October 2006 23:11 (eighteen years ago)

OTARI have a good name in reel to reels

electric sound of jim [and why not] (electricsound), Monday, 2 October 2006 23:22 (eighteen years ago)

couple things:

old reel to reels for home stereo use are often labeled as 4-track recorders, these are NOT the same as multitrack/overdub capable 4 tracks and should be more or less ignored for recording purposes.

maintanence is definitely an issue. things can be repaired but you will definitely be sending things away for fixes- this is an advantage over 16/24 trk decks that must be field-serviced at very high prices. spare parts could potentially be a problem.

the otari mx5050 8 track is an extremely solid 1/2" deck that comes up for sale fairly often. but you should check out the tascam 388, it's like a giant portastudio with built in mixer feeding a 1/4" 8 track deck. conventional wisdom and john above both suggest that 1/4" is too narrow for 8 tracks but the 388 is a pretty rockin machine, they have a very loyal cult following (on the tape op board, nowadays, for the most part).

awesome little blues monkey (awesome little blues monkey), Tuesday, 3 October 2006 01:52 (eighteen years ago)

oh, if you find them, the tascam 8 tracks that end in 8 (38, 48 etc) are pretty nice. the TSR-8 is their most high tech 8 track reel, and the last one they made (i'm pretty sure). the 16 track from that era (MS16) is hella nice. all this stuff is available now for PENNIES ON THE DOLLAR of what it used to cost. there are certainly cons to working with tape, but all in all you get a sound that is not attainable with digital (i'll leave the judgements about better/best to the individual).

just be sure to avoid the fostex stuff, in general. the R-8 is passable, but the A stuff is total shit.

awesome little blues monkey (awesome little blues monkey), Tuesday, 3 October 2006 01:57 (eighteen years ago)

Aliasing=non-issue.
That's my say on analog VS digital.
Thus, I support DVD-Audio. No aliasing in the audible spectrum(of note) and harmonics remain intact in the entire musical range.

The GZeus (The GZeus), Tuesday, 3 October 2006 06:19 (eighteen years ago)

Are you actually using it as a 4/8 track, or are you using it for mastering/analog warm-up?

John Justen, the tap-dancing spirochete in your zesty chicken fingers. (johnjust, Tuesday, 3 October 2006 21:28 (eighteen years ago)

Who me? It would be the primary recording tool, hopefully. This is kind of a pipe-dream plan at this point, but we do have a good chunk of change in our band fund that's currently not being used for anything, so maybe if I can convince my bandmates it's a good idea and find a decent deal, it could happen.

n/a (Nick A.), Tuesday, 3 October 2006 21:33 (eighteen years ago)

do it, nick! do it!

p.s. fong is thinking on similar terms i think.

Mark Danjer (Danjer), Thursday, 5 October 2006 21:34 (eighteen years ago)

Even as the psychoanalog guy that I am, I should probably mention that editing on a reel to reel is a pain in the ass...but a worthwhile pain in the ass.

John Justen, the tap-dancing spirochete in your zesty chicken fingers. (johnjust, Thursday, 5 October 2006 21:52 (eighteen years ago)

BELLAGIO. DO IT.

gbx (skowly), Friday, 6 October 2006 00:22 (eighteen years ago)

eleven months pass...

I am back on this kick.

n/a, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:57 (eighteen years ago)

I wish I knew more about this stuff.

n/a, Monday, 17 September 2007 13:11 (eighteen years ago)

We're using two otari MX-5050's, a MCI JH-110, and Some Ampex A-77's and B-77's. I'm really impressed w/the 5050's for the price (JH-110's are even cooler but hyperexpensive.)

I will, however, reiterate that editing and track stacking is a bitch.

If you have any specific questions on machines, I'm glad to help to the extent of my ability.

Another thing to mention is that you want to make sure that the machine you buy will handle 10 inch reels if possible. Also, before you buy tape, make sure you understand the whole interaction between mils/length/sound quality. I'll post a link when I'm not at work doing about 5 things when I'm only smart enough for 3. Maybe one.

John Justen, Monday, 17 September 2007 21:28 (eighteen years ago)

Thanks John. I need to talk to the band and figure out whether we are using band money for this or whether I am alone in my obsession and thus am spending my own money. Then do research based on that budget, I guess.

n/a, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 12:24 (eighteen years ago)

....i think benny is getting a portastudio, but it's just plain old tape, not reel to reel

river wolf, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 15:49 (eighteen years ago)

three months pass...

on an impulse, i just bought a fostex a-4 four-track reel-to-reel for $30. don't know if it works, but it looks clean and powers up.

so where do i buy 1/4-inch tape? looks like this four-track only takes 7-inch reels.

n/a, Monday, 31 December 2007 21:50 (seventeen years ago)

Which Fostex model is it? All the ones I recall could take 10-inch reels, but you might need to track down some NAB adapters to do it.

John Justen, Monday, 31 December 2007 23:09 (seventeen years ago)

oh wait duh you already said it was an A-4. Will do research, report back.

John Justen, Monday, 31 December 2007 23:09 (seventeen years ago)

BTW, o_O to this http://www.quantegy.com/

John Justen, Monday, 31 December 2007 23:12 (seventeen years ago)

you're right about the 7" only. BTW, before you go buy a photocopy of the manual from some scumbag on Ebay, here it is for free: http://www.fostexusa.com/support/pdf/fostex/a4/a4_owners_manual.pdf

John Justen, Monday, 31 December 2007 23:16 (seventeen years ago)

dude ... thanks! i was just wondering how people get away with charging money for old manuals, seems like someone would just set up a free download site for these things like everything else on the internet

n/a, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 01:43 (seventeen years ago)

I still have a Fostex 8-track reel to reel (1/4" tape) that still works pretty well. Sound quality wasn't too bad. Kinda muffled sound and it's easy to forget that there's only like 16 minutes per reel.

brownie, Wednesday, 2 January 2008 21:11 (seventeen years ago)

BTW, o_O to this http://www.quantegy.com/

-- John Justen, Monday, 31 December 2007 23:12 (2 weeks ago) Link

I was panicking for a moment there too, but do you know these guys:

http://www.rmgi-usa.com/rmg_studio.html

Bought the Munich BASF / EMTEC plant and re-located it, along with three of the engineers. Meant to be v/ good quality.

S-, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 03:21 (seventeen years ago)

i still don't know if mine works! i bought a couple of used reels on ebay then realized i didn't have a take reel so then i had to order that too. once it comes i'll finally be able to test it

n/a, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 03:32 (seventeen years ago)

finally got the take reel today and ... it doesn't work. if i hit play, nothing happens, but then if push up the one of the doohickeys to the right of the tape heads, the left reel starts turning, but the right reel doesn't turn, so the tape just kind of spews out. rewind doesn't work. so i guess some kind of mechanical issue regarding the right reel. going to find someone to take a look at it and see how much it would be to fix up.

n/a, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 22:05 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.dickdestiny.com/nomorepeas.jpg

Please Daddy, no more broken equipment that you put in my room!

Gorge, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 22:53 (seventeen years ago)

n/a, are you sure that you are threading the tape path right? I think that the doohickey you're pushing on is actually one of the tape tensioning arms.

John Justen, Thursday, 31 January 2008 18:29 (seventeen years ago)

in fact, i am almost certain that that is the problem, so check the manual upthread for tape path diagrams. the thing you are describing is exactly what would happen if you were on the wrong side of the tensioning arm.

John Justen, Thursday, 31 January 2008 18:31 (seventeen years ago)

yeah i followed the tape path diagram in the instructions

n/a, Thursday, 31 January 2008 19:18 (seventeen years ago)

huh.

so the tape is pressed against the thing you are pushing on to actuate the motor, but it isn't moving it to the extent that your finger does?

John Justen, Friday, 1 February 2008 00:24 (seventeen years ago)

one year passes...

^^^ after all this b.s. i procrastinated for a while and then took the reel-to-reel to a place here in chicago to get it repaired. that took a while and a decent chunk of $$$ but it appears to be working now. something i hadn't thought about is that i don't own a mixer to interface with the reel-to-reel, but i've figured out a way to use my tascam 8-track as a mixer at least for now. i know this isn't ideal but i think we're going to do a test run and record some new songs on the reel-to-reel this weekend just for fun and see what happens

congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 17 March 2009 19:10 (sixteen years ago)

also the tape i bought used off craigslist is kind of shitty, unfortunately, but should work for our test at least

congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 17 March 2009 19:14 (sixteen years ago)

congratulations, congratulations!

if the robot is quicker, I'll allow it to service me. (jjjusten), Tuesday, 17 March 2009 19:21 (sixteen years ago)

ah fuck that joke doesnt work at all once typed. anyway, sweet, look forward to hearing about the results.

if the robot is quicker, I'll allow it to service me. (jjjusten), Tuesday, 17 March 2009 19:21 (sixteen years ago)

this didn't really work very well on first attempt. there were some technical issues unrelated to the reel-to-reel at first, which made me frustrated. then once everything was finally set up with the cassette 8-track used as a mixer for the reel-to-reel, we did some test recordings on the 8-track and the reel-to-reel at the same time. when we listened back, the stuff on the reel-to-reel sounded muddier and less crisp than the 8-track recording. this could be due to lots of things: the age of the tape i'm using in the reel-to-reel, the general fucked-upedness of our setup, the fact that i don't really know what i'm doing, and/or me being flustered and frustrated at me trying to make things work with my bandmates waiting around and being bored. think i need to a) get a real mixer and b) spend some more time experimenting at home before i try this again in a band scenario

i've been looking at mixers online but it seems like no one makes mixers with 4 RCA tape ins and 4 RCA tape outs anymore, just two of each. running the reel-to-reel into a mixer shouldn't be a problem because i can just run the outputs of the reel-to-reel into individual mixer tracks, but i don't understand how i could record on all 4 tracks of the reel to reel at the same time without having 4 RCA tape outs on the mixer. am i going to have to shop for a vintage mixer?

congratulations (n/a), Monday, 23 March 2009 15:20 (sixteen years ago)

can't you just buy RCA>1/4" adaptors?

bela fregosi (brownie), Monday, 23 March 2009 15:35 (sixteen years ago)

I have an 8-track reel to reel which uses cassette width tape and I found the same problem in regards to the sound being muddier etc.

bela fregosi (brownie), Monday, 23 March 2009 15:38 (sixteen years ago)

that would work for the tape into the mixer, but i don't see how it could turn two tape outs into four inputs for the reel to reel?

congratulations (n/a), Monday, 23 March 2009 15:40 (sixteen years ago)

i guess unless the outs were stereo, but i don't think a single rca jack can be stereo

congratulations (n/a), Monday, 23 March 2009 15:40 (sixteen years ago)

I thik they can be stereo! otherwise headphone jacks would be mono

bela fregosi (brownie), Monday, 23 March 2009 15:50 (sixteen years ago)

oh you meant the outs

bela fregosi (brownie), Monday, 23 March 2009 15:50 (sixteen years ago)

headphone jacks are not rca

Jarlrmai, Tuesday, 24 March 2009 16:07 (sixteen years ago)

hey dude, what you might want to look for is either a mixer with 4 subs that are independently usable, or 4 aux sends (pre, not post).

on the muddiness side of things, a few questions - did you clean the tape heads before recording? also, if you were using used tape, did you erase it first or just record over whatever was on there?

actually there are kind of a billion questions here that could be part of this, but maybe start with those.

I will "Build This City" on your GODDAMN GRAVE (jjjusten), Tuesday, 24 March 2009 16:14 (sixteen years ago)

yeah i have no idea what i'm doing

the recorder was worked over pretty extensively by the dude who repaired it so i'm hoping (though not sure) he cleaned shit up too while he was in there

congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 24 March 2009 16:17 (sixteen years ago)

maybe call him up and ask if he checked the condition of the heads? i assume that he would have told you if he saw any problems or corrosion, but it never hurts to be sure about this stuff.

if he didnt clean the heads, there is a cheap and easy way to get the stuff to do it (and besides, head cleaning is one of those things that you really can't do too often, so you are going to need to have this stuff around anyway). go to (insert name of humungo pharmacy here, but the one i know for sure can get it is ugh walmart) and ask to get isopropyl alcohol, but be sure to let them know that you need the anhydrous kind (should be not less than 99% pure alcohol). you should be able to buy a lifetime supply (approx 16 fl oz) for not much. this is the same shit functionally as the megadollar tape cleaning kits that you see (note - only for use on the metal surfaces of the heads, don't go rubbing it on the rollers or anything). get a box of q-tips and go to town. just make sure that you give the surface time for full evaporation before you run tape on it (this should be close to instantaneous, but for cautions sake give it a minute).

I will "Build This City" on your GODDAMN GRAVE (jjjusten), Tuesday, 24 March 2009 16:27 (sixteen years ago)

six months pass...

finally figured out i could use my little yamaha USB mixer to run my nice mic into my reel-to-reel for home recording purposes. this is a little test, obviously a one-take performance, but i think it sounds pretty decent for mic direct into usb mixer out to reel to reel, then recorded back into garageband with no extra effects. i think i need to find better tape, you can hear the tape crap out for a couple of seconds in the middle of this test, and i could spend more time on mic placement and getting levels, but i think i could write some depressing folk songs and have fun with this thing.

http://scarequotes.net/reeltest.mp3

congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 6 October 2009 21:08 (fifteen years ago)

I always wanted to get a Reel to Reel but never got one. I did however go back to the future and picked up a Portastudio 488 a few weeks back. Always wanted one of those and found one pretty cheap. I did my first recordings on there and lined up the input and recorded and was surprised how low the recording level was on the tape. I forgot how hard you can really hit the tape with level. It's kind of nice to not having to really worry about clipping, unless you are getting totally insane on the input.

earlnash, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 01:29 (fifteen years ago)

ha the 488 has been my primary recording tool for the past 8-9 years. mine is on its last legs unfortunately.

congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 10:57 (fifteen years ago)

two years pass...

reel to reel appears to have crapped out in the middle of me using it. had it recording some stuff off the computer, walked away to talk to my wife, came back and it was stopped. now it won't record or play - the heads engage but the tape doesn't move - fast-forward and rewind still work. guessing maybe there's a separate motor for record and play and it died? have to decide if i'm going to pay $$$ to get it fixed again or transition to something else for analog recording, maybe just a basic cassette 4-track

congratulations (n/a), Monday, 2 July 2012 19:54 (thirteen years ago)

Try moving the tension arm(s), sometimes those can get a little glitchy and will stop the play/record

O_o-O_O-o_O (jjjusten), Monday, 2 July 2012 20:44 (thirteen years ago)

what have you got n/a?

you know if you're just using a reel to reel for tape compression you can use it as a send effect (as long as you've got a spare stereo in/out on your DAW) that way there's no bouncing involved. that's a nice way of doing things.

anyone looking for a cheap r2r setup i highly recommend the tascam 388

we've got an otari mtr90 2" r2r just sitting here because the twats that took it out of some studio in portugal decided to cut straight through the giant cable that connects the machine to the remote control. so we're going to have to get a decent cable made up which is going to cost a grand or two :'(

http://www.killedby9vbatteries.com/style/Otari%20MTR90%20MKII%203.3.jpg

Crackle Box, Tuesday, 3 July 2012 09:33 (thirteen years ago)

still the fostex a-4 i was talking about above. was never fully fixed, as one of the tracks doesn't work, so it's a 3-track instead of a 4-track

congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 14:54 (thirteen years ago)

one year passes...

plugged this in the other day bc i was thinking about trying to sell it, and oddly, it was working fine. i started using it again and it worked for about 24 hours before suddenly exhibiting the same problems again. so i'm putting it up on craigslist. RIP.

congratulations (n/a), Saturday, 3 August 2013 23:15 (twelve years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1tAYmMjLdY

markers, Saturday, 3 August 2013 23:17 (twelve years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.