thread to get over a breakup

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (4041 of them)

i did a two year recovery once. There's eventual light at the end of that tunnel; some of it may be more about personal growth than that person. In any case, it was for me.

loads of personality, loved to chase chickens (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 13:15 (thirteen years ago)

That seems like kind of a bad deal for the new steady girlfriend, in this case (or boyfriend, if it were flipped), but I guess it worked out for Mac and Mrs Mac, so...

WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:03 (thirteen years ago)

Date again wouldn't NEC be my advice, mostly because I haven't lived that path so I can't wholeheartedly advise it. But if fear/reluctance w/r/t dating is presenting some kind of barrier to meeting someone else, then by all means, just go out and do it.

Totally comf recommending personal growth, otoh. You should probably get your own house in order before using someone else as a...I was going to say "crutch" but that's ungracious. Remedy?

WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:08 (thirteen years ago)

woaah, easy on the mrs talk

I think as long as you're not 'fleeing' into another relationship- and i acknowledge this can be a thing- then it's ok not to be completely over a serious ex- again, for a given ymmv value on 'over' or, indeed, 'serious' or 'ex'

generation lmbo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:09 (thirteen years ago)

Oh god, sorry! Thought Ms in my head, fingers were faster.

WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:11 (thirteen years ago)

let your fingers do the walking... down the aisle?

generation lmbo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:14 (thirteen years ago)

Eh I read somewhere in some novel, a woman recommending that her daughter never stay with the first guy she dated after a breakup, because that first guy was like the greasy pancake that soaks up the grease from the grill so the other ones can come out right.

This is obv gross and over-labored as a metaphor but I think the whole concept is shitty to people.

WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:14 (thirteen years ago)

Using someone else as a crotch, surely Laurel?

I wouldn't recommend seeking out another relationship either, to be honest. It is perfectly possible to go into a good long-term relationship that began while you were still not quite over an ex, but that's different to advice saying 'get yrself a girlfriend, stat! It'll make everything better'.

emil.y, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:15 (thirteen years ago)

posted this itt already, but my ex got married this year and the pic caught me by surprise (fuckin local papers) and i def had a weird day or two, but... that's ok imo. texted her congrats, anonymously abused him on twitter, so over it baby.

generation lmbo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:16 (thirteen years ago)

i am grateful to another relationship for not allowing me to flee into it. god knows i've tried.

Upt0eleven, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:18 (thirteen years ago)

emil.y- agreed, totally- just saying that 'new relationship != cure', but also that 'not quite 100% tiggerish about it != don't consider dating'

generation lmbo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:19 (thirteen years ago)

Totally see where laurel is coming from, and would have otm'd that advice in the past, but: my husband was kinda emotionally wrecked from his last relationship when we met, as well as having some other stuff to deal with; sage advice would have been to work on himself before getting involved with me, but in reality it was meeting me that helped mend him in a lot of ways (lol braggin).

if we all waited till we were emotionally healthy before dating someone we would be single a really long time! You just need to meet the person who will support you and understand you and be willing to love you unconditionally.

just1n3, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:21 (thirteen years ago)

lol that is crazy braggin

generation lmbo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:25 (thirteen years ago)

'Unconditional love' is such balls, though, sorry. There are always conditions. I mean, what if I killed your family? What if my brain got transplanted into the body of a dog?

emil.y, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:28 (thirteen years ago)

but that's different to advice saying 'get yrself a girlfriend, stat! It'll make everything better'.

Didn't think I was saying this, exactly. But having someone to go through personal growth with can be better than woodshedding it sometimes. Also learning about and developing different styles and habits and behaviors to a relationship helped me put my old deal in perspective, even though I wasn't 100% into the new relationship.

I don't really feel like I was being unfair to the new woman either. I mean, we did care about each other and have good times together and all. I wasn't all like, "yo bitch, fuck me til I get over my shit. cool, I'm done. peace."

rustic italian flatbread, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:30 (thirteen years ago)

^posts you instantly regret making.

rustic italian flatbread, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:31 (thirteen years ago)

strange, that worked brilliantly for me, what a woild!

generation lmbo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:32 (thirteen years ago)

Also learning about and developing different styles and habits and behaviors to a relationship helped me put my old deal in perspective

Right, this part makes sense to me! How else are you supposed to learn HOW to be in a relationship but to be in one? Totally fair, imo.

Guess I just mistrust resting your personal work on the condition of having someone to do it "with." Or "for." Or someone to support you while you do it, or whatever.

WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:43 (thirteen years ago)

Gee, emily, I guess I should have added ” unconditional based the terms of our agreed reality” or something

just1n3, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:01 (thirteen years ago)

Yeah, that's fair. I mean, that certainly isn't how my 24-year-old self was working things out in his head. It was less about consciously putting in personal work than thinking optimistically about an individual - over the chorus of emotional keening that was still going on in my head over my previous girlfriend - and investing some faith in them and partnering up. I wasn't really into self-analysis or conscious personal improvement at the time.

rustic italian flatbread, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:07 (thirteen years ago)

xp"

rustic italian flatbread, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:07 (thirteen years ago)

I admit my examples were extreme, but everyone has a limit. It might be 'maintain a healthy sex life', 'move halfway across the world so I can live my dream of running an emu farm', 'not cheat', 'not change your political views', 'not find/lose religious beliefs', 'stay looking like the 20-year old version of you', 'not change your mind (for/against) about having children', 'not start a blood feud with my siblings', 'not become a drug addict'... I could go on. Obviously not everyone will react to such things in the same way, but everyone has their own limit.

emil.y, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:34 (thirteen years ago)

I'm gettin' pretty chary about the "unconditional love" part in my old age, tbh. For years I've felt like I could handle the "other stuff" if someone that *I* found unconditionally loveable would just make me the A++ #1 most important thing in his life and love me forever. It would give me...the newfound self-esteem? promise of safety? lift the threat of loneliness? who knows...that I thought I needed to be a functional "normal" person.

I don't think that anymore. Also have watched a TON of my friends decide that their long-term relationships or marriages weren't going to work anymore.

WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:15 (thirteen years ago)

Or, I should say, not work well enough for them to not resent the limitations the other person was putting on them.

WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:16 (thirteen years ago)

Unconditional to me obv doesn't mean "I will cover for your murder."

To back up Justine, to me it means when money is tight, when your health is at it's worst, when you are crabby & haven't slept, when you crash the car, when you've got horrible gastro & are going at both ends, that I will still be there beside you, that things would have to get pretty fucking hard to throw in the towel. It's not a guarantee. We don't shake on it. It's something I want to do, am compelled to do because I receive the same in return.

Whether you sign on for that depends on the relationship, or you, I guess. But as a concept it doesn't seem that ridiculous.

Janet Snakehole (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:35 (thirteen years ago)

I don't think I could keep going with a car-crasher.

rustic italian flatbread, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:42 (thirteen years ago)

when money is tight, when your health is at it's worst, when you are crabby & haven't slept, when you crash the car, when you've got horrible gastro & are going at both ends, that I will still be there beside you

That's just being part of a partnership. Obviously some people might leave, others wouldn't, but those things are fairly basic.

things would have to get pretty fucking hard to throw in the towel.

Then it's not unconditional and you're using the word wrong.

If you think about 'unconditional love' as it was originally used, as in parental/familial unconditional love, then you will see that it was meant to mean that, while they might not cover for your murder, they would still love you if you were a murderer. Of course, familial unconditional love is balls, too, but the social expectations and ties of life together are usually much more of a bind to make you pretend that it's not balls.

emil.y, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:44 (thirteen years ago)

Crashing the car is "fairly basic"?

rustic italian flatbread, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:46 (thirteen years ago)

Um, yes? I mean, I'm assuming here that it was an accident. Obviously if you were hepped up on goofballs and driving at 100mph it goes beyond basic.

emil.y, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:47 (thirteen years ago)

If someone crashes into you, that's an accident. If you crash into someone/something else, I would want nothing to do with you as a life-partner. That's my condition.

rustic italian flatbread, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:49 (thirteen years ago)

: D

rustic italian flatbread, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:49 (thirteen years ago)

getting hung up on a type of unconditional love that i don't think anyone is arguing for here

generation lmbo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:54 (thirteen years ago)

Ehh not everyone might be into the idea of giving unconditional love, but that doesn't mean it's balls.

just1n3, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:55 (thirteen years ago)

Lol, mister flatbread. Lol indeed. Well, I don't drive, so I'd be fine, anyway.

just1n3, if you really think that you can give unconditional love in a way that is rigorous philosophically and doesn't render the term redundant, then go for it. It seems to me that those who have argued for unconditional love existing in this thread have definitions of unconditional love that I would just call a definition of love, full stop, and certainly don't have anything to do with the term 'unconditional'.

emil.y, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 17:04 (thirteen years ago)

If send our children away in one another's cars they are not to come home in a neck brace. That is the bedrock of my relationship with my wife.

rustic italian flatbread, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 17:17 (thirteen years ago)

What if my brain got transplanted into the body of a dog?

would pet

mookieproof, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 17:21 (thirteen years ago)

would abuse advantage at sheep trials

generation lmbo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 17:23 (thirteen years ago)

'Unconditional love' is such balls, though, sorry. There are always conditions. I mean, what if I killed your family? What if my brain got transplanted into the body of a dog?

i loled and totally agree with you -- what we're talking about is "love" not "unconditional love"

Art Arfons (La Lechera), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 17:27 (thirteen years ago)

forgot about this thread, and it's been helpful to read through parts of it.

i guess it's been about a month or so since our breakup, and i just moved out last thursday. the hardest part for me has been realizing that i have no idea how to meet girls at all. last time i was dating lots of girls, i was 20 and i was having parties at my house every other night, and going to other people's parties when i wasn't having my own. now, only 8 years later, i have a job and i'm lame and i rarely go to parties...there's a halloween one this saturday i'm going to and i'm actually fucking NERVOUS! like, wtf happened to me? anyway, the thing where you go to a bar and meet someone just doesn't work well with me, and same with other chance encounters. i tend to be a little awkward when i first meet someone, so i need to bump into people multiple times over a short period of time and let them get to know me in different settings before things ever click. at least, that's the way it used to be?

god man, someone come here and toss cold water on my face and just slap the shit out of me, i am fucking lame

whooooaaaaa! (Z S), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 17:34 (thirteen years ago)

there's also the fact that i'm a sickly skinny dude and that means that 90% of girls reject me on sight. i really lucked out with my ex, she was "into" skinny guys, which was like the most lucky event of my life

whooooaaaaa! (Z S), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 17:36 (thirteen years ago)

i have no idea how to meet girls at all

overnight civil disobedience iirc

mookieproof, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 17:38 (thirteen years ago)

ha, that kind of didn't pan out. we're actually friends now, which is cool (i helped her work on a tar sands presentation that she gave last night in Alexandra, actually), but i quickly realized that the conversation was never going to expand beyond environmental issues and activism. i love to talk about that, but i also love to talk about many, many other things. and in our time together we've spent about 99.5% of the time talking about enviro stuff (other 0.5% was like "where is the bathroom?")

whooooaaaaa! (Z S), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 17:40 (thirteen years ago)

iirc zs is among the dreamiest of ilxors based on wdyll feedback

If you have friends then you'll meet ppl, don't sweat it. You'll be doing well to avoid blind dates tbh.

Also, go through yr phonebook. Worthwhile exercise ime

generation lmbo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 17:49 (thirteen years ago)

haha, i've already sent a few embarrassing late-night facebook messages to people i haven't talked to in half a decade.

whooooaaaaa! (Z S), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 17:53 (thirteen years ago)

corny admission, i combed my phonebook because my self-appointed wingman/guru forced me to and came up with one name.

generation lmbo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 17:56 (thirteen years ago)

ZS is totally cute, and so is crüt. But I still don't think the 'get a new relationship/get laid to validate yourself' advice is the best. I dunno, I mean, I get 'putting yourself out there' to a certain extent, but maybe I just don't get it because the world of American dating is so alien to me?

emil.y, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 17:57 (thirteen years ago)

'get a new relationship/get laid to validate yourself'

Feel like this is again a misreading.

rustic italian flatbread, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 17:59 (thirteen years ago)

imo never have a wingman. otoh there's a paradox here as that belief stems from my deep seated "all advice is awful/no one understands anything" conviction, so i'm not sure i can recommend this info to you.

ogmor, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 18:01 (thirteen years ago)

yeah ppl have already clarified they weren't saying that i think

generation lmbo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 18:01 (thirteen years ago)

Well, what are you saying? It was discussed in the context of advice, so are you denying that one of the pieces of advice to get over a breakup was to go out and meet someone else? If you do deny it, then what context does it have? If you agree that it was advice, then what is to be gained by it? Most of the thoughts have been some variant on self-validation, self-respect, feeling good about oneself again.

emil.y, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 18:04 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.