Billy Wilder's Ace in the Hole

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Anyone know how on earth to get a copy of this movie?

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Monday, 19 May 2003 14:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Or even Foreign Affair and Love in the Afternoon

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Monday, 19 May 2003 14:05 (twenty-two years ago)

I've always wanted to see Ace in the Hole. But take my advice and stay away from Love in the Afternoon.

slutsky (slutsky), Monday, 19 May 2003 15:40 (twenty-two years ago)

I've got a VHS copy of Love in the Afternoon, wasn't aware that was out of print. I think it's one of Wilder's best: it's certainly better than the interminable Seven Year Itch, for crying out loud.

Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Monday, 19 May 2003 23:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Yech, Seven Year Itch. Tom Ewell yech in particular.

slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 02:16 (twenty-two years ago)

four years pass...

Boy, Ace in the Hole's unavailability has inflated its reputation. Really stupid in a rancid way, as if he wanted the audience to applaud his "nasty" premise and rub its nose in it too. Kirk Douglas' loud, unmodulated performance doesn't help.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 9 September 2007 01:05 (eighteen years ago)

And, as usual, he doesn't have the courage to accept the consequences of his rancidness -- the last 30 minutes are just awful.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 9 September 2007 01:07 (eighteen years ago)

i love billy wilder, but i really didn't enjoy this movie.

poortheatre, Sunday, 9 September 2007 07:38 (eighteen years ago)

same here

abanana, Sunday, 9 September 2007 19:07 (eighteen years ago)

yes, I think it's overrated, but youse are all nuts.

Dr Morbius, Monday, 10 September 2007 14:54 (eighteen years ago)

(did Wilder ever say if Douglas growing a conscience was self-censorship or studio-imposed? after all, evil had to be punished under the Code)

Dr Morbius, Monday, 10 September 2007 14:55 (eighteen years ago)

I thought it was klunky and preachy, and was frustrated at first by the slow pacing, but once the crowds showed up and the film's narrative curve became clear I thought it was pretty brilliant -- the film stays sleepy and slow for the first half while you adjust to just how modest the story is, and when people slowly (and then rapidly) begin showing up in response to the newspaper coverage of the story, when the crowd starts really growing out of control at the end it's actually scary. it's weird to see a film save all of it's production value & big shots for the last fourth of the running time -- the hyperbolic pacing illustrated the problem perfectly.

and deployment of pointless human interest stories has only gotten more out of control, so I definitely have interest and time for a movie dissecting the mechanics of such situations circa 1951, two decades before the term "Media Circus" became a pejorative this film visualized the metaphor literally, maybe that's why you're groaning but I liked it

not as canny as 'a face in the crowd' or anything & not his best film, but absolutely still worth seeing

Milton Parker, Monday, 10 September 2007 20:32 (eighteen years ago)

I will admit that it's got the most eloquent shot of Wilder's career: that great slow dolly of the open train disgorging all these scurrying curiosity seekrs.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 02:59 (eighteen years ago)

Alfred, what do you think of Kiss Me, Stupid?

James Redd and the Blecchs, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 13:11 (eighteen years ago)

Also, AitH has the best imaginable use of the Hut Sut Song.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 13:23 (eighteen years ago)

Alfred, what do you think of Kiss Me, Stupid?

Pretty gross. I didn't finish watching it, actually. The post-Apartment films are very problematic, although Morbs has recommended the Sherlock Holmes thing many times.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 16:35 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.