I suppose you could store a low-res editing copy on your local drive and then just have FCP go back to the external drive to make the final print.
Is this accurate? Does anything have any suggestions?
For reference, I'm using the Apple iMac Desktop with 17" M9168LL/A (1.25-GHz PowerPC G4, 256 MB RAM, 80 GB Hard Drive, DVD-RW/CD-RW Drive).
Thanks.
― Dean Gulberry, Monday, 13 October 2003 19:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dean Gulberry, Monday, 13 October 2003 20:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 13 October 2003 22:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Monday, 13 October 2003 22:17 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm just cautious because I don't want to try rendering 80 minutes of high res and have it die out on me.
― Dean Gulberry, Tuesday, 14 October 2003 18:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 14 October 2003 19:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dean Gulberry, Tuesday, 14 October 2003 19:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 14 October 2003 19:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― adaml (adaml), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 20:35 (twenty-two years ago)
I would assume it had to do mostly with the ability to capture and edit audio and (mainly) high-quality video on a personal computer. Until that point, I can't really see any reason for a home user to need so much space. Also, it is unfortunate but 200 GB can often be barely enough space for someone who like to have enough coverage on shoots / more than project going at once.
>>>7200 RPMs is good, and if you're using one of those standards I mentioned above (FW400, FW800, USB2), you'll be okay.
Is the difference between FW400 and FW800 just the cable used? Are all firewire capable devices able to deliver that speed?
― Dean Gulbery, Tuesday, 14 October 2003 21:20 (twenty-two years ago)
There are drives out now that actually have all three transfer standards on one HD, and they usually cost a little bit more, but it's purely a consideration of being able to. I'd say if you don't have the ability to go FW800 to your computer, don't worry about it, because probably by the time you get FW800, you'll need/want a new HD anyway. And I'm assuming FW400 is going to be pretty standard on most new machines for quite some time. USB2, of course, has the advantage of being even more ubiquitous than FW400.
― Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 15 October 2003 01:33 (twenty-two years ago)
Anyways, thanks to all.
― Dean Gulberry (deangulberry), Thursday, 16 October 2003 19:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Friday, 17 October 2003 05:11 (twenty-two years ago)