Waking Life

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Philisophical epic or cinematic masturbation?

Anthony (Anthony F), Wednesday, 19 November 2003 22:27 (twenty-two years ago)

I was going to start a thread about this!

Awful. One of the worst films I've ever seen. Someone else said that "Requiem For A Dream" is the film of choice for those who don't know anything about film- I'd put this in that category, too.

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 19 November 2003 22:31 (twenty-two years ago)

hold on there. Requiem for a Dream is in a whole other class of badness from Waking Life. I HATE that movie and fuck Pi

personally i liked Waking Life a lot--and i even found the animation to be stupid and ugly too.

can i immediately disqualify and future comments to effect of "this was like first year undergrads talking about philosophy."

ryan (ryan), Wednesday, 19 November 2003 23:25 (twenty-two years ago)

can i immediately disqualify and future comments to effect of "this was like first year undergrads talking about philosophy."

I never did philosophy, so it would be somewhat foolish of me to put it down for those reasons, but I took classes in dull and vomit-inducing at the university of life and I know what's what...

;P

C'mon, at least Requiem was watchable...

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 19 November 2003 23:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Really though, what does put this above the discussion of a few philosophy undergrads, besides the kerazy visuals?

Isn't it just a stoner movie for snobs?

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 19 November 2003 23:36 (twenty-two years ago)

honestly, maybe i dont know. i DID think some of the discussions were actually very interesting (the one with Linklater himself and the one with the UT existentialism professor, for instance)--but yeah some were really obnoxious, kind of a "maybe this is a dream, maybe this is a dream of a dream!" type of regress into incoherence as shorthand for profundity. and since everyone talks in that mumbly slacker lilt it just makes it that much worse.

there is a notion in the film, that of meaning-making as game, of life as slow drift through consciousness, that i like, and that I find especially pertinent to explore on film. as such i dont find the film particulary profound (it really couldn't be, since it doesnt advance a position itself), but i do think it's fun to see once or twice.

it's not that life as a dream isn't philosophically profound (at least i think it can be) it's that the film doesnt really follow up the consequences of such a thought - it just wanders off into conversation after conversation, possibility after possibility (and if i didnt think linklater was a hippy it could almost be a satire of sorts).

ryan (ryan), Thursday, 20 November 2003 00:17 (twenty-two years ago)

The first time I saw it, the whole thing was fresh and exciting, and I enjoyed the hell out of it. Seeing it again recently, this time without all the "oohs" and "ahhs" over the animation (which I love, I must admit), I was surprised to discover how completely pointless this movie is. I could barely get through it. I admire it as an experiment, but whenever something new comes along, people tend to go crazy over it for that reason alone. As soon as we see some other, better films that utilize this interesting style of animation, I think Waking Life will wind up a forgotten relic.

Anthony (Anthony F), Thursday, 20 November 2003 00:49 (twenty-two years ago)

It's all about Caveh Zahedi, man!

Oh, and when I saw this for the first time in a theater my co-worker's girlfriend found out that her completely unnotable everyday-average-guy uncle is one of the speakers. Well, at first she just thought that the animation sorta looked like him, but then we watched the credits and it was him. Pretty weird, eh?

Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 20 November 2003 00:59 (twenty-two years ago)

that is weird!

i like stoner movies! and i pretty much like waking life, but the animation left something to be desired--specifically the fucking little literal representations of whatever people were talking about that kept popping up! terrible!

but i thought it was one of those rare movies that got better towards the end, where it started to get more nightmarish

s1utsky (slutsky), Thursday, 20 November 2003 02:40 (twenty-two years ago)

That being said, Tape was definitely Linklater's better film of 2001. (Funnily enough these two films were the first two that my current gf and I went out to see...)

Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 20 November 2003 03:34 (twenty-two years ago)

i saw Waking Life with my mother! she is extremely open-minded about movies too but she still hasn't forgiven me for that one.

ryan (ryan), Thursday, 20 November 2003 03:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Funnily enough these two films were the first two that my current gf and I went out to see...

I took my wife to see this before we got married, and it's still a sore point! I'm not joking!

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Thursday, 20 November 2003 04:02 (twenty-two years ago)

I like stoner movies! I loved Dude, Where's My Car! And The first Matrix movie!

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Thursday, 20 November 2003 04:04 (twenty-two years ago)

is Dazed and Confused a stoner movie?

ryan (ryan), Thursday, 20 November 2003 04:15 (twenty-two years ago)

I took my wife to see this before we got married, and it's still a sore point! I'm not joking!

Well, we liked both of them; in fact, we each have the DVDs for both.

is Dazed and Confused a stoner movie?

How stoned did you have to be to seriously ask this?

Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 20 November 2003 05:14 (twenty-two years ago)

ha stupid question i guess! but really, what makes something a stoner movie (besides the obvious)? fill me in!

ryan (ryan), Thursday, 20 November 2003 05:40 (twenty-two years ago)

dazed and confused is a fantastic stoner movie! best ever possibly!

s1utsky (slutsky), Thursday, 20 November 2003 06:20 (twenty-two years ago)

1. Did anyone else get the feeling that the animation in Waking Life was a last-ditch attempt to make the movie visually interesting? It seemed like it was just a digital version of Rotoscoping, so I wondered whether they originally shot it as a live-action feature and then said "Oh Jesus, nobody's going to sit through THIS, what can we do to salvage it?"

2. Individually I found some of the segments pretty interesting, though about halfway through I wished that they'd taken it to the Cartoon Network and said, "can we just break this up into chunks and air it on Adult Swim?" It seemed like there wasn't any arc to the story anyway, and it almost felt like it would have *benefitted* from commercial interruption (in that it would have given you a little time to think about the discussion that had just transpired before launching into the next one)...

Sean Thomas (sgthomas), Tuesday, 25 November 2003 19:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Did anyone else get the feeling that the animation in Waking Life was a last-ditch attempt to make the movie visually interesting? It seemed like it was just a digital version of Rotoscoping, so I wondered whether they originally shot it as a live-action feature and then said "Oh Jesus, nobody's going to sit through THIS, what can we do to salvage it?"

The problem here is that they did testing of it well before shooting the film proper (the test film they did is a bonus feature on the DVD). Also, I think that the way that the animation makes the background move tends to evoke the dreamscape far better than any live action ever could.

Individually I found some of the segments pretty interesting, though about halfway through I wished that they'd taken it to the Cartoon Network and said, "can we just break this up into chunks and air it on Adult Swim?" It seemed like there wasn't any arc to the story anyway, and it almost felt like it would have *benefitted* from commercial interruption (in that it would have given you a little time to think about the discussion that had just transpired before launching into the next one)...

Well, maybe so, but the film, I feel, fights the urges towards ebbs and flows mostly by mixing up different people's approaches. While there were a few mini-lectures strung together towards the beginning (the only place where you could keep any attention towards them at all), for the most part each section is vastly different from the two bookending it. This, for me, tends to shift my approaches. I think that the boredom effect often comes more from the monotony that occasionally occurs WITHIN certain scenes, for which your "Adult Swim" suggestion would offer no respite. But that's inevitable - certain talking heads and animation styles used in conjunction with them are simply going to be more fascinating than others. And certain subject matters will be more interesting to individuals than others.

The more fascinating thing I wonder about is that most peoples best/worst lists for this film are completely unique to themselves. So in that sense the viewing pleasures and agonies are more personal and variegated than the average film.

For an aesthetically similar technique within one story line, I think that Tape succeeds admirably.

Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 25 November 2003 21:55 (twenty-two years ago)

slutsky -- how can you overlook Bedtime For Bonzo (the colorized version) as the best stoner movie of all time.

PVC (peeveecee), Tuesday, 25 November 2003 22:57 (twenty-two years ago)

dude wrong thread

s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 26 November 2003 06:15 (twenty-two years ago)

"what is the best stoner thread of all time?"

s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 26 November 2003 06:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Dude, where's my thread?

PVC (peeveecee), Wednesday, 26 November 2003 16:08 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.