Heat -- the epic poem of heist films?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Cos how often do you use "detritus" in everyday speak?

More compelling reasons to come.

Leee Smith (Leee), Monday, 5 January 2004 19:59 (twenty-one years ago)

But does it rhyme?

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Monday, 5 January 2004 20:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, that speech Diane Venora gives to Al where she sez "detritus" is clearly, how do you say... in verse, and also does rhyme.

Leee Smith (Leee), Monday, 5 January 2004 21:27 (twenty-one years ago)

A weird thing I love about that movie: In the big heist-gone-wrong scene at the end, the automatic fire sounds like you imagine it should--big, flat, booming staccato echoing around all the canyons formed by those corporate towers--instead of like gunfights in movies usually sound. There are a lot of silly things about that film, Pacino's performance chief among them, but it did sweat the details.

Perhaps Pacino was going for the poetry with that turn. Consider his reading of "Cause she's got a GRRREAT ASSSSS . . . andyou'vegotyourheadallthewayUPit!"

Lee G (Lee G), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 15:27 (twenty-one years ago)

I love that line!

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)

"You could get killed WALKINGYODOGGY!"

Leee Smith (Leee), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 19:05 (twenty-one years ago)

"Don't waste my muthafuckin time!!"

I quote that line daily.

Anthony (Anthony F), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:53 (twenty-one years ago)

I like that Brad Pitt's character has a horribly deformed arm that is never mentioned.

anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 04:15 (twenty-one years ago)

?

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 04:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Fucking awesome film. Yes, it's a poem. A love poem.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 11:22 (twenty-one years ago)

A poem about Los Angeles in winter, a poem on the spiritual emptiness of modern life, a poem on the awful beauty of violence, the relativity of good and evil, the (im)possibility of redemption through friendship and loyalty, the incompatibility of love and work when only work is obsessive......plus the greatest gunfight in cinema since the Wild Bunch (or at least the Long Riders), DeNiro's best work in years, Pacino's improvisatory hamminess actually suiting his character for once,Val Kilmer looking like he means it, some great music and supeb direction.....
best american film of the 1990s....?

David Nolan (David N.), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 12:33 (twenty-one years ago)

The Tigger Movie was 2000, so yeah.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 13:36 (twenty-one years ago)

This has one of my favorite scores from any film ever. The Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan moments are overwhelming.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 16:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Nusrat's not on The Tigger Movie is he?!

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 20:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought he did the voice of Tigger, actually...

David Nolan (David N.), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 20:50 (twenty-one years ago)

I finally feel somewhat up to explaining myself a bit, so here: epic poem in the classical sense implies warness, always a province of men, and Heat postulates that in a modern war place where men, even if enemies, can achieve some spiritual bond (e.g. AlNiro's coffee break; clasped hands), those engaged in war must leave the family behind. Man/woman can't exist long in nuclear unit, since one will marginalize the other. Or something.

Leee Smith (Leee), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 22:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Ridiculous and dumb but massively entertaining, less there than meets the eye IMHO.

Gear! (Gear!), Monday, 12 January 2004 09:24 (twenty-one years ago)

?

there is a scene where he takes off his shirt and if you look at his elbow, it has some kind of gnarled, twisted tumor on it that is incredibly realistic. You can only see it in one shot, it never comes up again. It's just a nice touch.

anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Monday, 12 January 2004 20:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah I noticed Kilmer's elbow tumour and thought it just a (ridiculous) example of Michael Mann's noted obsessive attention to detail. Then I saw the Salton Sea and Kilmer has the same thing on his elbow......I think it may be his for real...actually now that I think about it I think I read somewhere that he fractured the elbow stage-diving during shooting of the Doors, and it never healed properly...errr : Val Kilmer's elbow and its role in Heat's epic poetry - discuss...

David Nolan (David N.), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 00:54 (twenty-one years ago)

i think this film has much more classical restraint than it gets credit for, despite all the longeurs and pacino's very unclassical overacting (which i like here, usually, and anyway i think pacino has a clause built into his contract that allows him to scream at least twice in every film). in a way it seems like one of the few true inheritors of something like "anatomy of a murder," one of those long, intricate, extremely ambitious and relentlessly objective (which is to say morally complex) preminger films.

amateur!st (amateurist), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 10:02 (twenty-one years ago)

i totally confused kilmer and pitt upthread. duh.

anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 20:33 (twenty-one years ago)

I've always felt this film had a fundamentally serious flaw in the plot device of Deniro being able to escape with his girlfriend but choosing to turn around and kill the snitch from his gang in the hotel room. This goes against everything established previously about Deniro's character; like his philosophy of leaving when the chance presents itself.
I enjoyed the movie after this genre plot device seemed to ruin everything.

theodore fogelsanger, Tuesday, 13 January 2004 22:50 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...
reasons to fear michael mann's next film:

1) it is called 'collateral'
2) it stars tom cruise
3) it was cowritten by frank darabont
4) the plot is as follows: 'A cab driver finds himself the hostage of an engaging contract killer as he makes his rounds from hit to hit during one night in LA. He must find a way to save both himself and one last victim.'

reasons not to fear michael mann's next film:

1) it is michael mann's next film

amateur!st (amateurist), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 11:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Oy.

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 23:30 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...
I've always felt this film had a fundamentally serious flaw in the plot device of Deniro being able to escape with his girlfriend but choosing to turn around and kill the snitch from his gang in the hotel room. This goes against everything established previously about Deniro's character; like his philosophy of leaving when the chance presents itself.

I think the sentiment is exactly similar to The Wild Bunch, where all throughout the movie, William Holden's character plays it pragmatic and wouldn't go out of his way to save anybody, then at the very end he leads them back to go get Angel (knowing it's suicide) even though they could get away scott free and that would have been truer to form.

Heat has lots of terrific moments/dialogue:

- "He was a makin' a move, man, I HAD to get it on!", DeNiro slams the psycho's head onto the table and up against window, Sizemore stares down the customer.

- Pacino's scene with Tone Loc is great.

- "I'm talkin' into an empty telephone...because there is a dead man on the other end of this fuckin' line." CLASSIC.

- "I'm very angry, Ralph." and "But Ralph, you do NOT [punch] get to watch my television set!!"

Joe (Joe), Sunday, 4 April 2004 19:05 (twenty-one years ago)

"I think the sentiment is exactly similar to The Wild Bunch, where all throughout the movie, William Holden's character plays it pragmatic and wouldn't go out of his way to save anybody, then at the very end he leads them back to go get Angel (knowing it's suicide) even though they could get away scott free and that would have been truer to form."

I believe there is a significant difference between Holden's actions at the climax of "The Wild Bunch" and Deniro's in "Heat," in the fact that Holden witnesses an appalling moral transgression in seeing one member of his gang sadistically tortured by the Mexican army. Also, leading up to that point Holden and the others react to signs all around of an increasingly modernized world and the death of western individualism (their own eventual extinction). I found completely compelling and beleivable that Holden and co. would take an an action motivated by something other than money for the first time in their lives.
Of course I should probably see "Heat" again, it's been a few years, but I don't recall any moral, personal imperitive or even bloodlust imbedded in Deniro's character to warrent such a sacrifice of self or risk of seperation with the woman he falls in love with.

theodore fogelsanger, Sunday, 4 April 2004 22:48 (twenty-one years ago)

well, the guy sort of caused his operation to be badly bungled, and compromised his own safety; but, i still take your point

i still think this film is less 'poetic' than really well put-together

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 5 April 2004 17:29 (twenty-one years ago)

The difference between The Wild Bunch and Heat is that the former has vast emotional depths that emerge organically from the story itself, while the bond at the heart of the latter feel mechanical and contrived, less to do with character and more to do with the iconic status of the leads.

Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 6 April 2004 06:23 (twenty-one years ago)

actually a better comparison would be Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid, which is so phenomenally touching and sad it makes Heat look like a Bruckheimer film.

Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 6 April 2004 06:25 (twenty-one years ago)

The beauty and poetry in Heat comes in the small moments - the tapestry of it, if you like.
The way Pacino skips away from Diane Venora after their final, resigned and candid conversation - he is free of her and excited by it,almost like a little boy. Free of her, able to indulge his obsession.
DeNiro's fatalistic speech to Amy Brenneman wherein he tries to persuade her to come with him. If there is a reaon he returns to the hotel I think it is because he senses he is doomed - "whatever time you get is luck" he says - and cannot keep his pessimism out of even this conversation with her. Then the transcendent moment of white light in the car afterward and its being swallowed by blackness as he accepts - to some extent - his fate.
The shared crease of pain and loss crossing the faces of Val Kilmer and Ashley Judd after they are forced to turn away from one another.

And Heat does look like a Bruckheimer film (literally), in a way. Mann basically invented the formula many Bruckheimer films are predicated upon. The heavy use of filters, the constant gloss, the obsession with lighting, the existential heroes - compare Bad Boys to Miami Vice and the similarities are frightening....

There are also parallels with Peckinpah in the romantic idealisation of the lonely man, the absense of humour, the expertise with the depiction of violence. ..

David Nolan (David N.), Tuesday, 6 April 2004 21:38 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah mann is very much one of the architects of a certain look, for better or worse--tony scott and ridley scott too. mann tends to be much, much more clever that either (and especially than tony) in his staging and patterns of close-ups, long shots, etc. for someone who spent much of his career working in TV and who has been accused of bringing a TV aesthetic to the cinema, his films are remarkably fluid, and rigorously balanced ("ali" wasn't as well balanced, so it felt like a film whose parts were greater than the whole).

i guess what i react to with skepticism is the idea of mann as a stylist in the european auteur mode, where some french critics and some american critics have placed him, using catchwords like "minimalism" etc. i think they focus exclusively on where mann seems to part from his contemporaries, which misses, i think, mann's achievement (or a big part of it), which is using a very contemporary style in unusually expressive and concentrated ways.

i don't really like al pacino very much in general, but he works perfectly in this film even while playing "al pacino."

amateur!st (amateurist), Thursday, 8 April 2004 10:14 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
Hey so is the new 2-disc DVD any better than the original release?

Organized Crime (Leee), Saturday, 16 April 2005 02:58 (twenty years ago)

heat is totally rocking the wild-bunch thing. i mean i read deniro's choice at the end as sort of a statement that he really doesn't want to leave the life behind and get away at all. i mean, the point of the film is really two guys more in love with one another than with anyone else in their lives, and neither of whom wants to see a moment when it will end. the parallelism between the fantastic "we just got made" scene and the scene where they end up in the diner is sorta similar, like a mutual flirtation.

the other thing i like is how the "just one last thing, then i'm out" here carries with it this sense of history, like everyone knows that's what you're supposed to do, and it never works, and you might as well go through with it anyway. unlike, say carlito's way or any other flik where you really have this sense the main character is being delusionally stupid, there's a sense of purpose and deliberation that's pulled off almost just by deniro's acting.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Saturday, 16 April 2005 16:23 (twenty years ago)

Reasons to fear Michael Mann's next film.

1) Its Miami Vice
2) It stars Colin Farrel

What happened to the guy who made awesome shit like Thief, The Keep & Manhunter?

endicot peabody, Tuesday, 19 April 2005 20:52 (twenty years ago)

i don't see any reason why michael mann's film version of miami vice can't be amazing. whether it actually will or not... we shall see.

a spectator bird (a spectator bird), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 21:02 (twenty years ago)

Um... Miami Vice was Michael Mann's version of Miami Vice in the first place, no?

Colin Meeder (Mert), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 11:09 (twenty years ago)

operative word is "film" - and i expect that there will be some impressive differences. or, could be.

a spectator bird (a spectator bird), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 12:04 (twenty years ago)

actually, the operative word should have been "movie" - i hope he keeps pushing the DV look he achieved with collateral.

a spectator bird (a spectator bird), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 12:10 (twenty years ago)

two weeks pass...
forget what I said, I think the flaws are far less crippling than I remembered and in some cases, they weren't there at all. Time changes everything, I guess. I hadn't seen it in awhile and I bought the 2-disc DVD set for 15 bucks and watched it and rewatched it.

What I like about this film more than other similar tales is that Neal McCauley is portrayed as a total sociopath, as Mann goes on about in the commentary. Which is revealed in little bits, like grabbing David Palmer to drive the car right before the robbery, acting all buddy-buddy with him and really not even reacting when he gets killed. He used him and tossed him. And really, I think Pacino's performance is a great one. Sure, it's over-the-top, but I think it's great because of that, not despite it.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 9 May 2005 02:08 (twenty years ago)

My favorite part of the the movie is the fact that the cops can't scare up a single police helicopter during the extended 15 minute street shootout. One guy in the chopper with one gun and its all over. I know, I know, the movie was otherwise completely realistic...

endicotpeabody, Tuesday, 10 May 2005 02:55 (twenty years ago)

A weird thing I love about that movie: In the big heist-gone-wrong scene at the end, the automatic fire sounds like you imagine it should--big, flat, booming staccato echoing around all the canyons formed by those corporate towers--instead of like gunfights in movies usually sound.

OTM. I distinctly remember being pleasantly surprised by that.

sleep (sleep), Friday, 13 May 2005 17:03 (twenty years ago)

On one of the supplements to the two-disc edition, someone talks about how in the sound editing process they had some more traditional gun sound effects, but Michael Mann said he wanted to use the original sound from the set, because he remembered how terrifying the gun blasts sounded during filming. So the sound of the gunfire in the film is apparently the actual sound of the guns being fired and was not added in post-production (although they were undoubtedly enhanced).

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Friday, 13 May 2005 17:48 (twenty years ago)

the other thing i like is how the "just one last thing, then i'm out" here carries with it this sense of history, like everyone knows that's what you're supposed to do, and it never works, and you might as well go through with it anyway

this sort of self-consciousness is already evident in melville's "bob le flambeur"

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Saturday, 14 May 2005 17:36 (twenty years ago)

so? i didn't say "another totally unique and avant-garde groundbreaking meta-idea that i like is..."

i just said that another thing i like is. of course this is a totally classic epic device -- which is sorta the point of the thread, no?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 16 May 2005 16:25 (twenty years ago)

seven years pass...

So good. It had been so long since I'd seen it that I forgot that Rollins is in it. lol.

(✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 01:58 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.