*In this light, maybe the issue is if kungfu films are modern day musicals.
― Leee (Leee), Wednesday, 30 April 2003 22:28 (twenty-two years ago)
I think one problem is that HK directors got very good and cutting every few seconds (or faster!) within an action scene while keeping the movement of the main players and the overall "story" of the fight absolutely coherent. But with extremely fast cutting (owing in part to digital editing consoles) that coherence begins to break down because all the spectator can get an impression of is violent movement.
― amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 30 April 2003 22:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 30 April 2003 22:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Leee (Leee), Wednesday, 30 April 2003 22:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 30 April 2003 22:42 (twenty-two years ago)
bothers me less with HK films, which have been on a faster-slicker-wickeder trajectory for years. by this time next year they'll just be one long blur with gunshots + weird chinese pop songs playing over top.
― jones (actual), Wednesday, 30 April 2003 22:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 30 April 2003 22:59 (twenty-two years ago)
The rapid-cutting-shaky-camera style has dominated action films for, what, ten years now - will there ever be a backlash?
― Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Wednesday, 30 April 2003 23:36 (twenty-two years ago)
"let's go HAND-HELD!!" = geronimo of the nitwit
― jones (actual), Thursday, 1 May 2003 00:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Thursday, 1 May 2003 00:23 (twenty-two years ago)
For the most part, I liked The Matrix, though the non-action (or say, non-spectacle) elements were pretty weak--that movie's got a great big 45-minute-or-so hump in the middle where they just explain ad nauseaum how great the Matrix is.
One of my favourite action movies ever, Ronin, came out in 1998 and didn't get as much notice as I think it should have. This movie is terrific--John Frankenheimer eschewed digital imaging and actually staged all of the stunts (which I'm not saying every action director has to do), but it really pays off, I think. Plus great wide-angle photography and a very cute Mamet-enhanced script.
― slutsky (slutsky), Thursday, 1 May 2003 00:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 1 May 2003 01:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― jones (actual), Thursday, 1 May 2003 01:47 (twenty-two years ago)
(by the way Trouble With Charlie AAArgh)
― slutsky (slutsky), Thursday, 1 May 2003 01:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― PVC (peeveecee), Thursday, 1 May 2003 02:24 (twenty-two years ago)
I do seem to detect in myself the demand for verity as far as action.
As far as recent axion: Matrix and Ronin no duh, Matrix Reloaded is wetting my pants. Crouching Tiger because of my aesthetic realism fetish. So Close if only for the opening volley (1. a high frequency sound wave shattering the glass in a high rise office, the glass floating slo-mo in the air like feathers; 2. the heroine jumping up to and planting her stiletto heel into the ceiling, shooting out Woo-stylee two henchmen; the ridiculous audacity of it!). Michael Mann's Heat. For similar reasons as Ronin, with also: the big shootout has no music (esp. bigbeat or cockrock) playing. And I'm also adamant that The Insider is an action film.
― Leee (Leee), Thursday, 1 May 2003 06:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Thursday, 1 May 2003 07:41 (twenty-two years ago)
Good action movies need good plots and characters. The action has to happen for a reason, this is why Die Hard and Midnight Run are fantastic. Fundamentally you need a flawed hero, someone who you root for but can potentially lose. I have a very soft spot for dumb action movies but generally feel unsatisfied afterwards (Equilibrium recently is a perfect example, since none of it made any sense there was a perverse pleasure in its lo-budget stylings. But in the end it was shit).
― Pete (Pete), Thursday, 1 May 2003 08:26 (twenty-two years ago)
Interesting.
That shoot out in HEAT takes the cake PRECISELY because there is no music. I really think it's the best shoot-out ever put on film.
― PVC (peeveecee), Thursday, 1 May 2003 19:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Thursday, 1 May 2003 19:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Thursday, 1 May 2003 23:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 2 May 2003 02:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Friday, 2 May 2003 02:17 (twenty-two years ago)
I actually read a nice piece on Heat in Jump Cut, a now-defunct Leftist film and media journal. It was about how the film is about work more than it is about crime, or the law, or relationships. I mean, a Leftist journal would say that, but it's true.
― amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 2 May 2003 02:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Leee (Leee), Friday, 2 May 2003 04:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Friday, 2 May 2003 05:10 (twenty-two years ago)
That stuff is mainly reserved for "thrillers" now of which Desperation was one of the best for similar reasons.
God I love people driving in cars and being tense.
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 2 May 2003 05:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Friday, 2 May 2003 05:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― Cozen (Cozen), Sunday, 11 May 2003 13:36 (twenty-two years ago)