I've always had a real problem with the "official art" quality of most of the major fifth generation films. Even as I'm impressed by Tian's films, and by
and so on, they seem stultifying, a bit oppressive, demanding to be called "masterpieces." Their style actually harks back to the Hollywood of the 1940s and 1950s, or the better Soviet films of that same period--I wonder if this has something to do with what was shown at the Beijing Film Academy when it reopended.
It's always been funny to me that most of the fifth generation films have been greeted by many Western critics as covert attacks on the Chinese government, when that's hardly the case. I don't want to posit too simple a model of the relationship between the Chinese authorities and the country's major filmmakers though, not really knowing all the specific intrigues and controversies.
― amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 2 May 2003 15:54 (twenty-two years ago)