First off, where is everybody? This site doesn't seem as active as in the past, this week being especially slow.
That said, on to my question. I just watched Caveh Zahedi's "In the Bathtub of the World" again last night, and enjoyed it quite a bit. Almost too much, as strangely as that sounds.
Usually, this type of film would repulse me immediately--self-indugent, unoriginal (well, in a way i guess it is VERY original, but I'm thinking along the lines of the 'film student turns the camera on his own life' kind of thing).
I figured it was Caveh's "character" that appealed to me, but it wasn't. Although his honesty and daring appeals to me, his neurotic, effeminate & childish qualities get kind of annoying after a while.
Yet I really enjoy this film. It's partly for its voyeuristic aspects, I guess, and the "realism" (though I'm a very believer in the idea that nothing is "reality" once it's filmed)--it seemed almost like a real-life version of "David Holtzman's Diary", complete with the angst, awkwardness & angry girlfriend that doesn't want to be filmed in her vulnerable moments (although I would argue that Mandy has an almost saint-like patience; I cringe thinking about putting my girlfriend through that).
So, for those of you who have seen this film & enjoy it, what do you think the appeal is? And for those who haven't seen the film, another question--what is the appeal of voyeurism, both in society & in cinema? Is it unhealthy? Is it "wrong" (if you believe in such a thing as something being "wrong")?
― jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 18:39 (twenty-one years ago)