(the) ring

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
ryan mckay on the 1/3 decade thred prefers the US version, saying "the low budget thing [!!!!] really hampered the impact"

wtf

i would say the whole prob with the us thing is trying to eke out cod suspense and give it all more of a sleuthy structure at the expense of the beautiful abbysal miasma of hopelesness, the sudden incredulity at a new inevitability, sadako's despair told anew... instead of that terrific suffocating scene in the orig of digging in the filthy well and fucking cradling this mushy corpse we get the abysmal rubbish of the perfectly magically formed kiddy body disappearing in a poof of dust and thenn to add insult to injury the twist with samara just turning out to be a BRAT and uh that's why she keeps killing okay?

atmosphere does not equal vaguely mysterious good-screamer girl watts ("hey wasn't she in that other weird film?" "yeah dude, spooky") + ripping off cold daylight rain lashed highrise buildings. you say they tell the plot too quick but which tv-crawly-climax scene is more scary! huh! because somehow you knew!

also what was wrong with that perfect ending with the parents in the original! is that concept too shocking for americans!

i'll admit the horse thing was aight but still felt like an awkward set piece, and also, yeah the other 2 japanese films were terrible

Chip Morningstar (bob), Monday, 5 May 2003 18:46 (twenty-two years ago)

and i don't get why samara was flickering at the end, she is not a product of the tv is she

Chip Morningstar (bob), Monday, 5 May 2003 18:48 (twenty-two years ago)

The Japanese Ring and Ring 2 (not seen Ring 0) are boring beyond belief. The American Ring was a huge improvement on both. Very rarely a Hollywood film shits all over the original but there you go. The rarely seen or discussed Korean remake, Ring Virus, is much more stylish and involving than the original Japanese film as well - though I'd warn you that this is a minority opinion.

Calum, Monday, 5 May 2003 19:03 (twenty-two years ago)

I liked the Japanese Ring! But as I mentioned on another thread somewhere, I watched a bootleg videotape of it all alone on a dark and stormy night.

slutsky (slutsky), Monday, 5 May 2003 19:06 (twenty-two years ago)

the orig made very creepy effective use of simple tricks like the "paralyzed faces" stuff but backed itself into a corner with a backstory (the volcano) so epic it could only be alluded to instead of actually depicted (i know the "show-don't-tell" rule is still basically a hollywood conceit but it does have its advantages - the american remake's horse story was better). also the guy's "oh by the way i am also PSYCHIC" thing halfway thru was just bizarre. the US version dwelled way too much on the kid tho. they both dropped the ball on the well sequence, as far as i'm concerned.

jones (actual), Monday, 5 May 2003 19:42 (twenty-two years ago)

I was ready to write the movie off at the "holding hands in the car" scene, but it redeemed itself.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Monday, 5 May 2003 21:05 (twenty-two years ago)

the original ring is overrated but preferrable to the US remake, although that film is not bad itself. the prolonged tape footage and the too neat fortune tellerness of it lamed it up a good deal for me. the endings of both films are eh but i did like the ominous, if puzzling, tone of the original's. they also reveal the girl's face and voice in the US one which is frustrating.

both are rich w/ atmosphere but i was swayed more by the japanese film... it is sedate, yes, but this is good. the soundtrack is also better, sparser, all screeches and, well.. rings (with some overblown moments like when she sees herself photographed - PSHSH#@$(@$&#@$@!!!!!).

ring 0 is only watchable when it gets silly in the final 3rd.

Honda (Honda), Monday, 5 May 2003 21:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I agree with everyone who prefers the American remake. Although the Japanese film has its own virtues, namely that it basically strips down to its central, and terrifying, conceit. I though the American films typically-Hollywood elaborations on that conceit (the whole idea of Watts as indifferent-turned-committed mother, the family gone mad, the horses, etc.) worked really well. Sort of like taking the basic idea of the Japanese films and embellishing it with motifs that have resonance thanks to American and European horror movies. Also it looked real nice and the kid actor was good.

I really lost patience with critics who decided the American remake was some kind of travesty. WTF?

Oh and Naomi Watts is so, so, so, so lovely in this film.

amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 5 May 2003 21:49 (twenty-two years ago)

never saw the japanese original but the american version left me with a question still to be answered: was the samara's footage an early surrealistic cinema bric a brac also in the oriental version? cause the formal relation made between the evil girl's spontaneous film-making and historical avant-garde movement's magnification of automatic artistic production was intriguing.

francesco, Tuesday, 6 May 2003 06:18 (twenty-two years ago)

I found the original Ring very atmospheric, the sequel a lame rerun of the same. Problem is that the film relies pretty much on atmosphere and the plot makes very little sense (in the Japanese version itmakes even less sense). Also the supposedly spooky ending that the virus must be spread to cure it does not work because there is nothing to stop your original being destroyed once its been copied. So there only ever need be two copies in existance...

The US version was a better piece of work and as such lacked the wtf atmosphere of the original. Never liked the psychic kid subplot anyway.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 12:25 (twenty-two years ago)

ok japanese psychic kid was lame but surely miles better than hokey detached pallid suit-wearing l'il businessman who calls his moms by her first name...

saying naomi watts is "so so lovely" is exactly the kind of creepier-still fanbase thing they were trying to achieve i see now

watts' empathies with her investigations i can see in theory but didn't really overwhelm me while i was watching it


Chip Morningstar (bob), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 12:49 (twenty-two years ago)

i mean all yr theory is nice and all amateurist but i'm yet to yet to be convinced the actual impact was greater in the remake

Chip Morningstar (bob), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 12:53 (twenty-two years ago)

)also the guy's "oh by the way i am also PSYCHIC" thing halfway thru was just bizarre.

Yeah, that was just so lame -- why even bother doing much investigation into the tape if he could just intuit what happened anyway?

Also, I liked how the female reporter had more to do in the American version. In the Japanese version she came off as a bit of a dimbo who deferred to her ex to do all of the work and figure out everything. So passive it made you wonder how she could even be a journalist.

Nicole (Nicole), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 12:54 (twenty-two years ago)


saying naomi watts is "so so lovely" is exactly the kind of creepier-still fanbase thing they were trying to achieve i see now

If you mean to suggest that producers cast attractive and charismatic actors in the hopes that audiences will fall for them, yay, here's your prize. Although please explain how my responding in the expected manner is creepy.

convinced

I'm not trying to convince anyone, I just liked the American version better.

amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 12:57 (twenty-two years ago)

maybe it's the way i imagine you speak

as i say above i thought her special milky nacreous kind of, um, loveliness was a cheap shot of approximating the atmos of the original. but it's not my real prob with the film anyway

ok 'convinced' was wrong yeah. you nah mean tho

Chip Morningstar (bob), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 13:03 (twenty-two years ago)

i wouldn't be so hard on the japanese girl but yes it's interesting how stranded the guy in the remake seems. if the ending wasn't such a dizzying botch i might even have said it was an advantage

Chip Morningstar (bob), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 13:07 (twenty-two years ago)

I had to look up the word "nacreous":


adj 1: consisting of or resembling mother-of-pearl 2: having a play of lustrous rainbow-like colors; "an iridescent oil slick"; "nacreous (or pearlescent) clouds looking like mother-of-pearl"; "a milky opalescent (or opaline) luster" [syn: iridescent, opalescent, opaline, pearlescent]

amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 13:40 (twenty-two years ago)

As it happens, I recently wrote a little video column about this:

The most interesting thing about The Ring (2002, PG-13) is that it was based on another movie, a smash hit called Ringu (1998, not rated). If you don’t remember Ringu, it’s probably because you don’t live in Japan, where it became the top-grossing horror film of all time (it’s already spawned a sequel and a prequel). Thanks to the mild success of the Hollywood version, the Japanese original is also now available here.
If you don’t have time for both, stick with Ringu. Director Hideo Nakata’s creepy ghost story is hardly perfect, but it is unpredictable and eerie, and it has a few magnificent freak-out moments. A reporter, Reiko (Nanako Matsushima), is investigating urban legends about people who die one week after they watch a haunted videotape. When she realizes her niece may have been a victim, she tracks down a copy of the tape -- which, this being a horror movie, she immediately watches. That sets the clock running, as Reiko scrambles to solve the mystery within seven days. She recruits her psychic ex-husband Ryuji (Hiroyuki Sanada) after showing him the video (hey, he’s an ex), and they’re soon snooping around desolate volcanic islands and abandoned stone wells. There’s abundant incoherence of the kind you can get away with only in a movie full of vague supernatural forces, but Reiko and Ryuji are a likable detective duo and Nakata keeps changing the story’s rhythm so that you’re never sure what’s coming.
In The Ring, on the other hand, studio hack Gore Verbinski can’t leave well enough alone. Although the movie follows the general outline of Ringu, everything about it is broader and slicker. The scares are more graphic and more telegraphed, and the whole tone has shifted from spooky fun to grim foreboding. It’s drenched in the kind of gray-green lighting that signifies “art” (or maybe just Seattle) in nu-metal videos. Where Nakata makes everyday settings unsettling by playing on their ordinariness, Verbinski’s grimy warehouses and disheveled cabins are spookhouse cliches. The reporter is played by a mordant Naomi Watts, showing none of the verve she brought to Mulholland Drive. Really, there’s not a pleasant character in the whole movie. They’re all pallid, doughy and bitter. The film insists on spelling out a lot of what was left implied in Ringu – not an improvement, considering that plot is hardly Ringu’s strong point. Watching The Ring after seeing Ringu is like listening to someone explain the punchline of a joke.

JesseFox (JesseFox), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 17:47 (twenty-two years ago)

There's that word again: hack. I'm still not sure what it means beyond "I don't like this director."

amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 17:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Ah. You've not seen The Mexican, then.

JesseFox (JesseFox), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 19:09 (twenty-two years ago)

has anyone?

jones (actual), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 19:10 (twenty-two years ago)

I have!

slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 19:15 (twenty-two years ago)

(surprise, surprise)

slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 19:15 (twenty-two years ago)

The Mexican poor. But didn't Verbinski also make the delightful Mouse Hunt? I'm surprised that you thought Ringu had a tone of spooky fun too, it had equally pointless tone setting artistic touches (the waves, etc). More importantly there is a feeling in the US version that the middle section of the film isn't a complete waste of time.

Pete (Pete), Friday, 9 May 2003 09:39 (twenty-two years ago)

My friend is currently on holiday near the beach from Ring 2.

I think the best thing about the Japanese version of Ring is how low-key and mundane the near-end scene in the well is. You are expecting mucho tension and instead get this long, drawn out section of quiet desperation. Nicely played.

I've not seen the Yank attempt, but from what I've been told there is a point made that if you break the curse if you make a COPY of the tape. I always thought from the Japanese version that you only had to SHOW it to someone else to escape bizzaro TV death. . . .

Lynskey (Lynskey), Friday, 9 May 2003 14:46 (twenty-two years ago)

But everyone who moans about America remaking it is forgetting, or hasn't heard of, Ring: Virus which is better than the original anyway. Ringu is the worst of the lot - it has too many "by complete coincidence" moments (the psychic sub plot for one) and the female villain just looks silly - not as creepy as the little girl in the Hollywood version.

Calum, Friday, 9 May 2003 15:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Does it have more tits in it? Is that why you like it?

Lynskey (Lynskey), Saturday, 10 May 2003 12:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Lynskey please.

amateurist (amateurist), Saturday, 10 May 2003 17:57 (twenty-two years ago)

How long before we the see the Swiss remake, 'Ringu Pingu'?

Ptee articulates above, what my brane was struggling with re: the neverending spread thing not working in the Japanese version. I haven't seen the US remake, but Naomi Watts will never be as lovely as she was in a wheelchair, dating Nick the dull policeman in Home & Away.

N. (nickdastoor), Saturday, 10 May 2003 20:23 (twenty-two years ago)

i got a real hard on for j-horror after i saw some kiyoshi kurosawa flicks last year and i bought boots of ring, ring 2 and ring 0 among other things on ebay. i'd seen the us remake before i watched ringu so idunno, maybe that's why it didn't strike me as strongly as i'd hoped, but i still haven't finished ring 2 or bothered with ring 0 yet, so...

i'm the sort who generally hates 'hollywood remakes' out of hand but the ring really impresses, i think.

as an aside, my favourite naomi watts was janet odgers in flirting. i hope gilby bagged her.

brian badword (badwords), Sunday, 11 May 2003 05:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Flirting is a great film.

N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 11 May 2003 16:40 (twenty-two years ago)

Flirting is indeed a fine film, as is The Year my Voice Broke.

Calum, Sunday, 11 May 2003 18:07 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.