Recommend me some nice anti-nationalistic/anti-patriotic films

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

:)

tron, Sunday, 26 October 2008 03:38 (seventeen years ago)

Were you the one asking for same in chatz? If not, Mr. Freedom. If so, I can think of tons of films that are viciously critical (of the USA) but may not be explicitly anti-nationalistic/anti-patriotic.

Kevin John Bozelka, Sunday, 26 October 2008 05:01 (seventeen years ago)

If you care about those

Kevin John Bozelka, Sunday, 26 October 2008 05:01 (seventeen years ago)

I've never seen Dalton Trumbo's 1971 film of his novel Johnny Got His Gun, so I can't vouch for how nice it is.

Paths of Glory

Duck Soup -- Groucho under bombing siege:

"You're a brave man. Go and break through the lines. And remember, while you're out there risking your life and limb through shot and shell, we'll be in here thinking what a sucker you are."

Dr Morbius, Monday, 27 October 2008 13:34 (seventeen years ago)

The Best Man
Secret Honor

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 27 October 2008 13:39 (seventeen years ago)

Starship Troopers
They Live
Barry Lyndon
Escape From NY/LA

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 22:27 (seventeen years ago)

i seem to be the only person who thought paths of glory was terribly overrated and emotionally/cerebrally vacant.

Kevin Keller, Thursday, 30 October 2008 02:41 (seventeen years ago)

yup

Kevin John Bozelka, Thursday, 30 October 2008 04:21 (seventeen years ago)

bullshit!

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 30 October 2008 19:45 (seventeen years ago)

WHOOPS!
I meant "Battle of Algiers." I loved "Paths of Glory". Coincidentally, I recently watched both of them in a class I'm taking, so thinking a bit too quickly, I swapped one for the other.

Kevin Keller, Friday, 31 October 2008 06:02 (seventeen years ago)

I loved Battle of Algiers a lot.

polyphonic, Friday, 31 October 2008 06:31 (seventeen years ago)

how could you even say you 'loved' it? to do that would be to say you were able to invest emotionally in the film on some level, which clearly is impossible. not only is the filmmaker too scared to take a side (he's just being fair! [no.]) but he refuses to allow the movie to paint a human face on the conflict. we don't come to know any of the characters, so we don't particularly care if they're blowing things up or getting blown up themselves. at the end, especially, i'm disgusted (in myself!) that i feel absolutely nothing for this little boy who's about to have his life cut short. the whole thing works as an extremely boring and tasteless documentary level, but this wasn't meant to be a documentary, was it? at the human level, it's a failure.

Kevin Keller, Friday, 31 October 2008 11:34 (seventeen years ago)

There are countless films I love that I am not able to invest in emotionally, Christopher Maclaine's The End (1953) perhaps being the greatest.

Kevin John Bozelka, Friday, 31 October 2008 15:10 (seventeen years ago)

at the human level, it's a failure.

I guess I didn't think the film was trying to operate at that level. It reminded me more of a movie like Battleship Potemkin. The idea that a movie isn't a success unless you care about characters is very odd to me.

polyphonic, Friday, 31 October 2008 17:07 (seventeen years ago)

i can see what you're saying, but this isn't trying to be Battleship Potemkin. furthermore, after seeing Battleship Potemkin once, would you ever want to see it again? Sure, I loved it too, but when you've seen it once, why watch it again? but i digress; Battle of Algiers is no Battleship Potemkin. BP was a proto- and archetype of technique, while Algiers is just trying to tell an unbiased story. i just don't particularly care for the story in this case.

Kevin Keller, Friday, 31 October 2008 19:47 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.