then at the end of the year we can sell the list to Film Comment and all become millionaires.
― slutsky (slutsky), Monday, 5 May 2003 22:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Monday, 5 May 2003 22:11 (twenty-two years ago)
The flatmates (who barely know each other) go out drinking and get ridiculous in a very endearing way, L'Auberge espagnole...
― slutsky (slutsky), Monday, 5 May 2003 22:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Monday, 5 May 2003 23:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Monday, 5 May 2003 23:17 (twenty-two years ago)
2002/2003 is iffy. It was released on five screens in late December, but didn't get a national release until early in January.
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 00:17 (twenty-two years ago)
For me a great movie moment was in Japón when the protagonist wakes up. The light coming through the window is blinding, and the screen is a wash of bright white and yellow. The camera cranes and tilts up to and over the windowsill, until we're looking outside. There are loud squeals. Two people arguing. Suddenly, a spill of deep red in the center of the bleached-out frame. And just as suddenly we make out where we are and what's happening. Underneath an awning, just below the window, a pig has had its throat slit. The bright white subsides and the details are filled out.
That one shot perfectly captures the sensory confusion of being woken up too early, too violently. It's also strikingly beautiful in itself.
There is also an astonishing final shot to this film but I wouldn't want to give it away.
― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 02:02 (twenty-two years ago)
I agree, and i think the reason for the hostility is the 9-11 angle, which, especially in the credit sequence, is handled wonderfully. also, making the movie post-911 (that is, after the Fall) makes PERFECT sense, and ties in beautifully with what the final scenes say about america, especially about america and race.
― ryan (ryan), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 02:21 (twenty-two years ago)
I don't know if I'd go so far as to call it a modern classic though; some of it I think fell short, like the nightclub sequence, which I thought was pretty anti-climactic, considering how it should've sorta owned the movie. And the PS Hoffman subplot I thought was a little weak.
― slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 02:33 (twenty-two years ago)
(OK I am becoming the resident perve, sorry.)
― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 03:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 03:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― PVC (peeveecee), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 03:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 03:09 (twenty-two years ago)
At some point in the 1990s Natalie Portman seemed to have that awkward teen thing down too, but one could never be sure if it was just her natural uncomfortability in front of the camera dovetailing with the shape of her characters -- or if she had some genuine ability. Several years and two Star Wars later the answer is sadly obvious.
― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 03:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 03:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 03:21 (twenty-two years ago)
I mean I think Lucas really succeeded in doing with those films what he wanted, it's just that what he wanted is extremely out of step with critical fashion (and much audience expectation) and modeled after films which weren't so great themselves, albeit entertaining.
― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 03:22 (twenty-two years ago)
(crosspost!)
― slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 03:25 (twenty-two years ago)
(boy this thread has sure digressed from its original aim! we were going to become millionaires!)
― slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 03:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― ryan (ryan), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 03:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 03:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― ryan (ryan), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 03:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 03:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 03:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 03:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― ryan (ryan), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 03:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 03:41 (twenty-two years ago)
I'll keep giving Portman the benefit of the doubt cause she's foxy.
― PVC (peeveecee), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 07:56 (twenty-two years ago)
(i'm a cornball, i know)
― lauren (laurenp), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 14:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― dave k, Tuesday, 6 May 2003 14:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 17:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 17:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― JesseFox (JesseFox), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 17:54 (twenty-two years ago)