Tarantino

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

It seems to me that Quentin Tarantino is worth discussing. No real question besides "what do you make of him"? I re-watched Reservoir Dogs recently and am still struck by his 1) really interesting dedication to Jim Thompson-style fractured narrative and 2) his sense of composition (the torture scene).

― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 00:31 (twenty-two years ago)

dont have a lot to say other than Jackie Brown is the only one I care for.

― ryan, Tuesday, 29 April 2003 00:48 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm not going to be of much help either talking about aesthetic stuff...i remember when pulp fiction came out and it was just the best movie ever for me age 14. it felt like the first genuinely stylish thing i had been exposed to and, just like i started fencing with sticks after princess bride, it kickstarted a lot of amusing posing along with delving into music/movies. I don't think it holds up so well - the dialogue and narrative at least- but that may just be by comparison to my old memory of it. i do agree that jackie brown has aged much better. I love that scene where pam grier slowly walks up to robert forster and asks him if he's afraid of her, and he just hold up his fingers.

― dave k, Tuesday, 29 April 2003 07:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Jim Thompson-style fractured narrative

I'm not a fan, but this is a great point. Jackie Brown is the sort of thing I can imagine an aging alcoholic pulp writer coming up with. I think Tarantino is good at what he does, but his characterizations are so weak (and not helped by "novelty" casting) taht I can't really stomach his films. Definitely a good subject for a "trash-meets-high-art" style discussion though - he "wears all his influences on his sleeve", whether you think that's a good thing or not.

― Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 11:39 (twenty-two years ago)

I never saw Jackie Brown - once Tarantino's cult-of-celebrity thing was all out of hand I couldn't stay interested (as as I noted in "Introduce Yourselves," I hardly ever go out to the movin' pitcher theater). But I bought the Reservoir Dogs DVD and I must say that many of the qualities that made QT so talked-about when he was coming up still gleam very brightly: quick, effortless dialogue; composition, as I noted above; his sense of timing above all. It's as though he's located where the artistic impulse lay hidden in, say, Die Hard.

I don't know, life is long, if he doesn't just retire to bathe in his money I think he might have a very interesting late career.

― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 12:48 (twenty-two years ago)

I guess what's interesting about him is that, not only can you sense (in Reservoir Dogs, particularly) a lifetime's filmic knowledge being truly put to use, but as his career progresses, you are watching a "buff" learn what it is like to make movies in modern-day Hollywood. The decision to make Jackie Brown seems like a tactical decision if anything, almost as if he has pre-visualized his "ouevre" before it's anywhere near done.

― Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 12:56 (twenty-two years ago)

"Jackie Brown is the sort of thing I can imagine an aging alcoholic pulp writer coming up with..."

Don't know about the alchohol, but Elmore Leonard is no spring chicken and he has written a bazillion books either about cowboys or criminals. Jackie Brown is taken from his book "Rum Punch". I think Tarantino gets some of his dialog style from Elmore Leonard.

Resevoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction are both quite a bit more cartoonish than most of Jim Thompson's books. I think those movies are more indebted to Starsky and Hutch or Superfly than most would admit. Mind you, the violence is intense as Thompson's books, but the settings are cop show, which is OK with me.

I'd like to see someone with some vision take a shot at Thompson's "The Killer Inside Me", that book could be the basis for a great movie.

Thompson could write for the movies. Check out Kubrick's "The Killing" and you will see what I mean. I thought "The Grifters" was a good adaption of one of his books.

― earlnash, Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:09 (twenty-two years ago)

That last comment (of mine) reads more cynically than intended, but if anyone is writing their biography in their head as they work, it's Quentin Tarantino.

I do enjoy his dialogue, though I think it's funny that after the release of Reservoir Dogs, critics said that his characters talked like some imaginary "everyman". Now, I'm from a white suburban middle-class English family - there's no way I ever speak like a Tarantino character!

Earlnash-you're right about Rum Punch. I totally forgot! :]

― Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:13 (twenty-two years ago)

It's as though he's located where the artistic impulse lay hidden in, say, Die Hard.

I wonder John, what do you mean by this?

― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:45 (twenty-two years ago)

I was wondering the same. It's something else he alludes to in his Introduce Yourself post. I'm not sure if he's questioning film as a valid art form (depends how you define "art form") or whether he feels looking at film as an art form is reductive.Do tell, J0hn!

― Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 15:51 (twenty-two years ago)

I was wondering because I think Die Hard is the key action film of its era and a very good one besides.

― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Die Hard is excellent. And it's certainly had more influence on the action genre in the last 15 years or so than any other film (though Aliens still echoes). McTiernan never really did anything else that lived up to it--though Jan De Bont did go on to make Speed, which I thought was quite strong.

― slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:22 (twenty-two years ago)

What you both said.It really does stand out, ever more so as that era grows distant.

― Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Also, that movie more or less invented the modern Euro-baddie.

― slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:25 (twenty-two years ago)

(or at least ensured that Hans Gruber-alikes would populate action movies for years to come)

― slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Is there an American film where a Euro-baddie faces off against a Euro-goody (such as Schwartzenegger, Van Damme), with a Euro-ingenue on the side?

― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:33 (twenty-two years ago)

There may be something in the Van Damme canon that I'm unaware of--can't think of many Euro-ingenues in American action movies though, unless you count The Good Thief.

There are probably dozens of these I'll remember after I post this.

― slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 16:39 (twenty-two years ago)

can't think of many Euro-ingenues in American action movies though

What about XXX or The Matrix: Reloaded?

― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 17:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Leonard is a recovering boozehound.

It's funny, before Jackie Brown I always thought that QT was doing George V. Higgins dialogue rather than Elmore Leonard, but I guess he's just read a ton of crime fic and a lot of it rubs off. I saw Jackie Brown again recently, and am more convinced than ever that it's his best film - a great romantic comedy, almost.

The director he most reminds me of is Kubrick - the early crime based thrillers, the increasing gap between making films, the problem w/ comedy and overripe performance, the formal symmetry of their shot-making. It's not a perfect match, of course - QT is much more of a humanist, and Tarantino's snobbery is expressed in ubergeek oneupmanship rather than Kubrick's intellectual contempt.

― Andrew L (Andrew L), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 17:51 (twenty-two years ago)

You're right on XXX, which I didn't see. I assume you're referring to Monica Belluci viz. Matrix, but I don't think she counts as an ingenue.

― slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 18:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Are their any ingenues anymore? (Cue strings.)

― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)

ha!

I'd like to think so. Otherwise I'm kind of in trouble.

― slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 18:52 (twenty-two years ago)

(who is the ingenue in Universal Soldier? Also Slutsky see xXx - if you just watched Jackass you're well over the hump!!)

― jones (actual), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 19:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Tarantino was one of several young Hollywood directors who were promising to use their newfound clout to make a musical--Soderbergh and Ang Lee were two others. I wonder if they all ran into financing problems, or if they were just blowing hot air.

I couldn't stomach the violence in Reservoir Dogs. I still haven't made it through the whole picture.

― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 19:44 (twenty-two years ago)

(trying again fingers crossed)

i'm not so sure qt's bio is mapped out start-to-finish (tho he is making two things back-to-back right now hmmm) - i think Jackie Brown was as much as anything a "but i can also do THIS" pre-emptive (and smart) response to the backlash that was bound to spring up from all the Boy Wonder hype post-Pulp Fiction. Over the long-term i expect his success/failure will depend almost entirely on this ability to keep ahead of the curve rep-wise, and that having to live down a few of the tricks that made him famous to begin with - the ones his legion of imitators can most easily pick up and possibly outrun him with - will be key. The same could be said of almost anyone obv but i think his particular predicament remains fairly unique right now, hiatus and all.

(i mention this partly cuz i predict the Kill Bill backlash will be enormous. the script is ok but it's an exploitation hommage played pretty by-the-numbers - possibly too nudgenudge genre-conscious for the NoMoPoMo crowd [if this "crowd" isn't just a phantom strawmob i've begun to channel thru ilx] on the one hand, and on the other hand slightly behind-the-times and dull as far as recent genre-commentary goes. Also if the teaser trailers are anything to go by it LOOKS dated - not in a kewl throwback way but in a Charlie's Angels three-years-ago way - the curse of the imitators again maybe)

(then again yes this could all be part of some masterplan designed to divert attention away from the coup de grace of the followup picture, who knows)

J0hn - Jackie Brown is worth renting, esp.if you're interested enough to have bought RD. I totally disagree with the "novelty casting" charge. This has probably been mentioned often enough to have become part of the official hype-parade by now but here goes anyway: the lead casting in JB sez loads more about tarantino's relationship with film than any of his whizkid camera-moves or script-mashups do. Giving enough of a damn abt the wasted potential/overlooked performances/??? of eg.Pam Grier and Robert Forster to write sharp, nuanced parts for them is exactly the kind of thing most of the nu-school film-on-film types can't pull off (well ok haha hello pt anderson i'll be with you shortly) - i mean even the Travolta/PF thing was like that at the time - i.e. totally NOT a "let's dress him up in disco clothes and point and laugh" move - and it's not QT's fault he turned back into a mockery of himself the first chance he got.

(also some of JB's growing-old-in-style theme [which is fun to watch auteur-champs grapple with as QT was positively bushy-tailed by hollywood standards at the time] [yet still managed to turn in a picture that got this element across without being TOTALLY ponderous about it (although hmm yes it sort of was)] can be read as a great big ILM metaphor if you get bored!!)

(ok that last part may not be true but there's a great minor "shopping for new music" scene that sez a hilarious eerie lot to me about my life)

― jones (actual), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 19:50 (twenty-two years ago)

jones, I printed your last post out and read it over a cheese sandwich. I liked it - the post, I mean.

― Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 20:25 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, I really enjoyed that too, jones.

― slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 20:26 (twenty-two years ago)

well thanks fellows but can't you find anything wrong with it (i mean besides my godawful WriTing sKilz)?? if everyone keeps agreeing with each other this board'll be dead in the water!! even I already disagree with half of what i wrote!

haha in fact let me come at this another way: tarantino sux

― jones (actual), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 21:23 (twenty-two years ago)

I think KILL BILL is definetly the kind of screenplay that will live or die by the way it's executed (no pun intended). It doesn't jump off the page in the same way Pulp did. But it's more action and less dialogue oriented anyway. action rarely "reads" that well. The dialogue however sounds like a half-remembered idea of exploitation movie dialogue. Which may turn out to be a good thing. If KB succeeds it will be from the cumulative effect of actually SEEING all that crazy shit cascade across the screen. It's a shameless script -- and it'll be interesting to see if people can get with Tarantino's first "movie-movie" universe film (me included). As he said himself to paraphrase "the movie-movie universe films are the ones that people IN Pulp Ficiton would see if they went to the movies". To explain. Pulp,Dogs and Romance take place in the "realer than real universe" a sort of suped up version of our world. Jackie Brown is the Elmore Leonard Universe (obviously?). And NBK, Dusk and Kill Bill are in the "movie movie" universe. Most people won't have that concept to back it up when they see it, so they will probably react similarly to the way they took Dusk till Dawn. maybe they should print up his Manifesto and hand it out to people as they enter the theatre. "you are about to see a film from the movie-movie universe". That'd go over well.

― PVC (peeveecee), Tuesday, 29 April 2003 23:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i forgot about that "multiple universes" gameplan. what a wingnut. you're right about the kill bill script too PVC - the leap from page to screen could be giant

this just occured to me: when he allows himself to come across like a COMPLETE filmgeek he lets in better surprises than when he concentrates on being a COOL filmgeek (if there is such a thing)

― jones (actual), Wednesday, 30 April 2003 00:55 (twenty-two years ago)

(oh! hello)

― jones (actual), Wednesday, 30 April 2003 00:56 (twenty-two years ago)

this also just occured to me: i have a habit of stating the BLATANTLY OBVIOUS when i need sleep

― jones (actual), Wednesday, 30 April 2003 01:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah we need more Dusk love. That movie was so fucking good.

― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 30 April 2003 07:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Tony Scott should clearly direct every Tarantino script, because as a director he has a good mind but no brain, whereas Quentin is the absolute opposite, which is why he sucks.
Re Jackie Brown, well for sure De Niro was hilarious, but what a dull, pointless film that was.

― Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Wednesday, 30 April 2003 10:20 (twenty-two years ago)

i need to see reservoir dogs again. i like his little scene in 'sleep with me'. i remember thinking 'four rooms' was pretty icky

― ron (ron), Thursday, 1 May 2003 03:37 (twenty-two years ago)

I have enjoyed every Tarantino film I've seen. Snappy dialogue, extreme violence - a winning combo.

Plus From Dusk To Dawn IS THE GREATEST FILM EVER MADE.

― DV (dirtyvicar), Thursday, 1 May 2003 15:33 (twenty-two years ago)

four months pass...

I read Rum Punch for the first time recently, and what struck me was how COMPLETELY Tarantino rewrote it, and yet got the mood exactly right. He should do Swag, but do it vintage early-'70s, 'cause there's no way armed robbers wouldn't wear masks now...

― Pete Scholtes, Thursday, 11 September 2003 17:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Chuck, I'd see JB again. I wasn't crazy about it the first time either, but it grows on you. A long coffee break of a movie, almost works better at home on the player. Then suddenly you're enjoying watching everything play out, enjoying the blandness of the mall setting, the dark bar hangouts, the Meters on the soundtrack, the character details, Forster, Fonda, and just about every second Samuel L. Jackson is onscreen. The whole sequence with Chris Tucker is genius. That's one of my favorite roles for Jackson...

― Pete Scholtes, Saturday, 13 September 2003 15:57 (twenty-one years ago)

six years pass...

I missed (Tarantino's) boast about being the owner of the only repertory house in Los Angeles (i.e., the New Beverly) and how he'll "burn the place down" before he shows anything there with digital projection.

YAY, Tarantino = OLDS, you monkeys!

http://hollywood-elsewhere.com/2010/02/gift_of_gab.php

― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 February 2010 14:32 (fifteen years ago)

whos tarantino talking about in the beginning of that clip?

― max, Monday, 8 February 2010 14:51 (fifteen years ago)

ah pta apparently

― max, Monday, 8 February 2010 14:55 (fifteen years ago)

I dunno max, can't watch here

― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 February 2010 15:02 (fifteen years ago)

he was talking about his 'rivalry' with pta i guess--and told a story about depalma finishing blow-up and feeling like he had really made a masterpiece, and then going to see raging bull

― max, Monday, 8 February 2010 15:06 (fifteen years ago)

Brett Ratner felt the same way after finishing Rush Hour 2 and then going to see The Fast and the Furious

― bee hand luke (latebloomer), Monday, 8 February 2010 21:30 (fifteen years ago)

the programming at the New Bev is kinda weak

― velko, Monday, 8 February 2010 21:33 (fifteen years ago)

I wonder why!

― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 February 2010 21:41 (fifteen years ago)

obama probably

― aarrissi-a-roni, Monday, 8 February 2010 21:46 (fifteen years ago)

haaaaa

― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 8 February 2010 21:47 (fifteen years ago)

i love how amateurist refers to a movie as a "picture." how many people still do that?

― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 12 February 2010 03:26 (fifteen years ago)

my dad

― Michael B, Friday, 12 February 2010 10:19 (fifteen years ago)

MARTIN SCORSESE

(in the credits and posters of all his pictures)

― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Friday, 12 February 2010 20:02 (fifteen years ago)

i'm done w/ IB thread, but

"Here's my problem with this whole influence thing," he told me. "Instead of critics reviewing my movies, now what they're really doing is trying to match wits with me...."

It's NO CONTEST, ASSHOLE

― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 02:22 (fifteen years ago)

you should go to revival movie screenings in los angeles, morbs, tarantino can be seen hanging near the back at half of 'em just watching some old movies. you guys could bro down!

― ('_') (omar little), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 02:28 (fifteen years ago)

I've seen Tarantino twice, randomly, in the past 3 years in NYC.

BUT I LIKE GOOD MOVIES

― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 02:29 (fifteen years ago)

You both can discuss Rio Bravo, Weekend, and Angie Dickison's tittays put your nads in a twister.

― Inculcate a spirit of serfdom in children (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 02:31 (fifteen years ago)

*how

― Inculcate a spirit of serfdom in children (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 02:31 (fifteen years ago)

four years pass...

“As far as I’m concerned, digital projection and DCPs is the death of cinema as I know it. It’s not even about shooting your film on film or shooting your film on digital. The fact that most films now are not presented in 35 millimeter means that the war is lost. And digital projections, that’s just television in public. And apparently the whole world is okay with television in public, but what I knew as cinema is dead.”

― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 27 May 2014 03:39 (ten years ago)

so finally you agree about something? idgi

― gbx, Tuesday, 27 May 2014 03:45 (ten years ago)

he & i agree on a TON of shit (Leone, Budd Boetticher, Eric Rohmer), just not on grindhouse garbage and the worthlessness of his own career in the last dozen years. I just thought it was notable that an ILX god could express such caveman OTM sentiments.

― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 3 June 2014 18:24 (ten years ago)

eight years pass...

Don't think I'd read a word about this till I bought it on impulse today:

https://uncrate.com/assets_c/2022/06/cinema-speculation-tarantino-1-thumb-960xauto-147692.jpg

Suspect I'll end up disagreeing with every third sentence--it's on '70s films (heavily tilted towards American films, I assume, but I'm not sure)--but it should be entertaining.

― clemenza, Friday, 18 November 2022 17:58 (two years ago)

(ILF...the wilderzone.)

― clemenza, Friday, 18 November 2022 18:09 (two years ago)

He was on Stern today; haven't listened yet

― ex-McKinsey wonk who looks like a human version of a rat (Eric H.), Friday, 18 November 2022 18:13 (two years ago)

one year passes...

So, uh, interesting choice with the Video Archives podcast he goes with Roger Avary. Season two dropped today and listening to the first episode, they get done talking about the first of three films and then, wham, there's the paywall. Apparently you get part of the episode for free now, but have to pay for the full thing. Which... is a choice, especially since this didn't seem to be announced anywhere before the new season started.

Judging by Reddit, this has pissed off quite a few people.

― Maxmillion D. Boosted (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 29 October 2024 19:40 (six months ago)

Somewhat sympathetic to the idea that Avery and Gala might want to make some cash but, ya know, get one patreon.

I shouldn't complain tho because even as someone with a high tolerance for the guy I couldn't really do Video Archives more than an ep every other month or so.

― Daniel_Rf, Tuesday, 29 October 2024 22:26 (six months ago)

and then, wham, there's the paywall

but, ya know, get one patreon

here's the episode descrip in the rss:

On the Season 2 premiere of The Video Archives Podcast, Quentin & Roger catch their train -- but only by a Narrow Margin. Once comfortably in their cabin, they'll chat about where Gene Hackman and Anne Archer were in their careers, the gender role dynamics of the characters, and how their initial viewing of this movie influenced the future of film forever. Remember, folks: between the viewer and a film there is only ... a Narrow Margin.
Then, on Patreon, Roger and Quentin continue the conversation with two more tapes pulled from the shelves of Video Archives. Next up is The "Human" Factor. Quentin and Roger chat about the important place this revengeamatic sits in the genre, a brief lesson on director Edward Dmytryk, and discuss the show stopping last ten minutes that need to be seen to be believed. Lastly, the guys head on over to Riverside, where the street violence is so out of control that we've no doubt reached the Killpoint. Featuring actors such as Leo Fong, Richard Roundtree, Cameron Mitchell, and Stack Pierce — you know this movie has Video Archives written all over it!

― Robespierre Delecto (sic), Wednesday, 30 October 2024 06:53 (six months ago)

Yes, a patreon where you provide bonus episodes, not one where you just cut up the format that was previously available for free - that's not how getting one patreon works.

― Daniel_Rf, Wednesday, 30 October 2024 09:21 (six months ago)

I’ve seen the “subscribe for uncut content” model before (including from ppl who had open access for years or decades previously). Patreon lets the user set a vast variety of pledge / perk / subscription / donation options, there’s not one single approach.

― Robespierre Delecto (sic), Wednesday, 30 October 2024 09:39 (six months ago)

i don’t remember tarantino & avary owing anybody anything

― Humanitarian Pause (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 30 October 2024 10:04 (six months ago)

I'm here for podcasts about the Poppy Bush/Gene Hackman Pay-For-My-Divorce Interzone.

― the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 October 2024 10:19 (six months ago)

I loved VA podcast too bad I can't listen to it anymore since he is a raging genocidal zionist stashing his kids away in a 3 million dollar condo in tel aviv.

― kurt schwitterz, Wednesday, 30 October 2024 14:59 (six months ago)

“I loved Joker 2 when I saw it in Tel Aviv” is one of the more alarming things a person can say https://t.co/amQM2sIbcR pic.twitter.com/UCWBrbwBJT
— Justin🦩Boldaji (@justinboldaji) October 29, 2024

― kurt schwitterz, Wednesday, 30 October 2024 15:00 (six months ago)

Yes, a patreon where you provide bonus episodes, not one where you just cut up the format that was previously available for free - that's not how getting one patreon works.

That's where I am. Of course they don't owe anyone anything and they can choose to monetize the podcast however they want, but I think it's a shitty thing to do after a full season to suddenly paywall 2/3rds of the regular content that was previously free.

― Maxmillion D. Boosted (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 31 October 2024 16:16 (six months ago)

I mean, Dan Savage, Throwing Fits, lots of others do it that way.

― bratwurst autumn (Eazy), Thursday, 31 October 2024 16:58 (six months ago)

I'd be much more interested in Avary and Tarantino trying to make money by teaming up again on a movie, even a terrible Pulp Fiction sequel set in space or something.

― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 31 October 2024 17:32 (six months ago)

two weeks pass...

^^^ What he said.

I listened to a lot of Season 1 but after listening to those two on the Bret Easton Ellis podcast I realized … I can’t deal with more of these two yelling over each other for hours on end, with Avary’s daughter awkwardly (to me) as a normal human being who has to find a physical copy of the movies. Timing, I guess, because no way am I paying for that even though it’s good to know they’re getting paid.

― Marten Broadcloak, mild-mannered GOP congressman (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 19 November 2024 00:27 (five months ago)

one month passes...

Avary having a normal one blaming the forest fires on "antifa sleeper cells" right now.

― a ZX spectrum is haunting Europe (Daniel_Rf), Thursday, 9 January 2025 17:20 (three months ago)

roger and quenton are like active fucking morons. they sounded so stupid on rogan. never want to hear them talk about anything ever again tbh.

― kurt schwitterz, Thursday, 9 January 2025 18:13 (three months ago)

two months pass...

the bar where Mr orange tells his story to Joe and in PF the butch / Vincent Vega confrontation is the same right

― calstars, Sunday, 16 March 2025 22:34 (one month ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.