Propective Girlfriend Game-Theory

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

desire:

1 girl A
2 girl B
3 girl C
4 girl D

likelihood of success:

1 girl B
2 girl D
3 girl C
4 girl A

J1MMY, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 18:26 (eighteen years ago)

diagram plz

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 18:56 (eighteen years ago)

-Every time you go out, you go to the ball
-When you face the ball, you can make an attempt to score
-If you do so and miss, you are embarrassed in front of all the spectators
-You can of course leave the ball alone, and be comfortable with your non-scoring
-If you make a play at scoring, you can hit a 'single', which is normally done through use of the pull-stroke
-If you pull successfully more than once, your score is accumulated
-If the ball 'goes down' before reaching the boundary, four is automatically added to the total
-'Six' speaks for itself
-If the ball results in a bouncer, you can attempt to take it on, but beware of the consequences; without swiftness or dexterity you could well end up with a black eye
-Usually it is best to beat a hasty retreat in such circumstances
-A 'wide' is when you effect a pull as the result of a dare
-A 'no-ball' is when your pull does not occur within a legitimate ball
-A 'bye' is when you pull a member of the same sex
-A 'leg-bye' is when you dress up as a member of the opposite sex and then pull an unwitting member of that sex, for a laugh
-There are only three methods of dismissal: marriage, death, and sex-change
-There is no second innings (barring sex-change or divorce)
-Drinks breaks are traditionally taken with great regularity
-After the ball has finished, it is common for the batter to prod repeatedly at the cut strip
-Success is all a matter of decision, timing, and playing the right stroke, not to mention having a good line and holding a decent length

Just got offed, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 18:58 (eighteen years ago)

http://web.media.mit.edu/~lifton/BigJimmy/FairTradeJimmy.jpg

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 18:59 (eighteen years ago)

http://content.answers.com/main/content/img/investopedia/gametheory.gif

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 19:02 (eighteen years ago)

take your nash equilibrium bullshit and shove it in the bullshit shoving center

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 19:03 (eighteen years ago)

i may be new here but everyone know you guys are smart. plz help me solve this conundrum using flowcharts and maths. and fix the typo in the title. thx!

J1MMY, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 19:33 (eighteen years ago)

lol cant type, think

vodka thighs, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 19:34 (eighteen years ago)

fu

J1MMY, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 19:35 (eighteen years ago)

ok so

This process has three major characteristics:

1. Reference level dependence: An individual views consequences (monetary or other) in terms of changes from the reference level, which is usually that individual's status quo.
2. Gain and loss satiation: The values of the outcomes for both positive and negative consequences of the choice have the diminishing returns characteristic. The α term in the value function equation captures the marginally decreasing aspect of the function. Empirical studies estimate that α is typically equal to approximately .88 and always less than 1.00. When the exponent α < 1.00, the curve will accelerate negatively (if α = 1.00, the function would be linear; and if α > 1.00, if would accelerate positively).
3. Loss aversion: The resulting value function is steeper for losses than for gains; losing $100 produces more pain than gaining $100 produces pleasure. The coefficient λ indexes the difference in slopes of the positive and negative arms of the value function. A typical estimate of λ is 2.25, indicating that losses are approximately twice as painful and gains are pleasurable. (If λ = 1.00, the gains and losses would have equal slopes; if λ < 1.00, gains would weigh more heavily than losses.)

- from Kahneman and Tversky 1979

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 19:48 (eighteen years ago)

http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/photos/uncategorized/ppt1s.jpg

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 19:54 (eighteen years ago)

or:

http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/images/2007/04/17/worstpptever.jpg

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:01 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.publicspeakingskills.com/pages/Death%20by%20PowerPoint%20Slide.jpg

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:01 (eighteen years ago)

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1081/1444449412_61ac73e71c_o.png

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:07 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.