1st Test Report Card

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Bowling:
Betcha never thought you'd be looking at the bowlers after the first test and admitting the Indians looked more impressive than the Australians.

Khan- close to Gillespie for best bolwer in the match. Used the conditions to perfection on the afternoon of the second day to blast India back into the game. Despite what several forummers were saying about it being 'a perfect wicket to bowl on', Australia didn't get anywhere near the same effect when bowling on the wicket relatively soon after. As I said at the time, it couldn't have got much better.
Nehra- had some good spells but couldn't put a run together. Still threatened when bowling to the openers which bodes well as the tests continue.
Agarkar- great support for Khan when the ball was moving around on the Friday afternoon. Started the rot by trapping Langer LBW. With a few more wickets in the next test could really step up. I think probably Indias most threatening bowler on a less bowler-friendly pitch.
Harbajan- Didn't really perform that well, but still looks confident. Probably still a better bet against Australia at the moment on Australian wickets than Kumble. Both for his bowling style and record against Australia.

Gillespie- Easily the standout, but really needs some support at the other end. McGrath at his miserly best or Warne obviously the best foil for him at the moment.
Bracken- Started well with some impressive movement but seemed to tire quickly. Couldn't contain the batsmen in the latter overs.
Bichel- A absolute shocker. Trying to hard? Completely out of form? Who knows. He is a trier and has done the job for us before- normally popping up to take an unexpected wicket. Tough decision to keep him for the next test, but playing Williams and Bracken together would be a big gamble, imho.
MacGill- Played pretty comfortably by the set Indian batsmen, but was the bowler who popped up with both the big middle-order wickets, which can't be discounted. Noone else (bar Dizzy) looked remotely likely to get them at that stage.
Katich- Only given two overs, and was picked for the strength of his bowling as well. Could we be looking at 5 bowlers for Adelaide?

The Australian attack was at it's worst when Ganguly and Laxman were on fire, and there seemed to be no answers. On Australian pitches we need to be prepared for batsmen to get set on hard, drying wickets and have the solutions to get them out. As much as it is difficult to rely on MacGill, that's what we are doing in those situations. We need to change that thinking now that our stocks are a little depleted.

But time to panic after one test? Lee rushed back into the side? Change Bichel for Williams? Tough calls.

Poseiden (Poseiden), Monday, 8 December 2003 03:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Waugh's bowling was OK in this game.


He got more swing than Bichel; hard to believe ...

pieman (pieman), Monday, 8 December 2003 05:31 (twenty-two years ago)

The next one's in Adelaide - it should be a big scoring game, regardless of the bowlers we use. Dizzy's probably the only one we can rely on to get anything out of that pitch.

Would rather take the chance with Willo and Bracken - Willo couldn't bowl any worse than Bix did at the Gabba, after all.

tailender (tailender), Monday, 8 December 2003 08:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Bichel will play in Adelaide. In the Pura match there last week he bowled well and would be a handful there on the fourth and fifth days when the wicket plays a bit lower. FWIW I thought MacGill bowled really well and could be the surprise of the summer.

chrisso, Monday, 8 December 2003 10:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorry Poseiden, I'm not buying it. The Indians had the best of the bowling conditions and were belted by the Aussies in the second dig. They did better than I thought they would have done but the truth about India's attack will be revealed in Adelaide.

The Aussies did not bowl well (Dizzy aside) however and Bicks was especially average. When was the last time he was collared like that? India has an excellent batting line up.

regards,

REB

Rik E Boy (Rik E Boy), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:04 (twenty-two years ago)

They've kept the same 12 but Williams will play this time and Bichel will do 'Manuel' duties.

If 'Mad Brad' is canned for his Perth Airport comments, the selectors are being too precious by half.

Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Maybe they can git a gig with the ABC! Oops! Wrong thread!!

regards,

REB

Rik E Boy (Rik E Boy), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:42 (twenty-two years ago)

I've never been someone who subscribed to the school of "could've been".
India had the better of the conditions, maybe. So What? That's the game of cricket. They used those good bowling conditions to perfection. It's pointless saying 'we would've done the same' or even 'we would've bowled better'. Pure heresay.

Australia, meanwhile, had some pretty good bowling conditions at the start of Day 4. They didn't use them that well, Bichel and MacGill letting Laxman and Ganguly off the hook when we should have been applying the pressure. Another reason we couldn't apply this pressure is because this time we didn't have 450 runs to play with.

The pressure was off in the Australian 2nd Innings. Little to play for really, a result most unlikely. I read alot more into the 1st Innings bowling preformance of both teams.

India were not expected to be able to threaten us with their bowling attack in this series. In the first Innings they have shown that they can be a threat. Any attack will need to bowl well in Adelaide. I have my doubts the Indians can bowl us out twice, but I also have my doubts Australia can do the same with their current attack.

This report card was about the performance in the first test, and I think the Indian attack came out ahead.

Poseiden (Poseiden), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:54 (twenty-two years ago)

I agree with Poseiden. The Indian attack came out looking better than ours. Ganguly and Laxmann in particular made the Aus 4 look very tame. After a Magoo over I'm sure I saw VVS mouth David Lloyd's(??) line "I could play this bloke with my tinkly winkly".

Whilst I fully expect MtB, Punter and the Wozzie crabs to have a feast in Adelaide I can't see how our bowlers are going to get through their top 6.

Voice of Racoons, Tuesday, 9 December 2003 04:50 (twenty-two years ago)

The thought of MacGoo bowling at Adelaide fills me with an overwhelming sense of dread.

Big Dog (Big Dog), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 04:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Not bad analysis there Poseiden. Can't wait for the cricket...or the Indian top six to fall over!

:)

regards,

REB

Rik E Boy (Rik E Boy), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 06:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Cheers REB.
I'm hanging out for five full days of cricket as well- it's the only way to determine who the stronger side really is.

Poseiden (Poseiden), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 06:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Doubt there'll be 5 full days of cricket ...

pieman (pieman), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 08:30 (twenty-two years ago)


Come on, pie - they won't beat us that easily . . . .

tailender (tailender), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 08:57 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.