Tri-series - WGAF ??

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
On C4 today the resident morons were again big-noting these games because of the high attendances ...

VoR of course said that the only ODI's that mattered cam around every 4 years ...

So - is McDonald's the best restaurant in town, because it gets the most customers?

pieman (pieman), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 08:55 (twenty-two years ago)

VoR of course said that the only ODI's that mattered cam around every 4 years ...

VoR was two keystrokes out.The apostrophe and the 's' immediately following it are superfluous.

(By the McDonalds logic, China must be the most desireable place to live on Earth....)

Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:01 (twenty-two years ago)

So - is McDonald's the best restaurant in town, because it gets the most customers?

In terms of the continued success of cricket, that's probably not a bad rule to apply.

And while I think of these games as Yamodis (Yet Another Meaningless One Day International), at least they are preparing the Australian batsmen to cope on slower wickets in a pro-India environment. Can't be all bad.
I don't think you can deny that playing in front of a cricket-mad public wouldn't be exciting for the players, as well.

Poseiden (Poseiden), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:03 (twenty-two years ago)

"I don't think you can deny that playing in front of a cricket-mad public wouldn't be exciting for the players, as well."

I think there is one too many negatives in there. Or possibly on too few.

The point about preparation is valid - especially for the less spin-happy batsmen in the team.

tailender (tailender), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Pfft. There is an 'I Love Grammar' forum y'know ;-)

Poseiden (Poseiden), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:36 (twenty-two years ago)

There is?!?!?!?!??!? Really?!?!?!?!?!?!!??

Where? Lemme at it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

tailender (tailender), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 11:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Same old petty nitpicking from the usual suspects. If you wanted to make a comment upon the (mis)use of the English language, do it somewhere else.


The ODIs are seemingly more popular, everyone knows that the grounds are packed out for them. And as for the meaningless nature of them, surely that would apply to the Moo-Moos more than them.

Aquarius (Aquarius), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 11:44 (twenty-two years ago)

"Same old petty nitpicking from the usual suspects. If you wanted to make a comment upon the (mis)use of the English language, do it somewhere else."

I could suggest that if you wanted to make a comment upon someone else's comments upon the (mis)use of the English language that you could do it elsewhere, too.

But I have better manners than that, and a little more respect for free speech, so I won't.

tailender (tailender), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 12:02 (twenty-two years ago)

And there are also dictionaries. Better manners? Not from where I've been sitting (since I've been the butt of some of your comments). Better manners? Not really.

Aquarius (Aquarius), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 12:19 (twenty-two years ago)

A dictionary is not something to make comments in - about the use of the English language, or anything else. It's for reading the definitions of words. It doesn't explain grammar, either, so I fail to see the relevance.

As for manners: you are the one giving orders in a place where - to the best of my knowledge - you lack the authority to do so.

Ohhh, getting back to dictionaries: try looking up a few words. Such as "irony", "sarcasm", "hypocrisy" . . .

tailender (tailender), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 12:25 (twenty-two years ago)

ODI's ... my pococuranteism knows no bounds.

And now the purpose of a dictionary should be clear to all.

pieman (pieman), Thursday, 13 November 2003 04:11 (twenty-two years ago)

The Moo-Moos are not meaningless. They are the foundation of our Test team's strength. Only a twit or an Englishman who believes that County cricket is not crap would say otherwise. We have a strong Test team because we have a strong first-class competition.

The periods of weakness that Australia has endured in the last 20 years have coincided with the gutting of the first class arena by 1)the Packer rebellion in the early 80's, and 2) the rebel South African tours, in the mid-late 80's. The second blow, following so close after the first, caused a 5-year strength hiatus, and it was down to the simultaneous removal of all the fringe Test players from the first class arena.

pieman (pieman), Thursday, 13 November 2003 04:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Aqua, the grounds may be packed out for them, but in Oz at least, a fair proportion of that seething mass of humanity care even less than they know (which sure ain't a lot) about what is going on in front of them, they are just looking for a place to get sozzled and act like drop-kicks. As long as they can do their Waves and Aussie Aussie Aussie Oi Oi Oi chants they're fine. They've forgotten about the game they've just seen before they've crossed Punt Road or Anzac Avenue on their way home.

Elitist? Hard cack.

Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Thursday, 13 November 2003 11:14 (twenty-two years ago)

So Fred, I DID not say 'elitist'.


If the idiots only care about getting sozzled, they should stay in the pub/s where they belong and leave those of us who want to watch a live game without interruption/idiocy in peace. No more chants of "Give us our (beach)ball back" and the like.

How many of them would be Members? Let's hope not many.

Aquarius (Aquarius), Thursday, 13 November 2003 11:57 (twenty-two years ago)

The quality of the crowds at the SCG went downhill when the Rugby members started turning up for cricket games, especially the ODIs. :-( Can't believe any other ground would be different.
Not that it makes any difference whether a drunken lout is a Member or not.

No-one's denying that the ODIs are more popular. The discussion was supposed to be about the relevance of that popularity. For many people, it's just an excuse to get together at a big occasion and party . . .

tailender (tailender), Thursday, 13 November 2003 12:09 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.