2013 NLCS: Los Angeles Dodgers vs. St. Louis Cardinals

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (407 of them)

smiles

Bee OK, Saturday, 12 October 2013 05:26 (eleven years ago) link

fucking beltran man, wow

k3vin k., Saturday, 12 October 2013 05:26 (eleven years ago) link

dude is something else

brand nubian wafers (bnw), Saturday, 12 October 2013 05:27 (eleven years ago) link

has to be one of the best postseason games ever

k3vin k., Saturday, 12 October 2013 05:30 (eleven years ago) link

Cards are like serial killers toying with their victims instead of making it quick. Disgusting.

Evan R, Saturday, 12 October 2013 05:45 (eleven years ago) link

Lynn gets the win? Haw

brand nubian wafers (bnw), Saturday, 12 October 2013 05:49 (eleven years ago) link

times like this is when i love living on the West Coast

eff you

has to be one of the best postseason games ever

AND you

eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 12 October 2013 07:56 (eleven years ago) link

OHHH, MOTHERFUCK THAT NON-TAG BY MOLINA

entering this as Dodger win in the ledger

eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 12 October 2013 08:02 (eleven years ago) link

Bee OK and k3vin k, send me your shipping addresses so I can send you a rulebook

eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 12 October 2013 08:03 (eleven years ago) link

actually told dvr to record 6 hours just in case...

― brand nubian wafers (bnw), Saturday, October 12, 2013 1:08 AM (8 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

hahaha

action bronson pinchot (sanskrit), Saturday, 12 October 2013 13:21 (eleven years ago) link

gonna really enjoy video bringing some TRUTH to umpiring next year and upending unwritten [sic] rules. Baseball will be more Catholic.

eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 12 October 2013 13:32 (eleven years ago) link

David Schoenfield ‏@dschoenfield
So if this game goes on and on and the Dodgers use all pitchers except Jansen, does Mattingly use a position player?

eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 12 October 2013 13:52 (eleven years ago) link

Skip Schumaker is the designated position player pitcher and he struck out on a pitch above his eyeballs in the 8th or 9th so he wasn't available. He has a 0 era this year. Hee hee

panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Saturday, 12 October 2013 15:36 (eleven years ago) link

morbs i meant beltran's individual performance, not the game itself

and ellis was out at the plate

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BWWT7arCUAEZ9OI.jpg

and even if there wasn't a "tag", ellis basically pushed molina's glove hand out of the way. i can't find anything in rule 7 about that kind of thing, but obviously the way the rule has been interpreted forever is that if you barrel into a catcher (provided the catcher's back isn't turned to you or something), who maintains control of the ball, yer out

k3vin k., Saturday, 12 October 2013 15:45 (eleven years ago) link

following up http://deadspin.com/why-your-cardinals-suck-1443513646

lag∞n, Saturday, 12 October 2013 16:29 (eleven years ago) link

beltran's WPA was 0.366, the second highest of his postseason career (the highest being a week ago, incidentally). throw in him gunning out ellis at the plate in a tie game in extra innings, and yeah that's a historic game

k3vin k., Saturday, 12 October 2013 19:45 (eleven years ago) link

Yeah, I also don't understand why people are getting upset about the supposed phantom tag, it's not like he tried for a swipe tag and missed, or didn't have possession of the ball. When the ball beats the runner by ten feet and he barrels into the catcher (making contact with his glove arm), he's out, and I'm fairly sure it's always been called that way.

NoTimeBeforeTime, Saturday, 12 October 2013 20:07 (eleven years ago) link

didn't this game just end?

Bee OK, Saturday, 12 October 2013 20:10 (eleven years ago) link

beltran got a timely hit and threw a guy out in a close game ergo historic? highly suspicious

lag∞n, Saturday, 12 October 2013 20:12 (eleven years ago) link

he also drove in the other 2 runs!

k3vin k., Saturday, 12 October 2013 20:12 (eleven years ago) link

i mean if it was an elimination game rather than game 1 it'd be a much bigger deal obv

k3vin k., Saturday, 12 October 2013 20:13 (eleven years ago) link

that was the timely hit, no

lag∞n, Saturday, 12 October 2013 20:13 (eleven years ago) link

he had 2 timely hits!

k3vin k., Saturday, 12 October 2013 20:14 (eleven years ago) link

oh right, but still

lag∞n, Saturday, 12 October 2013 20:15 (eleven years ago) link

i see we have reached the but still portion of this debate, i win

k3vin k., Saturday, 12 October 2013 20:16 (eleven years ago) link

lol no i mean wpa is a fun stat but it doesnt really judge whether someone had a good or really good game or not

lag∞n, Saturday, 12 October 2013 20:19 (eleven years ago) link

beltran went two for six and there happened to be some guys on base when he got his hits, and the game happened to be close. really not at all any sort of alltime great game

also not even close to alltime great even judged by wpa

lag∞n, Saturday, 12 October 2013 20:20 (eleven years ago) link

oh yeah i hate WPA too ftr, but in a one-game vs one-game comparison it can have some value if you agree on the meaning of "good game" beforehand

k3vin k., Saturday, 12 October 2013 20:21 (eleven years ago) link

i mean it has very little predictive value but it can do a decent job of describing what happened, and if you're only talking about one game then sample sizes are so small that you might as well talk about the sikkk plays a dude made rather than if it was due to luck or whatever

k3vin k., Saturday, 12 October 2013 20:22 (eleven years ago) link

he made some great plays and had a cool game im sure we can all agree

lag∞n, Saturday, 12 October 2013 20:24 (eleven years ago) link

beltran went two for six and there happened to be some guys on base when he got his hits, and the game happened to be close.

lol this sounds like something an anti-sabr person would say as they create their strawman

^^ post obviously honoring and supporting Qualcomm (zachlyon), Saturday, 12 October 2013 21:14 (eleven years ago) link

Apparently just fifteen minutes left until the shadows cover the whole diamond so the real game can start.

NoTimeBeforeTime, Saturday, 12 October 2013 21:15 (eleven years ago) link

finally

Bee OK, Saturday, 12 October 2013 21:30 (eleven years ago) link

lol this sounds like something an anti-sabr person would say as they create their strawman

― ^^ post obviously honoring and supporting Qualcomm (zachlyon), Saturday, October 12, 2013 5:14 PM (16 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

idgaf but isnt rbis arent a meaningful stat like one of stats dudes most cherished truths

lag∞n, Saturday, 12 October 2013 21:32 (eleven years ago) link

it's also the postseason, which is one great big small sample size, it's ok to get overly silly and romantic about it

^^ post obviously honoring and supporting Qualcomm (zachlyon), Saturday, 12 October 2013 21:36 (eleven years ago) link

so many rules

lag∞n, Saturday, 12 October 2013 21:39 (eleven years ago) link

He had a great game, and it seems even greater because it was Beltran--he reinforces perceptions that were already in place. I don't see it as historic, though, Kevin. If you're including pitchers, just in the past few days I'd say Wainwright and Verlander have him beat. (By WPA, I don't know.) If you limit the statement to position players, top...50-100?

clemenza, Saturday, 12 October 2013 21:42 (eleven years ago) link

that is some good pitching

Bee OK, Saturday, 12 October 2013 21:44 (eleven years ago) link

Wainwright was 0.371, Verlander 0.416--if you put any value in that, both slightly higher than Beltran last night. (Does his throw have any WPA value? If not, then yeah, Beltran's would undoubtedly be higher.)

(For the record: yes, Morbius, I am aware there's a game on right now, and I am watching it.)

clemenza, Saturday, 12 October 2013 21:53 (eleven years ago) link

One Kershaw AB plus two IP for one AB from Michael Young seems like a big net loss for the Dodgers.

NoTimeBeforeTime, Saturday, 12 October 2013 22:06 (eleven years ago) link

Who needs the best pitcher in baseball when you have VETERAN PRESCENCE.

NoTimeBeforeTime, Saturday, 12 October 2013 22:07 (eleven years ago) link

kershaw's a more clutch hitter anyway

mookieproof, Saturday, 12 October 2013 22:12 (eleven years ago) link

he's still an alleged hitter. xp

just got in for the Young ph, didnt think game wd be this fast even with these pitchers.

I'm fairly sure it's always been called that way.

I still don't care; it's wrong.

eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 12 October 2013 22:13 (eleven years ago) link

i guess i don't ever remember seeing a guy 'out by 10 feet' not being tagged? Yet another credit to the Almighty Yadier i guess.

eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 12 October 2013 22:23 (eleven years ago) link

Don't know that I've ever seen a manager questioned over the course of two post-season games like Mattingly has been thus far--he's in Grady Little/Ron Washington territory.

clemenza, Saturday, 12 October 2013 22:24 (eleven years ago) link

I can think of some dubiously managed World Series that wd've been more buzzed about if there had been internets -- eg 2001. (esp by the guy who won)

eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 12 October 2013 22:43 (eleven years ago) link

right down the middle

Bee OK, Saturday, 12 October 2013 22:45 (eleven years ago) link

good game

Bee OK, Saturday, 12 October 2013 22:48 (eleven years ago) link

I came in late, what did Donnie do wrong today? I'm not nec buying Michael Young as a mistake.

eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 12 October 2013 22:49 (eleven years ago) link

go bucs

mookieproof, Saturday, 12 October 2013 22:51 (eleven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.