2014 NLDS: St. Louis Cardinals vs. Los Angeles Dodgers

thx KM (not for the pic)

mayor gets called out repeatedly on twitter for saying/responding to stupid crap like that while downtown stl continues its prolonged death spiral.

@dylanohernandez
Zack Greinke, after first two questions of news conference: "Are these questions going to get better?"

http://i.imgur.com/53TzScR.jpg

<3 xp

I figure i will go to bed right after Kershaw-Waino so i can wake up in the 11th inning of Royals-Angels.

we be straw grasping
@b_hoffman11: Forecast is for 93 in Los Angeles. Kershaw career 1-2 w/ 7.98 ERA in 3 starts at 93 or higher.

grichuk?

Drafted one spot before Trout

as a goof

mathenaging ftw

gd is there a SINGLE team that isn't doing the stupid towel thing this year

good call on Grichuk by Karl (and Matheny)

YES I STRUCK YOU OUT DEE GORDON HAHA

Oh gawd

"this just changed the series. levels."

Nice butt tap from Puig there. <3

THEY WOKE EM UP

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

lol at all of the dodgers' helmets falling off whenever they do anything

I am switching to Vin on the radio but i must dump my video feed for it to work. i ... cannot... listen... to those two.

Charley Steiner and the other guy, good enough

you can probably take a nap and wait for royals-angels tbh

rare lefty homer off of kersh

hm maybe wake up from that nap

may i just say btw

SHUT THE FUCK UP, HAROLD REYNOLDS
SHUT THE FUCK UP, HAROLD REYNOLDS
SHUT THE FUCK UP, HAROLD REYNOLDS
SHUT THE FUCK UP, HAROLD REYNOLDS
SHUT THE FUCK UP, HAROLD REYNOLDS
SHUT THE FUCK UP, HAROLD REYNOLDS
SHUT THE FUCK UP, HAROLD REYNOLDS
SHUT THE FUCK UP, HAROLD REYNOLDS
SHUT THE FUCK UP, HAROLD REYNOLDS
SHUT THE FUCK UP, HAROLD REYNOLDS
SHUT THE FUCK UP, HAROLD REYNOLDS
SHUT THE FUCK UP, HAROLD REYNOLDS
SHUT THE FUCK UP, HAROLD REYNOLDS
SHUT THE FUCK UP, HAROLD REYNOLDS
SHUT THE FUCK UP, HAROLD REYNOLDS
SHUT THE FUCK UP, HAROLD REYNOLDS
SHUT THE FUCK UP, HAROLD REYNOLDS
SHUT THE FUCK UP, HAROLD REYNOLDS
SHUT THE FUCK UP, HAROLD REYNOLDS
SHUT THE FUCK UP, HAROLD REYNOLDS

― Andy K, Monday, October 6, 2008 7:19 PM (5 years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this is an impressive rally

wowowowow

awes

in harold reynolds parlance -- they just drained a three-point touchdown on a stolen sign

lool doyers

holy cow!

I stopped watching for 2 innings. Now I am scared to turn back on :O

^^^^DO NOT obvs

lmao

just checking in on the game now – and this is not the score i was expecting to see!

Get ready for an exciting ending. 2014 Trevor Rosethal is incapable of closing a game without walking the leadoff man and then allowing a single or double.

p prescient

Here we go

ooh, gass

rosenthal needs like uh a slider

wow this game

well that was not expected.

Yeah, sheesh!

lol awesome

you can probably take a nap and wait for royals-angels tbh

― mookieproof, Friday, October 3, 2014 8:35 PM

what happens when you listen to a Pirate fan

so there will be a playoff fap as soon as my meds break comes up

I was out and didn't see any of the game. Kershaw's linescore is quite puzzling. 6.2 innings, 10 K, 0 BB, 8 hits, 2 HR, and 8 runs. So he was in complete command...except when they were battering him around?

Mattingly left him in long enough to take the loss, so you would know he pitched badly.

what happens when you listen to a Pirate fan

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

(xpost) That's a complete non-sequitur...10/0 vs. 8/8/2 was the question.

In a SweetSpot pre-game post concerning Puig, one of the Tweets: "When talking about lost potential value in not starting Puig, don't forget to include value of being able to PH him. It's not zero."

Unless you don't pinch-hit him.

if 1 AB > 5 ABs, then 0 must be ideal

so never pinch hit ever, then?!

Justin Turner. Unfuckingbelievable.

plaschke calls benching puig 'too little too late'

I'm not sure what else the Dodgers could have done -- who could have predicted TWO complete implosions from Kershaw? That pitch to Adams was frigging awful, the league is literally hitting something like .100 off his curveball with like one HR off it in the past two years, and he throws just about the worst hanging curveball in the middle of the plate to a LHB that you'll ever see. Neither of the Cards' comebacks were lucky.

― NoTimeBeforeTime, Wednesday, October 8, 2014 12:32 AM (17 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This is what takes some of the sting out for me. The cardinals slapped the shit out of our best player TWICE. Mattingly made all the right moves and it still didn't matter.

The irony is fucking Ned loves nothing more than acquiring relievers at the trade deadline whether we need them or not - and for some reason this year he didn't do it. I assume other clubs all demanded 1 of our top 3 prospects which is some bullshit and I would have said no to all those offers as well..

Mattingly made all the right moves

Oh yeah?

That Plaschke article is ridiculous. Baseball is weird. Any team is capable of beating another team in a 5-game series. Mattingly made a few strange moves but no one could have counted on Adams hitting the first ever lefthanded HR off of Kershaw's curve. The relief pitching wasn't great but the dodgers also only scored 3 runs over the final 2 games. Kershaw kept them in it during the last game, and Ryu did as well. Baseball is weird.

Mattingly made all the right moves

worst of all, no more Vin

He could monetize the hell out of his own appeal by calling the rest of the playoffs Rifftrax-style.

"In his two-plus MLB seasons, Adams was batting .046 against curves from lefties." statistics shmatistics

@truebluela
One positive of the Dodgers 2014 being over: Andruw Jones is no longer on the payroll

how many ABs is that? xp

Speaking of, the immortal Ty Wigginton will finally be off the cardinals payroll after this season.

the mets will always have bonilla

Little-known fact: in an early draft of The Shining, Delbert Grady rather ominously announces, "The Mets have Bonilla; the Mets will always have Bonilla."

Any team is capable of beating another team in a 5-game series.

I know I don't post here a lot. I follow baseball pretty avidly, though. Since I've seen two people making this argument and no one making the counter-argument, I thought I would make it. I actually think that a team has a decent opportunity to show what they can do prior to the point where they've lost three games (or, better yet, to the point where they've lost four games in a best-of-seven).

Re. this year, I'm not sure why the Nats or Dodgers were better on paper anyway.

because they had better players

I think the Nationals were better than Giants (separated by eight games in the standings)--on paper, in terms of personnel. I'm less sure the Dodgers were better than the Cardinals (separated by four games in the standings). I think their series underscored how important Kershaw is to the Dodgers, and what could happen when he's not Kershaw, even for a couple of innings.

xpost
eh, i dunno. baseball's just different. a seemingly dominant team that wins 97 games in a season is only winning 60% of the time. when the worst team plays the best team in MLB, it's not an automatic loss like it (almost always) is in football or most other sports. a sweep isn't inevitable. and no one is too surprised when a team like the twins takes 3 out of 4 from the tigers during the regular season. it's a little disappointing for the dominant team, i guess. but it's Ordinary Baseball Weirdness.

I actually think that a team has a decent opportunity to show what they can do prior to the point where they've lost three games

i mean, you're right, they do. and if you somehow could have the dodgers and cardinals play another 5 game series right now, chances are the dodgers would win. they're a better team. but it's not crazy at all for the slightly weaker team to win over the course of 5 games.

Players who performed better this year doesn't equate straight up with "better players." Peavy and Vogelsong performances obviously crucial for Giants.

they performed better this year because they're better players; they were better before the season started and will continue to be better after the postseason ends

You're probably right on the whole. I'm just not sure the discrepancy is that great and really question the premise that the results of these series lack meaning.

the results of these series lack larger "meaning" because they were FOUR GAMES. vs 162.

Yeah, I understand that that's the argument. And I already said my piece about believing that teams are afforded a fair opportunity to show what they can do in the amount of time prior to losing three or four games.

the same holds true if the losing teams had won, btw.

You DO know that most of these were one-run contests? They are literally decided by a handful of fungible events.

Like last night? I don't think wild pitches and bases loaded walks are more fungible events than hits or strikeouts.

no one's saying the games lack meaning. there's a reason we don't end the season at game 162. you just have to divorce yourself from the idea that the postseason is about deciding who the best team is when there's like a million better ways to determine that. it's a contest.

It's entertainment (will post about this shortly)...

Short series, least of all 3 of 5 like the one my Mets won vs the Reds in '73, are a crapshoot. Were the Mets anywhere as good as Cincinnati? No fucking way.

Anyway,
ALCS = scrappy heroes
NLCS - villainous bastards

The Cardinals are the person who takes the parking spot you've been waiting for, clicker on, for three minutes. They'll step out, shirtless and tan, sunglasses hanging off the backs of their ears, and wave off your complaints. In their mind, they'll think they addressed your complaints politely. In reality, they yelled something like, "U jelly?" or "U mad bro?" and walked away holding the hand of someone insanely hot.

The Giants are more insecure, and it manifests itself in a mad desire to prove something over and over and over again that can't really be proven:

Giants fan: Why did you write that the Giants aren't the best team in baseball?

Pundit: Because they aren't.

Giants fan: /recites stories of recent success

Pundit: I think they have a lot of talent, but they also have ...

Giants fan: /complains

Pundit: You literally won a game last night with a bases loaded walk, a pitcher error, and a wild pitch.

Giants fan: /talks about knowing how to win

Giants fan: /mentions 'even year'

Giants fan: /clicks on 30 articles about the Giants

Giants fan: /complains about lack of Giants coverage

Giants fan: /screenshots postseason predictions and MS Paints "lolololol" over all of them

Pundit: I cover soccer as of five seconds ago. Please stop talking to me.

http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/2014/10/8/6946969/alcs-nlcs-giants-cardinals-royals-orioles

god, the idiots going on about how bryce harper has "no class" need to get punched in the anus

Harper reminds me of hockey. I don't know why.