pretty much
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 8 August 2018 02:48 (six years ago) link
yeah that's kind of silly
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 8 August 2018 02:50 (six years ago) link
I've been assuming the past month or so that Trout would again finish second for MVP behind Betts. But it's starting to look like Martinez, even as a DH, will take enough votes from Betts (Ramirez, too) that Trout will win. Usual disclaimer: just handicapping here, not advocating/opining.
― clemenza, Wednesday, 8 August 2018 14:32 (six years ago) link
It’s gonna be an interesting decision, for sure.
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 8 August 2018 14:44 (six years ago) link
hoping there are enough "best player, period" voters and the fact that Boston may win the East by more than the WAR of any of their players
Jose Ramirez, too
― a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 August 2018 15:08 (six years ago) link
I don’t think the best player should necessarily win the MVP. trout, betts, and ramirez are all equally deserving this year imo
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 8 August 2018 18:01 (six years ago) link
it's an individual award. it should go to the best individual.
― a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 August 2018 18:06 (six years ago) link
no it goes to the player who had the best season
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 8 August 2018 20:55 (six years ago) link
assuming these numbers hold I'd be surprised if Trout got it. his team is almost certainly going to miss the playoffs, while the other two practically have it clinched, with Betts being a part of what may be the greatest Boston Red Sox team ever. plus Trout is always in the conversation (plus he's won it twice), and they generally like to get fresh faces in there (remember the "he'll have plenty of chances to win one in the future" argument used to justify giving it to Miggy?). I know voters like to say this stuff doesn't affect their choice but I'm sure it does, for some of them at least. Enough to tilt it away from him.
― frogbs, Wednesday, 8 August 2018 21:03 (six years ago) link
If Martinez wins a Triple Crown--and he's pretty damn close right now--that would really scramble things up. I don't think Martinez would win--DH is a huge mountain to climb right now, more even than 10 years ago, when Ortiz had a 4th/2nd/3rd/4th run--but that would have a big effect on the results. And again, I think he'd take votes away from Betts, opening up room for Trout or Ramirez.
― clemenza, Wednesday, 8 August 2018 21:12 (six years ago) link
Playing the hits: There are now only eight position players in MLB history with at least three seasons of 10+ WAR. They are: Babe Ruth, Barry Bonds, Willie Mays, Rogers Hornsby, Ted Williams, Ty Cobb, Mickey Mantle, and Mike Trout. Mike Trout remains 27 years old.— Ted Berg (@OGTedBerg) September 27, 2018
― mookieproof, Thursday, 27 September 2018 15:43 (six years ago) link
Mike Trout remains 27 years old.
― Jersey Al (Albert R. Broccoli), Thursday, 27 September 2018 16:07 (six years ago) link
jesus christ
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 27 September 2018 16:44 (six years ago) link
did you mean to post that on the politics thred tracer
― YouTube_-_funy_cats.flv (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Thursday, 27 September 2018 16:45 (six years ago) link
i was thinking "hey maybe there's a chance Trout will wind up with the most 10-plus WAR seasons..." then saw Hornsby and Mays had 6 apiece, and Ruth had 9. So probably not.
― omar little, Thursday, 27 September 2018 16:48 (six years ago) link
He'll probably tie Mays for the most 10+ seasons that don't win him an MVP.
― clemenza, Thursday, 27 September 2018 17:22 (six years ago) link
(Can't realistically compare MVP-related things to anyone from the '30s or before--different system.)
― clemenza, Thursday, 27 September 2018 17:24 (six years ago) link
James has this new thing on his site called "HOF Value Standard" (he held a contest for the most awkward name possible and that won), which combines Win Shares and WAR. The "bar for Hall of Fame worthiness" is 500; Trout is at 523.2.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 15 January 2019 13:25 (five years ago) link
He's really clinging to Win Shares, isn't he?
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Tuesday, 15 January 2019 13:54 (five years ago) link
I know, it's kind of bizarre.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 15 January 2019 13:58 (five years ago) link
http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/26026415/angels-owner-arte-moreno-says-new-mike-trout-deal-subject-internal-talks
intersting
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 19 February 2019 03:48 (five years ago) link
Not news: Mike Trout can't be LeBron James or Wayne Gretzky.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/mike-trout-should-have-won-a-playoff-game-by-now/
― clemenza, Sunday, 17 March 2019 15:56 (five years ago) link
BREAKING: Star center fielder Mike Trout and the Los Angeles Angels are finalizing a record-breaking 12-year contract worth more than $430 million, sources familiar with the deal tell ESPN. Details: https://t.co/bROnnC11Uh— Jeff Passan (@JeffPassan) March 19, 2019
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 19 March 2019 14:18 (five years ago) link
hope the Angels get him and Ohtani some damn teammates
― a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 19 March 2019 14:27 (five years ago) link
wow
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Tuesday, 19 March 2019 14:28 (five years ago) link
holy moly
― heinrich boll weevil (Hadrian VIII), Tuesday, 19 March 2019 14:36 (five years ago) link
so weird to think about mike trout, age 40 baseball player. but as these things go, we'll all blink a few times and then suddenly the mike trout retirement thread will be upon us
― but i'm there are fuckups (Karl Malone), Tuesday, 19 March 2019 14:43 (five years ago) link
lol at harper going through all the rigamarole to get a bigger deal than machado
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 19 March 2019 14:51 (five years ago) link
considering what the Phils paid Bryce this seems like a bargain
― omar little, Tuesday, 19 March 2019 15:17 (five years ago) link
yeah i think that's a bit low
― a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 19 March 2019 15:20 (five years ago) link
it’s definitely low but you can only break with precedence so much
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 19 March 2019 15:22 (five years ago) link
a much better use of money than signing the 32(?) year old Pujols to 10 years/240.
― omar little, Tuesday, 19 March 2019 15:25 (five years ago) link
only 3 years left on that deal!!!!
― but i'm there are fuckups (Karl Malone), Tuesday, 19 March 2019 15:25 (five years ago) link
good news though:
Look, I know we as LA Angels fans do this every year. One way or another, we find ourselves dwelling on the idea of a possible Albert Pujols “resurgence” and year after year we are disappointed, but hear me out.LA Angels fans, this could be the year. This could really be the one. Albert Pujols is going to have a good year. I’m speaking (writing) it into existence. I am so confident in Pujols have a good year in 2019 that I would bet… absolutely nothing on it.My lack of confidence aside, Pujols is having himself a solid Spring Training. He had two surgeries over the offseason, undergoing a procedure on his knee that ended his year while also having bone spurs removed in September. Nonetheless, he is putting on a clinic down in Tempe.In 19 at-bats, Pujols is slashing .474/.545/.694 for the Angels, proving to us all that he can in fact swing a bat. Only two hits have gone for extra bases, a double and a home run, but Pujols has been making good contact every time he steps up to the plate.Usually at the beginning of Spring Training we get a quote from The Machine telling us he’s in the best shape of his life, has dropped weight, or something of the sort. This year things were relatively quiet as the best right-handed hitter of all time (yeah I said it) showed up in Tempe. The only reports were regarding his Opening Day status, which is looking good so far.But none of these Spring Training stats matter unless Pujols can carry it into the regular season. And truth be told Angels fans, I think he can.Last year, Pujols had to play first base 70 times, his highest total since 2014. Obviously you don’t want someone as injury prone as Pujols manning first that often, and 2019 should prove different for him.To start the year, Pujols will likely be the everyday designated hitter until Shohei Ohtani returns. Justin Bour will likely be playing first base in that period as well. Once Ohtani returns, things will get interesting as all three players are restricted to 1B/DH.Obviously, Ohtani will be in the lineup everyday except for the occasional day off and if his rehab towards pitching in 2020 interferes with the game. The Angels are intent on having him ready for 2020 as a pitcher, and have stated that his rehab will take priority.So when Ohtani doesn’t play, Pujols naturally slides into the DH role. When Ohtani is in the lineup though, there will be some sort of platoon between Pujols and Bour. It could be a natural lefty-righty platoon considering Bour absolutely mashed against right-handed pitching, but that is yet to be determined.The reason for optimism with Pujols this season comes directly from the fact that he won’t be playing first base nearly as much, keeping him well rested. If Pujols can start the season hot at the plate and carry that momentum once Ohtani comes back, the top of the Angels’ lineup becomes very, very scary.
LA Angels fans, this could be the year. This could really be the one. Albert Pujols is going to have a good year. I’m speaking (writing) it into existence. I am so confident in Pujols have a good year in 2019 that I would bet… absolutely nothing on it.
My lack of confidence aside, Pujols is having himself a solid Spring Training. He had two surgeries over the offseason, undergoing a procedure on his knee that ended his year while also having bone spurs removed in September. Nonetheless, he is putting on a clinic down in Tempe.
In 19 at-bats, Pujols is slashing .474/.545/.694 for the Angels, proving to us all that he can in fact swing a bat. Only two hits have gone for extra bases, a double and a home run, but Pujols has been making good contact every time he steps up to the plate.
Usually at the beginning of Spring Training we get a quote from The Machine telling us he’s in the best shape of his life, has dropped weight, or something of the sort. This year things were relatively quiet as the best right-handed hitter of all time (yeah I said it) showed up in Tempe. The only reports were regarding his Opening Day status, which is looking good so far.
But none of these Spring Training stats matter unless Pujols can carry it into the regular season. And truth be told Angels fans, I think he can.
Last year, Pujols had to play first base 70 times, his highest total since 2014. Obviously you don’t want someone as injury prone as Pujols manning first that often, and 2019 should prove different for him.
To start the year, Pujols will likely be the everyday designated hitter until Shohei Ohtani returns. Justin Bour will likely be playing first base in that period as well. Once Ohtani returns, things will get interesting as all three players are restricted to 1B/DH.
Obviously, Ohtani will be in the lineup everyday except for the occasional day off and if his rehab towards pitching in 2020 interferes with the game. The Angels are intent on having him ready for 2020 as a pitcher, and have stated that his rehab will take priority.
So when Ohtani doesn’t play, Pujols naturally slides into the DH role. When Ohtani is in the lineup though, there will be some sort of platoon between Pujols and Bour. It could be a natural lefty-righty platoon considering Bour absolutely mashed against right-handed pitching, but that is yet to be determined.
The reason for optimism with Pujols this season comes directly from the fact that he won’t be playing first base nearly as much, keeping him well rested. If Pujols can start the season hot at the plate and carry that momentum once Ohtani comes back, the top of the Angels’ lineup becomes very, very scary.
― omar little, Tuesday, 19 March 2019 15:29 (five years ago) link
Albert Pujols has the Los Angeles Angels in a very tough spot. He signed a 10-year, $240 million contract as a free agent prior to the 2012 season. And despite diminishing returns, he intends to fulfill every minute of it, he told Boomskie on Baseball in an exclusive interview a few days ago.
Inclusive of this one, he has three seasons to go on that deal and the Angels owe him $87 million. He turned 39 in January.
“Well, that’s what I signed, right? I signed a 10-year deal,” Pujols said in a nearly empty clubhouse at Tempe Diablo Stadium. “That’s my main goal: to try and honor that. And I’m going to do the best I can to do just that.”
hero
DEFENSE REPORT: 1B Albert Pujols made three errors in the fourth inning, including two on one play. He mishandled one routine bouncer. Then he bobbled another bouncer, for one error, and then swatted the ball into foul territory as he tried to shovel it to first, for a second error. Earlier in the game, Pujols showed some nice footwork to take a wide throw from 3B Ward with his foot on the bag.
― omar little, Tuesday, 19 March 2019 15:30 (five years ago) link
Here's the contract valuation for Mike Trout's 12-year, $430 million extension with the Angels. If he's worth more than 44.5 WAR from 2021 to 2032, this contract is a win for Los Angeles. You have to believe that he will easily reach that total. pic.twitter.com/wM1QDVI44R— Devan Fink (@DevanFink) March 19, 2019
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 19 March 2019 15:53 (five years ago) link
Smart guy, I'd say--happy where's he playing, big payday but not obsessed with the market. Compared to the three big recent signings, he could have held out for a lot more, I'm sure, either in fewer years or more money.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 19 March 2019 17:13 (five years ago) link
all that's true, but i'm sure the angels are very happy that he's a smart guy
― but i'm there are fuckups (Karl Malone), Tuesday, 19 March 2019 17:43 (five years ago) link
Definitely. And if they ever get out from under the Pujols contract, they can go get him some help.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 19 March 2019 18:01 (five years ago) link
that WAR above seems very conservative...am I missing something? A decline in age 30 season to 4.1? His avg seasonal WAR (discounting 40 gm rookie season) is 9.1
GIven this projection (and assuming he maintains current avg in 2019/20) he would end the contract 12th in WAR btw Musial and Hornsby
― heinrich boll weevil (Hadrian VIII), Tuesday, 19 March 2019 19:49 (five years ago) link
Or I guess this is just what he would minimally need to do in order to justify the $?
― heinrich boll weevil (Hadrian VIII), Tuesday, 19 March 2019 19:50 (five years ago) link
I’m more interested in what his surplus value is w that contract
― Its big ball chunky time (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Tuesday, 19 March 2019 20:13 (five years ago) link
― heinrich boll weevil (Hadrian VIII), Tuesday, March 19, 2019 3:50 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
correct
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 19 March 2019 21:04 (five years ago) link
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/mike-trout-is-a-430-million-bargain/
The title is, if things go as expected, absolutely true, but it made me laugh anyway because every 538 title is constructed the same way, sports and politics both. They had that title ready to go no matter what he signed for.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 19 March 2019 22:56 (five years ago) link
trout's contract compared to others, with everything converted to 2019 dollars:
https://i.imgur.com/mbm4u8M.png"I’ve included two Trout contracts below. The first is the $426.5 million figure representing the total value of the money owed to Trout; the second is Trout’s extension, assuming 5% inflation in the following two seasons."
https://blogs.fangraphs.com/mike-trout-leaves-money-on-the-table-again/
― but i'm there are fuckups (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 20 March 2019 01:31 (five years ago) link
Those who call Mke Trout “boring” think the Karkrasians are celebrities. Trout cares about being the best, 3.9 or 4.0 to first, winning, being a great teammate, person, without need for celebrity or entourage.— Peter Gammons (@pgammo) March 20, 2019
― Andy K, Wednesday, 20 March 2019 13:42 (five years ago) link
lolll
― heinrich boll weevil (Hadrian VIII), Wednesday, 20 March 2019 14:05 (five years ago) link
How exactly is the $10M/WAR number calculated? I always see these kinds of numbers but am never completely sure where they come from. Two win players are definitely not getting $20M/yr on the open market now. I'm assuming they look at every current player who signed via free agency and are calculating the average WAR they've put up over the length of their contract.
For example, take Albert Pujols' contract, he's making $24M/yr and he's averaged about 1.5 WAR/yr (I'm estimating) over the seven years of his contract, so that's $16M per win per year. Factor in all free agents in the same way, and you get to $10M/WAR.
If this is how it's done, I'm not sure I buy it. Is inflation taken into account? What about players who sign extensions that buy out their free agent years? Fewer big stars even reach free agency, and you could argue that the lesser players that do are increasingly overpaid, which makes WAR more expensive on the open market. etc.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Wednesday, 20 March 2019 14:40 (five years ago) link
leg cramp!
http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/26383539/trout-suffers-leg-cramp-escapes-serious-injury
― a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Friday, 29 March 2019 11:43 (five years ago) link