― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Thursday, 8 April 2004 06:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chris 'The Velvet Bingo' V (Chris V), Thursday, 8 April 2004 10:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― dyson (dyson), Thursday, 8 April 2004 14:29 (twenty-one years ago)
I was thinking of doing the NYC pilgrimage late this summer, but I might do Boston instead. Much as I dislike modern baseball, I've got to see a game at Fenway before they change it or (God forbid) tear it down.
So if they did decide to tear down Fenway for a modern stadium, are we talking rioting in the streets in Boston?
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Thursday, 8 April 2004 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― John (jdahlem), Thursday, 8 April 2004 22:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― John (jdahlem), Thursday, 8 April 2004 22:24 (twenty-one years ago)
The Baker Bowl wasn't as much of a HR paradise as it seems, though (not so bad as the Polo Grounds) - that 60ft wall did crazy things.
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Thursday, 8 April 2004 22:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― John (jdahlem), Friday, 9 April 2004 00:43 (twenty-one years ago)
i'm guessing the baker bowl's park index rocketed up with the advent of the lively ball, but the article doesn't make clear its effect on home runs. also, compare coor's field (at 155) to these guys. i had no idea the difference between it and other hitter's parks was that vast.
― John (jdahlem), Friday, 9 April 2004 03:52 (twenty-one years ago)