Hall of Fame Ballot 2005

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
This isn't an official list yet, so there may be a couple of first-time eligibles missing. (I cobbled this together from a HOF story on MLB.com, plus the Future Hall of Fame Elections page on the HOF website.) Still, any player who has a chance is probably already listed here. Who do you go with? (* first-time)

*Jim Abbott
*Paul Assenmacher
*Jeff Blauser
Bert Blyleven
*Wade Boggs
*Tom Candiotti
Dave Concepcion
*Chili Davis
Andre Dawson
Steve Garvey
Goose Gossage
*Jeff King
*Mark Langston
Don Mattingly
*Jack McDowell
*Willie McGee
*Brian McRae
*Jeff Montgomery
Jack Morris
Dale Murphy
*Otis Nixon
Dave Parker
*Tony Phillips
*Mark Portugal
Jim Rice
Ryne Sandberg
Lee Smith
*Terry Steinbach
*Darryl Strawberry
Bruce Sutter
Alan Trammell

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 26 July 2004 20:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Off the top of my head, no stats, no nothin' but guts & glory:

Jim Rice
Bruce Sutter
mmmmaybe Margo Chicken Boggs

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 26 July 2004 20:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Sandberg, Sutter, and Paul Assenmacher, if only for his legendarily bad pickoff move.

Gear! (Gear!), Monday, 26 July 2004 20:28 (twenty-one years ago)

DESTROY MARK PORTUGAL.

The Dreaded Rear Admiral (Leee), Monday, 26 July 2004 22:25 (twenty-one years ago)

ahhh Brian McRae, noooo

Chili Davis, yes!

Gear! (Gear!), Monday, 26 July 2004 23:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Bert Blyleven
Wade Boggs
Dale Murphy
Ryan Sandberg

The most intriguing name on that list Darryl Strawberry. Yeah, he put up some monster years, but the general consensus is that the guy came far from reaching his potential and that is almost fully his fault. I think he eventually gets in, but certainly not on the first ballot. That's his punishment for being such a dope.

boldbury (boldbury), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 01:15 (twenty-one years ago)

I think you mean "Bitch" McRae

oh Willie McGee, has it already been four years?!?

mookieproof (mookieproof), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 01:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I gotta say boldbury, I don't see Strawberry even coming close.

Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 01:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Do you think the numbers aren't there, or is the extra-cirricular stuff? Both?

I can see it going either way and neither way would surprise me.

boldbury (boldbury), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 01:51 (twenty-one years ago)

OK, I just looked at his career numbers and they were way less impressive than I thought they were. The first nine years of his career, '83-'91, he averaged 28.2 HR a season, which was very good for that era. However, his highest batting average during that stretch was .284 and he only topped .270 three times.

I guess I have too many memories as a young baseball fan of him being one of the top two or three most dangerous guys in the NL, and had forgotten just how bad-to-mediocre the second half of his career was.

boldbury (boldbury), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 02:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't think the numbers are there personally. Plus I think the view that he wasted his considerable potential will hurt him in the end. 335 HR, 1000 RBI, 1401 hits, .259 BA, .505 SLG, 221 SB....I don't see it, even taking into account his brief dominance. If Mattingly and Rice and Murphy can't make it in for their numbers, Straw ain't either.

Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 02:07 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah xpost

Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 02:07 (twenty-one years ago)

what happened to joe carter - he was on the last ballot, no¿

dyson (dyson), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 02:58 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm only sold on Sandberg, Boggs, Blyleven and Gossage. Trammell, Sutter and Lee Smith on the cusp.

Like Dave Parker and Dale Murphy, Straw and Rice just weren't good enough for long enough. Dawson and Mattingly are oversold by their fans.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 15:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Joe Carter got 3.75% last year and was dropped from the ballot, properly I think. An RBI-padded resume from being on hitting-heavy teams.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 15:06 (twenty-one years ago)

so if he was on a different team he'd have less RBIs? Not sure I follow that logic.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 15:09 (twenty-one years ago)

shitier team than the early 90's jays = less peeps on base = less rbi.

so what % is required to stay on the ballot, then¿

dyson (dyson), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 15:17 (twenty-one years ago)

C'mon h, you know better than that. Stick the Carter of '92-93 on the 2003 Dodgers and yep, he'd have a lot less RBIs.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 15:23 (twenty-one years ago)

so if he was on a different team he'd have less RBIs? Not sure I follow that logic.

dude! worse hitters = less guys on base = less Runners to Bat In.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 15:31 (twenty-one years ago)

so RBIs were the only criteria by which he was considered?

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 15:47 (twenty-one years ago)

I think his stint as color man on WGN Cubs broadcasts hurt him, too.

boldbury (boldbury), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 15:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, the conventional measures of baseball were weighted heavily upon:

Batting Average
Home Runs
Runs Batted In

aka the three elements of the triple crown.

I think that "modern" baseball analysis has shown RBIs are largely incidental and that Batting Average might mask a player's true objective (ie, to get on base = score runs).

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 15:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Carter still would have driven in 90 last year in LA, take a look at how he did in Cleveland back when it was the black hole of baseball. Joe Carter had a good career, but he probably isn't a hall of famer. He also never was as good at his peak as Rice, Dawson, Garvey, Parker, Murphy or Mattingly. Each of those guys you could say was one of the best players in the game at least for a season or two.

Don Mattingly was one of the best players in the game until he hurt his back and then he just wasn't the same guy. It is a shame, as he was a class player.

Dale Murphy had a couple of great seasons, a few good ones and played for a long time. He didn't really produce much after turning 32, which seems to be the difference in good players and HOF players.

I don't think Alan Trammell or Lou Whitaker came up in our past HOF discussions, but really, those guys deserve some props. Both were as good as it gets as SS and 2b during their time period. Checking out their stats, I was suprised by how many HRs that Whitaker hit and that he was still a solid player up until the strike year of 94 (age 37). Trammell was hurt a bunch the last few years of his career, which probably took his numbers down a bit.


Earl Nash (earlnash), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 16:03 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost - yeah but is it possible that by de-weighting RBIs we're placing too much emphasis on batting average (also a masking stat)? It just seems like punishing Carter for doing what hitters are supposed to do, ie. score runs.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 16:04 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah but is it possible that by de-weighting RBIs we're placing too much emphasis on batting average (also a masking stat)?

well, this is getting into stathead territory beginning with a quick jaunt up the OBPS foothills, a brief stayover at the VORP/EqA basecamp culminating with the trek up the steep slopes of RARP/AdjRunsCreated.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 16:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Hold on a sec, G - I'm gonna go piss on the campfire over at RISP. Fuckers.

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 16:16 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.julietwaldron.com/frodo/samfrodoDoom.jpg

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 16:19 (twenty-one years ago)

90 RBI is a lot different than 121.... and no indicator of the player's skill in and of itself.

I don't mean to "punish" Carter, but when you isolate his abilities, he had a number of big-RBI years which weren't as great as they "looked." ...he never placed in the top 5 in the league in slugging. Tony Perez, also a fine hitter with a longer career than Carter, is also an undeserved HOFer to me because he got credit (via his run of 90+ RBI seasons) for luckily batting when Rose Morgan et al were always on base.

More middle infielders should be in the Hall.

It's a hitter's job to get on base and get total bases. Runs and RBI are contextual, ie not "his." The Baseball Prospectus annual doesn't even include R and RBI in the player's stat line -- that's what we have OBP and SLG for.

http://www.baseballreference.com/c/cartejo01.shtml


His Adjusted OPS was 104% of the league average for his career, and his raw stats were .259/.306/.464? He shouldn't even be in the HOF discussion. Top comparable hitters: non-HOFers Murphy, Galarraga, Baylor.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 16:20 (twenty-one years ago)

All of whom had seasons that trounced Carter's best too!

Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 17:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't like Joe deserves to make the HOF, though I would have liked to see him at least hang around the ballot for a few more years as a consolation prize.

Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 27 July 2004 17:07 (twenty-one years ago)

four years pass...

Jim Abbott thrilled that University of Michigan will retire his baseball number

The first time Michigan baseball coach Rich Maloney ever spoke with pitcher Jim Abbott, Maloney was a college shortstop and team captain at Western Michigan. He called Abbott, then a promising high schooler from Flint, hoping to woo him to Kalamazoo.

Abbott instead opted for Michigan.

When the two spoke again in recent weeks, nearly a quarter-century after that first conversation in 1985, Maloney made Abbott another enticing offer. Would Abbott be interested in returning to Ann Arbor to have his uniform number retired?

This time, the pitcher eagerly agreed.

"I thought back immediately to my freshman year and showing up there, and how far off anything like this would have seemed at that point," Abbott said of learning the news. "I'm incredibly honored."

The university announced Wednesday that Abbott's No. 31 would be retired in a ceremony April 18 prior to the Wolverines' home game against Michigan State.

Abbott, who pitched for U-M from 1986 to 1988 before embarking on a 10-year professional career, will become the fifth person in program history to have his number retired.

Coaches hatched the idea of retiring his number during the building of the Wilpon Baseball and Softball Complex (LOL -- ed.) as a way to share the program's history. Maloney said Abbott's addition to the group was a "no brainer."

"You have to be very selective and it's a difficult decision, but to me, this one was not very hard," Maloney said. "Not only with the success he had at Michigan, but more importantly on top of all that, his humility and how he's represented the university."

Abbott retired from baseball in 1999. He currently lives in Orange County, Calif., and does motivational speaking around the country. He also recently worked on a disability awareness project for the federal government.

He counts his years at Michigan as one of his most cherished achievements.

"I take a lot of pride in having played at Michigan," Abbott said. "Pretty much everywhere I go, people know I went there. I wear it on my sleeve."

A look at some of the key statistics Jim Abbott compiled while pitching for Michigan from 1986 to 1988:

Stat Rank
26 career wins Fourth
13 complete games Eighth
3.04 career ERA Sixth

- 1987 Golden Spikes winner, given to college baseball's top player.
- 1987 Big Ten Male Athlete of the Year

Other Wolverines with retired baseball numbers: Don Lund (1943-45), Moby Benedict (1954-56), Bill Freehan (1961) and coach Ray Fisher (1921-58).

Andy K, Thursday, 12 February 2009 16:56 (seventeen years ago)

The first time Michigan baseball coach Rich Maloney ever spoke with pitcher Jim Abbott, Maloney was a college shortstop and team captain at Western Michigan.

WAHT

JtM Is Ruled By A Black Man (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Friday, 13 February 2009 03:17 (seventeen years ago)

o nevermind. I've been drinking.

JtM Is Ruled By A Black Man (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Friday, 13 February 2009 03:19 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.