From my amateur analysis I've come up with the following traits:
Lead-off: Patient (high OBP), Fast, Contact Hitter. The best combination of speed and OBP.2nd: ??? This seems to vary from manager to manager. Patient (high OBP) would be assumed, I'd guess the second best combination of speed and OBP.3rd: High-SLG (but not necessarily a home run hitter), Contact.Clean-Up: Contact, Home-Runs, High SLG.5th: Contact, High SLG, but not necessarily as patient (OBP) as #1-4. More prone to strikeouts than #3-4.6th: The remaining player who has the best combination of Patience (OBP) and SLG.7th: Next best OBP8th: OR should 8th have the next highest OBP so as to get on base with 2 outs and have the pitcher finish the inning?
What gives, baseball fans?
Sorry, this seems to apply to NL based management only, I'll leave the long-awaited "DH-C/D?" heated debate for another rainy day.
― gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 4 February 2004 02:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 4 February 2004 18:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 4 February 2004 18:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Wednesday, 4 February 2004 19:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― otto midnight, Thursday, 5 February 2004 02:44 (twenty-two years ago)
AL teams seem to follow some kind of Wockenfuss rule and never have the slowest runner batting 9th, even with the DH. You don't want some lead leg on base in front of your speedster, if possible.
I think if you have a power hitter that is dangerous, they are going to bat 4th even if they strike out like Rob Deer or Reggie Jackson. There are a bunch of current players with good power that strike out at ridiculous levels such as Adam Dunn, Richie Sexton, Jim Thome and Troy Glaus.
― earlnash, Thursday, 5 February 2004 02:57 (twenty-two years ago)
In the NL, the 8th batter should have a bit of speed if you can afford it. The same goes for the 9th hitter in the AL. The reason is that the next batter, be in the pitcher in the NL or the leadoff man in the AL, will likely be a ground ball or line drive hitter. Speed would be nice in the last spot so that they can leg it out.
Being a Yankee fan, I will use them to demonstrate MY perfect lineup. This is pending the A-Rod deal.
1. Lofton - Speed2. Jeter - Great opposite field hitter3. Giambi - Power; lot of K's. Not consistent enough to protect #4.4. A-Rod - Great all around hitter5. Sheffield - Power. Can protect A-Rod.6. Posada - Could also go with Matsui here, but Posada is a switch hitter.7. Matsui - Little pressure in this spot, so good production will come.8. Enrique Wilson, etc. - 2nd base is up in the air. Basically a leftover.9. Bernie Williams - I love Bernie, but he has lost ALL of his power. Since he can still run a little, he my be able to stretch a Lofton single to third.
― Tommy Baseball, Sunday, 15 February 2004 19:30 (twenty-two years ago)
4. In my opinion, the cleanup hitter doesn't need a bit of power at all, although most will disagree with me. Sure, you'd like anyone this high in the lineup to have some pop, but I feel that the cleanup hitter has to be the person with the best batting average.
I'm trying to envision a high batting average hitter like Tony Gwynn hitting clean-up in your lineup merely because of his high BA... all those slappy bloops or bunt-singles really put the probability of runners in scoring position making it home in jeopardy.
And just so you know, I have a huge soft spot for traditional baseball thought (SBs, hit/runs, sac plays)... that's why I rooted for the Marlins in the World Series last year! :-O
― gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 20 February 2004 01:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― John (jdahlem), Friday, 20 February 2004 01:20 (twenty-two years ago)
Migrating, migrating (homepage)...Something I wrote in 2009 after watching a VHS of the 1971 ASG:
Some comic relief right off the top: Sparky Anderson has Mays leading off and Aaron batting second. You'll sometimes hear about teams having power at the top of the lineup, maybe a couple of middle infielders with 15-20 home runs apiece. On this particular night, the N.L. had 1200+ home runs setting the table.
Looks like Sparky was a half-century ahead of the curve there. Mays and Aaron would almost certainly be leading off today for any team, unless there were a Rickey Henderson-level leadoff guy to knock them down to second.
― clemenza, Monday, 16 March 2026 00:16 (one month ago)
(There is no "Rickey Henderson-level" leadoff hitter not named Rickey Henderson; let's say Mookie Betts/George Springer-level instead.)
― clemenza, Monday, 16 March 2026 00:25 (one month ago)