2005 NL Most Valuable Player: Albert Pujols

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
NEW YORK -- Albert Pujols started his career with four startling seasons, equal or better than those of many Hall of Famers. Only Barry Bonds always did better -- until this year.

Pujols won his first National League MVP award Tuesday, beating Andruw Jones in a close vote that didn't include Bonds, who missed most of the season because of a knee injury.

"A lot of the fans and even the players, they missed Barry," Pujols said of the seven-time MVP, who had won the previous four seasons. "I wished he would have been healthy and played."

Pujols, the St. Louis Cardinals' first baseman, received 18 first-place votes and 14 seconds for 378 points in balloting by the Baseball Writers' Association of America. Jones, the Atlanta Braves' center fielder, got 13 firsts, 17 seconds and two thirds for 351 points.

Chicago Cubs first baseman Derrek Lee got the other first-place vote and was third with 263 points.

"It's awesome when you hear people compare yourself with Barry," Pujols said.

Pujols hit .330 with 41 homers and 117 RBIs. His average was second, five points behind Lee, and he trailed only Jones (51) and Lee (46) in homers. He tied for second in RBIs with 117, 11 behind Jones.


Jones led the major leagues in home runs, batted .263 and won his eighth straight Gold Glove.

"I think he deserved it. The voting was the right vote. He was the right choice," Jones said. "He had the most solid season average wise, home-run wise and RBI wise."

Pujols played in 161 of 162 regular-season games despite being bothered nearly the entire season by plantar fasciitis, a heel injury that he also felt in 2004.

"There were some times when I got out of bed, I had to sit up before I jumped out of bed because it was bothering me so bad," he said.

The 25-year-old Pujols has put up remarkable statistics in his first five major league seasons, averaging 40 homers and 124 RBIs to go with a .332 average.

He was third behind Bonds and Adrian Beltre in last year's MVP voting after finishing fourth as a rookie in 2001 and second to Bonds the following two seasons. Bonds missed most of this year with a knee injury after winning the award four straight times to increase his total MVPs to a record seven.

The Cardinals led the majors with 100 wins this season and breezed to the Central title. Pujols was the driving force on a team that lost Scott Rolen and other key players to injuries.

Atlanta went 90-72 and won its 14th straight division championship. Jones was the only Braves player with more than 21 homers or 78 RBIs.

Pujols, who gets a $200,000 bonus, won the 15th MVP award for the Cardinals, the first since Willie McGee in 1985.

By finishing third, Lee triggered a $750,000 increase in his next 2006 base salary to $8.75 million.

Florida first baseman Carlos Delgado, who was sixth, earned five points toward the 30 he needs by the end of 2008 to guarantee a $16 million salary in 2009. He would get 10 points for winning the MVP, 20 if he is a World Series MVP and 10 if he is a league championship series MVP.

gear (gear), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 06:53 (twenty years ago)

Chase Utley gets more points than David Wright :p :p :p

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 14:47 (twenty years ago)

Phillies got more wins than the Mess :p :p :p

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 15:00 (twenty years ago)

What, about 3?

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 15:55 (twenty years ago)

Jones coming in 2nd baffles me.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 16:36 (twenty years ago)

You should read more Yard Work then!

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 16:54 (twenty years ago)

Perhaps I shouldn't.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 17:22 (twenty years ago)

Alex: are you baffled that he didn't finish first, or that he finished as high as 2nd?

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 17:33 (twenty years ago)

Thank God Jones didn't finish first. I am a bit of a stickler about batting average, though.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 17:36 (twenty years ago)

This was a strange year for awards voting. They got the winners right, but the rest of the rankings were completely fucked.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 17:43 (twenty years ago)

I am baffled that Lee wasn't second (or first.) Other than the homers I didn't see Jones as having much to recommend him, but whatever Pujols is probably the best choice.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 17:47 (twenty years ago)

Other than the homers I didn't see Jones as having much to recommend him

Uh, he plays for the Braves?

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 17:56 (twenty years ago)

Not that I think that's a good reason, but it's why he finished second.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 17:57 (twenty years ago)

Piled up the major counting stats (HR & ribs) and is thought to be as great a CF as he was 5 years ago, which he ain't. From July on he was the clear favorite of the Flat Earthers (it made choosing btwn Pujols and Lee moot).

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 19:49 (twenty years ago)

They got the winners right, but the rest of the rankings were completely fucked.

With AL Cy Young being a clear exception, of course.

Also, Morbs OTM in voters liking RBI men on pennant-winning clubs non-shocker.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 20:02 (twenty years ago)

In Jones's favor, he was like a David Ortiz Lite in the NL. He carried a division-winning team for half of the summer. Not that he deserved to win; Pujols was the right call.

Garrett Martin (Garrett Martin), Friday, 18 November 2005 17:39 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.