this year's Hall of Fame ballot

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
here are the candidates on the ballot this year:

Rick Aguilera, Albert Belle, Bert Blyleven, Will Clark, Dave Concepcion, Andre Dawson, Gary DiSarcina, Alex Fernandez, Gary Gaetti, Steve Garvey, Dwight Gooden, Rich Gossage, Ozzie Guillen, Orel Hershiser, Gregg Jefferies, Tommy John, Doug Jones, Don Mattingly, Willie McGee, Hal Morris, Jack Morris, Dale Murphy, Dave Parker, Jim Rice, Lee Smith, Bruce Sutter, Alan Trammell, Walt Weiss, John Wetteland.

will scrappy Gary DiSarcina get in? or clutchmeister Hal Morris? watch this space...

gear (gear), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 02:54 (twenty years ago)

Weak ballot. Maybe this is the year Blyleven finally makes it? Or Andre Dawson?

I'm curious to see how many votes Belle and Gooden get (this is their first year, isn't it?)

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 04:39 (twenty years ago)

Ack.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 16:29 (twenty years ago)

GREGG JEFFRIES!?!? Goddamn.

W/out doing any number crunching (in honor of how 95% of the BBWAA do their thing), I'm gonna say that Belle & Dawson are shown love. (Yes, I do smoke crack, thanx.) Given how thin the crop seems, tho, maybe a Sutter or Blyleven can (rightfully, at least in BB's case) sneak in.

Have there ever been years when no one was inducted?

If Hal Morris does somehow get in, his plaque better include CLUTCHMEISTER on it.

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 16:38 (twenty years ago)

Gregg Jeffries is a prime example of a player hitting 30 and then being washed up. Back when he came up with the Mets, there was quite a bit of hype about Jeffries. He turned out to be an good player, but never the superstar that was expected. Jeffries played about every position at one time or another except shortstop and catcher.

There will be one Cinci sportswriter drop a vote on Hal Morris, he was a real popular player for the Reds.

I think Sutter will get the nod this year, he was close last year.

I'd vote for Blyelven, Sutter, Rice, Gossage, Dawson and Parker, but I am easy and grew up watching baseball at the end of the 70s and into the 80s.


Earl Nash (earlnash), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 17:45 (twenty years ago)

Wow, I think all their rookie cards combined are probably worth $45.

I hope Willie McGee gets in just so we can see what his plaque looks like.

http://www.apeculture.com/images/williemcgee.jpg

disco violence (disco violence), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 17:56 (twenty years ago)

yeah jeffries is the one name on that list that really makes me feel old, i can remember the hype on him coming up. am i wrong or is he the guy on sports illustrated's 'o noes! we are running out of wooden bats!' cover?

if you told me three people are going in i'd guess sutter, gossage, and dawson, but i don't think three are going in.

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 17:59 (twenty years ago)

My choice: Blyleven, and ONLY Blyleven.

disco violence (disco violence), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 18:13 (twenty years ago)

(for his wicked curve and his pioneering efforts in the advancement of fan-circling)

disco violence (disco violence), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 18:15 (twenty years ago)

I loved those stories of Jeffries swinging bats underwater to improve his bat speed and/or make baseball card collectors wet themselves in anticipation Ben McDonald / Kevin Maas style. Lesson to be learned: bat speed ain't worth a PED if you can't make contact. And being a card collector in the late 80s / early 90s in the hopes of making $$$ = a Darwin-Award-worthy move.

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 18:16 (twenty years ago)

Blyleven and Gossage; I'd have to think about Sutter, Trammell, and Alan Pakula.

I've never cared less about who gets in.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 18:25 (twenty years ago)

crippling hometown bias here, but any so-called "Hall of Fame" that excludes Dale Murphy ain't worthy of no respect.

Garrett Martin (Garrett Martin), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 18:46 (twenty years ago)

And being a card collector in the late 80s / early 90s in the hopes of making $$$ = a Darwin-Award-worthy move.

Well, I stuck with it long enough to get a half-dozen of those circa-'93 Topps "Top Prospects" with Derek Jeter on 'em.

disco violence (disco violence), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 21:10 (twenty years ago)

To make money in cards, you had to be lucky and get out at just the right time. There was a lot of money to be made off suckers in the early '90s.

David R. is crazeeee. No way the stiff-upper-lip/play-the-right/white-way writers give Albert 'Don't Call Me Joey' Belle any kind of first-ballot love.

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 21:16 (twenty years ago)

I was gonna say that, too, but David R. fully admits he's on crack upthread, so I figured it was redundant.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 22:21 (twenty years ago)

That's what I get for having Michael Irvin dump my pipe.

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 22:31 (twenty years ago)

I cashed out my cards right when the first Leaf series hit its peak, with David Justice cards going for $100 or something.

gear (gear), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 22:31 (twenty years ago)

My choice: Blyleven, and ONLY Blyleven.

I think I agree with this ... maybe Dawson as well.

The ballot is so weak, I'm wondering if voters will feel compelled to list more borderline candidates just to fill up their ballot a bit. Maybe we'll see anomalous one-year spike for guys like Mattingly.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 00:17 (twenty years ago)

Walt Weiss?

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 02:17 (twenty years ago)

I think they put most players that were a starter for ten years or so on the HOF list. Even though they do not really have a chance to get into the hall, it kind of acknowledges they were an OK player.

Earl Nash (earlnash), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 14:14 (twenty years ago)

I wish Tim Raines was eligible this time; he'd probably do a lot better than he will in whatever debut crop he IS in.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)

I'd definitely vote for Tim Raines for the hall.

I think Cal Ripken and Tony Gwynn will be eligible next year.

Earl Nash (earlnash), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 18:35 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, '06 is the year for Ripken, Gwynn, and Mark McGwire. What an amazing question-mark that last one has turned into.

Garrett Martin (Garrett Martin), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 18:50 (twenty years ago)

two weeks pass...
Jay Jaffe at Prospectus just did a meticulous 3-part ballot analysis, and endorsed these seven: Albert Belle, Bert Blyleven, Will Clark, Tommy John, Alan Trammell, Goose Gossage, and Lee Smith.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 19:42 (twenty years ago)

Lee Smith over Sutter seems suspect to me and Will Clark doesn't belong at all.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 21:01 (twenty years ago)

Jaffe's argument for Smith is completely centred upon his career value and ignores the fact that he never had a truly excellent season. During the 90's he was a one-inning saves robot who didn't post particularly great ERA's, had decent-to-good peripherals, and didn't pitch for any great teams.

His HOF argument is similar to Raffy's (before the steroids thing, of course), but weaker IMO.

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 21:15 (twenty years ago)

Raffy put up more impressive numbers and was more consistent (re: healthier) for longer.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 21:23 (twenty years ago)

To be more precise, it isn't "completely centred upon his career value" since peak WARP and career WARP are averaged in the JAWS/REJAWS metrics he's using ... however, he takes a one-year sample as the peak (five years would be better), which makes Smith look better than he was because of the long career and a pretty good 1991. Smith never had a five-seven year period of dominance like Rivera, Gossage, or even Wetteland did.

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 21:24 (twenty years ago)

Belle flat-out terrorized AL pitchers--and just about everybody else--for a decade before a degenerative hip condition, brought on by years of sticking needles into his ass, forced his retirement at age 33.

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 21:29 (twenty years ago)

Oh wait,

In past years I identified each player's peak value by his best five consecutive seasons, with allowances made for seasons lost to war or injury. That choice was an admittedly arbitrary one, and for the 2006 ballot I've revised the methodology to instead use each player's best seven seasons without concern as to whether they're consecutive or not.

OK, this helps to explain Smith's high ranking. I don't like this methodology, since it basically rewards career value all over again by allowing inconsistently great players to gain more peak value.

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 21:35 (twenty years ago)

Albert Belle has as much chance of getting into the hall of fame as Gary DiCarcina. Belle may have put up some good numbers, but he was loathed by both fans and the media. Jose Canseco was at least "liked" for a time. I think Belle was about the most disliked player of his time.

Lee Smith was a good closer on mostly bad teams, but he STUNK the few times he pitched in the playoffs. You can't say that about Gossage or Sutter.

Tommy John is an interesting vet to bring up. He pitched for a long, long time and won a bunch of games for good teams, but was never dominant. Hey how many other pitchers have a surgery named after them? There are probably some Yankee fans out there wondering what would have happened if Billy Martin had not pinch hit for him in the 4th inning during game 6 of the 1981 World Series.

I think Tommy John like Jim Kaat falls just a bit short, but he was a really good pitcher for a long time.

Earl Nash (earlnash), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 15:20 (twenty years ago)

he STUNK the few times he pitched in the playoffs

SM*LL S*MPLE S*ZE

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 15:55 (twenty years ago)

I still don't get the argument that Smith was better than Sutter. Was it just that Smith good for longer? Cuz no way Smith's best five years (in any order) beat Sutter's best five years. And small sample size or no, it's not like Smith had some amazing post-season performances which add weight to his argument.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 16:45 (twenty years ago)

i would like to see bruce sutter held out of the hall of fame until he stops with the "in MY DAY closers had to go more than 1 inning" crap. if the issue of character can be a determining factor in election to the hall it's my position that the hall doesn't need some whiney bitch of a crumudgeon.

otto midnight (otto midnight), Thursday, 22 December 2005 14:56 (twenty years ago)

So we kick out Bob Feller then?

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 22 December 2005 15:11 (twenty years ago)

is it possible to boot someone out of the hof? is there a procedure in place for that? if not should there be one?

otto midnight (otto midnight), Thursday, 22 December 2005 15:43 (twenty years ago)

BYE BYE SCOOTER

Who wants to draw parallels between Albert Belle's corked-bat scandal & Sammy Sosa's corked-bat scandal?

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 22 December 2005 15:57 (twenty years ago)

No to ejections; as Bill James wrote in his HOF book, it'd become a pretty insignificant honor if it was revocable.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 22 December 2005 17:55 (twenty years ago)

Bill Gilbert of SABR listed the Win Shares of the current Hall candidates -- Dawson, Blyleven and Will Clark are the top three, and none of the other first-timers are in the top ten (Dave Parker and Trammell are the only others over 300 WS).

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 31 December 2005 20:37 (twenty years ago)

i am curious to read neyer's current column about Hall of Famers currently playing, but not curious enough to pay money for it.

gear (gear), Saturday, 31 December 2005 22:59 (twenty years ago)

Can't they just not elect anyone some years? Dawson, Blyleven, Will Clark?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 1 January 2006 19:29 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, it happens all the time.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Sunday, 1 January 2006 19:46 (twenty years ago)

Sutter elected to Hall of Fame; Rice and Gossage fall short

By RONALD BLUM, AP Baseball Writer
January 10, 2006

NEW YORK (AP) -- Bruce Sutter was elected to the Hall of Fame on Tuesday, just the fourth relief pitcher given baseball's highest honor.

Sutter was selected on 400 of a record 520 ballots cast by 10-year members of the Baseball Writers' Association of America for 76.9 percent.

Players needed 390 votes (75 percent) to gain election. Jim Rice fell 53 votes short, finishing second with 337 votes (64.8 percent), one ahead of Goose Gossage.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 19:19 (twenty years ago)

I'm OK with that, but Gossage (who's up about 10% from last year)deserves it more... Don't see a voting summary yet, I'm assuming Bert B was down around 6th or 7th.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 19:35 (twenty years ago)

Bruce Sutter 400 76.9
Jim Rice 337 64.8
Rich Gossage 336 64.6
Andre Dawson 317 61.0
Bert Blyleven 277 53.3
Lee Smith 234 45.0
Jack Morris 214 41.2
Tommy John 154 29.6
Steve Garvey 135 26.0
Alan Trammell 92 17.7
Dave Parker 76 14.4
Dave Concepcion 65 12.5
Don Mattingly 64 12.3
Orel Hershiser 58 11.2
Dale Murphy 56 10.8
Albert Belle 40 7.7
x-Will Clark 23 4.4
x-Dwight Gooden 17 3.3
x-Willie McGee 12 2.3
x-Hal Morris 5 1.0
x-Ozzie Guillen 5 1.0
x-Gary Gaetti 4 0.8
x-John Wetteland 4 0.8
x-Rick Aguilera 3 0.6
x-Doug Jones 2 0.4
x-Greg Jefferies 2 0.4
x-Walt Weiss 1 0.2
x-Gary DiSarcina 0 0.0
x-Alex Fernandez 0 0.0

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 19:49 (twenty years ago)

WHO VOTED FOR DON MATTINGLY GET ME MY GUN AND HUNTING CAP PLS.

Jimmy Mod (I myself am lethal at 100 -110dB) (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 19:56 (twenty years ago)

If you believe in any sort of Northeastern bias among sportswriters, Mattingly placing higher than Murphy should be like exhibit # F, or something.

ample parking (Garrett Martin), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 19:57 (twenty years ago)

no, but seriously...who's in the hal morris and gary disarcina camps and why?

jonathan quayle higgins (j.q. higgins), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 19:57 (twenty years ago)

Garvey getting 3.5x votes of Belle = Boring White Guy Bias

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 19:59 (twenty years ago)

or, alternately, the anti-trick-or-treating backlash.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 20:03 (twenty years ago)

no one is in the gary disarcina camp, apparently.

otto midnight (otto midnight), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 20:07 (twenty years ago)

Wow, Wetteland got NO respect.

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 20:07 (twenty years ago)

So what paper does Walt Weiss's mom write for, again?

ample parking (Garrett Martin), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 20:09 (twenty years ago)

http://mlb.mlb.com/images/2003/12/23/cHEepwjp.jpg

Fuck yeah.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 22:11 (twenty years ago)

http://mlb.mlb.com/images/2003/12/23/cHEepwjp.jpg

VS

http://onlineathens.com/images/012005/13954_512.jpg

Jimmy Mod (I myself am lethal at 100 -110dB) (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 22:46 (twenty years ago)

Is Dave Concepcion that good (for a 70s SS) that he's getting more love than Murphy or Belle, or am I underestimating the Joe Morgan factor?

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 23:57 (twenty years ago)

I realize that Albert Belle's stats have to be judged against his era, but looking at what he did season to season and then looking at Rice, Dawson, Garvey, or Parker is quite shocking.

polyphonic (polyphonic), Wednesday, 11 January 2006 00:11 (twenty years ago)

Even judging him relative to his era ... here are the career OPS+ (OPS as a %age of the league avg) for the guys you listed:

Rice 128
Dawson 119
Garvey 116
Parker 121
Belle 143

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 11 January 2006 00:38 (twenty years ago)

Career OPS+ leaders:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/OPSplus_career.shtml

Granted, there are a lot of currently active players on the list, but their numbers will come down a bit as they decline.

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 11 January 2006 00:43 (twenty years ago)

http://www.fenwayfanatics.com/images/redsox/legends/legends_rice.jpg

cooperst0wnd

The Legend of Tony Balls (Adrian Langston), Wednesday, 11 January 2006 01:51 (twenty years ago)

concepion was pretty good daver, the reds were pretty good in the seventies.

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 11 January 2006 04:24 (twenty years ago)

Concepcion not in Trammell's league.

NY Post:
"I just don't get it," a frustrated Gossage said in Colorado yesterday, moments after he was told fellow reliever Bruce Sutter would be the only man going into Cooperstown this summer. "I'm at a loss for words... I just can't believe Sutter got in before me."


Not as memorable as "Take it to the fat man upstairs."

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 11 January 2006 15:05 (twenty years ago)

opening paragraph of dan shaughnessy's column today:

"no soup for you, jim rice."

otto midnight (otto midnight), Wednesday, 11 January 2006 16:24 (twenty years ago)

I have realized
that I do not give a damn
about HOF

Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 11 January 2006 18:23 (twenty years ago)

"the reds were pretty good in the seventies."

No shit?

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 11 January 2006 22:05 (twenty years ago)

Looking at Concepcion's stats -- he played a long time (long enough to pile up impressive hit totals and that's about it) but was never very good with the stick. Compared to replacement level shortstops, his batting looks a lot more impressive. In his career, he was 276 Batting Runs Above Replacement, compared to -27 Batting Runs Above Average. This basically confirms what we all knew growing up -- no SS in the 80's could hit worth a damn other than Cal Ripken, and the same was true in the 70's. Concepcion's numbers say more about the poor depth at his position than his own greatness. It's a lot easier now to find a shortstop who can hit than it was when Concepcion played. [although, I had no idea that he won two Silver Slugger awards, in 1981-2, years after the Reds' great run]

Of course, people don't really remember him for his bat, and glove-wise, his numbers are excellent. His peak and career Wins Above Replacement are amazing.

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 12 January 2006 02:27 (twenty years ago)

The thing I find interesting and I grew up a Reds fan and saw Concepcion play both at SS and 1b is that he didn't really become a everyday regular player until he was 26.

I cannot understand why Sutter got in and not Gossage. Maybe there was some vote splitting of some kind, but I have to believe that Gossage was just as effective and maybe even a bit more 'feared' than Sutter. The only thing I can figure is that Gossage pitching so many years past his prime that it somehow tarnished his image.

I have no doubts that if Rice, Dawson or Parker played in the late 90s they would have put up just as crazy numbers.

Earl Nash (earlnash), Thursday, 12 January 2006 03:04 (twenty years ago)

i think gossage didn't get in because he's been bitching and moaning for so many years about not getting in that he's created a backlash. i don't know if you've ever met many sportswriters but as a whole i've most to be bitter and vindictive towards, if not outright jealous of, the players they cover(ed).

otto midnight (otto midnight), Thursday, 12 January 2006 13:57 (twenty years ago)

But as noted above, he's gained a considerable amount of support year to year, just not enough.

Gossage may have pitched "many years past his prime," but unlike others (eg Steve Carlton) he was still effective at the end. From '89-94 he was generally above average, tho typically used for an inning of non-save work each appearance.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/g/gossari01.shtml

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 12 January 2006 14:52 (twenty years ago)

This basically confirms what we all knew growing up -- no SS in the 80's could hit worth a damn other than Cal Ripken, and the same was true in the 70's.

i think i know what you mean, except ripken didn't play in the 70s. kinda confusing phrasing.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 12 January 2006 16:16 (twenty years ago)

joe sheehan's piece about this is fantastic

Jams Murphy (ystrickler), Thursday, 12 January 2006 16:26 (twenty years ago)

Thanks (cept it's Steven Goldman). I forget that those columns go on in the winter...

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 12 January 2006 16:53 (twenty years ago)

i think i know what you mean, except ripken didn't play in the 70s. kinda confusing phrasing

Yeah, let me say that again ...

During the 80's, shortstops were crappy hitters by and large, with Ripken being a notable exception. I don't remember 70's baseball (many of us don't), but that decade is also known for its bad-hitting shortstops. Comparing Concepcion's numbers to those of the average or replacement-level shortstop of his day supports the notion that shortstops were just as bad with the bat in the 70's as we remember them being in the 80's.

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 12 January 2006 17:50 (twenty years ago)

Sheehan on the vote:

Over at ESPN.com, Rob Neyer did a chat session, and one of the questioners pointed to Sutter’s having a Cy Young Award, whereas Gossage doesn’t, as evidence of the former’s Hall worthiness.

Have you ever actually looked at that award? Sutter took a fractured vote with 77 of a possible 120 points, and just 10 of 24 first-place votes. It was one of the lowest winning vote totals of the 12-team era. Moreover, Sutter benefited from one of the more ridiculous split votes of all time, as Astros teammates Joe Niekro and J.R. Richard finished 2-3 right behind him, sharing 13 first-place votes. Richard, however, was vastly superior to Niekro in every way that year, with a lower ERA (and RA) in more innings, a 313/98 strikeout-to-walk ratio (versus Niekro’s 119/107), and eight more complete games than Niekro. Niekro’s edge? A 21-11 record against Richard’s 18-13, which was worth nine first-place votes to Richard’s four.

Sutter’s Cy Young Award is essentially the product of cluelessness among some voters in evaluating those two pitchers. If Richard gets proper credit, he wins the Cy Young Award, and a major part of Sutter’s Hall of Fame case, certainly vis-à-vis Gossage, disappears.

What’s galling is that Sutter is getting his Cooperstown pass in much the same way that he got that Cy Young Award: through a crack in a voting process. This is the most frustrating aspect of his election, and the one that calls the electorate into greatest question. What was acknowledged openly in the coverage of yesterday’s voting results was the idea that Sutter benefited from the lack of qualified first-ballot candidates. With no new players to vote for (Orel Hershiser led the way with 58 votes, and only two new candidates, he and Albert Belle, will make it back for another year), the voters changed the question from, “Is this player a Hall of Famer?” to “Who is the best player in this group?” That’s simply the wrong question to ask; this isn’t the MVP award, where you’re trying to determine a winner from among a field of candidates. This is the Hall of Fame, where the standards are set and it is entirely possible to have a year in which no one meets them.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 13 January 2006 21:13 (twenty years ago)

From Bill Deane of SABR...

As far as I can determine, following are the players in the Baseball
Hall of Fame with the fewest career Win Shares:

168 Bruce Sutter
181 Dizzy Dean
185 Lefty Gomez
186 Chick Hafey
188 Rollie Fingers
191 Ray Schalk
191 Addie Joss
193 Fred Lindstrom
193 George Kelly
194 Sandy Koufax

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 20 January 2006 22:52 (twenty years ago)

Looking at the stats I've changed my mind about Sutter. There is no way he should be in there. I don't know if Goosage should be either, but he has a far stronger case.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 20 January 2006 23:31 (twenty years ago)

Someone on the SABR list pointed to Sutter's comments along the lines of relievers being 'overlooked' compared to starting pitchers, which recent elections don't bear out. Youngest starting pitcher (obv counting Eckersley as a reliever) in the Hall: Nolan Ryan, b. 1947. Next youngest starter who's a lock: Roger Clemens, b. 1962. NO starting pitcher born in the intervening years has been inducted, or looks especially likely to go in. Can that be a fair appraisal?

The HOF's page on the candidates of the Negro League and pre-Negro League black players' election, results to come Feb. 27:

http://www.baseballhalloffame.org/hofers_and_honorees/negro_leaguers.htm

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 23 January 2006 19:57 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.