Which 2009 Playoff Team Will Miss the Postseason in 2010?

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

There will probably be more than one, but which one will miss by the most, I guess.

Poll Results

Option	Votes
Colorado Rockies	4
Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim	4
Los Angeles Dodgers	3
Minnesota Twins	3
Boston Red Sox	1
New York Yankees	1
Philadelphia Phillies	0
Saint Louis Cardinals	0

― Your body is a spiderland (polyphonic), Monday, 15 February 2010 17:06 (fifteen years ago)

Likeliest is one of the LA teams

― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 15 February 2010 17:10 (fifteen years ago)

LAA

― Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Monday, 15 February 2010 21:20 (fifteen years ago)

Automatic thread bump. This poll is closing tomorrow.

― System, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:01 (fifteen years ago)

I was going to say Minnesota but then I wondered who the hell else will give them a run for their money?

― mayor jingleberries, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:09 (fifteen years ago)

As long as Verlander and Porcello repeat the 2009 seasons, Bonderman, Willis, and Robertson revert to their career-best seasons, Sizemore and Jackson contribute league average numbers for their positions, Inge's knees remain intact, Ordonez achieves over 20 XBH, Carlos Guillen remains healthy and productive, Cabrera remains on the wagon, Valverde does not experience AL-hitter shock, Zumaya's right arm does not fly out of its socket, Everett does not botch over 20 routine plays, and all unmentioned position players double their respective career highs in positive counting statistics, the Twins will have to watch out.

The White Sox (pitching staff) could make it interesting.

― Andy K, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 00:26 (fifteen years ago)

I'm gonna say the Yankees don't make it due to the Rays pulling it together and showing the AL East who's boss again.

― ┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 07:52 (fifteen years ago)

rockies

― ere, Wednesday, 17 February 2010 09:19 (fifteen years ago)

dodgers

― nagl wayne (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 17 February 2010 09:24 (fifteen years ago)

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

― System, Thursday, 18 February 2010 00:01 (fifteen years ago)

morbs picked yanquis confirm/deny

― Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Thursday, 18 February 2010 00:47 (fifteen years ago)

who picked red sox?!? this = outrage.

― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 18 February 2010 00:48 (fifteen years ago)

JtM:

I'm gonna say the Yankees don't make it due to the Rays pulling it together and showing the AL East who's boss again.
― ┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:52 PM (Yesterday)

― ┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 18 February 2010 01:14 (fifteen years ago)

I dont know. As a Dodgers fan Im afraid of the Rockies. Their pitching staff was one of the best in the league last year. But I guess they do have Jim Tracy as their manager so I hope he comes through like he used to do for us.

― mayor jingleberries, Thursday, 18 February 2010 01:45 (fifteen years ago)

I picked one of the LA teams, probly Angels

― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 18 February 2010 02:28 (fifteen years ago)

seven months pass...

Bump

― Andy K, Wednesday, 22 September 2010 13:19 (fifteen years ago)

whoa

As long as Verlander and Porcello repeat the 2009 seasons, Bonderman, Willis, and Robertson revert to their career-best seasons, Sizemore and Jackson contribute league average numbers for their positions, Inge's knees remain intact, Ordonez achieves over 20 XBH, Carlos Guillen remains healthy and productive, Cabrera remains on the wagon, Valverde does not experience AL-hitter shock, Zumaya's right arm does not fly out of its socket, Everett does not botch over 20 routine plays, and all unmentioned position players double their respective career highs in positive counting statistics, the Twins will have to watch out.
The White Sox (pitching staff) could make it interesting.
― Andy K, Tuesday, February 16, 2010 7:26 PM (7 months ago) Bookmark

― sanskrit, Wednesday, 22 September 2010 14:37 (fifteen years ago)

being right about the angels sucking this year was decent consolation for being completely wrong about the mariners i guess

― ciderpress, Wednesday, 22 September 2010 14:56 (fifteen years ago)

NUMBER SIX ORG

― sanskrit, Wednesday, 22 September 2010 16:47 (fifteen years ago)

Likeliest is one of the LA teams

How about both?

― no gut busting joke can change history (polyphonic), Wednesday, 22 September 2010 17:17 (fifteen years ago)

Angels might be ok next year if they sign a decent LF and decide to actually give playing time to Mike Napoli at DH. They will probably also need a 3B since the Brandon Wood experiment seems to be an abject failure.

Dodgers on the other hand are a fucking mess with holes/replacements/upgrades needed at LF, 3B, 2B, C, and 3 goddamn rotation spots. And oh yeah the worst current owner in MLB with a matching GM.

― mayor jingleberries, Wednesday, 22 September 2010 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

angels gonna go hard for crawford? he's such an 00's-angels-type player

― ciderpress, Wednesday, 22 September 2010 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.