What Time Is It?

http://i1.wp.com/collegemedia.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/screen-shot-2013-06-02-at-7-21-38-am.png

time to shag your wife

https://ourtownbooks.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/chicken-story-time.jpg

https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4083/4847062786_9fc860dab0.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e86omL8uzks

i'm sorry

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jykIqQxEOw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0ItcjG3BgY

http://i.imgur.com/obyPuep.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/yTttRiy.png

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bXZ7BpwMlb4/UIoR6IxryJI/AAAAAAAChd8/Uk5mCHgzJgw/s1600/LBY_2012_11_VOGUE_PARIS_WATCHES_01.jpg

The same as usual.

When the 'then' which interprets itself in concernful awaiting gets dated, this dating includes some such statement as "then—when it dawns—it is time for one's daily work". The time which is interpreted in concern is already understood as a time for something. The current 'now that so and so . . .' is as such either appropriate or inappropriate. Not only is the 'now' (and so too any mode of interpreted time) a 'now that . . .' which is essentially datable; but as such it has essentially, at the same time, the structure of appropriateness or inappropriateness. Time which has been interpreted has by its very nature the character of 'the time for something' or 'the wrong time for something'. When concern makes present by awaiting and retaining, time is understood in relation to a "for-which"; and this in turn is ultimately tied up with a "for-the-sake-of-which" of Dasein's potentiality-for-Being. With this "in-order-to" relation, the time which has been made public makes manifest that structure with which we have earlier become acquainted as significance, and which constitutes the worldhood of the world.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/01/19/article-2542193-1ACDC55E00000578-917_634x1061.jpg

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41-UeiAxOAL.jpg

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51hbIOTfCnL._SY300_.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpDwiAgJhaE