It's one thing for one eyed Cat fans such as myself to overrate the ability of Geelong but it is a bit of a worry once the players start doing it. I reckon this game is the second match this season when the Cats have rolled up and have expected to win without the required effort.
Geelong's strength lies in it's even contribution accross the board and working hard for each other but against the Bulldogs as against Fremantle earlier in the year this quality was not evident.
Full credit to the Bulldogs who fully deserved their victory and for the Cats a visit to the room of mirrors is long overdue.
regards,
REB
PS - :(
― Rik E Boy (Rik E Boy), Sunday, 24 July 2005 21:02 (twenty years ago)
― chrisso (chrisso), Sunday, 24 July 2005 22:19 (twenty years ago)
You can just hope it's a mild aberration and they will be back at their best next weekend.
I was very pleased we managed to keep it together long eneough to get over the line. Chrisso your boys played well without their Captain and Rioli, I admit I was very very pleased to hear Hird would not be playing and then even more pleased when Rioli didn't take to the ground either. Hird has the uncanny nack of lifting a team that appear totally gorn e.g against WCE. In my eyes he's almost as good as Vossy!:) Much to be happy about if you're a Bombers fan, plenty of good talent coming through.
― Lucy Lion (Lucy Lion), Sunday, 24 July 2005 23:03 (twenty years ago)
REB, like me, you must have been waiting for Geelong to go 'click but they did not seem to get out of third gear. Is pace a problem for Geelong?
― Big Bird (Big Bird), Sunday, 24 July 2005 23:53 (twenty years ago)
Yeah, the whole joint was ravaged with sickness and was very happy with the way we fought hard in the face of adversity. A lot of teams would have just layed down and died. I saw a team do that two weeks ago.
― chrisso (chrisso), Sunday, 24 July 2005 23:58 (twenty years ago)
As for Pace Bird, normally Geelong is quite a quick side but I reckon the Dogs would have most sides covered for pace. While Ling is no speedster a few that are are Wojincksi and Byrnes who were not in the side. Tenace has pace but his foot skills are dodgy. Kelly, Bartel and Corey, while not superfast usually run hard to create space and I think that was the real problem for the Catters. They just didn't work hard enough. The players have got ahead of themselves in the worst way and this season could turn out to be a real waste.
Bring back Mackie Jase :)
― Rik E Boy (Rik E Boy), Monday, 25 July 2005 01:16 (twenty years ago)
Welcome to the world of up and down performances.
― jsa, Monday, 25 July 2005 01:27 (twenty years ago)
As with every week the crap victorian teams are given a free ride.
― jsa, Monday, 25 July 2005 01:30 (twenty years ago)
The stats make for interesting reading. Don't they Hawka. Hawka??
― Rik E Boy (Rik E Boy), Monday, 25 July 2005 01:44 (twenty years ago)
2 of those games were interstate.
come on hawka find out the frees for and against stats.
― jsa, Monday, 25 July 2005 02:31 (twenty years ago)
Err....because there is absolutely no connection between the amount of frees and the result?????
Radical I know, but surely worth a look?
― Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Monday, 25 July 2005 03:32 (twenty years ago)
Either they are always in front and deserving the free and on the bottom of packs etc and are deadset unlucky they keep getting belted or they receive favourable treatment.
― jsa, Monday, 25 July 2005 03:43 (twenty years ago)
― Bennö (Bennö), Monday, 25 July 2005 04:15 (twenty years ago)
Benno, I agree, cricket's a much more intersting game ATM, but it's already looking a whole lot less interesting than it was on Thursday.
― Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Monday, 25 July 2005 04:26 (twenty years ago)
Team For %For Agst %AgstCarlton 311 55.7% 247 44.3%Richmond 310 55.7% 247 44.3%Kangaroos 294 53.7% 253 46.3%Collingwood 307 53.5% 267 46.5%St Kilda 315 52.7% 283 47.3%Western B'dogs 295 52.1% 271 47.9%West Coast 291 50.7% 283 49.3%Fremantle 289 50.2% 287 49.8%Geelong 291 49.3% 299 50.7%Essendon 269 49.3% 277 50.7%Brisbane Lions 270 48.6% 285 51.4%Melbourne 279 47.5% 308 52.5%Adelaide 256 47.5% 283 52.5%Hawthorn 289 46.0% 339 54.0%Port Adelaide 285 45.5% 342 54.5%Sydney 282 45.3% 341 54.7%
Pretty Close i'd say, with Port, Syd and Haw being worst free kick giveawayers and the HAWKS being a Victorian Team ... those ruddy umpires advantaging all the Victorian sides except Hawthorn. They must still be jealous because their teams didn't win many grand finals in the 80s.
cheers
― Hawka (hawka), Monday, 25 July 2005 09:16 (twenty years ago)
jsa ... as for "carlton with a +60 freekick count" divide that by 17 games and you get 3 and a bit more free kicks between all the teams. Given that the majority of free kicks are given in backline or centre that is not that much difference.
Then you could go on for ever about the umpires not picking up the little throws, the new interpretation about slapping the arms away and numerous other contentious issues .... but now is not the time or place.
― Hawka (hawka), Monday, 25 July 2005 09:32 (twenty years ago)
― Rik E Boy (Rik E Boy), Monday, 25 July 2005 21:03 (twenty years ago)
But still doesnt answer how a side winning 2.5 games could possibly be receiving more freekicks than other sides who at least win.
― jsa, Monday, 25 July 2005 21:58 (twenty years ago)
Thanks for the freekick stats.
Funny how 2 of the top 3 sides are in the bottom for receiving freekicks and thay happen to be interstaters.
Dont tell me those stats dont clearly show that umpires either cheat or are instructed to help the victorian clubs.
― jsa, Monday, 25 July 2005 22:02 (twenty years ago)
― chrisso (chrisso), Monday, 25 July 2005 22:46 (twenty years ago)
Team Avg F Avg A DiffCarlton 18.3 14.5 3.8Richmond 18.2 14.5 3.7Kangaroos 17.3 14.9 2.4Collingwood 18.1 15.7 2.4St Kilda 18.5 16.6 1.9Western B'dogs 17.4 15.9 1.4West Coast 17.1 16.6 0.5Fremantle 17.0 16.9 0.1Geelong 17.1 17.6 -0.5Essendon 15.8 16.3 -0.5Brisbane Lions 15.9 16.8 -0.9Melbourne 16.4 18.1 -1.7Adelaide 15.1 16.6 -1.6Hawthorn 17.0 19.9 -2.9Port Adelaide 16.8 20.1 -3.4Sydney 16.6 20.1 -3.5
I am still of the opinion that an average of 3.8 free kicks per game is not that significant. I believe that umpires do have a tendency to give "softer" free kicks to teams that are behind with very little bearing on the game, except when Hawthorn lost to Carlton in the early rounds. ;)
I believe this is the only reason that some of the "Victorian" clubs are in front and the interstate clubs behind.
If I did some digging I reckon that the clubs from other states would be in front when they were having ordinary years and not playing well. I certainly wouldn't call this cheating, I would call it being more favourable to teams getting flogged (most of us love the underdog - with the exception of a few footy teams). It just so happens that the last few years it has been Victorian teams getting flogged.
As for making a difference in matches REB, you are quite correct. One or more bad calls can turn a game, however, I believe this to be rarity rather the norm. You could then ask the question, as Chrisso pointed out, why aren't Essendon on top? or why are Carlton on the bottom?
Remember that 87.5% of statistics are made up on the spot.
― Hawka (hawka), Monday, 25 July 2005 23:27 (twenty years ago)
― Rik E Boy (Rik E Boy), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 00:14 (twenty years ago)
I repeat from an earlier thread: the time span for whining about umpires without sounding like a complete tool is about 3 and a half minutes after the match. Or at least it should be. Lazy club officials like nothing better than to have the fans blaming the umps rather than themselves for their club losing games.
― Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 00:26 (twenty years ago)
It's no coincidence that 'conspiracy' starts with 'con'.
― Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 00:29 (twenty years ago)
CheersLucy
― Lucy Lion (Lucy Lion), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 05:51 (twenty years ago)
they help no doubt, but even the cheating umps cant save the Vic clubs from interstate domination.
― jsa, Wednesday, 27 July 2005 03:20 (twenty years ago)
― Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 06:29 (twenty years ago)
The swans concede plenty because of the 1000 tackles a game, you are going to have a few high and in the back.
But yep, get over it. Although there are times I do wonder if the Umpire should kick the goal as well, after giving the soft free 20 metres out (to Lloyd - *Cough*)
― Bennö (Bennö), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 09:06 (twenty years ago)
― Lucy Lion (Lucy Lion), Thursday, 28 July 2005 06:38 (twenty years ago)
You are pretty much on the mark.
Each Teams Record after playing Brisbane
― Hawka (hawka), Saturday, 30 July 2005 02:32 (twenty years ago)
― Lucy Lion (Lucy Lion), Monday, 1 August 2005 05:44 (twenty years ago)