Ack!!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Cripes what an 'effort' by my beloved Catters on Saturday. Rodney Eade has stated that Geelong did not respect the Bulldogs and I reckon he was OTM.

It's one thing for one eyed Cat fans such as myself to overrate the ability of Geelong but it is a bit of a worry once the players start doing it. I reckon this game is the second match this season when the Cats have rolled up and have expected to win without the required effort.

Geelong's strength lies in it's even contribution accross the board and working hard for each other but against the Bulldogs as against Fremantle earlier in the year this quality was not evident.

Full credit to the Bulldogs who fully deserved their victory and for the Cats a visit to the room of mirrors is long overdue.

regards,

REB

PS - :(

Rik E Boy (Rik E Boy), Sunday, 24 July 2005 21:02 (twenty years ago)

When talking about respect it got even worse after the siren when the pussies walked off the ground before the trophy presentation.

chrisso (chrisso), Sunday, 24 July 2005 22:19 (twenty years ago)

I must admit REB I started watching the game but it was sooo bad I switched and watched the Hawks v Carlton.

You can just hope it's a mild aberration and they will be back at their best next weekend.

I was very pleased we managed to keep it together long eneough to get over the line. Chrisso your boys played well without their Captain and Rioli, I admit I was very very pleased to hear Hird would not be playing and then even more pleased when Rioli didn't take to the ground either. Hird has the uncanny nack of lifting a team that appear totally gorn e.g against WCE. In my eyes he's almost as good as Vossy!:) Much to be happy about if you're a Bombers fan, plenty of good talent coming through.

Lucy Lion (Lucy Lion), Sunday, 24 July 2005 23:03 (twenty years ago)

The Dawgs got in a few good passages of play in early (Skippers goal to name one) and then the running, chasing and effort became infectious, in the end they looked faster and more committed.

REB, like me, you must have been waiting for Geelong to go 'click but they did not seem to get out of third gear. Is pace a problem for Geelong?

Big Bird (Big Bird), Sunday, 24 July 2005 23:53 (twenty years ago)

Chrisso your boys played well without their Captain and Rioli, I admit I was very very pleased to hear Hird would not be playing and then even more pleased when Rioli didn't take to the ground either.

Yeah, the whole joint was ravaged with sickness and was very happy with the way we fought hard in the face of adversity. A lot of teams would have just layed down and died. I saw a team do that two weeks ago.

chrisso (chrisso), Sunday, 24 July 2005 23:58 (twenty years ago)

Yes Susso a lack of respect at the trophy presentation. The whole day was forgettable from a Cat point of view. I don't agree that we laid down in the Swannie game though. In their one big quarter they went forward 8 times and got 8 sausage rolls. Scarlo was puking his guts up at quarter time of that game and was nowhere near Big Bazza for the rest of the night. We actually came out firing (or mis-firing when you look at the conversion rate) but to suggest we 'layed down and died' is a bit far off the mark. We got blown away in one quarter and lost by that margin.

As for Pace Bird, normally Geelong is quite a quick side but I reckon the Dogs would have most sides covered for pace. While Ling is no speedster a few that are are Wojincksi and Byrnes who were not in the side. Tenace has pace but his foot skills are dodgy. Kelly, Bartel and Corey, while not superfast usually run hard to create space and I think that was the real problem for the Catters. They just didn't work hard enough. The players have got ahead of themselves in the worst way and this season could turn out to be a real waste.

Bring back Mackie Jase :)

regards,

REB

Rik E Boy (Rik E Boy), Monday, 25 July 2005 01:16 (twenty years ago)

REB,

Welcome to the world of up and down performances.

jsa, Monday, 25 July 2005 01:27 (twenty years ago)

Please explain how both richmond, kangaroos and Essendon can have more frees then their interstate counterparts, yet be trailling most of the day, and get beaten.

As with every week the crap victorian teams are given a free ride.

jsa, Monday, 25 July 2005 01:30 (twenty years ago)

Victorian umpires? Or maybe because most games are played in Melbourne and the umps favour the crowd factor?

The stats make for interesting reading. Don't they Hawka. Hawka??

regards,

REB

Rik E Boy (Rik E Boy), Monday, 25 July 2005 01:44 (twenty years ago)

REB,

2 of those games were interstate.

come on hawka find out the frees for and against stats.

jsa, Monday, 25 July 2005 02:31 (twenty years ago)

'Please explain how both richmond, kangaroos and Essendon can have more frees then their interstate counterparts, yet be trailling most of the day, and get beaten.'

Err....because there is absolutely no connection between the amount of frees and the result?????

Radical I know, but surely worth a look?

Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Monday, 25 July 2005 03:32 (twenty years ago)

Perhaps your right Fred but there is a definite connection between vic sides and lots of freekicks. When looking at carlton with a +60 freekick count considering they have won 2.5 games how could it be.

Either they are always in front and deserving the free and on the bottom of packs etc and are deadset unlucky they keep getting belted or they receive favourable treatment.

jsa, Monday, 25 July 2005 03:43 (twenty years ago)

why are we talking footy? isn't the season over? I swear I was watching cricket on TV all weekend... is this the wizz-hard cup???

Bennö (Bennö), Monday, 25 July 2005 04:15 (twenty years ago)

I don't ever bother checking the free kick stats. There's no point. Two and a half more kicks a game, means squat, Fevola and co drop that many uncontested marks most quarters. Especially now when the first thing the bloke with the kick does is look sideways for a bloke to handball to.

Benno, I agree, cricket's a much more intersting game ATM, but it's already looking a whole lot less interesting than it was on Thursday.

Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Monday, 25 July 2005 04:26 (twenty years ago)

Due to popular demand ....

Team For %For Agst %Agst
Carlton 311 55.7% 247 44.3%
Richmond 310 55.7% 247 44.3%
Kangaroos 294 53.7% 253 46.3%
Collingwood 307 53.5% 267 46.5%
St Kilda 315 52.7% 283 47.3%
Western B'dogs 295 52.1% 271 47.9%
West Coast 291 50.7% 283 49.3%
Fremantle 289 50.2% 287 49.8%
Geelong 291 49.3% 299 50.7%
Essendon 269 49.3% 277 50.7%
Brisbane Lions 270 48.6% 285 51.4%
Melbourne 279 47.5% 308 52.5%
Adelaide 256 47.5% 283 52.5%
Hawthorn 289 46.0% 339 54.0%
Port Adelaide 285 45.5% 342 54.5%
Sydney 282 45.3% 341 54.7%

Pretty Close i'd say, with Port, Syd and Haw being worst free kick giveawayers and the HAWKS being a Victorian Team ... those ruddy umpires advantaging all the Victorian sides except Hawthorn. They must still be jealous because their teams didn't win many grand finals in the 80s.

cheers

Hawka (hawka), Monday, 25 July 2005 09:16 (twenty years ago)

.... especially that Goldskunk character!


jsa ... as for "carlton with a +60 freekick count" divide that by 17 games and you get 3 and a bit more free kicks between all the teams. Given that the majority of free kicks are given in backline or centre that is not that much difference.

Then you could go on for ever about the umpires not picking up the little throws, the new interpretation about slapping the arms away and numerous other contentious issues .... but now is not the time or place.

Hawka (hawka), Monday, 25 July 2005 09:32 (twenty years ago)

I disagree that one or two kicks doesn't make a difference. That's one or two times extra you have to win the ball of the oppo and can alter momentum of matches.

regards,

REB

Rik E Boy (Rik E Boy), Monday, 25 July 2005 21:03 (twenty years ago)

Hawka, it may be only 3 freekicks a game, plus the 3 freekicks the other side receives less of, and you have at least 6.

But still doesnt answer how a side winning 2.5 games could possibly be receiving more freekicks than other sides who at least win.

jsa, Monday, 25 July 2005 21:58 (twenty years ago)

Hawka,

Thanks for the freekick stats.

Funny how 2 of the top 3 sides are in the bottom for receiving freekicks and thay happen to be interstaters.

Dont tell me those stats dont clearly show that umpires either cheat or are instructed to help the victorian clubs.

jsa, Monday, 25 July 2005 22:02 (twenty years ago)

Essendon get the second lowest ammount of free kicks! I knew we should be on top. LOL.

chrisso (chrisso), Monday, 25 July 2005 22:46 (twenty years ago)


Team Avg F Avg A Diff
Carlton 18.3 14.5 3.8
Richmond 18.2 14.5 3.7
Kangaroos 17.3 14.9 2.4
Collingwood 18.1 15.7 2.4
St Kilda 18.5 16.6 1.9
Western B'dogs 17.4 15.9 1.4
West Coast 17.1 16.6 0.5
Fremantle 17.0 16.9 0.1
Geelong 17.1 17.6 -0.5
Essendon 15.8 16.3 -0.5
Brisbane Lions 15.9 16.8 -0.9
Melbourne 16.4 18.1 -1.7
Adelaide 15.1 16.6 -1.6
Hawthorn 17.0 19.9 -2.9
Port Adelaide 16.8 20.1 -3.4
Sydney 16.6 20.1 -3.5

I am still of the opinion that an average of 3.8 free kicks per game is not that significant. I believe that umpires do have a tendency to give "softer" free kicks to teams that are behind with very little bearing on the game, except when Hawthorn lost to Carlton in the early rounds. ;)

I believe this is the only reason that some of the "Victorian" clubs are in front and the interstate clubs behind.

If I did some digging I reckon that the clubs from other states would be in front when they were having ordinary years and not playing well. I certainly wouldn't call this cheating, I would call it being more favourable to teams getting flogged (most of us love the underdog - with the exception of a few footy teams). It just so happens that the last few years it has been Victorian teams getting flogged.

As for making a difference in matches REB, you are quite correct. One or more bad calls can turn a game, however, I believe this to be rarity rather the norm. You could then ask the question, as Chrisso pointed out, why aren't Essendon on top? or why are Carlton on the bottom?

Remember that 87.5% of statistics are made up on the spot.

Hawka (hawka), Monday, 25 July 2005 23:27 (twenty years ago)

Because they are crap.

regards,

REB

Rik E Boy (Rik E Boy), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 00:14 (twenty years ago)

Daniher had a whinge last night about how Melbourne got the rough end of the pineapple in the first three quarters when Melbourne were matching Freo, then got a few free kicks in the last Q when they were getting blown out of the water. And so ingrained is the 'whinge-about-the-umps' syndrome that nobody has realised yet how stupid he sounded, how he shot himself in the foot with his own reasoning.

I repeat from an earlier thread: the time span for whining about umpires without sounding like a complete tool is about 3 and a half minutes after the match. Or at least it should be. Lazy club officials like nothing better than to have the fans blaming the umps rather than themselves for their club losing games.

Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 00:26 (twenty years ago)

Jase, looking at the ladder I'd say if the umps are meant to be 'helping' the Vic clubs it's time somebody had a serious word to them because they're obviously not helping anywhere near enough.

It's no coincidence that 'conspiracy' starts with 'con'.

Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 00:29 (twenty years ago)

My theory Hawka which has nothing to do with free kicks, is that sides that play Brisbane lose the following week - whether we beat them or not. Do you have any stats on that one from "allthestats"?

Cheers
Lucy

Lucy Lion (Lucy Lion), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 05:51 (twenty years ago)

Fred.

they help no doubt, but even the cheating umps cant save the Vic clubs from interstate domination.

jsa, Wednesday, 27 July 2005 03:20 (twenty years ago)

So who gives a toss? It just sounds like Johnny whinging to the kinder teacher because Billy got more lollies. I couldn't even fake being less interested.

Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 06:29 (twenty years ago)

How about Port players try playing in front, and they might get a few frees going there way.

The swans concede plenty because of the 1000 tackles a game, you are going to have a few high and in the back.

But yep, get over it. Although there are times I do wonder if the Umpire should kick the goal as well, after giving the soft free 20 metres out (to Lloyd - *Cough*)

Bennö (Bennö), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 09:06 (twenty years ago)

Hope you're not choking on flying grass Benno! :)

Lucy Lion (Lucy Lion), Thursday, 28 July 2005 06:38 (twenty years ago)

Lucy,
Been up your neck of the woods for the last few days. Beautiful weather ... better than down here I give you the drum.

You are pretty much on the mark.

Each Teams Record after playing Brisbane

Hawka (hawka), Saturday, 30 July 2005 02:32 (twenty years ago)

Yes the weather has been great Hawka. Shame about my theory - Essendon blew that one out of the water!

Lucy Lion (Lucy Lion), Monday, 1 August 2005 05:44 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.