I really liked the way she talked about Birmingham as a city that wants reinvent itself & grab the future, but keeps changing its mind about what the future should be, so there are fragments & ghosts of old schemes all over the place. Seemed a simple, smart and affectionate way to look at a city.
― tetrahedron of space (woof), Thursday, 29 July 2010 11:03 (fourteen years ago)
anyone heard of michael syjuco's illustrado? sounds so much like my kind of thing i am a little afraid. here is a thing i read about it on tumblr
http://booksinthekitchen.tumblr.com/post/916201564/miguel-syjuco-ilustrado
― thomp, Saturday, 7 August 2010 10:36 (fourteen years ago)
The 15 Most Overrated Contemporary American Writers
― Number None, Sunday, 8 August 2010 20:04 (fourteen years ago)
the word 'overrated' should be removed from all discourse imo
― max, Sunday, 8 August 2010 20:08 (fourteen years ago)
Which of these Filmmakers are Most Overrated?
― buzza, Sunday, 8 August 2010 20:39 (fourteen years ago)
real talk
― gross rainbow of haerosmith (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Sunday, 8 August 2010 20:48 (fourteen years ago)
Others hide behind a smokescreen of unreadable inimitability--Marilynne Robinson, for example
OK is this writer an imbecile?
― Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 8 August 2010 20:56 (fourteen years ago)
Also, if critics of the 1920's were so "perceptive" why they'd pick so many Pulitzer winners which are, by the writer's estimation, unworthy?
― Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 8 August 2010 20:57 (fourteen years ago)
i would like to stand up for my man Mark Gluth and say that "The Late Work of Margaret Kroftis" is the best novella of the year, imho.
also markers, 'The Child in Time' is clearly the best McEwan novel. i've been pretty 'meh' about everything else i've read by him, but that book is just undeniably gorgeous.
― pounding beats of worship (the table is the table), Sunday, 8 August 2010 21:29 (fourteen years ago)
seriously, amy tan is not my cup of tea either, but ascribing to her the power/role of "ruining ethnic/minority fiction" is totally insane/absurd/blaming an author for a marketing/publishing industry issue
― horseshoe, Sunday, 8 August 2010 22:36 (fourteen years ago)
guess i'll never read anything by an asian american again, bc joy luck club sucks
― horseshoe, Sunday, 8 August 2010 22:37 (fourteen years ago)
getting so mad just thinking about it; i need to not read the rest of that thing
― horseshoe, Sunday, 8 August 2010 22:38 (fourteen years ago)
^^^good idea
― Mr. Que, Sunday, 8 August 2010 23:03 (fourteen years ago)
haha right?
― horseshoe, Sunday, 8 August 2010 23:16 (fourteen years ago)
i just dont read articles with the word "overrated" in them anymore because if i want to raise my blood pressure i might as well eat deep fried oreo or something, at least that way i enjoy myself
― max, Sunday, 8 August 2010 23:23 (fourteen years ago)
i know i'm such a sucker
― horseshoe, Sunday, 8 August 2010 23:25 (fourteen years ago)
articles about fiction are to me as fox news is to my dad
hahaha me too
― Mr. Que, Monday, 9 August 2010 00:05 (fourteen years ago)
that could go either way
― Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 9 August 2010 00:06 (fourteen years ago)
Yeah I couldn't even get to the second page. Ugh @ the first paragraph - it sounds like something from my high school written exams.
― franny glass, Monday, 9 August 2010 14:05 (fourteen years ago)
^^^^ with a vengeance.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 9 August 2010 18:56 (fourteen years ago)
quick show of hands: who's going to read the new jonathan franzen?
― thomp, Thursday, 26 August 2010 13:01 (fourteen years ago)
hand up
― just sayin, Thursday, 26 August 2010 13:02 (fourteen years ago)
hand up (in paperback)
― Ward Fowler, Thursday, 26 August 2010 13:03 (fourteen years ago)
i just noticed it comes out three weeks later in england! cockgoblins
― thomp, Thursday, 26 August 2010 13:11 (fourteen years ago)
hand upthe uk cover's also kind of a monstrosity
http://nozama.typepad.com/.a/6a00e54ed05fc288330133f294f045970b-600wi
― schlump, Thursday, 26 August 2010 13:13 (fourteen years ago)
i p much always prefer us covers to uk
― just sayin, Thursday, 26 August 2010 13:16 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2010/aug/23/jonathan-franzen-freedom
oh god
i predict this novel will be 'sort of alright'
― thomp, Thursday, 26 August 2010 13:19 (fourteen years ago)
also, i wouldn't want to judge between those two covers without seeing physical versions - i think the drop-shadows on the uk one might be better, and the colour tone on the us one less obnoxious, in person. BUT OH, WHAT IS THE SYMBOLISM OF THE BIRD
― thomp, Thursday, 26 August 2010 13:21 (fourteen years ago)
hang on which cover is which? one on the left with the bird is by far the most dreadful.
― ledge, Thursday, 26 August 2010 13:21 (fourteen years ago)
i just realised i have them the wrong way round, i thought the one with the bird was the uk one? but i guess it's the us one since it says 'A NOVEL'
― just sayin, Thursday, 26 August 2010 13:24 (fourteen years ago)
yessssss
― thomp, Thursday, 26 August 2010 13:26 (fourteen years ago)
neither of them are above kindergarten level really. uk one is portentous-by-numbers (pretty low numbers at that) but the us one is just 'clip art photoshop filter will this do'?
― ledge, Thursday, 26 August 2010 13:29 (fourteen years ago)
otm. why could they not have got better designers? i guess it's obv gonna sell so no one cares but still
― just sayin, Thursday, 26 August 2010 13:36 (fourteen years ago)
guys apparently one of the subplots of this novel is about the quest to save a lesser spotted warbler or something, that is why there are birds on the cover
― thomp, Thursday, 26 August 2010 14:17 (fourteen years ago)
Still, that is a very weak cover.
Also, my hand is way up. I'm on the request list at the library, but according to the online catalogue they haven't even ordered it yet.
― franny glass, Thursday, 26 August 2010 14:48 (fourteen years ago)
i just pre-ordered it, but i am hell of sick of the discussion surrounding it already
― thomp, Thursday, 26 August 2010 15:11 (fourteen years ago)
yeah that's true. also, so much of the discussion making it sound like no good books have come out since the corrections
― just sayin, Thursday, 26 August 2010 15:14 (fourteen years ago)
doubt the insta-reviewers have like, read it, tbh
― unchill english bro (history mayne), Thursday, 26 August 2010 15:17 (fourteen years ago)
it's mainly how for most of the last ten years if he was mentioned it was 'ha ha that goofy self-obsessed jonathan franzen, and those overeducated white male novelists and their overeducated white male preoccupations' - which is totally correct, nb - and once there's a new book and the marketplace steps in this viewpoint is nowheeeeeeeeere
― thomp, Thursday, 26 August 2010 15:18 (fourteen years ago)
xpost i definitely plan to review it without reading it
― thomp, Thursday, 26 August 2010 15:19 (fourteen years ago)
it's mainly how for most of the last ten years if he was mentioned it was 'ha ha that goofy self-obsessed jonathan franzen, and those overeducated white male novelists and their overeducated white male preoccupations' - which is totally correct, nb
i dunno if either of these things are true? i mean obviously one shouldn't be too educated or white, and the best people to say so are... literary critics? academics? bloggers? but ppl were saying franzen was a good element iirc.
― unchill english bro (history mayne), Thursday, 26 August 2010 15:23 (fourteen years ago)
yeah, i think a part of my issue is my bias in terms of the media outlets i choose to expose myself to
― thomp, Thursday, 26 August 2010 15:27 (fourteen years ago)
like maybe the default broadsheet opinion on franzen would have been a lot closer to his current position over the entire period '01-'10, i just wouldn't encounter it because without the new book he hasn't been so publicly visible in terms of these things. whereas in terms of lit crit and lit blogs and nerds on message boards and er talking to people who read these things in real life the default opinion on him is a little more context-aware.
― thomp, Thursday, 26 August 2010 15:29 (fourteen years ago)
conversely, i probably need more exposure to sophisticated 'omg this writer is white and well-educated he probably sucks and gets all his college friends to write nice things about him' type blogs
― unchill english bro (history mayne), Thursday, 26 August 2010 15:30 (fourteen years ago)
I hate spoilers, so I've managed to avoid reading any of the reviews in full. I read the first paragraph of the NYT one and that will do until after I'm finished it.
― franny glass, Friday, 27 August 2010 03:28 (fourteen years ago)
Super Sad True Love Story remains mostly unread :-/
― markers, Friday, 27 August 2010 03:38 (fourteen years ago)
there's a new book and the marketplace steps in this viewpoint is nowheeeeeeeeere― thomp, Thursday, 26 August 2010 16:18 (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― thomp, Thursday, 26 August 2010 16:18 (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
it's somewhere - http://www.theawl.com/2010/08/behind-the-franzenfreude
― just sayin, Friday, 27 August 2010 13:40 (fourteen years ago)
But really, we're still doing the thing where we elevate a fiction-writing white men as the Greatest Thing In American Writing Today?
yeah ima stop reading when it gets this sassy
curse those white men though, curse them!
― unchill english bro (history mayne), Friday, 27 August 2010 13:46 (fourteen years ago)
the author of that just started following my tumblr after a post of mine kvetching about franzen got reblogged ... she's pretty smart & a good writer, i think
― thomp, Friday, 27 August 2010 13:56 (fourteen years ago)