sorry i led anyone astray with light boxes. i dug it a lot. i dig this guy, too, he's a new discovery for me:http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/13/books/review/Hoffman-t.html
― Mr. Que, Saturday, 9 July 2011 21:02 (thirteen years ago) link
mr. que have read/heard much about jesse ball's 'the curfew'? im interested in purchasing it but reviews have been mixed & no one i know has read it
― ((( (Lamp), Saturday, 9 July 2011 21:04 (thirteen years ago) link
yeah, i just read a thing in the new yorker that sealed the deal for me, something about "an inverted skyscarper plunging hundreds of feet underground" sounds pretty rad. there's a cool interview on the millions with the dude, too
not to mention this
http://www.themillions.com/2011/07/most-anticipated-the-great-second-half-2011-book-preview.html
― Mr. Que, Saturday, 9 July 2011 21:08 (thirteen years ago) link
skyscraper, not skyscarper
haha skimming that im reminded of how fantastic (wordplay!) i thought stephen millhauser's 'dangerous laughter' was. its also making me feel bad about how dismissive ive been of contemp writing this year, theres so much stuff i havent bothered to read or even think of reading. i was however vaguely aware there was a new ann patchett novel out
― ((( (Lamp), Saturday, 9 July 2011 21:12 (thirteen years ago) link
yeah the only real new thing i've read in a while is "The Pale King" and it was really really boring, terrible, awful, sad (not in a good way sad.)
― Mr. Que, Saturday, 9 July 2011 21:16 (thirteen years ago) link
ty for that link que -- i love kate christensen & didnt know she had a new book out!
other than the big names (baker, stephenson maybe, eugenides) im interested in the dana spiotta book
― johnny crunch, Saturday, 9 July 2011 21:20 (thirteen years ago) link
hey mr que sorry to be overly dismissive of the shane jones book
i was sort of on-the-fence about it until we got to february as writer-figure, it was then stuck for me both as generically like something i'd read before and very specifically like i. the people of paper (and i didn't even like that book much) ii. someone trying to 'do' ben marcus ?? which anyway i then started rereading notable american women and i like it way less than i remembered liking it, so either i'm not really in the mood for this stuff or my tastes have shifted away from it, oh well
― thomp, Monday, 11 July 2011 09:21 (thirteen years ago) link
I like César Aira a lot, though How I Became a Nun was my least favorite of everything I've read by him (which is everything in English translation, or 1% of his overall writing I think).
― boxall, Monday, 11 July 2011 16:27 (thirteen years ago) link
a year later and i'm still not reading fiction -- is there a literary fiction Book of the Summer? (or Book of 2011?) :-/
i want to get back to reading fiction but it's all non-fiction over here
― markers, Tuesday, 12 July 2011 04:06 (thirteen years ago) link
still haven't read the pale king, although i want to -- i read that interview book twice though
― markers, Tuesday, 12 July 2011 04:09 (thirteen years ago) link
i want to read that tea obreht book too
― markers, Tuesday, 12 July 2011 04:13 (thirteen years ago) link
bump for the not 12:13 am at night crowd :)
― markers, Wednesday, 13 July 2011 20:48 (thirteen years ago) link
just read this over the weekend, it was just okay, nothing special. read like a long short story. not very memorable, sorry.
― Mr. Que, Monday, 12 September 2011 18:20 (thirteen years ago) link
that's handy, i was pondering whether to get or not, but i'll save the money
― not bulimic, just a cat (James Morrison), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 02:19 (thirteen years ago) link
i ended up really liking dana spiotta's 'stone arabia' although i think its the sort of book thats too slight to really sustain scrutiny or mass affection, if that makes any sense
i also really enjoyed denis johnson's 'train dreams' which i think is mb the most lucid and thoughtful book of his ive read, certainly since 'fiskadoro'
― Lamp, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 04:59 (thirteen years ago) link
Yeah, Train Dreams was really nice. Though I've only read this and Nobody Move, I'm going to have to get me some more of him.
― not bulimic, just a cat (James Morrison), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 05:05 (thirteen years ago) link
whats up with this baseball book
― just sayin, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 10:31 (thirteen years ago) link
what about this book
ALL MY FRIENDS ARE SUPERHEROES
is this 'quirky twee fiction' or something?
― the pinefox, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 10:32 (thirteen years ago) link
― just sayin, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 11:31 (4 minutes ago) Bookmark
the harbach, right. yeah i am looking forward to it.
― and my soul said you can't go there (schlump), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 10:35 (thirteen years ago) link
is
The Family Fang
― you don't exist in the database (woof), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 10:54 (thirteen years ago) link
o my bbcode blows. i not q!
― you don't exist in the database (woof), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 10:55 (thirteen years ago) link
Family Fang was pretty standard dysfunctional family contemporary lit. It had its moments though and is a pretty fast read.
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 11:33 (thirteen years ago) link
i guess it was a little "lighter"/less overwrought than franzen e.g.
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 16:52 (thirteen years ago) link
anyone read the new amy waldman? or house of holes? curious about both.
― Mordy, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 16:53 (thirteen years ago) link
'house of holes' is not as bad as 'the anthologist'
― thomp, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 16:55 (thirteen years ago) link
kinda curious about the art of fielding since it's getting so much press but also it sounds like fairly middle-of-the-road contemporary lit
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 16:56 (thirteen years ago) link
ha i liked the anthologist a lot but house of holes sounds gross
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 16:57 (thirteen years ago) link
i was too until i read an interview or two with the dude, he loves franzen i guess, so i'm a little less enthusiastic now
― quit stalking me shithead (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:02 (thirteen years ago) link
Who knows, it still could be good. . . but still. I hated the Corrections.
http://www.theawl.com/2011/09/a-conversation-with-chad-harbach-author-of-the-art-of-fielding
What don’t you like that he’s written?My least favorite of his books is Strong Motion. You can probably point to some parts of Strong Motion that I don’t like, but Freedom and The Corrections are two of my favorite books in recent history.
― quit stalking me shithead (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:06 (thirteen years ago) link
am reading the amy waldman, only a short way through; so far it's good, there have been points that have seemed pat - from what i gather it's pretty sprawling, and some of the characters so far seem p simply drawn - but i'll only know by finishing it whether that's sorta besides the point.
― and my soul said you can't go there (schlump), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:09 (thirteen years ago) link
i could go for a great piece of lit about baseball but it seems like art of fielding is not so much about the art of fielding and more about kids in college who happen to play shortstop
― Mordy, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:20 (thirteen years ago) link
maybe i should just read the natural
or great american novel
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 18:26 (thirteen years ago) link
or universal baseball association
― max, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 18:40 (thirteen years ago) link
I really enjoyed the Family Fang
― not bulimic, just a cat (James Morrison), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 22:43 (thirteen years ago) link
i read really slowly & give up easily, so live blogging my reactions would be kinda excruciating, but characters in this are still really annoying me & sounding unrealistic, fwiw. i read a hammy exchange & then am all, she was bureau chief for somewhere or other for the new, york, times, this must be good, but it is bugging me.
― and my soul said you can't go there (schlump), Thursday, 15 September 2011 00:03 (thirteen years ago) link
thanks n/a and james. Won't read Fam Fang now, I'll put it in a to-read-when-I-fancy-contemporary-fun pile.
― you don't exist in the database (woof), Thursday, 15 September 2011 07:19 (thirteen years ago) link
― the pinefox, Tuesday, September 13, 2011 10:32 AM (1 week ago) Bookmark
pinefox, oddly, otm
― thomp, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 16:39 (thirteen years ago) link
Quite interested in the new John Burnside - I read his first one, and I remember thinking it was ok without being great. Review here.
― Fizzles the Chimp (GamalielRatsey), Thursday, 22 September 2011 08:20 (thirteen years ago) link
Yes, I was intrigued by that too, while also thinking that an author who publishes 2 novels even he admits aren't any good has perhaps exhausted my goodwill before I even start
― not bulimic, just a cat (James Morrison), Friday, 23 September 2011 00:41 (thirteen years ago) link
so i couldnt make it past page 58 of 'the art of fielding' w/o continuously cringing so ive decided to read a book about rich english ppl in italy instead
― this display name must in some way reference laurel halo (Lamp), Sunday, 25 September 2011 16:46 (thirteen years ago) link
That sounds good what is it
― just sayin, Sunday, 25 September 2011 16:59 (thirteen years ago) link
'a book of secrets' by michael holroyd
― this display name must in some way reference laurel halo (Lamp), Sunday, 25 September 2011 17:04 (thirteen years ago) link
so i couldnt make it past page 58 of 'the art of fielding' w/o continuously cringing
oh what was up with this? i'm still in the buying-the-hype phase so you could save me some time if you named some specific unappealing trait
― 347.239.9791 stench hotline (schlump), Sunday, 25 September 2011 20:42 (thirteen years ago) link
ha i just started art of fielding last night and was enjoying until it switched perspective from the baseball player to the college president and his estranged daughter. seems to have turned into rote franzenesque "strained family relationships" contemporary lit. haven't decided if i'm going to keep up with it or not.
feel like no one's writing good weird books anymore.
― congratulations (n/a), Sunday, 25 September 2011 22:18 (thirteen years ago) link
feel like no one's writing good weird books anymore
like what kinda thing? just curious. bc maybe the genre of like rolling literary fiction isn't the place to find it. i think 'busy monsters' is meant to be kinda strange at this end of the spectrum.
― mr. vertical (schlump), Sunday, 25 September 2011 22:57 (thirteen years ago) link
i just feel like all the big contemp lit over the past year or two has just been franzen rip-off stuff about estranged families and bad relationships. no one's writing novels about the world or the mind or ideas, or at least no one who's getting any press. if i'm missing it on stuff, please let me know.
― congratulations (n/a), Sunday, 25 September 2011 23:25 (thirteen years ago) link
i get that a lot of people like books about relationships and emotions, but i like good stories and stuff that makes me think. the current contemporary literary world feels very unambitious to me, content to explore these family/marriage dynamics and not go any bigger.
― congratulations (n/a), Sunday, 25 September 2011 23:26 (thirteen years ago) link
Have you read Gilead or Home? The religious debates in these novels undergirding the family drama are powerful.
― Anakin Ska Walker (AKA Skarth Vader) (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 25 September 2011 23:32 (thirteen years ago) link