ThReads Must Roll: the new, improved rolling fantasy, science fiction, speculative fiction &c. thread

finished game-players of titan. i didn't like that book at all. so dumb. reading this now:

https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfa1/v/t1.0-9/17670_10154003985842137_1963265635912919803_n.jpg?oh=8f3187c8e11301baf927219f5547b735&oe=55EFB74D

also, saw Tomorrowland with Cyrus yesterday and really enjoyed that. it looked so nice and had such great detail. also, that speech at the end by House M.D. hit pretty close to home. about how people just want to watch end of the world movies and zombie shows instead of trying to make the world better because they have given up and figure there is nothing they can do because we are doomed. he was speeching at ME! oh well.

Richard Middleton's "The Ghost Ship" was quite fun. A short little whimsical tale of a ghost ship landing on a farm and all the local ghosts go on the ship to get drunk.

Lovecraft's "Dunwich Horror" starts out very well but I found the second half very boring, going through the motions and far longer than it needed to be. I think the intent was to make it similar to a detailed report (as he often does) but there was just too many inessential details and repetitions. All the dialogue with the heavy accents didn't help either.
The desciprtions of Wilbur Whateley and the countryside were probably the best things in the story.

So that finishes Great Tales Of Terror & Supernatural (after way too long of not touching it). I think that much like Dark Descent, only one third of the stories are good enough to be in a big doorstopper book like this. The rest are decent, okay or just kinda interesting. One or two I thought were actually pretty bad.

in the middle of "the goblin emperor" and enjoying it a lot. riyl court intrigue

reread 'this is the way the world ends'; still good

Ooh that looks cool. Never heard of her (in her own name or her pen name). Thanks!

Xpost

https://www.blackgate.com/2014/03/25/i-invoke-the-voidal-oblivion-hand-by-adrian-cole/

This Voidal series by Adrian Cole sounds nutty and right up my street.

The cover art of Baen books are really perplexing. There's always been bad fantasy cover art but why do their books so often look like bad fantasy cover art from over 25 years ago?

tradition!

I keep looking and thinking "Does the audience really love this? Do the artists who paint this stuff even like their work that much?"

Intriguing description of a timeslip indeed:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-kg0sA_ByZC8/VYU_gZlPAiI/AAAAAAAAAiM/PYmjTGfAwF8/s320/img097.jpg

http://wormwoodiana.blogspot.com/2015/06/fanfaronade-ivo-pakenham.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Wormwoodiana+%28Wormwoodiana%29

And xpost speaking of art

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Zi2VJY0L79k/VYp86qOd3UI/AAAAAAAAAjE/pI-1HjC0EMU/s1600/Tessa%2BFarmer.jpg

http://wormwoodiana.blogspot.com/2015/06/in-fairy-land-tessa-farmer.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Wormwoodiana+%28Wormwoodiana%29

Never in the history of art

i'm enjoying Wayward Pines. 10-part series starring Matt Dillon. and based on a trilogy of books i'd never heard of. if you haven't seen it, don't read about it. sci-fi spoilers abound.

so that's not just some terrible Shamalayan Twin Peaks rip?

no, see, that's what makes it good. it's based on books that he didn't write. and it definitely belongs on a sci-fi thread. but i won't spoil.

Dillon makes me favorably disposed to it but the Shamster, I just can't get with him

yeah, but really you gotta just pretend that he isn't part of it. cuz it's entertaining. he's a producer of it and he directed one or two episodes.

actually i think he just directed the pilot. the guy who brought it to t.v. though is just some guy i've never heard of. made two t.v. shows previously: runaway & the playboy club. neither of which i have seen.

Cinderellas, the Rocket Post, other stamps beyond my ken---looks like I gave up philately way too soon:

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-8aoBByTWlHc/VY1O1aDcNAI/AAAAAAAAAjU/zeRoHnDQ5vQ/s1600/img100.jpg

http://wormwoodiana.blogspot.com/2015/06/alice-through-pillar-box-gerald-m-king.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Wormwoodiana+%28Wormwoodiana%29

Just watched The Happening on the syfy channel. Rather unsatisfying.

Intriguing review of Neal Stephenson's Seveneves and Kim Stanley Robinson's Aurora, with cogent, concise comments on their relationship to the present era:http://lareviewofbooks.org/review/the-warm-equations

Only thing: the reviewer limits himself *so much* by abstention from all spoilers. But he says why.

Also check the links below the review, like Matthew Synder on Hieroglyph:
http://lareviewofbooks.org/review/saving-spaceship-earth

Snyder!

500 and 900 pages! My heart falls at such figures. But I know that if the narrative is compelling enough the pages can just fly by; I did really enjoy Anathem (other Stevenson not ~so~ much) and I have unintentionally avoided Robinson for too long, this might be as good a place to start as any.

tried abt 100 pages of quicksilver by n stephenson, life is too short etc

Quicksilver def not the place to start with him

Yeah, that trilogy picks up steam but it takes a long, long time to do it.

Huh never seen that doctorow quote re: cold equations before. Inclined to agree.

xp A lot of Stephenson's books take a good couple of hundred pages to get going. Anathem is great and worth checking out (but I also love The Baroque Cycle).

I didn't really get on with Seveneves as the last portion felt a bit too rushed/convenient. Think it would have benefited from being split into two or even three books.

the fact that Seveneves opens with a Mr. Show-ish moon explosion conceit just cracks me up

my wife asked me to describe the Lafferty stuff I've been reading to her and I couldn't do it. I just couldn't think of anything that really worked as a point of comparison. There's a lot of strange allegorical stuff - loads of historical, religious, folk/myth references - next to no exposition, a tendency to describe people in almost totemic/animist terms. He seems to enjoy repeating people's names or pat descriptions a lot in the text. There isn't really anything in the way of plot or character development, things are just set in motion and then come to almost comic (sometimes nastily so) Twilight-Zone style conclusions. Standard sci-fi and fantasy tropes don't figure into his writing except as occasional window-dressing (I kinda wonder if he bristled at being characterized as a scifi writer). The way say space/time travel or new technology or aliens are deployed is closer to magical realism than anything else, but only in the most superficial way - again he's not concerned with characters or realism as much as he is about funny little folk tales. I guess that (and his Catholicism, which is all over this material) puts him in the realm of Gene Wolfe, but Wolfe is a fundamentally different kind of storyteller, one with a better flair for sentence and plot construction. Lafferty's material seems to just spill out like a series of campfire story with a weird twists and silly names.

I dunno if he's great exactly but he's definitely unique.

Didn't ledge compare him to Flann O'Brien a little bit upthread?

Some Lafferty discussion on the old thread too---here's where I got hooked, more or less:

I recently came across Lafferty's "Encased In Ancient Rind" in Quark/3, from 1971: A Quarterly of Speculative Fiction, edited by Samuel R. Delany and Marilyn Hacker. Thought I'd read this before, and that it was mostly terribly dated, but don't remember Lafferty at all, so I better check the whole thing, because Lafferty's tale seemed dated for a second, but quickly spun me through something lighthearted but not not lightheaded; too much commitment to deft detail; but not really lighthearted either (except he and his readers don't have to live through what his characters do, so hey!)(not yet anyway, so hey). Kind of an outlier inspiration to some New Wavers like Delany, according to this intriguing profile:
http://www.sf-encyclopedia.com/entry/lafferty_r_a

― dow, Friday, September 6, 2013 2:11 PM (1 year ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Guess you'd call that an eco-fable, but dude's get levels, shifty shell-game tectonics. Ditto in this other one:
I found another Lafferty: "Narrow Valley", in Masterpieces of Fantasy and Wonder, compiled by D. G. Hartwell, with some assistance from Kathryn Cramer. Haven't encountered any Masterpieces yet, but doesn't seem as erratic as other H-K compilations (yet). This one is def more open air than xpost "Encased In Rind", and the topographical capers around weightier matters (incl. munchies for turf, Injuns vs. Homesteaders, but in 1966) seem like they might've influenced/encouraged young Rudy Rucker. It's sandwiched between a good shadowy no-nonsense buffalo ballet presented by L. Frank Baum (also way out West, not Oz) and Tiptree's "Beyond the Dead Reef", which is eco-gothic in the Tropics (and private parts)--somewhat Conradian structurally, also unmistakably late-period Tiptree. More well-behaved than, say, xpost "The Man Who Wouldn't Do Horrible Things To Rats", but nasty where, when and how it counts.

― dow, Tuesday, October 1, 2013 5:17 PM (1 year ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Looks like we discussed Lafferty quite a bit!

I do find him intriguing. In a funny way, despite all the Catholic details, I have yet to locate any real moral POV in his work

yeah in fact i remember some of his stuff, particularly the short Reefs of Earth novel, basically reveling in wickedness (the wickedness of children in that instance)

yeah a number of stories where there's evil shit going on and no judgment is rendered, just evil beings doin evil shit, like they do

ftr (dunno if I mentioned this upthread) I've been reading his first novel "Past Master" and a late collection of short stories called "Iron Tears". The former is a bit of a slog, the plot is just really rambling and aimless, so much so that I wonder if it's a paste-up job but who knows.

I had to look up who Thomas More was, after being baffled by characters in the book declaiming him as the greatest, most moral man in human history and the only candidate suitable to be transported from the past into the future to save society from its present day ills.

i'm surprised you didn't know abt him (t more). then again, i might only know about him because i read past master at a relatively young age

annals of klepsis and reefs of earth are the lafferty novels i fuck with. and the sindbad one, and okla hannali is enjoyably unlikely.

(keep getting reminded of the first of those lately because when I try to type 'jlewis' into ios it always guesses either 'klepsis' or 'jewish' lol)

The Wolf Hall craze obviously passed you by, Shakey.

hey if he had ref'd Henry VIII or Ann Boleyn or Anglicans vs. Catholics I would've got it, I just didn't recognize More's name - I mean listing the guy along with Plato, Caesar, Bismarck, Thomas Jefferson etc. is a little odd, no?

(lol I am aware that there is a book/tv series called Wolf Hall and that's about it!)

i dont think its odd, no. hes probably better known than bismarck!

a bismarck for all seasons

Didn't ledge compare him to Flann O'Brien a little bit upthread?

not just one crazy guy's opinion:

http://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2014/aug/13/ra-lafferty-secret-sci-fi-genius-poised-for-comeback

http://i.guim.co.uk/img/static/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2014/8/11/1407759106767/RA-Lafferty-covers-006.jpg?w=700&q=85&auto=format&sharp=10&s=0d569fc094adb197b81197ace8288193

Wow, thanks ledge! If that image goes away, incl. best blurb ever:
"Whom the gods would destroy, they should have first read FOURTH MANSIONS"---Roger Zelazny
(Speaking of RZ again, a science fiction magazine reviewer once opined that all of his best books had "of" in their titles.)

man for a second I thought that Space Chantey cover was by Vaughn Bode