― Derek Smith, Monday, 13 March 2006 03:39 (nineteen years ago)
p.s. what is a POD?
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 13 March 2006 03:43 (nineteen years ago)
Last I checked, Amazon was still in business.
Are you reluctant to use credit cards online?
Do you equate POD publishers with vanity publishers?
Well, yes, of course, unless there is some sort of editorial oversight. I don't necessarily have a problem with vantiy publication, though, although I prefer the vanity publishers who pay to get a hundred copies of their book made and then give it to all their friends for free. But not everyone can afford that.
― Casuistry (Chris P), Monday, 13 March 2006 03:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Ray (Ray), Monday, 13 March 2006 11:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Derek Smith, Saturday, 25 March 2006 00:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Saturday, 25 March 2006 03:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Saturday, 25 March 2006 04:05 (nineteen years ago)
The first is obvious enough: publicity. If no one has heard of your book, they won't buy it because (to them) it doesn't exist.
The next (and quite similar) problem I will call 'opacity'. Even if the potential reader finds out your book exists, they can find out very little more than that. Without an independent source of reviews or the chance to browse the contents, your POD book is a pig in a poke.
The best successes for POD and self-published authors tend to be books that dovetail with their other self-employment activities. If you teach classes, lecture, or speak publically, then you can do the equivalent of a band selling CDs at its gigs. Also good are niche books that contain valuable hard information for a market that is too small for a regular publisher to bother about.
Ocassionally, you can talk the local newspaper into reviewing your book. But mostly, you're going to have to work your fanny off to publicize your book and even then expect meager results. Especially for novels. The market is glutted with titles and the number of readers is shrinking. It's just the way it is.
― Aimless (Aimless), Saturday, 25 March 2006 17:03 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 25 March 2006 23:25 (nineteen years ago)