― justine paul (justine), Friday, 29 September 2006 07:43 (nineteen years ago)
Also, to risk the ire of Our Northern Neighbors, would you consider Canada to be part of the US?
― c('°c) (Leee), Friday, 29 September 2006 15:29 (nineteen years ago)
Also, does postwar simply designate a timeframe in this case?
― c('°c) (Leee), Friday, 29 September 2006 16:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Friday, 29 September 2006 20:09 (nineteen years ago)
chris, sorry i don't know what you mean...
― justine paul (justine), Friday, 29 September 2006 21:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Friday, 29 September 2006 21:32 (nineteen years ago)
― justine paul (justine), Friday, 29 September 2006 22:23 (nineteen years ago)
― ramon fernandez (ramon fernandez), Saturday, 30 September 2006 04:43 (nineteen years ago)
― ramon fernandez (ramon fernandez), Saturday, 30 September 2006 04:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Leopold Boom! (noodle vague), Saturday, 30 September 2006 08:49 (nineteen years ago)
― justine paul (justine), Saturday, 30 September 2006 08:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Leopold Boom! (noodle vague), Saturday, 30 September 2006 09:18 (nineteen years ago)
― justine paul (justine), Saturday, 30 September 2006 09:43 (nineteen years ago)
start with Appointment in Samarra or Butterfield 8 before you tackle his longer, later epics from the 50s.
actually, he was just as much pre as well as post WW2.
From Here To Eternity by James Jones is a good novel about "the war" though it's improved by seeing the movie first.
― m coleman (lovebug starski), Saturday, 30 September 2006 10:43 (nineteen years ago)
Tobias Wolff is one of my favourite writers - he's more post-Vietnam and bloody fantastic. This Boy's Life is my favourite (it's a memoir) - all the rest of his stuff is short fiction.
Also you might like Tim O'Brien.
― franny (frannyglass), Saturday, 30 September 2006 12:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Saturday, 30 September 2006 13:57 (nineteen years ago)
― c('°c) (Leee), Saturday, 30 September 2006 17:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Leopold Boom! (noodle vague), Saturday, 30 September 2006 18:24 (nineteen years ago)
― Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Saturday, 30 September 2006 18:35 (nineteen years ago)
And from what I recall of the first-person plural short, sort of the omniscient unreliable narrator was so wrapped up in its tacit point-making that the style tried my patience.
It's been a long time since I've read anything of his, so I can't be terribly precise; but I know that lots of people love him, and lots of people hate him.
― c('°c) (Leee), Saturday, 30 September 2006 19:34 (nineteen years ago)
John Updike: the Rabbit novelsSaul Bellow: The Adventures of Augie March, Herzog, Humboldt's GiftPhilip Roth: Portnoy's Complaint, Sabbath's Theater, American Pastoral, The Human Stain, I Married a CommunistRichard Yates: Easter Parade, Revolutionary Road, The Complete StoriesCormac McCarthy: Blood Meridian, Suttree, Child of God, The RoadCharles Portis: Masters of Atlantis, Norwood, Dog of the SouthDenis Johnson: Jesus' Son
― Mike Lisk (b_buster), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 13:14 (nineteen years ago)
Also: you're supposed to hate Rabbit.
― Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 14:14 (nineteen years ago)
also stuff like mark leyner, douglas coupland, is kind of a particular & necessary snapshot of a certain period. although that's post-gulf war even. at some point "postwar" is going to be a useless classification for american fiction.
foster wallace has a marvellous takedown of updike in his last collection. well, not marvellous. but impressively snide, once you get to the punchline. in u &i n baker (who might go with that duo, above) mentions updike's comparison of the inside of a vagina to a ballet slipper. i always wondered what john updike was doing fucking the ballet slipper.
― tom west (thomp), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 14:20 (nineteen years ago)
― c('°c) (Leee), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 16:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Leopold Boom! (noodle vague), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 16:32 (nineteen years ago)
He is clumsy with his feet.
― Casuistry (Chris P), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 18:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 18:42 (nineteen years ago)
― Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 18:45 (nineteen years ago)
If we're bring up experimetal stuff (esp. poetry and the L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E movement) then check out Charles Bernstein (the essays in Content's Dream & My Way and the poetry in the Sophist), Bob Perelman (my teacher, totally cool guy), Leslie Scalapino, Bruce Andrews (prepare to be offended) and a bunch of other folk--Michael Palmer (not the medical thriller writer) and Ron Siliman amongst them.
― ramon fernandez (ramon fernandez), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 20:09 (nineteen years ago)
Am I supposed to be the ILB troll?
― Casuistry (Chris P), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 22:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 22:31 (nineteen years ago)
― tom west (thomp), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 22:37 (nineteen years ago)
― c('°c) (Leee), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 22:43 (nineteen years ago)
― tom west (thomp), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 23:45 (nineteen years ago)
-- Casuistry (chri...), October 4th, 2006.
This is troll.
Sterling, and everyone else, here's the takedown
http://www.ptwi.com/~bobkat/observer1.html
― Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 23:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 5 October 2006 05:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Josh (Josh), Thursday, 5 October 2006 06:58 (nineteen years ago)
Everyone leaves Danielle Steele off these lists because she's a hack.
― Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Thursday, 5 October 2006 10:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Thursday, 5 October 2006 10:40 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 5 October 2006 12:12 (nineteen years ago)
Well but yes. I mean if you take an 18th C English fiction course and they include Tristram Shandy then this seems questionable -- Tristram Shandy is, as far as I know, an exception, and reading it -- while awesome -- gives you very little sense of what 18th C English fiction was like! The literary history that we're given is an exceptionalist one, which makes for good reading but bad history.
I haven't read the Roth, but I'm pretty sure if I did I could make a case for it being about Vietnam (by which I don't just mean the war itself but also its effects on the US and the changes in culture that it brought about). That may or may not be the most interesting way to read that book, of course.
― Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 5 October 2006 15:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Thursday, 5 October 2006 16:05 (nineteen years ago)
― I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Thursday, 5 October 2006 18:51 (nineteen years ago)
My Danielle Steele case, such as it is, is that if you want to understand something about a culture in a time period, it makes more sense to pay attention to the "popular mainstream hacks" than to the relatively unpopular idiosyncratic literary geniuses. Although really my point was that the list was blandly homogenous, and I wanted to think up someone who fit the description but would never be mentioned here. It was either Steele or Iceberg Slim, who I also haven't read.
― Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 5 October 2006 19:01 (nineteen years ago)
if danielle steele or anyone else doesn't make for much of a contribution on the 'importantly registering reaction to the times' angle, does anything she wrote constitute an actual development in or at least change in fashion of a mass genre? that seems like a more fruitful way of pushing this line of argument.
― Josh (Josh), Thursday, 5 October 2006 19:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 5 October 2006 19:59 (nineteen years ago)
Also, you should have picked Iceberg Slim.
― Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Thursday, 5 October 2006 20:06 (nineteen years ago)
― Josh (Josh), Thursday, 5 October 2006 21:47 (nineteen years ago)
I've not read Peyton Place, but I'll rep for Valley of the Dolls as a well-written, popular description of its era. Nelson Algren's major novels are better written and even more descriptive of their era, from my remote romantic viewpoint.
― Leopold Boom! (noodle vague), Thursday, 5 October 2006 22:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Leopold Boom! (noodle vague), Thursday, 5 October 2006 23:02 (nineteen years ago)
And, OK, Tristram Shandy is a somewhat complicated example. It was something of a surprise hit.
― Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 5 October 2006 23:31 (nineteen years ago)
mike, i have just bought Bellow's Humboldt's Gift, it is patiently waiting on my bookshelf.
tom, i am quite a Douglas Coupland fan, have read most of his books. they have dated but provide quite funny cultural observations and i found them intelligent and also very easy reading. some of his endings are pretty shoddy though.
― justine paul (justine), Friday, 6 October 2006 07:02 (nineteen years ago)
― justine paul (justine), Friday, 6 October 2006 07:08 (nineteen years ago)