postwar American authors: recommendations?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
finishing up a degree in English lit, would like to focus on 20thC postwar american authors, but need some guidance. would appreciate any recommendations

justine paul (justine), Friday, 29 September 2006 07:43 (nineteen years ago)

For recreational purposes or academic?

Also, to risk the ire of Our Northern Neighbors, would you consider Canada to be part of the US?

c('°c) (Leee), Friday, 29 September 2006 15:29 (nineteen years ago)

More diplomatically: do you mean North American, or simply American?

Also, does postwar simply designate a timeframe in this case?

c('°c) (Leee), Friday, 29 September 2006 16:45 (nineteen years ago)

If you give us an X we might be better able to give you a RIYL X, if you know what I mean.

Casuistry (Chris P), Friday, 29 September 2006 20:09 (nineteen years ago)

north american, postwar=20thC; literature produced in the aftermath of war, WWII and the Vietnam war - although not necessarily with "war" as the main subject. but am interested in all US literature. academic interest but also for pleasure.

chris, sorry i don't know what you mean...

justine paul (justine), Friday, 29 September 2006 21:10 (nineteen years ago)

RIYL = Recommended if you like. "Postwar literature" seems like a monumental and non-monolithic (polylithic?) body of work. But if you have read, say, Pynchon and want to read more along those lines, then we can probably help.

Casuistry (Chris P), Friday, 29 September 2006 21:32 (nineteen years ago)

thanks. this particular interest is pretty new, so im not very well-read in the area at all. but i have recently been reading E.L. Doctorow, Raymond Carver, Richard Ford, Jack Kerouac, F. Scott Fitzgerald, and i'm currently reading Falconer by John Cheever and Catch-22 but not particularly enjoying either of these.

justine paul (justine), Friday, 29 September 2006 22:23 (nineteen years ago)

I've been reading a lot of post-WWII stuff recently--probably the most prominent authors emerging from 1945-1952 or so were Saul Bellow (try Adventures of Augie March), Paul Bowles (The Sheltering Sky,) Norman Mailer (The Naked & the Dead,) Tennessee Williams (drama,) and John Berryman (poetry.) Truman Capote & Gore Vidal started writing in this period though not their best stuff, and Cheever was writing his early stories. If you include Canada then Malcolm Lowry's "Under the Volcano" is maybe the best book of the era.

ramon fernandez (ramon fernandez), Saturday, 30 September 2006 04:43 (nineteen years ago)

I forgot about Robert Lowell (Lord Weary's Castle, also poetry.)

ramon fernandez (ramon fernandez), Saturday, 30 September 2006 04:46 (nineteen years ago)

I'd unhesitatingly recommend you read Updike's Rabbit novels, tho I think he's a polarising figure round these parts. (I'd also recommend you run amok with Burroughs and Pynchon but the Updike might make more sense in light of what you've already been reading.) And DeLillo's Great Jones Street. And Bukowski's short stories. And Philip K. Dick. This is a very big pond if you want to go swimming.

Leopold Boom! (noodle vague), Saturday, 30 September 2006 08:49 (nineteen years ago)

i read Mao II a couple of years ago and enjoyed it, have attempted Libra twice but never seem to get past the 3/4 mark, some other reading material always seems to steal my interest. Philip K. Dick wrote Bladerunner? and the novel that Ben Affleck movie was based on? or am i confusing him with someone else?

i like big ponds... there are many more, and varied, fish ;)

justine paul (justine), Saturday, 30 September 2006 08:55 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, Blade Runner was based on Dick's Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?

Leopold Boom! (noodle vague), Saturday, 30 September 2006 09:18 (nineteen years ago)

i think as a new zealander who has grown up with American t.v. as a babysitter, US literature fascinates me because in a kind of paradoxical way, it is both familiar and alien... i'm trying to remember other US novelists i've read in the last year, but i'm homeless at the moment so all my books are in storage...
Brett Easton Ellis is someone who repulses me, yet i've read (and own) most of his books... he holds a kind of morbid fascination me. i once read aloud a particularly graphic passage from American Psycho to my ex while we were on a road trip and he had to pull over and get out of the car because he felt physically ill!

justine paul (justine), Saturday, 30 September 2006 09:43 (nineteen years ago)

he's kinda forgotten these days but John O'Hara is pretty great. non-flashy realism plus unique class consciousness and eye for detail.

start with Appointment in Samarra or Butterfield 8 before you tackle his longer, later epics from the 50s.

actually, he was just as much pre as well as post WW2.

From Here To Eternity by James Jones is a good novel about "the war" though it's improved by seeing the movie first.

m coleman (lovebug starski), Saturday, 30 September 2006 10:43 (nineteen years ago)

I'll reiterate the Gaddis recommendation. Also, I liked 'White Noise' far better than DeLillo's other stuff (although I've not tried 'Libra').

Tobias Wolff is one of my favourite writers - he's more post-Vietnam and bloody fantastic. This Boy's Life is my favourite (it's a memoir) - all the rest of his stuff is short fiction.

Also you might like Tim O'Brien.

franny (frannyglass), Saturday, 30 September 2006 12:07 (nineteen years ago)

If you ready any Cheever, read the stories. Seconded on the Updike Rabbit stuff.

Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Saturday, 30 September 2006 13:57 (nineteen years ago)

Updike is awful. Off the top of my head the only author I hate.

c('°c) (Leee), Saturday, 30 September 2006 17:11 (nineteen years ago)

Like I said, polarising.

Leopold Boom! (noodle vague), Saturday, 30 September 2006 18:24 (nineteen years ago)

Updike is awful? Writes too much, yes. But awful? Make your case.

Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Saturday, 30 September 2006 18:35 (nineteen years ago)

I've only read Rabbit Run and one short story (it was written in first-person plural) -- wait, he also wrote "A&P," so that makes two shorts -- but RR didn't help itself by being in a genre that I dislike: lower-middle-class drama set in suburban squalor. Updike is technically adept (and even then, there was something about his prose -- cleverness? smugness? I don't remember what exactly -- that felt like Chinese water torture, and that, of all things, light stream-of-consciousness was a breath of fresh air), but I couldn't stand Rabbit himself, and the trajectory of the story was loathesome -- deliberately loathsome yes, but I was never able to shake the feeling that part of Updike sympathized with Rabbit.

And from what I recall of the first-person plural short, sort of the omniscient unreliable narrator was so wrapped up in its tacit point-making that the style tried my patience.

It's been a long time since I've read anything of his, so I can't be terribly precise; but I know that lots of people love him, and lots of people hate him.

c('°c) (Leee), Saturday, 30 September 2006 19:34 (nineteen years ago)

c didn't make his case.

John Updike: the Rabbit novels
Saul Bellow: The Adventures of Augie March, Herzog, Humboldt's Gift
Philip Roth: Portnoy's Complaint, Sabbath's Theater, American Pastoral, The Human Stain, I Married a Communist
Richard Yates: Easter Parade, Revolutionary Road, The Complete Stories
Cormac McCarthy: Blood Meridian, Suttree, Child of God, The Road
Charles Portis: Masters of Atlantis, Norwood, Dog of the South
Denis Johnson: Jesus' Son

Mike Lisk (b_buster), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 13:14 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah that was a pretty vague post. Updike's themes are pretty boring after awhile (OOOOOOH SEX IN SUBURBS) but I read him (not that I read him that often) for his prose. There are very few writers I can think of who even approach some of the beauty and rhythms of his sentences. The caveat is the sentences are about golf courses and Gibsons.

Also: you're supposed to hate Rabbit.

Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 14:14 (nineteen years ago)

this seems to be focussing on particular claimants of Great American Novel type positions, i dunno about it. what about the L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E crowd, say.

also stuff like mark leyner, douglas coupland, is kind of a particular & necessary snapshot of a certain period. although that's post-gulf war even. at some point "postwar" is going to be a useless classification for american fiction.

foster wallace has a marvellous takedown of updike in his last collection. well, not marvellous. but impressively snide, once you get to the punchline. in u &i n baker (who might go with that duo, above) mentions updike's comparison of the inside of a vagina to a ballet slipper. i always wondered what john updike was doing fucking the ballet slipper.

tom west (thomp), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 14:20 (nineteen years ago)

I did say "deliberately loathsome," mind, and I hold to my assertion that his prose was lackluster. I didn't find his prose at all beautiful, probably because it wasn't pure style and it was too wedded to the subject matter -- too self-consciously crafted and technically neat (which is also why I don't like Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man).

c('°c) (Leee), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 16:13 (nineteen years ago)

You so crazy.

Leopold Boom! (noodle vague), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 16:32 (nineteen years ago)

i always wondered what john updike was doing fucking the ballet slipper.

He is clumsy with his feet.

Casuistry (Chris P), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 18:39 (nineteen years ago)

Also everyone always leaves Danielle Steele off these lists. Why is that? Her first novel ("Going Home") came out in 1973, so it's hard to imagine reading it as anything other than a commentary on Vietnam.

Casuistry (Chris P), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 18:42 (nineteen years ago)

Great. Trolls in I love Books now.

Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 18:45 (nineteen years ago)

xpost

If we're bring up experimetal stuff (esp. poetry and the L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E movement) then check out Charles Bernstein (the essays in Content's Dream & My Way and the poetry in the Sophist), Bob Perelman (my teacher, totally cool guy), Leslie Scalapino, Bruce Andrews (prepare to be offended) and a bunch of other folk--Michael Palmer (not the medical thriller writer) and Ron Siliman amongst them.

ramon fernandez (ramon fernandez), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 20:09 (nineteen years ago)

Perelman is your prof? He'd probably be good at that.

Am I supposed to be the ILB troll?

Casuistry (Chris P), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 22:10 (nineteen years ago)

someone summarize the dfw takedown plz.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 22:31 (nineteen years ago)

it's a very, very long and even-handed windup that collapses into "and basically that's because updike is a dickface".

tom west (thomp), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 22:37 (nineteen years ago)

I think I'm supposed to be the troll.

c('°c) (Leee), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 22:43 (nineteen years ago)

i spent a year trying to troll and no one noticed.

tom west (thomp), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 23:45 (nineteen years ago)

Also everyone always leaves Danielle Steele off these lists. Why is that? Her first novel ("Going Home") came out in 1973, so it's hard to imagine reading it as anything other than a commentary on Vietnam.


-- Casuistry (chri...), October 4th, 2006.

This is troll.

Sterling, and everyone else, here's the takedown

http://www.ptwi.com/~bobkat/observer1.html

Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 23:58 (nineteen years ago)

If you're interested in postwar American fiction, then I strongly recommend you don't limit yourself to relatively unpopular but critically acclaimed novels that are considered to have literary merit and which were mostly written by white men (as almost all the books mentioned in this thread so far have been). You'll get a really distorted picture of what the postwar American fiction scene was like that way. On the other hand, if you're interested in relatively unpopular but critically acclaimed novels that are considered to have literary merit and which were mostly written by white men (which is as perfectly fine thing to be interested in as anything) don't go around calling it "postwar American fiction" -- that just seems deeply problematic.

Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 5 October 2006 05:01 (nineteen years ago)

not really much more than calling 18th century english fiction '18th century english fiction' eh?

Josh (Josh), Thursday, 5 October 2006 06:58 (nineteen years ago)

Casuistry, that's great, but I seriously doubt the poster above is looking to read Danielle Steele. You assumption that just because a novel came out in 1973 indicates that it is about Vietnam is pretty ridiculous. Philip Roth's The Great American Novel came out in 1973, too--the book is about baseball, but according to your logic, it's about Vietnam.

Everyone leaves Danielle Steele off these lists because she's a hack.

Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Thursday, 5 October 2006 10:36 (nineteen years ago)

Also, I didn't mean to say you were a real troll, I was just having fun, but really. . . .Danielle Steele? C'mon.

Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Thursday, 5 October 2006 10:40 (nineteen years ago)

i would certainly recommend reading peyton place. and maybe some genre stuff. mickey spillane! jim thompson, certainly. some sci-fi...oof, its kinda endless.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 5 October 2006 12:12 (nineteen years ago)

not really much more than calling 18th century english fiction '18th century english fiction' eh?

Well but yes. I mean if you take an 18th C English fiction course and they include Tristram Shandy then this seems questionable -- Tristram Shandy is, as far as I know, an exception, and reading it -- while awesome -- gives you very little sense of what 18th C English fiction was like! The literary history that we're given is an exceptionalist one, which makes for good reading but bad history.

I haven't read the Roth, but I'm pretty sure if I did I could make a case for it being about Vietnam (by which I don't just mean the war itself but also its effects on the US and the changes in culture that it brought about). That may or may not be the most interesting way to read that book, of course.

Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 5 October 2006 15:34 (nineteen years ago)

You haven't even made your Danielle Steele case yet and you're jumping ahead to the Roth now. One thing at a time.

Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Thursday, 5 October 2006 16:05 (nineteen years ago)

Check out Rumors of Peace by Ella Leffland.

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Thursday, 5 October 2006 18:51 (nineteen years ago)

north american, postwar=20thC; literature produced in the aftermath of war, WWII and the Vietnam war - although not necessarily with "war" as the main subject. but am interested in all US literature.

My Danielle Steele case, such as it is, is that if you want to understand something about a culture in a time period, it makes more sense to pay attention to the "popular mainstream hacks" than to the relatively unpopular idiosyncratic literary geniuses. Although really my point was that the list was blandly homogenous, and I wanted to think up someone who fit the description but would never be mentioned here. It was either Steele or Iceberg Slim, who I also haven't read.

Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 5 October 2006 19:01 (nineteen years ago)

'pay attention to the "popular mainstream hacks"' = more references to 'since 9/11' slipped into in genre fiction at the opportune moments

if danielle steele or anyone else doesn't make for much of a contribution on the 'importantly registering reaction to the times' angle, does anything she wrote constitute an actual development in or at least change in fashion of a mass genre? that seems like a more fruitful way of pushing this line of argument.

Josh (Josh), Thursday, 5 October 2006 19:54 (nineteen years ago)

If you were studying "American fiction of the first decade of the 21st C." and walked away not knowing that "since 9/11" was completely overused in those [these] days, then you did not study anything at all.

Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 5 October 2006 19:59 (nineteen years ago)

Really? How many books have mentioned "since 9/11" since 9/11?

Also, you should have picked Iceberg Slim.

Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Thursday, 5 October 2006 20:06 (nineteen years ago)

haha i am extrapolating from genre television and genre film

Josh (Josh), Thursday, 5 October 2006 21:47 (nineteen years ago)

Cazh I feel like you're right and wrong all at once. The irony is, as far as I understand it, that Tristram Shandy was a Pop Fiction best-seller during its original print run. The fact that only the idle middle class were big novel-buyers at that time might have something to do with that, but still, Lawrence Sterne = 1750s Stephen King.

I've not read Peyton Place, but I'll rep for Valley of the Dolls as a well-written, popular description of its era. Nelson Algren's major novels are better written and even more descriptive of their era, from my remote romantic viewpoint.

Leopold Boom! (noodle vague), Thursday, 5 October 2006 22:38 (nineteen years ago)

NB I'm drunk, that reads like bollocks.

Leopold Boom! (noodle vague), Thursday, 5 October 2006 23:02 (nineteen years ago)

It's true, I have no idea about the "since 9/11" thing. But from what little I have read, the importance of women characters who were sexually abused and who dabble in lesbianism until they find themselves and them, just afterwards, find the man more or less of their dreams: That is certainly a late 90s/early 00s trope, and one you might not encounter if you stuck with David Foster Wallace and friends.

And, OK, Tristram Shandy is a somewhat complicated example. It was something of a surprise hit.

Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 5 October 2006 23:31 (nineteen years ago)

hmm... i see i have stirred the pot...

mike, i have just bought Bellow's Humboldt's Gift, it is patiently waiting on my bookshelf.

tom, i am quite a Douglas Coupland fan, have read most of his books. they have dated but provide quite funny cultural observations and i found them intelligent and also very easy reading. some of his endings are pretty shoddy though.

justine paul (justine), Friday, 6 October 2006 07:02 (nineteen years ago)

and i've also just bought The Waterworks by E.L. Doctorow.

justine paul (justine), Friday, 6 October 2006 07:08 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.