What books from the last 25 years will be considerd as classic,let's say, 100 years from now?

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

1.Austerliz - Sebald

― Zeno, Saturday, 12 May 2007 11:43 (eighteen years ago)

cause Sebald created something new out of his influences, and because the book got this strong emotional power, and because it deals with world war 2.

― Zeno, Saturday, 12 May 2007 11:45 (eighteen years ago)

http://a4.vox.com/6a00c22520e9df549d00c225211c1c8fdb-500pi

― scott seward, Saturday, 12 May 2007 14:07 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.alexisleon.com/figs/opal.jpg

― scott seward, Saturday, 12 May 2007 14:08 (eighteen years ago)

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/141690235X.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

― scott seward, Saturday, 12 May 2007 14:09 (eighteen years ago)

I am always sayin' that assuming we emerge from global nuclear apocalypse with humanities academia somehow intact, Terry Pratchett will be read by lit undergrads in the same annoyed way that they are now forced to read Dickens? I dunno!

― Gravel Puzzleworth, Sunday, 13 May 2007 19:38 (eighteen years ago)

Yet another way in which lit academics are like cockroaches.

― Casuistry, Monday, 14 May 2007 17:33 (eighteen years ago)

David Foster Wallace is a shoe-in, I think -- probably Infinite Jest because it's a big cock of a book.

― Hurting 2, Monday, 14 May 2007 21:35 (eighteen years ago)

i know yr kidding, but i could make an arguement that rainbow party is like price of salt or other pulp

― pinkmoose, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 12:43 (eighteen years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.