Experimental fiction

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

From the current edition of Harper's:

EXPERIMENTAL FICTION

Experimental fiction is the art of telling a story in which certain aspects of reality have been exaggerated or distorted in such a way as to put the reader off the story and make him go watch a television show. Another aspect of the experimental story is the innovative use of language. Here is an example of noninnovative use of language: "As Bill arrived at the store to buy milk, it started to rain." What a snore! Anyone can write that! That is not innovative. That does not open our eyes to the hypocrisy of our society. Try this: "Went buy to arrived as he rain started it Bill Bill Bill the milk, Bill the milk!" Or, in the tradition of Kafka, the writer might tum Bill into a giant bug who can't buy milk because he can't reach the counter, and when Bill gets home, his wife has also turned into a bug who, with her tentacles, signals, "Hey, Bill, where's the milk?" That's when Bill realizes all meaning is subjective and sprays his wife with a can of insecticide that he happened to buy at the store, because that store keeps the insecticide on the floor.

Incidentally, the way they execute bugs? Murdering bugs like Bill, who used to be human? A big foot comes crashing down.

Whereas a boring realist writer might write, "Lillian sat at the black table," an experimental writer says, "Lillian sat at the flat plane of ebony, the night-shaded planar surface, the nonwhite spatial expanse on which one can put things, such as ashtrays, if one smokes." See how that is more innovative, because not just anyone could have written it, just the nerdy kids in school or your friends' smart-ass son who rolls his eyes when you say what bands you like?

And to be superexperimental, one could have Lillian, at the black table, turn into a chimp. To show that bourgeois life is a sham. But when she is a chimp, she is still Lillian. That is the deep part. Her husband, Brian, likes her better as a chimp and always makes her banana milkshakes. Until one day a milkshake develops vocal cords and begs Brian to spare him because he is terrified of chimps. In retaliation, Lillian has an affair with an orangutan, who is either from the zoo or from another experimental story. See how edgy that is? You will never look at your wife, a milkshake, or a chimp in the same way again. Whenever you see these things, you will be like: I am a capitalist oppressor. The ending of an experimental story is very important. It should make no sense, thus disrupting the reader's dominant paradigm. You, the reader, should just sit there, stunned, asking yourself, "Wait, am I missing the last page?"

But guess what? You're not.

Surmounter, Monday, 21 July 2008 17:27 (seventeen years ago)

Dick.

Noodle Vague, Monday, 21 July 2008 18:19 (seventeen years ago)

On the one hand, that is idiotic drivel.

On the other hand, experimental writers "justify" themselves in idiotic ways (and needless ways, too).

Casuistry, Monday, 21 July 2008 20:23 (seventeen years ago)

There are bad experimental writers, for sure. The Harper's article stinks like one of those dude's who turns up at Boulez concerts just to boo.

Noodle Vague, Monday, 21 July 2008 20:29 (seventeen years ago)

Uh, this is from George Saunders' column in the Guardian, and I suspect he's just kidding around.

Here's one for example, for comparison.

http://lifeandhealth.guardian.co.uk/wellbeing/story/0,,2291208,00.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2007/oct/13/weekend7.weekend1

Mr. Que, Monday, 21 July 2008 20:32 (seventeen years ago)

Okay he sucks at being funny, not at criticizing books.

Noodle Vague, Monday, 21 July 2008 20:35 (seventeen years ago)

those columns kind of suck. his fiction is really funny though. i swear.

Mr. Que, Monday, 21 July 2008 20:35 (seventeen years ago)

You will never look at your wife, a milkshake, or a chimp in the same way again. Whenever you see these things, you will be like: I am a capitalist oppressor

sorry but this is funny

HI DERE, Monday, 21 July 2008 20:39 (seventeen years ago)

i love the bit about Lillian turning into a chimp

Surmounter, Monday, 21 July 2008 20:40 (seventeen years ago)

yeah actual too-close-to-home lol when i read that line xp

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 21 July 2008 21:13 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah, sheesh, it's George Saunders - when isn't he having a laugh? And his fiction is very funny.

bamcquern, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 21:24 (seventeen years ago)

Oh for heavens sakes, aim higher.

Casuistry, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 22:26 (seventeen years ago)

what are you talking about, brah?

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 22:53 (seventeen years ago)

pretty awesome writer having a so-so column in a brit newspaper is no big deal. and if it gets people to check out his fiction, all the better.

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 22:56 (seventeen years ago)

kinda weird that people find this so obnoxious. i was cracking up. it's not taking itself too seriously, just having a laugh at something kind of funny.

Surmounter, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 23:00 (seventeen years ago)

I think I would enjoy it, too, if it were funny. As it isn't, I don't. Fucking shut it, writer person. Still, it's mostly true. Just also mostly not funny.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 21:21 (seventeen years ago)

casuistry i feel like every time i see you post about writing on this board its to shit on it

max, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 21:23 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.