Anyway, nominations for good (and bad) novels about novelists?
― Jonathan Z. (Joanthan Z.), Thursday, 26 February 2004 09:43 (twenty-two years ago)
Incidently, I once interviewed a girl for a retail job and she said she liked modern fiction. I asked her what authors she admired. She said Martin Amis, pronouncing his surname, Amee. I looked at her oddly. She said, 'He's French'. I didn't give her the job.
― Mikey G (Mikey G), Thursday, 26 February 2004 10:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Thursday, 26 February 2004 10:19 (twenty-two years ago)
The protagonist as novelist ploy is really overused by Auster as well, and is only really successful in the New York Trilogy.
― Jonathan Z. (Joanthan Z.), Thursday, 26 February 2004 10:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mouse, Thursday, 26 February 2004 12:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jonathan Z. (Joanthan Z.), Thursday, 26 February 2004 12:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mikey G (Mikey G), Thursday, 26 February 2004 12:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 26 February 2004 13:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― mck (mck), Thursday, 26 February 2004 14:46 (twenty-two years ago)
Getting back to the question at hand: Chaucer's use of himself in The House of Fame is amazing and hilarious. An eagle swoops down on him while he's at his desk and takes him away to the House of Fame, where all the words ever said or written come to rest. On the way there, the eagle mocks him, describing how after he comes home from his mind-numbing clerk job, he sits at home and does even MORE reading "till fuly daswyd is thy looke." (I think we've all looked "daswyd" after reading too many hours in a row during college.)
Most of John Gardner's characters are writers of a kind, though I can't think of any that are "literary" writers (they're philosophers, manifesto-scribblers, crazy guys locked away in rooms, amateur poets, and monologuists a la Grendel). This way he gets around the problem of "Oh, damn, another writer talking about himself."
― Phil Christman, Thursday, 26 February 2004 18:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― slow learner (slow learner), Thursday, 26 February 2004 18:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― otto, Thursday, 26 February 2004 18:46 (twenty-two years ago)
I am generally pretty fond of novels about authors. If it's done in the first person, you've got a great opportunity for some interesting observation/reflection. As for a list:
There's Roth's first Zuckerman book (someone else can do the googling)Richard Ford's "The Sportswriter" and "Independence Day" are about a failed short story writer, which is close.Platform is a book about someone whose written an account of something, which feels different from being a book about a novelist.Harry Mathews' "The Journalist" is about a writer, not a novelist; and is just about my FBOAT.
― David Joyner (David Joyner), Friday, 27 February 2004 03:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― NickB (NickB), Friday, 27 February 2004 09:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― eleni (eleni), Friday, 27 February 2004 18:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― Not That Chuck, Friday, 27 February 2004 19:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pat Sheehan (Pat Sheehan), Friday, 27 February 2004 20:00 (twenty-two years ago)
Anybody every read "Second Lieutenants of Literature" by Tom Zigal? It's a GREAT short story about a once promising writer who finds himself judging a short story contest at a summer writer's conference in Oklahoma. (If you can find it, it's in a collection Careless Weeds.) It's a not-so-gentle poke at the MFA biz (the title is from Robert Stone, who said that creative writing programs are producing the second lieutenants of literature) Zigal wrote some novels but I never read them
― donald, Friday, 27 February 2004 20:04 (twenty-two years ago)
You either like John Self or you don't
is true in a trivial sense, but not very interestingly true. I think that the point of Money is more that eg
a) you hate him but you find him endearing
b) you disapprove of him but you like him
c) you hate him but you know that he's brilliantly fabricated (this would be more my line)
etc
― the bluefox, Friday, 27 February 2004 20:30 (twenty-two years ago)
It's entirely fair to put it in the prof/university category, but because his being a writer is still essential to the plot (and there's much discussion of the process of writing, workshopping, etc.), I think it's relevant here. Though it isn't so much a novel about a writer writing as about a writer living/working.
― mck (mck), Friday, 27 February 2004 21:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― eleni (eleni), Friday, 27 February 2004 21:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― Steve Walker (Quietman), Saturday, 28 February 2004 04:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ann Sterzinger (Ann Sterzinger), Monday, 1 March 2004 00:35 (twenty-two years ago)
But the Glass stories are where it started to go horribly wrong for Salinger. "Hapworth" = possibly the worst piece of creative writing I've ever read by an established author.
― Jonathan Z. (Joanthan Z.), Monday, 1 March 2004 10:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Caenis (Caenis), Friday, 5 March 2004 17:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― isadora (isadora), Friday, 5 March 2004 22:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― anode (anode), Saturday, 6 March 2004 13:53 (twenty-two years ago)
Dennis Potter - BlackeyesBernard Malamud - The TenantsJohn Updike's Bech booksIris Murdoch - The Black Prince
I'm writing a doctoral thesis on this very subject...
― falseazure, Saturday, 6 March 2004 17:27 (twenty-two years ago)
(The Bech books are pretty good, by the way.)
Has anybody mentioned Wonder Boys by Michael Chabon or Straight Man by Richard Russo?
― David Nolan (David N.), Sunday, 7 March 2004 03:39 (twenty-two years ago)
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0375760318/qid=1078630982//ref=pd_ka_1/102-4503958-9694513?v=glance&s=books&n=507846
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Sunday, 7 March 2004 03:43 (twenty-two years ago)
I think you all really ought to go and read it right away.
― Howard Pates, Sunday, 7 March 2004 22:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― winterland, Tuesday, 9 March 2004 09:06 (twenty-two years ago)
But all books are about writers. Take a book about a plumber; the plumber is seen through a writer's eyes, so how intrinsically plumberish is it?
― All Bunged Up. (Jake Proudlock), Tuesday, 9 March 2004 10:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 9 March 2004 19:22 (twenty-two years ago)
(x-post)
― winterland, Tuesday, 9 March 2004 19:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― cheeesoo (cheeesoo), Tuesday, 9 March 2004 21:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― bek, Tuesday, 9 May 2006 05:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Docpacey (docpacey), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 21:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Sons Of The Redd Desert (Ken L), Friday, 12 May 2006 02:16 (nineteen years ago)