Teenage Bookcase Embarassments... that you hated as a teenager

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I tried reading On the Road and Dharma Bums as a teenager - every adult I knew said I'd love the Beats, etc.. Found the former interminably boring, the goings on of people I cared nothing about doing things I cared nothing about. Found the latter's hipster-Buddhism even worse.

I refused to associate with Rand fans, her mixture of pseudo-intellectual philosophy and joyless writing drove me nuts. (My membership in the Socialist Party USA may have been a factor.)

But I don't think anything matched the disdain I held for Catcher in the Rye.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Sunday, 4 April 2004 07:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes! Finally! Someone who agrees with me!

Can't abide that book. Self-indulgent, whiny little pipsqueak. Grr.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Sunday, 4 April 2004 15:56 (twenty-one years ago)

THAT WAS THE POINT oh forget it.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Sunday, 4 April 2004 21:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Ayn Rand! urgh - I read most of The Fountainhead because I thought I should, but finally became so fed up that I walked out of the house and hurled the book into the street and watched cars run over it. I was 18.

aimurchie (aimurchie), Sunday, 4 April 2004 21:52 (twenty-one years ago)

I sooo hated _Catcher in the Rye_ when I had to read it in highschool, and I still do.

Ayn Rand- I've read all her fiction, and where I don't agree with everything that she says, I got something out of it. I'm not a hard core fan of it... I think she could have said the same thing in a 100 pages instead of 700.

Haven't read the Beat stuff yet. So I have no opinion there.

Kelly Spoer (onefingertoomany), Monday, 5 April 2004 12:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Agreed on Catcher In The Rye - a 'classic' for semi-illiterates. The Bell Jar rivals it for self-indulgent twattishness. I find the facile dystopia of 1984/Animal Farm massively overrated too, I'm sure no-one agrees tho'!

Timofey Pnin (Feynman), Monday, 5 April 2004 14:09 (twenty-one years ago)

god, i couldn't bare holden, the whiny little brat. i like salingers other books though. hmmm maybe i should try and read catcher again. i used to have completely opposite tastes from my sister when i was a kid, our bookshelfs were matter & antimatter - she liked austen, brontes, tolstoy, trollope, hardy, etc etc. the only thing we could agree on was these series of books called things like 'volcano adventure', 'amazon adventure' and quite ridiculously 'cannibal adventure' starring these two boys called hal and roger.

zappi (joni), Monday, 5 April 2004 15:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Have to agree with you about "Catcher in the Rye" - somehow, I didn't quite get it.

The other book I absolutely hated was "Lolita" - we were given it as 16/17-year-old sixth formers. Everyone else raved about it, but it seemed little more than low-grade soft-core porn to me.

Over twenty years later, I haven't been able to bring myself to revisit either of these books - perhaps it's time I did.

Glyn Haggett, Tuesday, 6 April 2004 07:56 (twenty-one years ago)

i wonder what you'd consider high-grade soft-core porn, then?

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 03:11 (twenty-one years ago)

"Red Shoe Diaries," of course. David Duchovny gives those a real Masterpiece Theater ambience.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 7 April 2004 06:46 (twenty-one years ago)

THAT WAS THE POINT oh forget it.

So far all us Holden hataz have failed to address JD's point. I think J.D's right. The whole point of Holden's character is that he's unashamedly unappealing as a person, but I don't think you're supposed to hate him for it. I think the point of the book is to identify with his outsider nature and to feel that you too are disillusioned with the world in a way that's difficult to articulate. You know, you say "turbulent nihilist", I say "whingey self-obsessed wanker". Let's call the whole thing off.

Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance was another one I never got into. I'm just not that interested in the minutiae of motorcycles, and was never stoned enough as a teenager to appreciate this book.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Thursday, 8 April 2004 09:46 (twenty-one years ago)

"the point" of catcher in the rye is surely revealed somewhere in seymour: an introduction

tom west (thomp), Thursday, 8 April 2004 23:19 (twenty-one years ago)

"if you don't understand why it burns when you pee i recommend you stab yourself in the crotch"

tom west (thomp), Thursday, 8 April 2004 23:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah the point is that Holden's supposed to be a hateful shit, but the book still sucks and it doesn't help that like 90% of the book's fans don't realize he's not some sort of way-cool role-model.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Friday, 9 April 2004 10:08 (twenty-one years ago)

About Salinger...."A Good Day for Bananafish" kinda rules, as does "Franny and Zooey". I hated "Catcher In The Rye" as well, and spent many years questioning my existence because everyone I loved loved it. (I quickly weeded out Ayn Rand fans)The best adolescent novels I ever read were Paul Zindel, who probably deserves his own thread. i have a niece and a nephew, and am determined to be the crazy auntie who plys them with good books. I eagerly await their pre-adolescence so I can finally present them with "The Pigman".

aimurchie (aimurchie), Saturday, 10 April 2004 17:11 (twenty-one years ago)

OOps. This is about adolescent novels that you are embarrased by. Oh well then. While having Eyres and Brontes forced down my gullet I developed a taste for Victoria Holt. And I loved every minute of it! There is a weird lack of bashing of "Forever" and "Fatso" and "Are you There God? it's Me, Fatso." What's her name? I really can't recall it right now. I would put this all behind me if she didn't have the NERVE to write books for adults. Which are bad Erica Jong. And it ain't easy to be a bad Erica Jong.

aimurchie (aimurchie), Saturday, 10 April 2004 17:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Did Paul Zindel write My Darling, My Hamburger?
[Looks up Amazon]
Ah yes, he did. He is great, even if I didn't read that book till I was twenty-four. My cousin's kids were doing it in school and she read it and then gave it to me. Very well-written and mature. Not at all appropriate for this thread.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Thursday, 15 April 2004 10:19 (twenty-one years ago)

To take up the response to my posting above, I think there is am interesting debate to be had as to where the erotic ends and the pornographic begins; everyone has their own idea, of course.

Glyn Haggett (Glyn Haggett), Friday, 16 April 2004 12:01 (twenty-one years ago)

hah

i think Catcher is a fantastic book. I think Zen and the Art is a fantastic book too. In my opinion, it has very little to do with the minutia of motorcycles and being stoned. I appreciate Rand too, but like Kelly I think she coulda said it in 100 pages instead of 700. sometimes it's just toooo drawn out.

i like catcher more for style and Zen and Rand more for content. I wouldnt hold up Robert Pirsig or Ayn Rand as great writers per se. the books are good, but their writing doesn't hold up too well. prisig's is more of a meandering essay and rand is just too goddam repetitive for chrisake. it really is.

AaronK (AaronK), Monday, 19 April 2004 13:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I really enjoyed reading Ayn Rand in grade 11, 12, despite being, even then, an avowed socialist. Part of me was quite proud for identifying the arguments and separating them from the prose, which I loved for it's sheer lack of, well, getting the joke. Atlas Shrugged was so completely over the top that I enjoyed the sheer spectacle of it, not to mention the wonderfully descriptive railway scenes.

Fountainhead is my favourite. I drew a lot of atheism from it, and, being fond of architechture, I reveled in the imporatnce she placed on buildings, and their importance in society. All the Gail Wynand stuff was ridiculously overblown, but again, that's the fun of Ayn Rand. We The Living was a little less grand, but even more obvious, if possible.

derrick (derrick), Tuesday, 20 April 2004 07:42 (twenty-one years ago)

sorry, that's "sheer lack of, well, NOT getting the joke". If there's one thing lacking in all 1100 pages of Atlas, it's a good sense of humour, jesus...

derrick (derrick), Tuesday, 20 April 2004 07:43 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.