― zappi (joni), Wednesday, 24 December 2003 17:32 (twenty-one years ago)
a. the circle that radiates from Dave Eggers/McSweeney'sb. writing that seems awfully impressed with its own clevernessc. the novel as Seinfeld episode: perhaps funny and well-crafted but with no moral center or purposed. Rick Moody
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Wednesday, 24 December 2003 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― quincie, Wednesday, 24 December 2003 18:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― flacajax (Speedy Gonzalas), Wednesday, 24 December 2003 20:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Prude (Prude), Wednesday, 24 December 2003 21:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 24 December 2003 22:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― zappi (joni), Wednesday, 24 December 2003 22:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Prude (Prude), Wednesday, 24 December 2003 22:45 (twenty-one years ago)
ahhhhhh....that site is like a collection all those people i've met in the past who were too snobby to talk to me
― zappi (joni), Wednesday, 24 December 2003 23:44 (twenty-one years ago)
Boy, do I sound embittered today... but... eh?
― Ann Sterzinger (Ann Sterzinger), Thursday, 25 December 2003 00:58 (twenty-one years ago)
Bookbloggers often sound selfconsciously hip. "Bookslut", for example, and "Confessions of an Idiosyncratic Mind". Um, how sluttish or idiosyncratic can you be if you read that many books.
I believe that at the moment it's hip to like Kafka. When I've tried to argue against him, the response from Kafkaettes has pretty much been that there must be something wrong with me. It's someone akin to the jeering that ensues when it emerges that there's always a Bananarama track buried somewhere in my dance mixes.
― Roderick the Visigoth. (Jake Proudlock), Thursday, 25 December 2003 13:10 (twenty-one years ago)
Terms used to define hipster books: underground, experimental, meta. Of course the product is really none of these, as they are not underground nor experimental, and perhaps pseudo-meta but only because they use lots of footnotes.
Other books/writers included on the reading list: Mark Danielewski, Will Self, et al.
I suppose it's the rise of 'youth culture' as defined by not-clever-by-half white male writers who produce 'biting' commentaries.
(Although I rather liked Generation X.)
― Catty (Catty), Thursday, 25 December 2003 14:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― , Friday, 26 December 2003 01:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Viva La Sam (thatgirl), Friday, 26 December 2003 02:04 (twenty-one years ago)
Other hipster writers: Martin Amis (thanks to London Fields), Dennis Cooper, Bret Easton Ellis.
― Catty (Catty), Sunday, 28 December 2003 16:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 30 December 2003 09:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― quincie, Tuesday, 30 December 2003 15:29 (twenty-one years ago)
"That's not writing, that's typing!" - Truman Capote on On The Road
― LondonLee (LondonLee), Tuesday, 30 December 2003 20:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 09:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Catty (Catty), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 10:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 11:25 (twenty-one years ago)
There have been alot of good, even great writers listed here - why would you call "Everything is Illuminated" shit based on who reads it then dismiss him as a "one hit wonder"? Well he has only written one book so far but I doubt it will be his only succesful one - and even if it is then so what? Its still a good and interesting book.
My one problem with alot of the people who read some of these books is that they have generally only read about 10 books yet they still try to force them on you.
― jed (jed_e_3), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 12:33 (twenty-one years ago)
Well he's a different type of hipster, one who wears a suit and bathes. And he could actually write.
― LondonLee (LondonLee), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 14:06 (twenty-one years ago)
I thought the purpose was to identify what books/authors are labeled 'hipster' reading material and perhaps why. Who said anything about slagging?
― Catty (Catty), Thursday, 1 January 2004 23:22 (twenty-one years ago)
The "Everything Is Illuminated" shit.
These books will end up on the three-for-two rack at Borders. They're like hipster one-hit wonders.
alot of this is slagging.
― jed (jed_e_3), Friday, 2 January 2004 00:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Catty (Catty), Friday, 2 January 2004 13:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― flaca, Saturday, 3 January 2004 07:56 (twenty-one years ago)
I think 'hipster books' is a pretty silly label, mind.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Saturday, 3 January 2004 15:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 3 January 2004 18:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Catty (Catty), Saturday, 3 January 2004 23:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― Catty (Catty), Saturday, 3 January 2004 23:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― LondonLee (LondonLee), Saturday, 3 January 2004 23:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Sunday, 4 January 2004 12:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Sunday, 4 January 2004 13:50 (twenty-one years ago)
And Burroughs is just unreadable.
― LondonLee (LondonLee), Sunday, 4 January 2004 15:47 (twenty-one years ago)
He just chose not to write like that for much of his life.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 4 January 2004 20:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 4 January 2004 20:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― LondonLee (LondonLee), Sunday, 4 January 2004 23:48 (twenty-one years ago)
Anyway, I'd say that I agree with Tico in that a lot of this stuff goes together and a certain group will be drawn in, but that doesn't mean the work is without merit. At least not all of it.
Am I a bad person for buying my mother an Eggers book and White Teeth for Christmas? I got them for her based on excerpts I'd read, but now I'm thinking that I may be accidentally training her to be a hipster.
― mike h. (mike h.), Monday, 5 January 2004 04:28 (twenty-one years ago)
For the eager, the post-bookish, the future-but-not-current MFAs: it's generally Eggers &c., anybody mentioned on Baum's Eggernomicon, the fetching Zadie Smith, the overbright+neurotic D.F. Wallace, the well-connected Safran Foer or Eggers, with any of whom one may want to identify one's life. Perfect metrosexual accoutrements, in general. This says nothing about the books themselves, which, obviously, differ in quality quite independently of their desirability among the current jetset.
There's, natch, also the cyborg/trans-humanist/metasexual agenda, starting with Gaiman and Dick and Stephenson and Ballard, moving on from there.
For the young, in general, you've got the business above, maybe, with some Beats thrown in-- the same sensibility, aged, leads one to authenticity-charged authors, Frey mayhaps, who decided to offer his vision of the real against the coy feints and stabs of the Fence/3rd Bed/McSweeney's generation.
But no one really calls something a "hipster book" unless they're meaning to slag, I wouldn't think. Even if I like a book, the H.Q. (hipster quotient) is going to be a social if not a private ill associated with the book, ie, I enjoy much of Foster Wallace's fiction but am unlikely to talk about him much unless I know which ear's bent, just because there's too much baggage trundled into the room with his name. And who wants to just put more garbage into the air, hm?
The hipster mess, with the lit hipsters and the whole cult of resentment surrounding them, the incestuousness, the connection-envy: it all seems inevitable, and non-new. But it's easy enough just to make like Mailer and crash Isherwood's breakfast table, isn't it? Isn't it?
M.
― Matthew K (mtk), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 00:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ann Sterzinger (Ann Sterzinger), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 00:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 01:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― Catty (Catty), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 13:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 13:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 13:33 (twenty-one years ago)
Hipster lit=what hipsters read
That's different from anything to do with Isherwood: perhaps his broad 'set' was a kind of 1930s hipster circle (Auden, Lehmanns Rosamund and John, Henry Green, Cyril Connolly) but somehow I think not; rather that literary society back then, in England, was almost exclusively upper-middle class and that these ppl may well have known each other even if they'd never written a word.
It's different now, so we don't have groups like that. I quite like groups, but only because I like comparing takes on things, as well as feuds, etc (ie Green vs Waugh, or Connolly vs Orwell).
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 13:37 (twenty-one years ago)
As a general rule I try to stay away from anything that is suffering from over the top hype because it usually means the emperor has no clothes. A little hype is okay -- otherwise how would you know it's out there?
― Catty (Catty), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 13:40 (twenty-one years ago)
bulgakov's "the master and margarita"
i swear to god, for 2 or 3 weeks early in the year every fucking indie scenester kid that came in the store i worked at wanted a copy.
― vahid (vahid), Thursday, 8 January 2004 21:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― R the V (Jake Proudlock), Thursday, 8 January 2004 23:57 (twenty-one years ago)
Top shelf, right side, left to right:
obscuredEmerick, Here There and EverywhereA. Burroughs, Running With Scissorstwo unknownsGeorg Groddeck, Exploring the UnconsciousFreud, DoraHallowell and Ratey, Driven to DistractionWheelwright, The Presocraticsunknown Bettelheim, Freud and Man's SoulHemingway, The Sun Also Rises" The Complete Short Stories" A Farewell To Arms" The Old Man and The Sea
Next shelf down, right side, left to right
Masters, Spoon River AnthologySalinger, Catcher in the RyeVranckx(!), 150 Best Loft IdeasGoodman, 75 Short MasterpiecesO'Brien, The Things They CarriedCohen, Beautiful Losers (this one is appropriate)Coelho, The AlchemistBurroughs, unknown titleBurroughs, Cities of the Red NightCamus, The StrangerCamus, The PlagueKafka, MetamorphosisKafka, The Trialunknown
Just to the left of her pelvis is Lord of the Flies
― alimosina, Sunday, 15 January 2012 04:31 (thirteen years ago)
god, tumblr prn is just ... the worst
― thomp, Sunday, 15 January 2012 12:59 (thirteen years ago)
Ugh. Misread the guy's name and thought it was gonna be nabisco's site.
― Mayne ... Or Astro-Mayne? (James Redd and the Blecchs), Sunday, 15 January 2012 14:25 (thirteen years ago)
looool
― somebody sh1pley the brinks truck (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 15 January 2012 16:26 (thirteen years ago)
got tired of looking at skinny blond chicks with boring tattoos, didn't get that far
― sarahel, Sunday, 15 January 2012 22:54 (thirteen years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/lP1xT.jpg
― nakhchivan, Sunday, 15 January 2012 22:57 (thirteen years ago)
Haha. Is that for real? Probably not. Reminds of when Momus made up all these fake foreign language book covers of his imaginary books, although I can't remember how to find them and I think he has published a book for real since then.
― Das Lexist (James Redd and the Blecchs), Sunday, 15 January 2012 23:03 (thirteen years ago)
http://imomus.com/lifeofmilk.html(Note grammatical error in the German title)
― Das Lexist (James Redd and the Blecchs), Sunday, 15 January 2012 23:05 (thirteen years ago)
ya s'real
― nakhchivan, Sunday, 15 January 2012 23:08 (thirteen years ago)
sub[kultura]
A Russian translation of this I'm guessing, not a book about today's "stilyagis".
― alimosina, Monday, 16 January 2012 22:28 (thirteen years ago)
http://i652.photobucket.com/albums/uu241/dnvnoo/small_figures.jpg
― los blue jeans, Thursday, 23 February 2012 23:46 (thirteen years ago)
that's more 'nerd with vague occasional hipster leanings'
― desperado, rough rider (thomp), Thursday, 23 February 2012 23:52 (thirteen years ago)
do you mean the dude whose collection that is, or the authors of the books in that collection?
― Philip Nunez, Friday, 24 February 2012 00:05 (thirteen years ago)
presence of tony tanner also makes me want to say 'english undergraduate'
― desperado, rough rider (thomp), Friday, 24 February 2012 00:54 (thirteen years ago)
my list itt is still the definitive one, nice try tho urban outfitters
― 99x (Lamp), Friday, 24 February 2012 01:33 (thirteen years ago)
Is pulp crime fiction hipster lit?
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-osMFxN_b1qg/Tq0eOP01SiI/AAAAAAAADX0/l0qrThGIyVY/s400/Parker+Black+Ice+US+and+UK.jpg
― Träumerei, Friday, 24 February 2012 01:35 (thirteen years ago)
no
― 99x (Lamp), Friday, 24 February 2012 01:37 (thirteen years ago)
basically i guess
march 1997 issue of disney adventures definitely tilts towards nerd
― los blue jeans, Friday, 24 February 2012 02:31 (thirteen years ago)
i really must get around to reading the tunnel
― desperado, rough rider (thomp), Friday, 24 February 2012 09:06 (thirteen years ago)
looks like the right sort of Crash, but hipster should have Dick in 70s Panther not 90s Vintage surely.
― woof, Friday, 24 February 2012 09:58 (thirteen years ago)
I don't know what Panther is but there is some 70s Dick on another shelf
You can just barely make out 70s editions of The Adolescence of P-1 and Barth's "The End of the Road" on the second shelf there
btw this is a shelf in my old room at my parent's house that's been untouched since around 2002. wow, 10 years, that seems impossible.
― los blue jeans, Friday, 24 February 2012 13:12 (thirteen years ago)
in 02 these wouldve been a lot closer to h1pster books i think
― 99x (Lamp), Friday, 24 February 2012 17:13 (thirteen years ago)
MIRANDA JULY
― ehkarl, Sunday, 26 February 2012 20:48 (thirteen years ago)
lydia davis
― the jeremy lin of YANIV (cozen), Sunday, 26 February 2012 21:02 (thirteen years ago)
where does Jonathan Safran Foer fit into this band scheme
― corey, Sunday, August 28, 2011 1:38 PM (2 years ago)
http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2014/05/chipotle-cups-will-now-have-stories-by-jonathan-safran-foer-toni-morrison-and-other-authors
― j., Thursday, 15 May 2014 13:55 (eleven years ago)
The truth is, that’s not really why I did this. I mean, I wouldn’t have done it if it was for another company like a McDonald’s, but what interested me is 800,000 Americans of extremely diverse backgrounds having access to good writing. A lot of those people don’t have access to libraries, or bookstores.
What an elite prick
― famous instagram God (waterface), Thursday, 15 May 2014 14:00 (eleven years ago)
"People who have access to a Chipolte but not a library or a bookstore"
Can only imagine how bad the Saunders story will be
― famous instagram God (waterface), Thursday, 15 May 2014 14:01 (eleven years ago)
Will probs feature a talking burrito
que?
― Ward Fowler, Thursday, 15 May 2014 14:03 (eleven years ago)
Foer didn’t know what to expect, but Ells went all in. Starting Thursday, VF Daily can exclusively reveal, bags and cups in Chipotle’s stores will be adorned with original text by Foer, Malcolm Gladwell, Toni Morrison, George Saunders, and Vanity Fair contributing editor Michael Lewis. Foer says ,” Chipotle refrained from meddling in the editorial process for the duration of the initiative, which the burrito chain has branded Cultivating Thought. “I selected the writers, and insofar as there was any editing, I did it,” Foer said. “I tried to put together a somewhat eclectic group, in terms of styles. I wanted some that were essayistic, some fiction, some things that were funny, and somewhat thought provoking.”
― famous instagram God (waterface), Thursday, 15 May 2014 14:04 (eleven years ago)
http://imgur.com/vRLeaHD.jpg nsfw
― dylannn, Thursday, 15 May 2014 15:11 (eleven years ago)
If anyone could pull off a good short story on a chipotle cup, it's george saunders. no idea what the fuck waterface is talking about.
― Doritos Loco Parentis (Hurting 2), Thursday, 15 May 2014 16:33 (eleven years ago)
i think it sounds like a bad idea thats what im talking about
― famous instagram God (waterface), Thursday, 15 May 2014 16:37 (eleven years ago)
the whole idea yes, but IDG what you're talking about wrt saunders
― Doritos Loco Parentis (Hurting 2), Thursday, 15 May 2014 16:44 (eleven years ago)
these are all oprah winfrey writers, what do you expect. promoting people hurting themselves for bags of cash is sorta the deal.
― Spectrum, Thursday, 15 May 2014 17:09 (eleven years ago)
yeah saunders is the most promising name here, in context. (also out.) all the ones printed in that vf piece suck as far as i can tell.
― difficult listening hour, Thursday, 15 May 2014 17:24 (eleven years ago)
wait no sorry i didn't see gladwell's name. gladwell is perfect for this obv.
― difficult listening hour, Thursday, 15 May 2014 17:28 (eleven years ago)
Saunders is not an Oprah writer
― famous instagram God (waterface), Thursday, 15 May 2014 17:54 (eleven years ago)
but Oprah is a Saunders character
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 15 May 2014 18:01 (eleven years ago)
that neuromancer cover is hilarious
― a lake full of ancient spices (los blue jeans), Friday, 16 May 2014 01:24 (eleven years ago)
https://lareviewofbooks.org/essay/los-angeles-review-cups
chipotle cup reviews
Jonathan Safran Foer, “Two-Minute Personality Test”: A series of would-be thoughtprovoking questions that instead provoke total exasperation. They are all terrible, but I found the last one most particularly and powerfully irritating: “You know it’s a ‘murder of crows’ and a ‘wake of buzzards’ but it’s a what of ravens, again? What is it about death that you’re afraid of? How does it make you feel to know that it’s an ‘unkindness of ravens’?”Foer’s casual presumption and smug moral certainty drove me up a tree in record time. While it is completely unsurprising to learn that he is not a fan of the greatest British crime novelist of the last several decades, Ruth Rendell, surely Foer might at least have heard of the (excellent) mystery, An Unkindness of Ravens. Also no, I did not know it was a “wake of buzzards.” Entirely grating, from stem to stern.Thoughts Cultivated? No.
Foer’s casual presumption and smug moral certainty drove me up a tree in record time. While it is completely unsurprising to learn that he is not a fan of the greatest British crime novelist of the last several decades, Ruth Rendell, surely Foer might at least have heard of the (excellent) mystery, An Unkindness of Ravens. Also no, I did not know it was a “wake of buzzards.” Entirely grating, from stem to stern.
Thoughts Cultivated? No.
― j., Wednesday, 21 May 2014 22:09 (eleven years ago)
jonathan safran foer is such a piece of shit
― flappy bird, Tuesday, 24 November 2015 21:56 (nine years ago)
I don't really think of his books as hipster books, more like mainline young democratic NPR-listener books, although I get that those are the same things to some people.
― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Tuesday, 24 November 2015 22:00 (nine years ago)
A writer I think of as a hipster writer, perhaps unfairly, is John Fante -- he just seems like someone people want to be seen reading and I unreasonably don't believe that his books can actually be any good based on who has recommended him to me.
― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Tuesday, 24 November 2015 22:01 (nine years ago)
i overheard a non-hipster woman recommending john fante to her father in a used bookstore the other day
― flopson, Tuesday, 24 November 2015 22:08 (nine years ago)
John Fante is actually very good, BUT I suspect you have to first read him when you're young
― as verbose and purple as a Peter Ustinov made of plums (James Morrison), Wednesday, 25 November 2015 00:31 (nine years ago)
lots of people came to him via bukowski/black sparrow. thus the cool dude cred or whatever.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 25 November 2015 03:21 (nine years ago)
I never really liked Bukowski, but when I was a struggling young writer with no money, Fante's books about struggling young writers with no money definitely worked for me
― as verbose and purple as a Peter Ustinov made of plums (James Morrison), Wednesday, 25 November 2015 05:39 (nine years ago)