The list: Tobias Hill, Catherine Smith, Jean Sprackland, Amanda Dalton, Pascale Petit, Leontia Flynn, Sophie Hannah, Gwyneth Lewis, Owen Sheers, Patience Agbabi, Paul Farley, Nick Drake, Jacob Polley, Henry Shukman, Jane Draycott, Alice Oswald, Deryn Rees-Jones, Maurice Riordan and Robin Robertson.
― Archel (Archel), Monday, 7 June 2004 15:25 (twenty-one years ago)
Of the 20, I have never heard of 6. I have read 9, am a 'fan' of maybe 3, and have met 4. Oh dear. Call myself a poet?
It makes me want to get out and read a bit more, so I suppose it's a successful promotion.
― Archel (Archel), Monday, 7 June 2004 15:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Monday, 7 June 2004 15:42 (twenty-one years ago)
The list seems fairly arbitrary: any generation that includes both Jacob Polley and Maurice Riordan is elastic to the point of absoidity. I'm not sure that any of them, bar Farley, are actually that good, either. There's certainly not a Maxwell or an Armitage or a Paterson or a Shapcott or a Greenlaw among them. It's tempting to say that this list bears the same relation to the NewGen as the new wave of new wave did to punk.
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 7 June 2004 17:09 (twenty-one years ago)
To the 'good' list I would add, perhaps, with hesitancy, Alice Oswald.
I have never heard of 11. 'Oh dear', indeed.
― cozen (Cozen), Monday, 7 June 2004 17:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Monday, 7 June 2004 17:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Monday, 7 June 2004 18:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― bnw (bnw), Monday, 7 June 2004 22:10 (twenty-one years ago)
Of that list, the ones *I* know are not Ashberry-influenced I wouldn't say, but there is certainly a school that is. The current editorship of Poetry Review seems to favour them...
As JtN says, it does read like a very arbitrary list.
Incidentally, I think Paul Farley and Alice Oswald at least may both be 'better' than Simon Armitage, who I have come to find a bit tedious.
I can't remember the last time I bought a poetry book - shame on me. It was probably Paul Farley when he read for us. Probably the only other one of the NextGen whose book I might buy is Catherine Smith, out of Sussex solidarity and because we read together recently, and it just gets embarrassing if you keep having to say you haven't read iy. Oh and I do quite like some of her stuff.
But you can get things in the library pretty smartish these days, and what with all the anthologisation going on it's rare that I'd love a poet enough to fork out for their own collection. Well, I would if I *had* the money maybe.
― Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 07:27 (twenty-one years ago)
There is a huge gap between American and English poetry. Stephen Burt does a manful job of trying to bridge it - we did a special issue on youngish Americans with him when I was at PR: http://www.poetrysociety.org.uk/review/pr88-1/pr88-1.htm
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 08:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 10:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 11:15 (twenty-one years ago)
Presumably Cozen doesn't mean it, literally?
His silly question is good - and I agree with it, in a way.
I agree that Farley is better than all those poets I have never read too, naturally.
Post-Muldoonism: what an idea.
― the bellefox, Tuesday, 8 June 2004 14:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 16:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 18:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 22:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 12:50 (twenty-one years ago)
Is Simon Armitage stuff usually as bright, entertaining and readable as this article? I think I read somewhere (else) that he was a bit of a bore. Perhaps somebody was just 'having a go'.
'Dart' sounds great, but I haven't read it. One of my long-cherished projects is a television series about the river Trent, written by me and presented by Billy Brewer.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 19:17 (twenty-one years ago)