― St. Nicholas (Nick A.), Friday, 23 July 2004 15:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck, Friday, 23 July 2004 15:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vermont Girl (Vermont Girl), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Fred (Fred), Saturday, 24 July 2004 10:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Saturday, 24 July 2004 11:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rabin the Cat (Rabin the Cat), Saturday, 24 July 2004 14:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― pepektheassassin (pepektheassassin), Saturday, 24 July 2004 14:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― pepektheassassin (pepektheassassin), Saturday, 24 July 2004 14:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― SRH (Skrik), Saturday, 24 July 2004 14:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― schmutzie, Saturday, 24 July 2004 17:22 (twenty-one years ago)
My other recommendation isn't an author but a series - the "Modern Library Chronicles" series. There a collection of short (about 200 pages each) histories of a variety of subjects: Islam, American law, the Balkans, evolution, and so forth. While not every volume is great, most of them are well-written and informative introductions to their subjects.
― Mark Klobas, Saturday, 24 July 2004 17:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matthew S, Monday, 9 August 2004 11:31 (twenty-one years ago)
The only recent scienece book that's given me that kind of 'Eureka' feeling that Dawkins does is Stephen Johnson's 'Emergence'. It's a look at how complex systems and structures can come about from very simple 'dumb' rules. As soon as you read it you suddenly start seeing these structures everywhere. (Oh, and I guarantee after reading it you'll know a little more about slime moulds, town planning, amazon's book recommendations, ant colonies and the Florentine guild system.)
A quick mention for Sacks' "The man who mistook his wife for a hat', too.
― winterland, Tuesday, 10 August 2004 06:21 (twenty-one years ago)