To which magazines/journals/newspapers/other periodicals do you subscribe?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
This has been done before on ILX but seems reasonably appropriate here on ILB (although obviously is not about books per se).

In my household:
The New Yorker (two subscriptions so spouse and I don't have to share)
Gourmet
Saveur
Various alumni rags
The Key Reporter (someone in the household is a smarty-pants)

No subscription but might as well have one given that we buy every issue:
The Washington Post (except on Sundays, which go to the NYTimes)
The Believer

Read regularly at the B&N but don't actually purchase:
Us Weekly
Entertainment Weekly
Assorted other trashy entertainment

Tell me what treasures I am missing.

quincie, Monday, 5 January 2004 20:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Now you post.

quincie, Monday, 5 January 2004 20:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I also listed these on the "Introduce Yourselves" thread, but:

New Yorker
NY Review of Books*
New Republic

*This one I'd especially recommend to anyone who likes books.

o. nate (onate), Monday, 5 January 2004 20:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Tell me what treasures I am missing.

The Atlantic Monthly!

LondonLee (LondonLee), Monday, 5 January 2004 20:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Amen to Atlantic Monthly. I'm currently about four issues behind, but when I get up the courage, I always love each issue.

Also:
Foreign Policy
Seed
Bust
Texas Monthly
Everyday Food (surprisingly helpful and useful Martha Stewart magazine)
Bridge
Readerville (currently on hiatus)

(This is making me want to do a magazine run.)

Jessa, Monday, 5 January 2004 21:06 (twenty-one years ago)

subsciptions tend to be so cheap in the US compared to the UK, i think thats why people tend to subscribe more. What about The Believer? thats NOT cheap but id like to have a look at it (it's unavailable here as far as i know)

jed_ (jed), Monday, 5 January 2004 21:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Personally, I don't think The Believer is anywhere near being worth what they charge. I'd say about half of what they print is superfluous. A six-page interview with Jack White about fucking upholstery? I nearly threw the magazine across the room when I read that. I keep getting it because I (foolishly) subscribed, but I only read one or two articles per issue. I wish I hadn't wasted so much money on it.

Jessa, Monday, 5 January 2004 21:40 (twenty-one years ago)

I only subscribe to Stuff; Reason just started showing up at my house for free. Stuff is brilliant, best toilet reading ever. Is there something I'm actually missing in the New Yorker? I thought they've been printing the exact same fiction story over and over since 1973 and you just sat and read the year's worth of cartoons while waiting at the dentist's.

Ann Sterzinger (Ann Sterzinger), Monday, 5 January 2004 22:06 (twenty-one years ago)

I subscribe to:
The Nation
In These Times (yeah, yeah, I know)
The New Yorker
Film Comment

I skim the following because a friend subscribes:
Rolling Stone
Entertainment Weekly

**If you like books**, check out the following:
Bookmarks Magazine

Robomonkey (patronus), Monday, 5 January 2004 22:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Esquire is the only magazine I subscribe to but that's mainly because I like the design. I used to subscribe to Harper's Bazaar for the same reason.

I get The Atlantic free every month because I work there. We get Harper's too but I find a lot of it's commentary really predictable.

LondonLee (LondonLee), Monday, 5 January 2004 22:18 (twenty-one years ago)

don't subscribe really but do buy the wire magazine and the odd ish of the london review of books.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 5 January 2004 22:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Is there something I'm actually missing in the New Yorker?

Well, I keep getting it for: the listings section (which makes me feel like a with-it NYer, even if I never make it to anything), the occasional good longish reporter-at-large article (you know the trademark NYer type deal where they set someone loose for 20-odd pages on a topic of current interest), the Murakami stories, the Updike book reviews, the occasional good Louis Menand review, and the cartoons.

o. nate (onate), Monday, 5 January 2004 22:58 (twenty-one years ago)

My household subscribes to:

Newsweek
Vanity Fair
Jane (although my wife will prob. not renew)
Tape Op

Read regularly:

Mojo
The Source
XXl
Rolling Stone
Spin

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 00:55 (twenty-one years ago)

What percentage of the ones that you subscribe to would you guess that you manage to read? I only subscribe to three (albeit two weeklies and a bi-weekly), and I probably read less than 25% of the contents.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 02:18 (twenty-one years ago)

The Atlantic
Granta

when the atlantic shows up, I tend to put aside whatever else I'm reading at the moment and devour it. when granta shows up, I put it on my desk and pop one story/article at a time over a few months.

I usually read 75% of the atlantic (everything before the reviews start) and 95% of granta (rarely don't read something).

j. pantsman (jpantsman), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 02:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Current subscriptions: Tin House, Granta, Literary Review, Mslexia, Bitch.
I also pick up Harper's and the Bookseller when I'm at the shops.

New subscriptions: Bust, the Believer.

Anyone interested in writing should have a peek at Mslexia. They do the kind of nuts and bolts stuff that other magazines turn into books and sell you on top of the subscription.

Catty (Catty), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 13:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Holy shit Ryan! You must be a fast reader and not require much sleep. Good to see another science (as opposed to science fiction) geek on ILB.

Thoughts on the New Yorker: I almost never read the fiction. For no particularly good reason I decided that I dislike the new fiction editor, whatever her name is. I like the long articles, the Talk of the Town, and the book and movie reviews. Shouts and Murmurs is almost always horrible and I wish they would just get rid of it already. I adore the Booth and Roz Chast cartoons.

Thoughts on the Believer: I gave the first two issues a chance and now don't even glance at the issues the husband brings home.

Thoughts on The Atlantic Monthly: It appears I must start reading this.

quincie, Tuesday, 6 January 2004 13:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Heat
London Review of Books

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 14:03 (twenty-one years ago)

The NY'er
Atlantic Monthly
In These Times
ReadyMade

Recently let subscription to the Nation lapse when I realized they were just gathering dust; let sub to Saveur go when I realized I don't cook.

On-line, tho, I'm a regular at the Complete Review, Bookslut, Arts Journal . . .

martha bayne, Wednesday, 7 January 2004 00:28 (twenty-one years ago)

o. nate--love your take on The New Yorker. I signed up about 18 months ago as a trial and made it a goal to read all the fiction. (this may interest you, too, quincie.) Above that, I'd read only what interested me--Louis Menand has become my favorite (esp. his outstanding piece on Orwell/1984 last year). M. Gladwell is fluffy and overrated (but his pieces hardly ever run).

For my little fiction project, I kept a log and recorded quick takes on every story. (Yes, I'm crazy. But what are you bloggers looking at me like that for?) It's been interesting to see which stories I love vs. which stories get picked by Best American Short Stories and the O. Henry Prize. Generally, I concluded that stories by authors I'd never heard of were more likely to be worth reading. I got sick of seeing some names appear over and over: Boyle, Proulx, Munro (and those are some of the more tolerable examples). [When I get home I'll try to remember to post a new thread listing my favorites of the last couple years.]

Anyway, I'm burning out on the project (I'd only originally planned to do it for a year), so I'll probably quit soon and just read what grabs me, hoping I won't miss the gems

Robomonkey (patronus), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 18:36 (twenty-one years ago)

I get a bunch of subscriptions with professionl memberships (but I don't have to count those do I ?!?) Umm, Atlantic Monthly, Utne Reader, ArtNews, Pages, Bookmarks, Scientific American. I can't remember the last time I made it through all of them.

(sallying), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 21:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm excited to see this thread, because my girlfriend offered me a subscription to some magazine of my choice (as a Christmas present) and I haven't been able for the life of me to make up my mind. Maybe someone's really bored and wants to voice an opinion on the options, which are:

The Economist (half-year sub because it's so expensive)
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Policy (which is better?)
Poets and Writers (is this worth it? I am serious about writing, but I don't want to subscribe if it's just going to be a badge of pretentiousness that sits around the house)
World Press Review (is this any good? And what's their bias?)

Also, of the big literary journals (Granta, Paris Review, Ploughshares, etc.), which do y'all think is best (measured in terms of "good stories you wouldn't otherwise have run across")?

About magazines generally: I've always preferred Harpers overall to the Atlantic, New Republic and New Yorker. It's a question of tepid centrism vs. occasionally-not-tepid dissent. Also, Harpers is funnier. But I love TNR's book reviews (especially now that Guy Davenport isn't doing books for Harpers anymore--damn). And Atlantic does do a good job of exhuming forgotten writers--I'd never have heard of, say, John Cowper Powys without them. NY does something great every now and then that makes me wish I'd pay closer attention to them (Adam Gopnik on Bill Evans a few years ago), then nothing.

I like the Believer, especially after Tom Bissell's John Gardner-boosterism in the current issue, but can't imagine subscribing. They do need to overcome the cutesiness and clique-iness. The hatred they've generated, though, seems churlish to me. Even that infamous "snark" piece wasn't that awful--her point (that a shallow, knowing, can't-impress-me stance leads to bad criticism) was fine, it's just that her examples (James Wood?!) were nonsense.

Phil Christman, Thursday, 8 January 2004 18:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I quite enjoyed the early issues of The Believer that I read. I haven't read the most recent copies. I couldn't believe that someone was publishing a handsome magazine devoted almost entirely to essays on writers and writing. And i'm always excited to read about writers and books that i'm unfamiliar with. Things that fell tru the cracks for whatever reason. And I even thought the long interviews were entertaining(I'm a sucker for the Q&A format. But yeah, i would have preferred a more paris review kinda thing and could have done without the rock stars). I heard that nick hornby writes a column now? that doesn't bode well. especially if he's writing about music. But, you know, i don't care who's girlfriend is the editor and all that crap, i only judge the finished product. I mentioned on ILE once that i supported the high cover price because the thing looked so nice and that it wasn't every day that people would be crazy enough to start a literary zine that was really quite ambitious and yet accessible. Plus, i spend that much on impulse buys at the grocery store of US magazine, Vanity Fair, etc.
I too, like Phil, prefer Harpers to The Atlantic. I don't know WHAT happened to the Atlantic. It's a shame. I never want to pick it up anymore. Was it Krugman who blasted the Atlantic in the pages of Harpers lamenting how it had become a shoddy right-wing rag whereas in the past it had been a shining beacon of liberalism? I can't remember. It was something like that though.I used to read it more, i know that much.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 January 2004 18:53 (twenty-one years ago)

john cowper powys rules though. i learned about him (along with knut hamsun and Jean Giono) from henry miller in his book Books In My Life(i think that was the title) when i was a kid. And The Atlantic may have been the mag that ran that piece on Dahlberg not too long ago that was pretty good. Yeah, i mean, i've never had a problem with their litcrit.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 January 2004 18:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Scott, totally agree about The Atlantic. If only we could combine their litcrit with TNR's and then junk the political reporting. I don't want to bother with a magazine that publishes rationales for using torture, even if John Updike does publish the occasional listless story in it. In fact, I think I personally learn more from reading openly biased, partisan writing from all sides (along with Harpers and the International Socialist Review, I also read National Review and Weekly Standard at the library, though never on God's green earth would I monetarily support them) than from reading flabby, boring centrist publications.
What's your favorite book by Powys? He sounded so interesting in that article that he's been in my queue for a couple years now.

Phil Christman, Thursday, 8 January 2004 19:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Wolf Solent is a good place to start. His books are almost fantasy they are so out of this world. He would have gotten along well with Robinson Jeffers.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 January 2004 19:39 (twenty-one years ago)

New Yorker, Harper's, Foreign Affairs, National Review (a present from my wife's uncle -- the gift card said, affectionately, "To the left-wing commie pinko, from the right-wing fanatic"). I read the NY Times pretty much every day for work-related reasons, and especially on Sundays (the Times Magazine by itself is reason enough to buy the paper). Oh, and I at least browse the Village Voice every week, especially the arts and culture stuff (music, movies, books, calendar).

As to the question about the New Yorker: I honestly think that under David Remnick it has become a great magazine again. There's a new, young fiction editor who's allowed some really interesting stuff in alongside the old faithfuls, and the news reporting at its best is pretty much unbeatable (e.g. the piece two weeks ago by a guy who spent a few months in Saudi Arabia -- explained way more about the actual life and culture of the country that produced al qaeda than almost anything else I've read, even though that wasn't his explicit intent). If I were only going to subscribe to one magazine, it would be the New Yorker.

spittle (spittle), Friday, 9 January 2004 08:30 (twenty-one years ago)

At this point, just The New Yorker -- although I probably only read the fiction 20% of the time. Unless it's an author I already know and like, like Updike or Murakami, it's hard to pique my interest. One thing I like about the magazine is its profiles: recent articles on Howard Dean and Wesley Clark have been among the most interesting and comprehensive pieces I've read on either man.

I've bought three issues of The Believer so far and have liked them all well enough to justify the purchase (though not all $8 of it!). I have a weakness for intellectual treatments of pop culture, especially if they aren't "academic." Hermenaut used to do this; I'm glad The Believer has picked up the slack. (This month's issue has an interesting piece on the relationship between Smallville and 19th C. utopian Christian socialism.)

I'll also occasionally read Harper's and The Atlantic when I'm visiting my parents. There are occasionally great articles in both, but the amount of time I spend with each issue (i.e., not all that much) doesn't justify subscribing.

I recently let my subscription to the Utne Reader (which was a gift, anyway) lapse. After the sixth cover in a row about the importance of "community" and/or how to overcome stress, I had about enough. I also stopped subscribing to Magnet -- but only until they have a better selection of CDs as subscription gifts. (I basically look at that magazine, which can be unbearably indie-rock, as a CD, with six free issues.)

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 9 January 2004 19:20 (twenty-one years ago)

somebody gave us the nation for christmas, i don't think i had ever read it until we got the first issue. we get the new yorker, discover, gq, esquire, spin, rolling stone, um, there are probably others. spin and rolling stone are good for a quality 15 minute read. the killer kid/pot legalization articles are always the best in those two. gq and esquire are always good for an article or two. the new yorker either takes me 20 minutes to read or hours, depending on what they have going on. i want to subscribe to harpers and maybe a couple others.
i think my favorite magazine is Ugly Things. If you have no interest in 60's rock/garage rock/freakbeat stuff then you will have no interest whatsoever. i love it. it's obsessive to the extreme. i love the reviews. the latest issue has 40 pages on the 60's garage rock band The Misunderstood! 40 pages!! and it's the second of two parts! and the first part was just as long! let me say that again: 80 pages on the 60's garage rock band The Misunderstood!! but, yeah, you have to be a freak like me to enjoy such stuff.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 9 January 2004 21:12 (twenty-one years ago)

visiting some of my wife's family in Newton,Massachusetts tonight, and my Maria took me to this place down the road called New England Mobile Book Fair which was pretty amazing. It's a warehouse really filled to the rafters with overstock cheap books and tons of new stuff as well all divided on the shelves by publisher. so basically you will be walking along and come across a wall of penguin or a wall of grove press. pretty cool. and all discounted. they must do a lot of mail-order business or sell to schools. anyway, they had all the back-issues of The Believer there that i had missed so i picked them up and you know what: it is a really good magazine. it's highly entertaining. even nick hornby is entertaining. i dunno, it's kind of a dream magazine in a lot of ways. and whereas with McSweeney's i tended to buy it, never read it, and think about selling them on ebay in twenty years, The Believer i actually read. abd i learn stuff. and i'm always finding out about writers i never knew about. can't ask for more than that. i think i might subscribe. 65 bucks for 12 issues. anyway, that's my plug. and no, i am not related to dave eggers or any of his family.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 11 January 2004 02:37 (twenty-one years ago)

sorry if that was garbled. i'm writing on the fly. and i forgot to bring any punctuation to newton with me. tomorrow i'm hoping to go check out the site of brook farm. my great-great grandfather was a printer there. he put out the transcendentalist newspaper.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 11 January 2004 02:41 (twenty-one years ago)

NY Review of Books
The Economist
Foreign Affairs
The Big Takeover
Harper's
Stay Free!
Washington Post

mookieproof (mookieproof), Sunday, 11 January 2004 03:22 (twenty-one years ago)

"Poets and Writers (is this worth it? I am serious about writing, but I don't want to subscribe if it's just going to be a badge of pretentiousness that sits around the house)"

In my opinion not worth it. Most of what is useful about it is available freely online, and their articles on craft, marketing, and publishing are not likely to help anyone but beginning or insecure writers.

Ryan McKay (Ryan McKay), Sunday, 11 January 2004 06:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Hmmmmm... Between bookmarked sites and stuff at work (I work in a
library) I scan around 50 magazines/journals and find maybe 5-10
articles to read. Some things, like the Economist, are musting
reading. An excellent meta site for essays and reviews (forgive
me if you already know about it) is Arts & Letters Daily
http://www.aldaily.com

Hey Scott, doesn't New England Mobile Book Fair rock? :)

Steve Walker (Quietman), Monday, 12 January 2004 03:07 (twenty-one years ago)

it rocks a little too much, steve! i had to get out of there before they made me a pauper.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 12 January 2004 04:33 (twenty-one years ago)

'Quadrant'. I would probably also subscribe to 'Private' if I had the motivation.

writingstatic (writingstatic), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 00:21 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm the worst: SPIN.

Leee Majors (Leee), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 01:07 (twenty-one years ago)

arena homme +
pop
the face
new york review of books
artforum
new yorker

i used to have the time for harper's and the money for japanese vogue, and was unselfconscious enough for wallpaper.

lately i've been intrigued by a french mag called WAD and a new art mag called "influence"

vahid (vahid), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 01:16 (twenty-one years ago)

oops forgot world of interiors, australian vogue entertaining and nest: can't afford those anymore either.

vahid (vahid), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 01:17 (twenty-one years ago)

three weeks pass...
The Washington Post
New York Times
Harper's
Quest
Booklist
Cook's Illustrated
Taste of Home
Assorted trade-related publications.

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Thursday, 5 February 2004 12:01 (twenty-one years ago)

I can't believe you guys subscibe to all those magazines! I have one word to say to you , RAINFOREST!!!! Me, I go to the LIBRARY and read Utne in the comfort of the reading room. Its free and its sharing! GAD! Whose planet is this anyway? Yours?

flacajax (Speedy Gonzalas), Thursday, 12 February 2004 20:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Punk Planet (the best), Yankee, Elle, and Index. The new Index with Morrissey on the cover has an excellent interview with Johnny Temple of Akashic Books - he rules.

Kathleen, Friday, 13 February 2004 14:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Punk Planet & Yankee is an awesome combo.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 13 February 2004 16:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Mother Earth News
Cooks Illustrated

Vermont Girl (Vermont Girl), Friday, 13 February 2004 16:10 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.