― Fred (Fred), Monday, 10 January 2005 22:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― anonymous poster, Tuesday, 11 January 2005 01:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andi Ferguson, Tuesday, 11 January 2005 16:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― the bellefox, Tuesday, 11 January 2005 17:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ken L (Ken L), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 17:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 17:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― the bluefox, Tuesday, 11 January 2005 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 17:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Fred (Fred), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 20:34 (twenty-one years ago)
I would suggest Conan Doyle.
― SRH (Skrik), Thursday, 13 January 2005 15:49 (twenty-one years ago)
what's thrilling about gravity's rainbow?I was being a little ironic in my seconding, perhasp to compensate for some overhate (or rather tone down my message)on the Gravity's Rainbow thread, and perhaps the pinefox was doing something similar, but I'll bet lovers of the book do view it as a science thriller.
― Ken L (Ken L), Thursday, 13 January 2005 16:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― adam (adam), Thursday, 13 January 2005 22:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ken L (Ken L), Thursday, 13 January 2005 22:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Friday, 14 January 2005 10:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 14 January 2005 11:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matt (Matt), Friday, 14 January 2005 12:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matt (Matt), Friday, 14 January 2005 12:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 16 January 2005 03:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― 57 7th (calstars), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:58 (twenty-one years ago)