― Fred (Fred), Monday, 10 January 2005 22:03 (twenty years ago)
― anonymous poster, Tuesday, 11 January 2005 01:42 (twenty years ago)
― Andi Ferguson, Tuesday, 11 January 2005 16:19 (twenty years ago)
― the bellefox, Tuesday, 11 January 2005 17:10 (twenty years ago)
― Ken L (Ken L), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 17:33 (twenty years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 17:39 (twenty years ago)
― the bluefox, Tuesday, 11 January 2005 17:42 (twenty years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 17:49 (twenty years ago)
― Fred (Fred), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 20:34 (twenty years ago)
I would suggest Conan Doyle.
― SRH (Skrik), Thursday, 13 January 2005 15:49 (twenty years ago)
what's thrilling about gravity's rainbow?I was being a little ironic in my seconding, perhasp to compensate for some overhate (or rather tone down my message)on the Gravity's Rainbow thread, and perhaps the pinefox was doing something similar, but I'll bet lovers of the book do view it as a science thriller.
― Ken L (Ken L), Thursday, 13 January 2005 16:14 (twenty years ago)
― adam (adam), Thursday, 13 January 2005 22:30 (twenty years ago)
― Ken L (Ken L), Thursday, 13 January 2005 22:32 (twenty years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Friday, 14 January 2005 10:16 (twenty years ago)
― cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 14 January 2005 11:00 (twenty years ago)
― Matt (Matt), Friday, 14 January 2005 12:57 (twenty years ago)
― Matt (Matt), Friday, 14 January 2005 12:58 (twenty years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 16 January 2005 03:10 (twenty years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:04 (twenty years ago)
― 57 7th (calstars), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:58 (twenty years ago)