Provoked suddenly by finishing Zadie Smith's On Beauty and wondering if it should be on such a list - of ten, say? I wondered what else would be on my list and realized it would be very mainstream indeed.
(let's say post-2000 includes 2000, here)
― the pinefox, Tuesday, 17 March 2009 13:14 (sixteen years ago)
wow, this board can't handle the humble apostrophe; or I can't (apos).
― the pinefox, Tuesday, 17 March 2009 13:15 (sixteen years ago)
2666.
― Blackout Crew are the Beatles of donk (jim), Tuesday, 17 March 2009 13:19 (sixteen years ago)
Making a list of the best 10 novels of the 2000's is proving more difficult than I first thought. I can't seem to get to 10. But I like this sort of thing, so I'll obsess about it some more.
― silence dogood, Tuesday, 17 March 2009 13:32 (sixteen years ago)
i'm going to be interested in what ppl put here bcz i dont read enough current fiction. agree w/ jim that 2666 is definitely on the list tho
― just sayin, Tuesday, 17 March 2009 13:39 (sixteen years ago)
yes, it's harder than it should be - my list will doutbless be impoverished, in a sense, in its obviousness, though I love and admire some of these recent books.
THE CORRECTIONS? I think so.
― the pinefox, Tuesday, 17 March 2009 13:53 (sixteen years ago)
My list would look something like this:
1. Nowhere Man, Hemon2. White Teeth, Smith3. Cloud Atlas, Mitchell4. The Intuitionist, Whitehead5. Shadow Country, Matthiessen6. The Hakawati, Alameddine7. Bee Season, Goldberg8. The Human Stain, Roth9. Kafka On the Shore, Murakami10. The Devil and Miss Prym, Coelho
All of these novels have flaws, but I'm happy to have read them.
― silence dogood, Tuesday, 17 March 2009 17:43 (sixteen years ago)
this is sort of hard for me because my taste has changed so much in the last 9 years--stuff i loved when i was a freshman in high school is totally different from stuff i loved when i was a freshman in college is totally different from stuff now
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Tuesday, 17 March 2009 17:45 (sixteen years ago)
Off the top of my head, I'd include these:
An Episode in the Life of a Landscape Painter, Cesar Aira2666, Roberto BolanoThe Melancholy of Resistance, Laszlo KrasznahorkaiAusterlitz, W.G. SebaldBartleby & Co., Enrique Vila-Matas
― wmlynch, Tuesday, 17 March 2009 17:50 (sixteen years ago)
off the top of my head, not counting short story collections
1. bolano, 26662. jonathan lethem, fortress of solitude3. david mitchell, black swan green (cloud atlas is still on my shelf waiting to be read)4. arthur phillips (i can't single out one of his novels as being really outstanding, but i like his work as a whole)5. richard price, lush life6. haruki murakami, kafka on the shore7. colson whitehead, sag harbor (because i just read it, and because the intuitionist is '99)8. junot diaz, the brief wondrous life of oscar wao9. samuel delany, dark reflections 10. orhan pamuk, my name is red
― Tracy Michael Jordan Catalano (Jordan), Tuesday, 17 March 2009 18:02 (sixteen years ago)
Aira has a new book coming out, or is out already, which is very good. Ghosts.
― silence dogood, Tuesday, 17 March 2009 18:04 (sixteen years ago)
Shit, this is hard. Must think.
― James Morrison, Tuesday, 17 March 2009 21:52 (sixteen years ago)
its cool to see ppl repping david mitchell i had to interview him once around when cloud atlas come out and he was a total bro despite me writing a kind of meh review of the book. not that ive met or interviewed that many writers but he was the coolest of those that ive met.
these kinds of lists are pretty flawed i guess + im for sure forgetting really awesome stuff + savage detectives was 98 but i read it in 07 + runaway has some of the best writing post-2000 but isnt a novel + i have pretty terrible taste, obv
black flies: burke call be your name: aciman cold six thousand: elroy line of beauty: hollinghurstlightning on the sun: bingham memories of ice: erikson netherland: o'neill russian debutante's handbook: shteyngartstorm of swords: martinveronica: gaitskill
― Lamp, Tuesday, 17 March 2009 22:20 (sixteen years ago)
oh 02 should be call me by your name
― Lamp, Tuesday, 17 March 2009 22:22 (sixteen years ago)
With all the usual caveats, my fairly mainstream and conventional list:
The Human Stain - Philip RothThe Amazing Adventures of Kavalier & Clay - Michael ChabonOn Beauty - Zadie SmithThe Line of Beauty - Alan HollinghurstBlack Swan Green - David MitchellJonathan Strange & Mr Norrell - Susanna ClarkeThe Blind Assassin - Margaret AtwoodThe Dream Life of Sukhanov - Olga GrushinWhat I Loved - Siri HustvedtNetherland - Joseph O'Neill
― frankiemachine, Tuesday, 17 March 2009 22:37 (sixteen years ago)
danielewski - house of leaveshouellebecq - elementary particles & platformjon franzen - the correctionschris adrien - the children's hospitalsam lipsyte - homelandjack pendarvis - awesome
― johnny crunch, Tuesday, 17 March 2009 23:07 (sixteen years ago)
did you read adrian's collection of stories he released last year? i wasnt that into children's hospital but i thought the short stories were wonderful and managed all the best bits of his work w/o becoming ridiculous they way the novel could
― Lamp, Tuesday, 17 March 2009 23:20 (sixteen years ago)
2666
I hope so! I'm about to start reading it. Not sure what my list would look like, but Phillip Roth's The Plot Against America would be on it.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 17 March 2009 23:23 (sixteen years ago)
The CorrectionsTwelveErasure: (a novel)Middlesex
― Plaxico (I know, right?), Tuesday, 17 March 2009 23:42 (sixteen years ago)
?
Hm, I don't really have time to read much contemporary literature these days. I absolutely adore Ben Marcus' Notable American Women, though (released in 2002).
Also, I haven't read it yet but I must give more promotion to my friend Chris Killen's new novel The Bird Room, which I'm sure will be top 10 of the decade, yeah!
― emil.y, Tuesday, 17 March 2009 23:51 (sixteen years ago)
xp haven't gotten to adrien's collection. i know i had read one of his that was sort of coming-of-age & 9/11 themed that i liked a lot that i would guess was in there
― johnny crunch, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 00:05 (sixteen years ago)
I need to re-read it, but I really really loved Salvador Plascencia's The People of Paper.
― if you like it then you shoulda put a donk on it (bernard snowy), Wednesday, 18 March 2009 00:12 (sixteen years ago)
roughly in this order
Toni Morrison: A MercyMarilynne Robinson: GileadToni Morrison: LoveMcCarthy: The RoadJunot Diaz: The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar WaoRichard Powers: The Echo MakerHollinghurst: The Line of Beauty.Nicholson Baker: A Box of Matches
i can't think of any others i love but if i could go back to 1999 i would include Morrison's Paradise and Coetzee's Disgrace. fwiw i loathed the 150 or so pages i read of 2666.
― jed_, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 02:21 (sixteen years ago)
Maybe i would put The Corrections on my list too. it's truly great until the last section.
― jed_, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 02:24 (sixteen years ago)
I haven't read most of the novels mentioned, but I'm touched by how a few names that I have keep coming up - The Line of Beauty, Black Swan Green, even On Beauty. My own limited list:
Franzen: The Corrections (at least this is respectable)Hollinghurst: The Line of Beauty (a masterpiece, if cold in a way)Smith: On Beauty (her masterpiece so far, and not cold at all)Lethem: The Fortress of Solitude (I am deeply fond of it)Peace: GB84 (harrowing, desperate, relentless, like life was)Lennon: Pieces For The Left Hand (readable)Doyle: Oh Play That Thing! (audacious)Sansom: Ring Road (likeable)Bracewell: Perfect Tense (probably his best, good on his great theme of cultural change)Mitchell: Cloud Atlas (oddly I don't feel so fond in retrospect, but it is stunning)McEwan: Saturday (perverse - so many despise it, and it has flaws - but I think it has real intelligence too, about a recognizable world)
― the pinefox, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 11:48 (sixteen years ago)
I don't read too many contemporary novels, so it's a short list:Tom McCarthy: RemainderMitchell: Cloud Atlas, Black Swan GreenPynchon: Against the DayHoullebecq: Atomised (is this a cheat? 1998 in France apparently)
― woofwoofwoof, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 12:50 (sixteen years ago)
Interesting that you call The Corrections "respectable", Pinefox. I swithered about including it but left it out on the basis that "favourite" implied "what did you like", not "what did you think was good". I found it very impressive, faults notwithstanding, but only patchily enjoyable. Asked to pick a novel from this period that would be likely to be taught in universities in 20 years time, it would have been at or near the top of my list, along with Gilead; both had an underlying earnestness, even puritanism, that prevented me from enjoying them wholeheartedly. Re-reading might change that.
I preferred Black Swan Green to Cloud Atlas for similar reasons: CA is probably more remarkable but BSG was a much more enjoyable read for me.
x post
― frankiemachine, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 12:53 (sixteen years ago)
yes I did mean 'what did you like', though it could, possibly, be the same thing (but it might not - I know my list is packed with special pleading and old favourites).
I don't think I draw a line between 'impressive' and 'enjoyable', etc. + (a digression?) I can never really understand when people say things like 'I just read it for the story, not critically' - I think of all reading of literature as thoughtful and critical, in some broad sense (doesn't mean you then have to write a book about it).
I thought BSG sounded like it ought to be the best book ever, but it really really disappointed me. Some of it was actively bad. It's a bit like Joyce's Portrait in that one way - it seemed like it ought to be amazing, but didn't do much for me (at 18), and in a way has never really won me over. (another digression: books that don't live up to what they ought to be.)
― the pinefox, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 13:32 (sixteen years ago)
(Corrections = respectable for me cos I don't think other people will mock me for putting it on a list, as they might re. Bracewell for instance)
― the pinefox, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 13:33 (sixteen years ago)
of course The Corrections should be on my list. i've no idea why i left it off. even the relative fainlure of the last section can't affect how great the writing and characterisation are.
pinefox, if you loved Fortress of Solitude (which i loved and loathed in equal measure) you need to read "The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao" ASAP. now that book is audacious. i haven't even finished it yet but it's quite clear that it's one of the best novels of recent years and unless Diaz falls at the last hurdle i don't think i'll be changing my opinion of it.
― jed_, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 13:43 (sixteen years ago)
i wasnt that impressed with oscar wao but it was ambitious in a really good way. so different than something like gilead which is the only book listed so far that i dislike outright altho i never finished the lethem.
oh the corrections. i reread it a few months ago and liked it a lot it was better than remembered more generous and less didactic and self-satisfied. i still think theres a smallness of spirit esp in the denise sections that keeps it from being a great or likeable book too much dont u see dont u see hysterical moralism but its undeniably important
― Lamp, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 16:56 (sixteen years ago)
also jed if you havent already read it based on that list i think you might really like call me by your name its a beautiful book imo
― Lamp, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 16:57 (sixteen years ago)
Nicholson Baker: A Box of Matches
OTM. I liked Checkpoint a lot too.
My complete list contains about ~20 novels published since 2000, which surprised me since I feel like I barely ever read anything contemporary. Favourites:
Diary of a Bad Year, CoetzeeBreath, Tim WintonJulius Winsome, Gerard DonovanEurope Central, William VollmannTicknor, Sheila Heti
Re: The Corrections, I liked it a lot.
― franny glass, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 17:41 (sixteen years ago)
Lamp, i'll definitely check that out thanks.
the section of the corrections with Gary and the spycam and the booze and the hedge trimmers and the cut hand with the plastic bread bag over it is kind of miraculous.
― jed_, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 17:46 (sixteen years ago)
I would probably nominate "The Feast of the Goat" by Vargas Llosa. But that's quite possibly just because I am a huge Vargas Llosa stan and I think that's his best of the three he's published this decade. Really not sure what critical consensus of his later work is.
― Blackout Crew are the Beatles of donk (jim), Wednesday, 18 March 2009 17:49 (sixteen years ago)
McEwan: Saturday (perverse - so many despise it, and it has flaws - but I think it has real intelligence too, about a recognizable world)
does anyone really despise this? its too slight and misguided to despise i think ~~~
where did you find real intelligence pinefox? not tryna bait you atonement was my favorite new book in high school and i still admire mcewan but i thought this book was stupid about ppl and about how they feel (rather than think) their way into and out of problems. also theres no denying the "reflections of a great man on the rabbelous proletariat on the eve a squash match" aspect. its kinda gross no?
― Lamp, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 17:56 (sixteen years ago)
didnt love the book when it came out at the big new yorker profile on mcewan last month made me dislike it even more
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Wednesday, 18 March 2009 18:39 (sixteen years ago)
cmon post a list max
― Lamp, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 19:55 (sixteen years ago)
lol i tried and i came up with
2666the emigrantsthe intuitionist
and it turns out that two of those are not even from the 2000s... i guess i dont read enuf contemporary fiction. i didnt know my name is red is post2000, i guess i would include that. um... the known world?
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Wednesday, 18 March 2009 22:32 (sixteen years ago)
i need 2 go back and look at my bookshelf in NJ
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Wednesday, 18 March 2009 22:33 (sixteen years ago)
i liked motherless brooklyn more than fortress of solitude so maybe that
o i really loved middlesex when i read it
but like i was saying above that was in 2003 and im very different now than i was, so i dont know if id still love it as much?
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Wednesday, 18 March 2009 22:35 (sixteen years ago)
great thread thanks people
― cathlamet wa (jergins), Wednesday, 18 March 2009 22:57 (sixteen years ago)
Like Emily I have only read Notable American Women and nothing else! Maybe Ben Marcus puts people off current fiction or some such...I could read some Bolano, but not before I'm done with my other Latin Americans (Carpentier, Donoso or Cortazar).
― xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 22:58 (sixteen years ago)
motherless brooklyn is '99, max. lol u love the '90s.
― i'm grand like auto theft 3 (Jordan), Wednesday, 18 March 2009 23:06 (sixteen years ago)
this is a good thread for me. i hardly ever read anything new(ish). sebald and alice munro were probably my big discoveries of the last ten years. so, everything by them that fits this time-frame.
i mean, i DO read some new(ish) stuff, but i can't think of anything "great" that i read. mostly just some stuff that i thought was "good" to "pretty good".
i am really fond of reading all about the new hot big books in reviews and essays and articles, but i never actually read them. i know a LOT about franzen and i've never read a word of his fiction.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 23:30 (sixteen years ago)
i figure if something is really good, it'll keep. until i get to it.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 23:31 (sixteen years ago)
Was going to add DFW's Oblivion before checking the thread's title. Have been shocked at how few post 2000 novels I've read. Couldn't finish Line of Beauty (so, so dull). Appreciated The Corrections for its humour and characterisation but then I thought it let itself down (the cruise ship ectsasy stuff). Couldn't finish My Name is Red (I don't know if dull is right, but certainly close). So all I'm doing is compiling a list for a mirror thread: "dullest novels since 2000". I've been saving up Austerlitz so maybe it's waited long enough. Same with Europe Central. Oh, wait, I've just checked my copy of The Royal Family and YES it makes it for 2000.
― David Joyner, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 23:55 (sixteen years ago)
I think Motherless Brooklyn might well be better than TFoS but like Jordan said, it'd 1999, so not on my list. It's actually one of the most impressive books by anyone anywhere anytime I've ever read.
Lamp, your contempt for Saturday kind of makes the point about whether people despise it. It's too late here now to take it up again, but I don't really agree with you about this book, though as I said and have always said, it's also flawed, maybe sometimes embarrassingly so.
Glad the thread has been a handy provocation to thought for one or two people.
― the pinefox, Thursday, 19 March 2009 00:13 (sixteen years ago)
lots of ppl think dara is a psuedonym, possibly of vollmann but i dont really see it
― johnny crunch, Friday, 20 March 2009 18:37 (sixteen years ago)
which dara is the best to read first?
― Lamp, Friday, 20 March 2009 18:41 (sixteen years ago)
check out the lost scrapbook first id say
― johnny crunch, Friday, 20 March 2009 20:56 (sixteen years ago)
lots of names that come to mind have been mentioned already, but i'll mention 'bel canto'. looked forward to returning to it each day while i was reading it and i remember being quite taken with the beauty of some of the sentences and aptness of certain metaphors.
― W i l l, Friday, 20 March 2009 21:14 (sixteen years ago)
Hey, yeah, 'Bel Canto' was really good.
― James Morrison, Friday, 20 March 2009 22:46 (sixteen years ago)
thirded
― Ismael Klata, Friday, 20 March 2009 23:00 (sixteen years ago)
Never read The Autograph Man, but it sounded abysmal in the LRB, which I don't consider 'british newspaper-level criticism'.
― the pinefox, Saturday, 21 March 2009 00:31 (sixteen years ago)
Avoided 'On Beauty' because 'The Autograph Man' was unfinishably bad, plus I already love 'Howard's End' and couldn't see the point of a retread. Am now reconsidering in light of above comments.
― James Morrison, Saturday, 21 March 2009 02:03 (sixteen years ago)
I understand your doubts, James, but can at least assure you that it's radically, radically different from White Teeth; wouldn't be surprised if it's radically different from Autograph Man also. I kind of love Howards End myself, but don't think this book would ruin that one for anyone. It's just full of fine writing and insight in its own right.
― the pinefox, Saturday, 21 March 2009 11:05 (sixteen years ago)
I have literally stopped reading books since graduation. It's awful. :(
― leigh exodus (country matters), Saturday, 21 March 2009 11:07 (sixteen years ago)
you graduated? Congratulations!
― Plaxico (I know, right?), Saturday, 21 March 2009 11:18 (sixteen years ago)
There's no doubt OB is also radically different from AM. I found AM enjoyable enough as pure entertainment, but it was a second division attempt at a kind of book Smith isn't really equipped to write. OB is hugely better, although not without its weaknesses (noteably a rather flabby sense of structure). I think Pinefox is also right, James, in suggesting that your fear of it spoiling Howards End is misplaced. The Howards End echoes are fairly subtle and I suspect many readers would have missed them entirely if Smith hadn't drawn attention to them herself.
― frankiemachine, Saturday, 21 March 2009 14:48 (sixteen years ago)
am i alone in finding ZS's sentences in OB (only work of hers i've read)...clunky? sometimes almost...unnatural? i don't have the book handy for an example, unfortunately.
― W i l l, Saturday, 21 March 2009 15:47 (sixteen years ago)
Human Stain, The Immigrants, 2666 and probably another unknown novel that wasnt translated (yet?!)
― Zeno, Saturday, 21 March 2009 17:13 (sixteen years ago)
My big fiction discovery this decade = William Gaddis
― Mr. Que, Thursday, March 19, 2009 3:14 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark
Me too! I've been trying to do 1 per year because they're so emotionally exhausting. I have Carpenter's Gothic for this year, and then I guess I'll start re-reading.
― franny glass, Saturday, 21 March 2009 17:25 (sixteen years ago)
don't know whether you're alone, but I don't share your response: I think many many sentences in OB are very finely judged. (I don't think many sentences at all in WT are.)
― the pinefox, Sunday, 22 March 2009 01:41 (sixteen years ago)
OK, 'On Beauty' is on the list to get!
― James Morrison, Sunday, 22 March 2009 04:27 (sixteen years ago)
I don't think OB is a continuous stream of finely judged sentences (although as the pinefox says it has many). But if that kind of aesthetic polish were what mattered "The Master" by Colm Toibin or "The Sea" by John Banville, perhaps "Mothers Milk" By Edward St Aubyn - I could no doubt come up with some others if I worked my memory a bit harder - would be on my list. It's not that I'm indifferent to a consistent beauty of style - Hollinghurst is in my list partly for that reason - but in the final analysis other things matter more.
― frankiemachine, Sunday, 22 March 2009 11:32 (sixteen years ago)
Well, beauty in prose is an odd thing, hard to define, and maybe hard to separate from a sense of cognition. Hollinghurst's book is beautifully written, but that's not to say it's all purple prose - rather it's full of fine judgements, perceptions rendered with great precision and concision - and that seems to be part of what I find beautiful about it. OB does share that quality of perception and emotional nuance with TLB, though it doesn't really go in for fine descriptive writing so much.
I loathe Banville and hope I never have to read that last book of his.
― the pinefox, Sunday, 22 March 2009 13:04 (sixteen years ago)
god, i loathe him too and i've only read two half-books. i found his prose v ugly, actually.
― jed_, Sunday, 22 March 2009 14:30 (sixteen years ago)
I loathe Banville too (& was v scathing about him here when The Sea won the Booker). I do think he writes beautifully controlled sentences. My point was that that isn't enough - they don't compensate for the pretentious awfulness of his dreary books.
― frankiemachine, Sunday, 22 March 2009 14:57 (sixteen years ago)
I like his sentences too but the two novels I've read have never thrilled me.
― franny glass, Sunday, 22 March 2009 16:00 (sixteen years ago)
It's great that three of us hate the odious Banville so much !
― the pinefox, Sunday, 22 March 2009 16:27 (sixteen years ago)
Banville scandal: he wrote the introduction to one of the Penguin Simenon Maigret reprints a few years ago, but in a more recent introduction to a Simenon book for an American publisher, he talks about how he has never finished a Maigret book.
― James Morrison, Sunday, 22 March 2009 22:04 (sixteen years ago)
Ha, I thought I was going to like Christine Falls by one Benjamin Black but just could not get into it at all let alone finish it and then I discovered it was really by Banville so I was off the hook.
― moe greene dolphin street (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 23 March 2009 19:24 (sixteen years ago)
Good! More justice meted out to bad Banville!
― the pinefox, Tuesday, 24 March 2009 10:48 (sixteen years ago)
i dislike banville generally but the book of evidence was a great, i have to admit.
― Michael B, Tuesday, 24 March 2009 16:58 (sixteen years ago)
Kepler was great too. Upon that rock I stand.
- Banville Holdouts Resistance Group
― alimosina, Tuesday, 24 March 2009 17:17 (sixteen years ago)
reading a lot of short fiction l8ly its weird feelin like theres been a "comeback" in terms of critical appreciation for plainly told "moment of clarity" stories this decade iirc werent we supposed to be reading mostly short fiction abt robot ghosts or cyborg detectives or smthn ca. 2004 w/e happened to that i wonder
― Lamp, Friday, 11 December 2009 05:49 (fifteen years ago)
mb its just necessary to find a way to present to us so clearly and sharply and unadorned the ways in which we make ourselves unhappy
― Lamp, Friday, 11 December 2009 05:50 (fifteen years ago)
Off the top of my head, I'd include these:An Episode in the Life of a Landscape Painter, Cesar Aira2666, Roberto BolanoThe Melancholy of Resistance, Laszlo KrasznahorkaiAusterlitz, W.G. SebaldBartleby & Co., Enrique Vila-Matas― wmlynch, Tuesday, March 17, 2009 5:50 PM (8 months ago) Bookmark
― wmlynch, Tuesday, March 17, 2009 5:50 PM (8 months ago) Bookmark
oh whoa, I wonder if this thread is where I first heard about Bartleby & Co.? great book, at any rate. the story about Salinger was pretty great/hilarious. I haven't read the whole thing straight through yet, though; just been dipping into it at random, like I do with Pessoa's Book of Disquiet (which it reminds me a little of, and which I think the narrator actually mentions reading at one point (maybe even talks about doing so by opening it to random passages??))
haven't read Austerlitz or Melancholy yet, but what Sebald I've read is obviously great, and the other Laszlo Krasznahorkai I just started on, War and War, seems really intriguing/promising.
― I got gin but I'm not a ginger (bernard snowy), Friday, 11 December 2009 12:59 (fifteen years ago)
so I am glad
― cock juggling thundercunt (cozwn), Friday, 11 December 2009 13:29 (fifteen years ago)
http://img1.fantasticfiction.co.uk/images/n27/n137756.jpgshe got pretty bad after this tho
― conezy (cozwn), Friday, 11 December 2009 13:47 (fifteen years ago)
loooool sorry it came out in 1995 decades blow by so fast these days
surprised this hasnt been mentioned
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/25/Never_Let_Me_Go.jpg
― Michael B, Friday, 11 December 2009 14:14 (fifteen years ago)
The Known World by Edward P. Jones
― Moreno, Saturday, 12 December 2009 04:14 (fifteen years ago)
Any appetite for a proper write-in end-of-decade poll? I may even do the honours myself if people are into it.
― Ismael Klata, Saturday, 12 December 2009 15:56 (fifteen years ago)
i was wondering the same myself actually. although i seem to have only read 3.6 new books this decade
― thomp, Saturday, 12 December 2009 16:29 (fifteen years ago)
city of tiny lights
but then, i'm me.
― what u think i steen for to push a crawfish? (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Saturday, 12 December 2009 16:33 (fifteen years ago)
you should sign off all your posts that way
― thomp, Saturday, 12 December 2009 16:36 (fifteen years ago)
looks like it's just me & you, thomp
― Ismael Klata, Saturday, 12 December 2009 20:12 (fifteen years ago)
I don't read contemporary fiction very often because i'm so behind on the old stuff my interest in current stuff is competing with my interest in fucking ages of over stuff.
― Pedro Paramore (jim), Saturday, 12 December 2009 20:14 (fifteen years ago)
other even
― Pedro Paramore (jim), Saturday, 12 December 2009 20:15 (fifteen years ago)
I vaguely remember liking Walter Mosley's The Man In My Basement
I'd love to see a post-2000 poll. Can't say I've read more than 15 or so new books this decade though.
― Moreno, Saturday, 12 December 2009 20:42 (fifteen years ago)
I'd say yes to a poll!
― Attention please, a child has been lost in the tunnel of goats. (James Morrison), Sunday, 13 December 2009 04:37 (fifteen years ago)
Right, I'm going to give it a shot. I'll get a nominations thread up later today.
Two thoughts before I start:- nominations will be curtailed to keep the list manageable; and- I'm going to make it a 'best books' poll, not just 'best novels' - so you'll be able to vote for Jordan's autobiography after all.
In the meantime, start racking those brains!
― Ismael Klata, Sunday, 13 December 2009 12:44 (fifteen years ago)
One more thing: should I put it here or on ILE? I don't want it to be lost, and I'm never sure how many people ever read I Love Books.
― Ismael Klata, Sunday, 13 December 2009 12:51 (fifteen years ago)
I loved these recently published ones:
Colm Toibin - BrooklynWilliam Trevor - Love and Summer
― Hell is other people. In an ILE film forum. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 13 December 2009 13:49 (fifteen years ago)
Here's the nominations thread - have at it!
― Ismael Klata, Sunday, 13 December 2009 18:59 (fifteen years ago)
i have just bought my father a copy of this 'city of tiny lights' book.
but then, he's him.
― thomp, Monday, 14 December 2009 13:38 (fifteen years ago)