― Adrian, Friday, 22 April 2005 07:01 (twenty years ago)
but the books i think are his best are from "the american chronicle series" i'm thinking of "lincoln", "burr", "1876"...there are 7 of them but i'm not sure i know which all are: "washington, dc." is one. "empire." the newer one - "the golden age." that's six...oh yeah "hollywood".(those are not in the right order, but i think the series is just in more of a 'historical' order not a 'have to read in order to understand the next one')
― carolyn, Friday, 22 April 2005 10:41 (twenty years ago)
I read Julian at a time when I was reading a tremendous amount of primary source material from Greek and Roman times, and I don't recall his making any obvious blunders. It did share the normal problem of historical novels about antiquity, in making his characters a bit too modern in their thinking and outlook, but that is so unavoidable as to be easily forgiven.
― Aimless (Aimless), Friday, 22 April 2005 16:44 (twenty years ago)
― anthony, Friday, 22 April 2005 23:12 (twenty years ago)
― m coleman (lovebug starski), Saturday, 23 April 2005 10:44 (twenty years ago)
― Jaq (Jaq), Saturday, 23 April 2005 15:25 (twenty years ago)