and while we're at it, has anyone but the author himself ever made it through robert caro's 3000 page lyndon johnson bio?
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 24 November 2005 11:21 (twenty years ago)
okay i can't really help. are gore vidal's novels about them all any good?
― tom west (thomp), Thursday, 24 November 2005 15:26 (twenty years ago)
Burns's biography is one of the best on FDR, I haven't read it cover-to-cover, but I consult it every now and then and I've found it to be very informative, especially on the politics of his presidency. It's only the first of two, though; the follow-up volume is Roosevelt: The Soldier of Freedom, which focuses on the last five years of his presidency.
― mbk, Thursday, 24 November 2005 17:19 (twenty years ago)
― logout star, Saturday, 26 November 2005 16:06 (nineteen years ago)
Gore Vidal's Burr is a great read, full of catty, gossipy (but v. well researched) commentary on various eminent personages - particularly Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Martin Van Buren, one of those unlionized presidents, is also a focus. Lincoln is simply tremendous. 1876 spotlights the corruption of Grant's presidency and the nasty, dirty politics of the campaigns of Hayes and Tilden - again, lots of catty tidbits. I was reading Vidal's memoir Palimpsest concurrently, which is full of firsthand observations of the Kennedys. Empire gives an astonishing portrait of Teddy Roosevelt, the conflation of the battle of San Juan Hill and the machinations and meddlings of the US in the Phillipines, all orbiting around William Randolph Hearst. I haven't read the remaining novels in the series, but they have all been better than good as well as accurate - Vidal delineates his deviations from the historical record in the postscript of each.
― Jaq (Jaq), Saturday, 26 November 2005 17:26 (nineteen years ago)
― ls, Saturday, 26 November 2005 20:23 (nineteen years ago)
― ls, Saturday, 26 November 2005 20:25 (nineteen years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 27 November 2005 01:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Sunday, 27 November 2005 03:13 (nineteen years ago)
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Friday, 5 May 2006 05:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Friday, 5 May 2006 14:19 (nineteen years ago)
It matters that FDR dived into marriage young with an ugly cousin to get away from his doting mother. It matters that his love for Lucy Mercer drove Eleanor Roosevelt to baleful despair. It matters that LBJ "was rude, boorish, taunting, humiliating, and thought nothing of urinating into the sink in his office while still interviewing someone". It matters that Jacqueline Bouvier was not the love of John Kennedy's life but "a cultural snob par excellence" who evoked "tantalisingly little initial interest or affection on JFK's part" before "a sullen, desultory romance" made her the necessary wife and – like Lady Bird Johnson – a kind of mute brothel supervisor, finding and fielding young aides and interns who could keep him happy for an hour or two (even under the dinner table).
this looks pretty interesting. i wish there was something like this on the scale of bathroom reading books.
― Earning your Masters in Library and Information Science is beautiful (schlump), Sunday, 25 July 2010 23:12 (fifteen years ago)
That does make it sound great. I'd been put off by a rather sour review in The Sunday Times last week. The complaint there was basically 'not enough Rome', come to think, which I could hardly care less about.
― Ismael Klata, Monday, 26 July 2010 06:47 (fifteen years ago)
Hamilton's JFK book was gossipy but readable (and credible IMO)
― too rock for country/too country for rock & roll (m coleman), Monday, 26 July 2010 10:34 (fifteen years ago)
Great presidential bios:
Arthur Schlesinger, Jr - Age of Roosvelt (hagiographic in chunks, but he's a terrific stylist and knows how to construct these grand narrative arcs).Joseph Ellis - American Sphinx on JeffersonEdmund Morris' two-volume TR set.Garry Wills - Nixon Agonistes
― balls and adieu (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 July 2010 11:57 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hY4Qkp7FoaE
― balls and adieu (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 July 2010 12:31 (fifteen years ago)
ok i think i may need that american caesars book
― thomp, Monday, 26 July 2010 13:56 (fifteen years ago)
also, i still have not got a copy of the caro johnson bio
this is really good. lots of stuff i didn't know:
http://twitchfilm.net/news/abraham-lincoln-vampire-hunter.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_TTwOs5OjJ7g/S7KhESupHSI/AAAAAAAAAqY/ETgGOGu1djU/s1600/Abe+vampire_back+cover.jpg
― scott seward, Monday, 26 July 2010 14:24 (fifteen years ago)
Master of the Senate is simply one of the best books I've ever read. Such assurance, fluidity, etc.
― balls and adieu (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 July 2010 14:25 (fifteen years ago)
Also, Jaq is 100% OTM on Vidal's historical fiction – an excellent gateway to the epoch it's covering (and very accurate).
― balls and adieu (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 July 2010 14:27 (fifteen years ago)
I have wanted to read one of those caro volumes for years. Do I have to start chronologically?
― xyzzzz__, Monday, 26 July 2010 14:34 (fifteen years ago)
I didn't!
― balls and adieu (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 July 2010 14:35 (fifteen years ago)
So I can get away with picking up Master of the Senate and skipping the rest?
― Chuck_Tatum, Monday, 26 July 2010 15:30 (fifteen years ago)
Yup!
― balls and adieu (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 27 July 2010 00:45 (fifteen years ago)
though you shouldn't -- 'the path to power' is probably longer than it needed to be but you really do need to read about how lyndon stole his high school election, etc. plus much of it is just great, great writing, fascinating even in the (surprisingly long) stretches that have virtually nothing to do with lbj.
if you skip one, make it the second book, 'means of ascent,' which is just an extended look at the 1948 election, and includes far too much about governor coke stevenson, a segregationist who caro rather bizarrely lionizes as a kind of romantic hero, with lots of passages that read like imitation louis l'amour.
i enjoyed miller's 'plain speaking' way back when i read it, but i've since heard that miller may have made a lot of the quotes up.
i agree with the recommendation of 'nixon agonistes.' for maximum effect, follow it up with jonathan schell's 'the time of illusion,' the best book i've read on the man's actual presidency.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 28 July 2010 19:02 (fifteen years ago)
The recent Leuchtenberg bio on Hoover for the American Presidents series is the first one to separate the myths from the reality, without ever attempting a revisionist take. You can read it in a couple of afternoons.
― balls and adieu (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 July 2010 19:07 (fifteen years ago)
friend of mine recommended 'the audacity to win' recently
also said friend turns out to work in the white house these days, to which i could only think: oh maaaaaaaaan
― thomp, Wednesday, 28 July 2010 19:39 (fifteen years ago)
not technically a biography, i admit
― thomp, Wednesday, 28 July 2010 19:50 (fifteen years ago)
hagiographies of US presidents: S and D
― balls and adieu (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 July 2010 21:13 (fifteen years ago)
... it's about campaign strategy?
― thomp, Wednesday, 28 July 2010 21:20 (fifteen years ago)
Should I even read Dumas Malone's hagiography?
― The Edge of Gloryhole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 June 2011 18:57 (fourteen years ago)
I'm tempted.
probably more fun to just page through TJ's collected works looking for the good stuff, i'd think.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 14 June 2011 19:19 (fourteen years ago)