Now what happened to the New New New Leak Alert Thread (The REvenge)???

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Seriously, with all due respect, why do these thread keep on getting deleted???

marcusthe, Sunday, 19 February 2006 02:52 (nineteen years ago)

lol

Tuomorous (eman), Sunday, 19 February 2006 03:04 (nineteen years ago)

Real reason: BUY ONE ALBUM.
-- Sterling Clover (s.clove...), February 18th, 2006.

The real reason is because the "M" in ILM now stands for "mean people."

billstevejim (billstevejim), Sunday, 19 February 2006 03:55 (nineteen years ago)

I may download some stuff, but I also buy it. And then some. A lot more than then some.

marcusthe, Sunday, 19 February 2006 03:59 (nineteen years ago)

fuck off.

cutty (mcutt), Sunday, 19 February 2006 04:09 (nineteen years ago)

Added to the ILM FAQ:

What sorts of things are frowned on?

Illiteracy, treating ILM as your personal music bank and forum for piracy, posting of not-safe-for-work pictures, pointless list threads, incessant self-promotion, in short killing music by not talking about it. While not encouraged, moderaters will at times take apparently arbitrary action against general idiocy when the signal-noise ratio exceeds their personal sanity threshold. When they do so, this is generally both unfortunate and completely understandable.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 19 February 2006 04:10 (nineteen years ago)

"moderaters"

cutty (mcutt), Sunday, 19 February 2006 04:30 (nineteen years ago)

doh. fixing now.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 19 February 2006 04:52 (nineteen years ago)

change it to "moderateurs", sounds french classier!

WROFLMOTHER (haitch), Sunday, 19 February 2006 05:09 (nineteen years ago)

"signal"? "noise"?

Fuck!

Paul in Santa Cruz (Paul in Santa Cruz), Sunday, 19 February 2006 06:34 (nineteen years ago)

10/10 Sterling.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Sunday, 19 February 2006 10:44 (nineteen years ago)

Yes, that's pretty much completely OTM. Thanks.

StanM (StanM), Sunday, 19 February 2006 11:20 (nineteen years ago)

When is a list thread pointless and when it is otherwise?

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 19 February 2006 12:36 (nineteen years ago)

The Mods believe all list threads about music are to be locked down and deleted in accordance to internet law. Note that certain criteria provide an exemption to this rule, however said criteria remain a closely guarded secret, only known to The Mods and a select (superior) few.

ESTEBAN BUTTEZ~!!! (ESTEBAN BUTTEZ~!!!), Sunday, 19 February 2006 12:52 (nineteen years ago)

It's allowed only if its pazz & jop related.

Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Sunday, 19 February 2006 12:59 (nineteen years ago)

YOU SMASHED THE DA VINCI CODE WIDE OPEN, JIMMY

ESTEBAN BUTTEZ~!!! (ESTEBAN BUTTEZ~!!!), Sunday, 19 February 2006 13:03 (nineteen years ago)

While not encouraged, moderators will at times take apparently arbitrary action against general idiocy when the signal-noise ratio exceeds their personal sanity threshold. When they do so, this is generally both unfortunate and completely understandable.

... then why were Jess' privileges revoked?

StanM (StanM), Sunday, 19 February 2006 13:11 (nineteen years ago)

yeah!!

ham'ron (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 19 February 2006 13:45 (nineteen years ago)

testify, brother!!

ham'ron (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 19 February 2006 13:46 (nineteen years ago)

the destroyer thread should have been kept around for posterity, that's why. i had great zingers in that thread. should have been locked!

why do these thread keep on getting deleted??? (mcutt), Sunday, 19 February 2006 15:47 (nineteen years ago)

What I don't get is why the original New Album leak thread was locked and then allowed to continue as the New New thread but then deleted. I mean, I kind of know why (strange Eastern European grammar), but it seems a bit odd still.

marcusthe, Sunday, 19 February 2006 16:04 (nineteen years ago)

I'm 100% in favor of the recent spate of anti-moron moderation.

adam (adam), Sunday, 19 February 2006 16:14 (nineteen years ago)

no it doesn't. go away.

xpost

why do these thread keep on getting deleted??? (mcutt), Sunday, 19 February 2006 16:15 (nineteen years ago)

Further steps to make this board even more cliquey and forcing it to confirm even more to a batch of fifteen random oldsters personal tastes, please. That's what Tiggers do best!

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Sunday, 19 February 2006 16:23 (nineteen years ago)

Okay... It doesn't bother me at all that threads are getting deleted. I just thought it was weird that threads which I considered useful were getting deleted, and I assumed people would have wanted to know why it was happening. It's your forum, do whatever the hell you want.

billstevejim (billstevejim), Sunday, 19 February 2006 16:35 (nineteen years ago)

ok, someone start a "tell billstevejim what to listen to" thread

why do these thread keep on getting deleted??? (mcutt), Sunday, 19 February 2006 16:38 (nineteen years ago)

I can discover music just fine without ILM, thanks.

billstevejim (billstevejim), Sunday, 19 February 2006 16:40 (nineteen years ago)

One question you should probably add to the FAQ is "Why are all the mods giant penisheads?"

HAHAHA I just kid.

The "L" in ILM stands for "love."

billstevejim (billstevejim), Sunday, 19 February 2006 16:40 (nineteen years ago)

Also you should add to the FAQ "Why does everyone here violently attack every innocent question that's ever asked?"

And the answer should be "Because this forum encourages a hostile environment where people should be scared to ask questions because then it makes us look more l33t."

billstevejim (billstevejim), Sunday, 19 February 2006 16:49 (nineteen years ago)

yeah well.. i need some new stuff to download, and now i dont know where to begin.

-- billstevejim (tummlerandsolomo...), February 18th, 2006 1:21 PM. (billstevejim) (later)

why do these thread keep on getting deleted??? (mcutt), Sunday, 19 February 2006 16:50 (nineteen years ago)

I CAN DISCOVER MUSIC JUST FINE WITHOUT ILM THX

why do these thread keep on getting deleted??? (mcutt), Sunday, 19 February 2006 16:50 (nineteen years ago)

More hostility less indie rock pirates please.

http://www.halloweencostumeworld.com/images/PIRATE%20STUFF/19360ooom.jpg

adam (adam), Sunday, 19 February 2006 16:52 (nineteen years ago)

You misunderstood what I was saying. Can this be over yet?

billstevejim (billstevejim), Sunday, 19 February 2006 16:52 (nineteen years ago)

i don't really see how you can misunderstand that.

why do these thread keep on getting deleted??? (mcutt), Sunday, 19 February 2006 16:53 (nineteen years ago)

"I don't know where to begin"

The "where" was not referring to "the forum in which I gathered my downloading suggestions," but rather it was referring to the new artists themselves. I recalled seeing interesting stuff in that thread, and I couldn't remember any of it at the time wrote that. I have since recalled a few of them.

The reality of the situation is that I recieve dozens of promo CD's every week, and I was looking for help with which ones I should pay the most attention to, since I don't have time to listen to all of them. Some of those that appeared interesting and which I didn't recieve in the mail, I was planning on downloading to check out. I rarely used those leak threads in the past. I'm not an indie-rock pirate. I was planning on promoting, which is the opposite of piracy.

billstevejim (billstevejim), Sunday, 19 February 2006 17:13 (nineteen years ago)

Can I go now?

billstevejim (billstevejim), Sunday, 19 February 2006 17:16 (nineteen years ago)

yes!

why do these thread keep on getting deleted??? (mcutt), Sunday, 19 February 2006 17:24 (nineteen years ago)

Well, this is fine, but why was the leak thread deleted (aside from the annoying Orson-whinging), when it contained very few links to downloadable music, while the YSI threads are still allowed to run rampant? It seems a little contradictory…

carson dial (carson dial), Sunday, 19 February 2006 17:33 (nineteen years ago)

the ysi threads generally post particular links to rare/hard to get stuff and occasional special requests for individual tracks by regular posters. the "leak" thread was all about fanboy obsessive hoarding and or50n's "special place" or whatever. there's fanboy idiocy on the ysi threads, but i recognize that that's v. much a matter of my opinion (e.g. that i give far less a flying fuck about mr. thin white guitar than about say, new dubstep or riddim releases or whatever) and there's furthermore a sort of generousity and sanity when compared to spawning endless requests for "TEH NEW YEAH YEAH BLAH ALBUM HAZ LKED YET? PLZ PLZ YSI I NEED!"

and yeah there's a big difference between whole albums (especially by less mainstream artists) and particular tracks.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 19 February 2006 18:27 (nineteen years ago)

Well, that's a good enough explanation for me - I do agree that the leak thread did get rather annoying in the past couple of weeks.

carson dial (carson dial), Sunday, 19 February 2006 18:36 (nineteen years ago)

So basically new leak threads are banned?

Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Sunday, 19 February 2006 18:48 (nineteen years ago)

Only on Wednesdays.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Sunday, 19 February 2006 18:53 (nineteen years ago)

I don't know if there's any consensus among ilm's moderators about this. It mightn't be a bad idea to hold off starting one for a coupla days?

If any more threads are started, and if Sterl or any of the other mods don't shitcan them immediately, I'll be making them registered users only and unindexing them from search engines. Like the 0ink and k4z44 threads, they seemed to be the less fun sort of google-bait. Also, I noticed that there was more than one individual on those threads whose entire posting history on ilm cosisted of tiny variations on a/when is the new {xxxx} album going to leak plz plz plz give me free music" or "come to my ftp site, I'll invite you to join my secret file sharing society if I think you're k3wl enough". This is basically exploiting the board - giving nothing in terms of joining in w/music discussion/arguing/community/whatever, just basically strolling up, grabbing & taking &/or self-promoting and then just fucking off. If anyone turns up pulling such shit in future, they're on a level with spammers as far as I'm concerned, and they're cruising for a sitewide ip ban.

that's all I can think of for now. Any suggestions gratefully received etc.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Sunday, 19 February 2006 19:17 (nineteen years ago)

Le Sigh.

NEW NEW NEW NEW ALBUM LEAK ALERT(CAN'T,WON'T,DON'T STOP)

StanM (StanM), Sunday, 19 February 2006 23:44 (nineteen years ago)

I'm glad to know after 3 years here i'm still missing nothing on 4/5 of the whole of ILX.

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 20 February 2006 00:03 (nineteen years ago)

part of the impetus behind my starting the original leak alert thread was to stem the tide of what (at then) seemed like an excessive amount of people clogging specific album and artist threads to ask if [x] had leaked yet. it was obviously also largely intended as a piracy/p2p resource as well, my (naive) thinking being that participants would be constrained those from to 'the ilm community', whatever that means.

in light of the googlers it has attracted, and the extent to which it has contributed to the furthering of ilm's collective retardization, i acknowledge it was a super-bad thing in retrospect. i don't know if this is worth anything, but an as ilm mod, my personal opinion at this point is that we should be strenuously and concertedly squashing any followup threads, and, for that matter, by way of ip banning, the endless procession of anon dweebs requesting ysis and oink invites.

fwiw, i think we should also be doing our best as mods to steer users towards old threads as often as possible, preferably by linking and locking rather than deleting. without directing new users to past threads with identical subjects, we're engendering the construction of another layer of discussion on top of what's archived, a lot of which is bound to be straight repetition of whats been said/listed years before and therefore just more noise. while that won't necessarily create more signal, it might help unclutter the slate and staunch the old-school exodus. the absence/souring of a lot of whom, let's face it, is a huge reason why ilm sucks now.

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 20 February 2006 00:27 (nineteen years ago)

Further steps to make this board even more cliquey and forcing it to confirm even more to a batch of fifteen random oldsters personal tastes, please. That's what Tiggers do best!

forks if you seriously think this is what's happening you are mad. I agree with pash and mark.

WROFLMOTHER (haitch), Monday, 20 February 2006 01:25 (nineteen years ago)

also, cutty should be a moderateur. imagine the roffles!

WROFLMOTHER (haitch), Monday, 20 February 2006 01:27 (nineteen years ago)

GOD YES PLZ TO MAKE HAPPEN

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 20 February 2006 04:31 (nineteen years ago)

it's definitely a pity that the leak threads went the way they did - for the first year (2 years? i can't remember) that thread functioned well in the way that mark intended it to.

fwiw, i think we should also be doing our best as mods to steer users towards old threads as often as possible, preferably by linking and locking rather than deleting. without directing new users to past threads with identical subjects, we're engendering the construction of another layer of discussion on top of what's archived, a lot of which is bound to be straight repetition of whats been said/listed years before and therefore just more noise. while that won't necessarily create more signal, it might help unclutter the slate and staunch the old-school exodus. the absence/souring of a lot of whom, let's face it, is a huge reason why ilm sucks now.

totally otm.

toby (tsg20), Monday, 20 February 2006 04:56 (nineteen years ago)

AMIRITE

Pablo (Pablo A), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 03:52 (nineteen years ago)

Stop being a knob, Dom.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 09:23 (nineteen years ago)

I've removed Nicole's thread categorisation privs as per her request. Nicole, if you want me to do the same for ile, let me know.

I don't recall seeing Felicity posting anywhere on ilx for a long time, though she might have changed her handle or something. Does anyone know her off board? If so, can they ask her if she wants to remain on the list, or can I remove her as well?

I added electricsound jim to the ilm mods list - he's active, has been doing good work on the ile side, and most importantly, he covers a gap, timezonewise.

If anyone drops out on the north american east coast, I'll add Cutty. At present we have JBR, Jess, Sterling and Mark P all busy & active, so it seems redundant to add another mod from there.

Looking at the reaction to Jess' deletions the other day, it looks to me like most ilm people either haven't even noticed (I must admit, I didn't notice, b/c of the drop in the bucket effect cited by Sterling) or don't care enough to comment. Most of the people who have commented seem to approve, or are OK about it, most of the people who aren't ok about it are, well, orson, basically. So I just reinstalled Jess' mod privs.

After all the bullshit yesterday, I banned "orson" from ilx. It will have to promote its ftp site elsewhere.

I think that at this point, if someone posts up a load of abusive/obnoxious/nsfw shit on ilm, as happens from time to time, then there's going to be someone awake and online who can deal with it quickly?

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 10:00 (nineteen years ago)

Wait - why the heck was the "Destroye's Rubies" thread deleted? Seriously? Apart from indie hate?

sean gramophone (Sean M), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 10:18 (nineteen years ago)

I have no idea. I looked at it about twice while it was up, and I didn't have a clue what most of those people were even talking about.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 10:31 (nineteen years ago)

I thought it was a pretty awesome and quintessentially ILM thread (albeit without many oldtimers contributing) -- initial rapture, well-articulated praise, debate, and then an ascent into self-mockery, self-reference and absurdism. In places it was genuinely funny! Furthermore, it was referred to in several really great analyses of the record (e.g. Carl Wilson), and it seems totally random that it would just be poofed.

Can deleted threads be resurrected? I am genuinely annoyed and perplexed that it disappeared. (I had been quite happily thinking that no one saw the need to bring it back just because Pfork had weighed in, but now I see that it wasn't brought back because it was mysteriously deleted. Which isn't anywhere near the accomplishment.)

sean gramophone (Sean M), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 10:55 (nineteen years ago)

The thread appears to still be on the backup server:

see this ilm search, here.

I don't know if it can be resurrected from this or not. Alan or Noodles would know, I suppose?

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 10:59 (nineteen years ago)

searching for "messages" not "threads" brings up more results

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 11:02 (nineteen years ago)

It's one thing deleting orsons threads because he's being annoying.
But i don't agree with threads being deleted just because a mod doesn't personally like the subject.
Can we have more common sense please?

Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 11:47 (nineteen years ago)

The rubies thread was not good funny and interesting. It was one illiterate mofo or two who appeared out of nowhere and posted under multiple identities like some fanclub pr machine.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 11:55 (nineteen years ago)

I've removed Nicole's thread categorisation privs as per her request. Nicole, if you want me to do the same for ile, let me know.

Yes, thanks.

My Psychic Friends Are Strangely Silent (Ex Leon), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 12:13 (nineteen years ago)

Sterling - I am very certain that you didn't get a joke.

Seriously, is there nowhere to go to protest the arbitrary deletion of a 450+ post thread that had been around for weeks?

sean gramophone (Sean M), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 12:22 (nineteen years ago)

protest appeal

sean gramophone (Sean M), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 12:22 (nineteen years ago)

Looking at the reaction to Jess' deletions the other day, it looks to me like most ilm people either haven't even noticed (I must admit, I didn't notice, b/c of the drop in the bucket effect cited by Sterling) or don't care enough to comment. Most of the people who have commented seem to approve, or are OK about it, most of the people who aren't ok about it are, well, orson, basically.

Did you catch these comments which weren't made on the moderator board:

anyway, what happened to that other thread from a few days ago, where people were listing their favorite albums of 2006 already? it was here, but now it seems to be gone, unless i am just blind. was it deleted? and if so, why? it was a perfectly nice thread.

-- xhuxk , February 20th, 2006 4:57 PM.

Deleted. Discussion of this is on the ILX Moderator Request Forum, xhuxk.
-- zebedee , February 20th, 2006 5:01 PM. (zebedee)

Let me just say, before this thread is deleted too, that a lot of y'all are on power trips.
-- Haikunym , February 20th, 2006 5:26 PM. (Haikunym)

Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 12:28 (nineteen years ago)

why is clover fixating on 'illiterate'?

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 12:40 (nineteen years ago)

I seem to recall a few people saying they were "taking a break" from ILX because of it all. Perhaps that was on threads that were deleted.

Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 12:45 (nineteen years ago)

I doubt deleting posts will raise the level of ILX. *shrug* I really don't think it'll make people think:"Shit, I'll stop posting these ridiculous threads and instead try to post some deep thoughts instead." Secondly what's ridiculous anyway? I don't know about the content of the threads Jess deleted,but the titles didn't indicate that they were superfluous. Boards evolve and, shit yeah, it ain't what it used to be. So what?

Whatever. I don't have much time to post anyway. The only thing that gets on my tits these days is my baby. ;-)

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 13:21 (nineteen years ago)

i'd delete you all if i could

ham'ron (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 13:50 (nineteen years ago)

start a thread about it?

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 14:13 (nineteen years ago)

DON'T TEMPT ME

Dan (Mr. Annoying) Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 14:32 (nineteen years ago)

and your babies too.

ham'ron (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 14:45 (nineteen years ago)

on your special day you can delete every single thread posted to that day and nobody will give you shit about it

I heard about this on the internet

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 15:20 (nineteen years ago)

Randomly deleting threads has a chilling effect. Judging the quality of threads without strict guidelines is a quagmire (a strict guideline would be "no oink invites," or "no leak threads," not "don't say something stupid," or "this thread contributes nothing"). If you're going to delete threads that don't promote the discussion of music, here are a few easy targets:

Dick Cheney - What's On Your Walkman?
What's a goodf band name for these dudes?

Or any of the other goof threads that provide people a cheap larf and/or give ILM some character. If a thread is stupid, it'll die out. If people keep posting to it, obviously there's some interest, for whatever reason. It's a built-in corrective to the system. Draconian attempts to exert control might make you feel nice and powerful but they create an alienating, stifled environment. People notice, and it's like the Complaint Department. For every person who complains, there are at least 10 who say nothing (but don't come back).

It was on the Destroyer's Rubies thread that I first introduced the concept of "post-yacht." Now it is lost forever and for that I shed a quiet tear. Requiescat in pace.

Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 15:49 (nineteen years ago)

now i remember why mods don't like to do their jobs again.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 15:51 (nineteen years ago)

hey people, this isn't a constitutional due process issue, it's a message board and the mods are perfectly within their right to assert some quality control at their discretion.

there is obviously a need for it at this point.

cutty (mcutt), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 15:55 (nineteen years ago)

Hahahaha Sterling, THIS IS WHY I QUIT

Dan (I Missed The Mass-Delete Window) Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 16:02 (nineteen years ago)

the destroyer's rubies thread is archived somewhere on the other server. if you really, really, really want its contents to live on, you can cut and paste it (or the good parts anyway) into an existing rubies thread.

mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 16:04 (nineteen years ago)

the world cries for the loss of the destroyer's rubies thread.

somewhere, a sheep bleats for its mother.

and somewhere, a lonely emo kid writes a poem.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 16:06 (nineteen years ago)

Somewhere, a message board mod complains for no apparent reason.

Wow, it's like that Van Halen video, innit?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 16:27 (nineteen years ago)

go Dom!

worst poster ever, Tuesday, 21 February 2006 17:01 (nineteen years ago)

Never gave a damn about the meter man until I was the man who had to read the meter.

Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 17:04 (nineteen years ago)

ha that was my high school yearbook quote!

cutty (mcutt), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 17:07 (nineteen years ago)

"Looking at the reaction to Jess' deletions the other day, it looks to me like most ilm people either haven't even noticed"

I noticed! And I don't like people fucking with my pointless threads! Where do I have to go to discuss Acid Ant, discogs???? no thank you. Fine, you aren't a coldcut fan, i don't care. maybe the paid in full remix IS the only good thing they ever did. fuck it, i'm never starting another thread. i've learned my lesson. i'll just post on old ones. and i do apologize if i bum people on ilm out for being too pointless and not contributing anything interesting. maybe i'll just lurk from now on, and occasionally add something to the metal thread if that's okay with the moderators.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 17:26 (nineteen years ago)

Scott, come back, all is forgiven!

ha that was my high school yearbook quote!
-- cutty (holle...), February 21st, 2006 12:07 PM.

Yeah, it's a good one. I hope you quoted it right, cause I sure as hell didn't.

Now can we please lock this thread and continue this discussion here:
Destroye's Rubies

Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 17:28 (nineteen years ago)

fwiw, i think we should also be doing our best as mods to steer users towards old threads as often as possible, preferably by linking and locking rather than deleting. without directing new users to past threads with identical subjects, we're engendering the construction of another layer of discussion on top of what's archived, a lot of which is bound to be straight repetition of whats been said/listed years before and therefore just more noise. while that won't necessarily create more signal, it might help unclutter the slate and staunch the old-school exodus. the absence/souring of a lot of whom, let's face it, is a huge reason why ilm sucks now.

This pretty much reeks of what I hate about other boards and I'd hate to see it start happening here. It creates a weird hierarchy that more or less defeats the purpose.

-- dan. (dan_haa...), February 20th, 2006. (later)

I obviously don't object to the pointing to past threads that deal with the same subject. However, when done in this kind of big brotherly way it stinks of the "Internet" or your standard message board. Most message boards suck in a pretty bad way and one of the draws of ILM is it's openness and the fact that good and or entertaining discussion happens despite or rather because of that relative openness.

dan. (dan.), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 18:56 (nineteen years ago)

"it looks to me like most ilm people either haven't even noticed"

I was annoyed that the Destroyer thread was deleted

too arbitrary

Renard (Renard), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 19:12 (nineteen years ago)

renard you have roughly 60 posts total on ilx (some of which include that "plz leak the yyy" bullshit, a number of the rest also being with this random crowd that appeared to squeal over like five crappy indie bands) so yr. hardly an ilm regular, as aren't most of the complainers (who have 5-20 posts generally, and often from DIFFT email addresses each time) and you have your boring thread back anyway and all people seem to want to do on it is whine. i don't know where the fuck yr. dull clique came from but plz. give it a rest and play nice.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 19:22 (nineteen years ago)

hey, been on ilm since 00, didnt notice deleted threads, plz delete more

,,,,,,,,,,,, Tuesday, 21 February 2006 19:26 (nineteen years ago)

If you're wondering why
All the love that you long for eludes you
And people are rude and cruel to you
I'll tell you why
I'll tell you why
I'll tell you why
I'll tell you why

You just haven't earned it yet, baby
You just haven't earned it, son
You just haven't earned it yet, baby
You must suffer and cry for a longer time
You just haven't earned it yet, baby
And I'm telling you now ...

If you're wondering why
When all I wanted from life was to be Famous
I have tried for so long, it's all gone wrong
I'll tell you why
I'll tell you why
I'll tell you why
I'll tell you why
But you wouldn't believe me

You just haven't earned it yet, baby
You just haven't earned it, son
You just haven't earned it yet, baby
You must suffer and cry for a longer time
You just haven't earned it yet, Baby
And I'm telling you now ...
I'll tell you why
I'll tell you why

Today I am remembering the time
When they pulled me back
And held me down
And looked me in the eyes and said
You just haven't earned it yet, baby
You just haven't earned it, my son
You just haven't earned it yet, baby
You must stay on your own for slightly longer
You just haven't earned it yet baby
And I'm telling you now ...

You just haven't earned it yet, baby
Oh ...
You just haven't earned it yet, baby
Oh ...
Oh

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 19:56 (nineteen years ago)

^^ amirite

,,,,,,,,,,, Tuesday, 21 February 2006 20:00 (nineteen years ago)

,,,,,,,,,, knows the score.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 21:14 (nineteen years ago)

Sterling, the Destroyer record is kind of good!

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 21:26 (nineteen years ago)

Can we use this thread to talk about Destroyer's Rubies?

Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 22:07 (nineteen years ago)

This is beyond music now, Edward.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 00:25 (nineteen years ago)

you people are all batshit

gear (gear), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 00:43 (nineteen years ago)

"renard you have roughly 60 posts total on ilx (some of which include that "plz leak the yyy" bullshit a number of the rest also being with this random crowd that appeared to squeal over like five crappy indie bands)"

haha I posted ONCE to that yyy thread to make fun of the ppl asking for leaks! I recognize what type of stuff you are frustrated with but don't lump me in with it, I've been posting on the beardo disco thread, electro-house bobbins, optimo, villalobos, all kindsa shit. Oops I also happen to like Destroyer, MY BAD.

"i don't know where the fuck yr. dull clique came from but plz. give it a rest and play nice."

plz. get off the rag and stop being so condescending

ok I am giving it a rest starting ..... now. ahhh. much better.

Renard (Renard), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 01:24 (nineteen years ago)

anyone know where i can download destroye's rubies 4 free??? soundz gud

get me back

k thx bye

Edward III (edward iii), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 01:39 (nineteen years ago)

www.fluxblog.org

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 02:29 (nineteen years ago)

the heat-death of ilx: when "making fun" of maddening junk is indistinguishable from the junk itself.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 03:47 (nineteen years ago)

Still, you were a dick to him.

dan. (dan.), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 05:31 (nineteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.