ILX fails

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Filx.p3r.net%2Findex.php

hihi

― Q('.'Q) (eman), Saturday, 10 June 2006 01:25 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.seasite.niu.edu/thaidict/thailex1/picture/fail.jpg

― Q('.'Q) (eman), Saturday, 10 June 2006 01:30 (nineteen years ago)

Bad ILX

― Sons Of The Redd Desert (Ken L), Saturday, 10 June 2006 02:42 (nineteen years ago)

with the exception of complaining about width=100%, all those errors are associated with the embedded RDF trackback code, which is perfectly validly defined (AFAICT), but as it says here http://www.sixapart.com/pronet/docs/trackback_spec

"current validators choke on RDF embedded in XHTML, if you want your pages to validate you may wish to enclose the ... RDF in HTML comments"

i.e. what we all used to do to scripts in head elements back in the day. no big deal i say

― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Saturday, 10 June 2006 10:07 (nineteen years ago)

Alan, have you looked at WCAG2? WHAT SHIT

― lord pooperton (ex machina), Sunday, 11 June 2006 16:40 (nineteen years ago)

This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.