Why do I keep getting locked out of board?

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

why have I been locked out?

― Abra K. Dabra (householdname), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 02:54 (eighteen years ago)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v338/splodey182/PEW.gif

― UART variations (ex machina), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 02:55 (eighteen years ago)

Can we IP ban this douche?

― UART variations (ex machina), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 02:56 (eighteen years ago)

because you're a chronic spammer, for one

― jimbo (electricsound), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:03 (eighteen years ago)

if you go away and never return, i promise to stop locking you out

― jimbo (electricsound), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:06 (eighteen years ago)

could you first tell me why you lock me out?
I'm not spamming anything. To be a spammer you have to try to be selling something and I'm not selling anything. Just wanting to share my ideas with people...isnt that the American way?

― Abra K. Dabra (householdname), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:07 (eighteen years ago)

we hate you

― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:08 (eighteen years ago)

plus i hate your smarmy face

― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:09 (eighteen years ago)

Paul: Give up posting spam. I'll keep on filtering for whatever variations of your blog URL you come up with.

If you keep trying to get round that, it'll set up a script that deletes anything you post, within five minutes of you posting.

xpost: spam is linking to your blog. A lot. Stop that.

― stet (stet), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:09 (eighteen years ago)

Why do you hate me? You dont even know me. And I've never said anything derogatory to anyone. Sure, I have strong opinions about some things, but show me someone who doesnt and I'll show you someone who is rather boring.
Seriously, I'll leave, but I'd like to know what in the world I've done to have such an avalanche of hate dropped on me.

― Abra K. Dabra (householdname), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:11 (eighteen years ago)

You spammed us.

― stet (stet), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:13 (eighteen years ago)

http://ilx.wh3rd.net/searchresults.php?box=true&q=wagemann&board=2

― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:13 (eighteen years ago)

stet, why do you consider linking to my blog as spam?
I generally just use my blog as sort of a signature. And no one is being forced to click the link--in fact the link says MySpaceblog right in it--so why would they even click on it?
Why cant they just look at it as a signature, no different than your signature: stet (email address). Do people automatically have to click on your email address everytime you make a post? Ofcourse not, so then why should my blog link be any different?

― Abra K. Dabra (householdname), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:15 (eighteen years ago)

You posted this:

can you believe this list?
Nirvana at #7 while yo la tenga is tied with the police?
http://blog.myspace.com/[yourblog]

Which is your list! That's not a signature, that's "come read my blog!"

― stet (stet), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:17 (eighteen years ago)

PEW, do you think it is a coincidence that every message board hates you?

― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:22 (eighteen years ago)

Okay. I'll stop that. But I would like to put a link to my blog as a signature when I post somewhere--is that at least possible?

― Abra K. Dabra (householdname), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:23 (eighteen years ago)

cutty, do you realize the difference between a message board and a high school prom?

― Abra K. Dabra (householdname), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:24 (eighteen years ago)

NO ONE WANTS YOU TO POST HERE DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT

― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:25 (eighteen years ago)

I disagree.

― Abra K. Dabra (householdname), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:26 (eighteen years ago)

"household name"

― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:28 (eighteen years ago)

BAN PAUL EDWARD WAGEMANN

― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:28 (eighteen years ago)

Abra = bot, obv.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:29 (eighteen years ago)

people on another message board made a goddamn animated gif of your head you fucking maniac

― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:30 (eighteen years ago)

people on another message board made a goddamn animated gif of your head you fucking maniac

and first century pagans made effigies of christ. Your point?

― Abra K. Dabra (householdname), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:33 (eighteen years ago)

my point is, find another message board to troll

― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:34 (eighteen years ago)

But I would like to put a link to my blog as a signature when I post somewhere--is that at least possible?

No.

― stet (stet), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:35 (eighteen years ago)

all right stet, I accept that. But do you mind me asking why this board doesnt allow signature? I cant think of any other board I've ever been to that doesnt allow signatures. And if folks dont want to see the signatures their is a feature that allows them to disable it. So was this a conscious decisions by the board creators? And if so, then why?

― Abra K. Dabra (householdname), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:41 (eighteen years ago)

Look at this place! It barely allows images! We like it like that. I'm pretty sure this is the only forum in the world where comments on a code rewrite are things like "it looks too much like a forum", and "just plain text please".

― stet (stet), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:44 (eighteen years ago)

Well I can certainly appreciate you sticking to your guns in that regard...I guess theres a niche for that kind of message board minimalism. But I wonder is this done for aesthetic reasons? Or is it something else?

― Abra K. Dabra (householdname), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:48 (eighteen years ago)

lock thread please

― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 03:50 (eighteen years ago)

You're so vain, you probably think this messageboard minimalism is about you.

― do i have to draw you a diaphragm (Rock Hardy), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 04:00 (eighteen years ago)

why do people even attempt to give this guy a serious answer? He's beyond warnings. Just set up the script to delete his posts and be done with it.

― A. Lingbert (A. Lingbert), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 04:17 (eighteen years ago)

Can you guys unlinkify his blog everywhere it exists in the database in all forms? I don't want a weasel like him getting any google PageRank out of ILX's good name.

― UART variations (ex machina), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 06:02 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.last.fm/user/EdwardWagemann/

EdwardWagemann hasn't listened to any music yet.

― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 31 January 2007 07:24 (eighteen years ago)

why do people even attempt to give this guy a serious answer? He's beyond warnings. Just set up the script to delete his posts and be done with it.
-- A. Lingbert (alingber...) (webmail), Today 4:17 AM. (later) (link)

Because the serious answer keep people like myself informed. Otherwise, I'd be all "stop abusing the poor guy, what has he ever done?"

― mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 10:10 (eighteen years ago)

(I thought that pic was P.Mandelson!)

― mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 10:38 (eighteen years ago)

The original reason he was banned had nothing to do with blog pimping and everything to do with racist trolling, btw.

― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 10:51 (eighteen years ago)

racist trolling = "i would have sex with all this black girls"

― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 11:38 (eighteen years ago)

oh no wait it was for saying 'a coon's age', like that noize thread!

― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 11:39 (eighteen years ago)

It was all that 'you are all just suffering from white man's guilt' thing that was the last straw I think.

Okay, trolling based on race, anyway.

― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 11:40 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, I saw that as well.

― mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 11:41 (eighteen years ago)

spamming = evil/BAN
bullying = acceptable/blind eye

― teh_kit (g-kit), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 11:45 (eighteen years ago)

fuck off greg

― mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 11:49 (eighteen years ago)

bullying is our bread and butter

― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 12:30 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ENVIRONMENT/fspubs/99232823/cover.jpg

― The Sine Qua Non of Pie-Dom (noodle vague), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 12:57 (eighteen years ago)

PEW, if he's reading, if you can't stop posting that as yr 'sig' then go somewhere where that's allowed. There are lots of boards that are set-up to do that. I like this place for a number of reasons, number seven is "It's entire of itself, there isn't a lot of "read this blog and comment here or (better) on there"... (number eight is: "ah I can't think of a number eight")
If you like your board this way, then fine. I'm not criticising it. In fact I like it this way for the most part as well. In this age of information it is easy to get over-saturated with data and images and bullshit, etc. But I dont see what harm having a small signature (next to your name for instance) would do?

― Abra K. Dabra (householdname), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 16:48 (eighteen years ago)

BECAUSE IT ALLOWS FOR DICKKNOBS LIKE YOU TO SPAM US WITH YR CRAZY MYSPACE BLOGS

― Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 16:50 (eighteen years ago)

BECAUSE IT WOULD ALLOW DICKKNOBS LIKE YOU TO SPAM US WITH YR CRAZY MYSPACE BLOGS

― Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 16:50 (eighteen years ago)

Mr. Que, Do you have terrets syndrome?

― http://blog.myspace.com/paulewagemann (householdname), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 16:51 (eighteen years ago)

if some misguided soul wanted to actually read your blog, they could find it through your user info, provided you posted the link there.

― elmo argonaut (allocryptic), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 16:52 (eighteen years ago)

Elmo, that's fine, but I'm a giver by nature. So I'm just trying to make it easier on those poor misguided souls...they deserve a break, dont you think?

― http://blog.myspace.com/paulewagemann (householdname), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 16:55 (eighteen years ago)

huh

― Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 17:05 (eighteen years ago)

seeing as there is a resounding consensus against signatures on this board, incessantly linking to your blog here amounts to a breach of both taste and etiquette.

this is why you should get the fuck out and never come back.

― elmo argonaut (allocryptic), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 17:06 (eighteen years ago)

seeing as there is a resounding consensus against signatures on this board, incessantly linking to your blog here amounts to a breach of both taste and etiquette.

So anyone here who has a different opinion than the "consensus" needs to leave? Sounds like fascism to me Elmo.

― http://blog.myspace.com/paulewagemann (householdname), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 17:13 (eighteen years ago)

FFS STOP TALKING TO HIM

― The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 17:14 (eighteen years ago)

Please go away, there are many other boards, which you can, and by the look of it do post all over. Not this one.

― Pashmina (Pashmina), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 17:15 (eighteen years ago)

No, many people who have differing opinions do stay here and contribute. It's just that generally when they are told, no, this specific behavior is not allowed, they accept it and move on. Continuing to post over and over again something that you know very well will make you banned is nothing more or less than trolling, though, and that is why you are being locked out by fascist bore pigs.

PS I have never read your blog and will not do so seeing your behavior here.

― Allyzay doesnt get into the monkeys or vindications (allyzay), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 17:29 (eighteen years ago)

Fuck's sake, you're putting it in your name line now?

― stet (stet), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 17:30 (eighteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Icke

― UART variations (ex machina), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 17:32 (eighteen years ago)

I banned both usernames from mod request forum.

― Pashmina (Pashmina), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 17:35 (eighteen years ago)

Stet, is it possible to disable email notifications?

― Pashmina (Pashmina), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 17:36 (eighteen years ago)

Why not an ip ban

― UART variations (ex machina), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 17:37 (eighteen years ago)

Stet, is it possible to disable email notifications?
Aye, can do.

― stet (stet), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 17:47 (eighteen years ago)

I IP banned the guy on the 29th, Jon, the posts made today and yesterday are coming in from the exact same #. The IP ban feature seems to be broken, by the look of it.

― Pashmina (Pashmina), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 17:52 (eighteen years ago)

The IP ban feature seems to be broken, by the look of it.
Oh, great.

― stet (stet), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 17:53 (eighteen years ago)

Well, it was never that effective anyway, really, was it.

― Pashmina (Pashmina), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 17:57 (eighteen years ago)

The new code doesn't bother with it, actually. So I'm not fretting about fixing it.

― stet (stet), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 17:58 (eighteen years ago)

How hard would it be to build a Negative Zone capability? I would find it more entertaining than a sitewide ban than just to stick certain posters into a Sartre-like room/thread, and have that be the only place they can post. For example, there's a coupla posters in particular I'd like to consign to a thread with PEW.

― kingfish moose tracks (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 18:42 (eighteen years ago)

isn't that what aja/dante used to be for

― elmo argonaut (allocryptic), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 18:51 (eighteen years ago)

Has anyone checked to see if PEW has his myspace page set for "approve comments"? If not, we could probably illustrate why we're irritated fairly effectively en masse.

― John Justen waitin to get his W2s back so he can file his tax and ball out (john, Wednesday, 31 January 2007 19:25 (eighteen years ago)

The new code doesn't bother with it, actually. So I'm not fretting about fixing it.

.htaccess nigga!!!

Has anyone checked to see if PEW has his myspace page set for "approve comments"? If not, we could probably illustrate why we're irritated fairly effectively en masse.
You need to be a friend to comment on someone. Unless you mean his BLOG, in which case:

http://content.ytmnd.com/content/b/0/a/b0ac13a3f82f24bbc56333fb76103546.gif

― UART variations (ex machina), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 19:49 (eighteen years ago)

That is the greatest gif I've ever seen.

― The Sine Qua Non of Pie-Dom (noodle vague), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 19:53 (eighteen years ago)

This is the greatest gif I've seen

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v338/splodey182/PEW.gif

― Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 20:31 (eighteen years ago)

In this age of information it is easy to get over-saturated with data and images and bullshit, etc.

HELLO, MR. PART OF THE PROBLEM

― daniel striped tiger (OutDatWay), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 21:17 (eighteen years ago)

i love when he gets all intellectual

― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 21:37 (eighteen years ago)

i love it when hes elsewhere

― Storefront Church (688), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 22:00 (eighteen years ago)

i love it when he abandoned his kid or whatever

― carl taylor (688), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 22:00 (eighteen years ago)

>The new code doesn't bother with it, actually. So I'm not fretting >about fixing it.

Err.. The new code does bother with it. I said it was a waste of time but everyone protested, so I implemented it. Fun night that was.

― KeefW (kmw), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 22:17 (eighteen years ago)

Fuck's sake, you're putting it in your name line now?

gygax (RIP) was our first spammer:

Peer pressure? Diseased with musical fashion? is this a po-mo "ironic" move like the fleeting destiny's child/missy elliot affection of last year?

-- http://gygax.pitas.com (gygax0r@yahoo.com) (webmail), May 28th, 2002 8:00 PM. (12 trackbacks) (link)

― the kwisatz bacharach (sanskrit), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 22:21 (eighteen years ago)

he made millions off that

― the kwisatz bacharach (sanskrit), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 22:22 (eighteen years ago)

I said it was a waste of time but everyone protested, so I implemented it.
Erk. Note to self: read changelog.

― stet (stet), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 22:27 (eighteen years ago)

gygax! DIED for posting his blog, will this guy be next??

― slackety yax (H2-H4), Thursday, 1 February 2007 00:37 (eighteen years ago)

OK that joke.

― Trayce (trayce), Thursday, 1 February 2007 01:12 (eighteen years ago)

have *you* heard from gygax! recently?

― UART variations (ex machina), Thursday, 1 February 2007 02:55 (eighteen years ago)

hmmm.

― Trayce (trayce), Thursday, 1 February 2007 03:52 (eighteen years ago)

I said it was a waste of time but everyone protested, so I implemented it. Fun night that was.

thanks keef!

― vita susicivus (blueski), Thursday, 1 February 2007 10:28 (eighteen years ago)

This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.